If you want better Midrange clarity
Choose Bose QuietComfort Ultra Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 4.0 for Midrange clarity, with a 4.0 overall score.
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones (2nd Gen) Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Bose QC Ultra 2 if ANC, long-wear comfort, travel portability, and USB-C listening matter most. Skip them if you want richer audiophile tuning, deeper EQ control, workout durability, or a major upgrade from Gen 1.
Best for
Best for travelers, commuters, and desk workers who want top-tier ANC, very high comfort, foldable portability, and flexible wired or wireless listening. It also suits new buyers who want the latest Bose flagship rather than a discounted Gen 1.
Not for
Not for buyers who want the most detailed audiophile tuning, deep EQ controls, strong workout durability, or a clearly necessary Gen 1 upgrade. Reviewers also caution value-focused shoppers because the price is high and competition is strong.
Verdict
Across the reviews, the Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen comes across as a travel-first flagship: ANC and comfort are the clearest strengths, with many reviewers calling the noise cancellation elite or best-in-class and the fit easy for hours. Sound quality is generally liked, especially bass, spaciousness, and USB-C playback, but reviewers disagree on tuning; several praise the balanced, lively sound after EQ, while others find the default profile dark, bassy, or not detailed enough. The biggest tradeoff is that Bose nails the daily-use fundamentals but keeps the app and EQ simpler than rivals, and the price feels harder to justify for current Gen 1 owners.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
72 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.027 (38%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.431 (43%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (13%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (7%)
Pros
-
Comfort during long use is one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers repeatedly saying the headphones can be worn for hours.
-
Active noise cancellation is the product’s strongest consensus win, repeatedly described as elite, best-in-class, or among the best available.
-
ANC background noise is generally improved or very low, with reviewers praising quiet operation and reduced hiss, though not every review is flawless.
-
Travel friendliness is a major strength because reviewers highlight comfort, ANC, foldability, and long-flight usefulness.
-
Overall recommendations are positive for new buyers and travel users, but several reviewers temper that with Gen 1 upgrade and price caveats.
-
Bass is frequently praised as strong, deep, and enjoyable, though a few reviewers call the default balance bass-heavy or V-shaped.
Cons
-
Water and sweat resistance is a weakness because reviewers call out the lack of an ingress protection rating.
-
Preset EQ quality is weak in the evidence, with reviewers calling presets ineffective or lackluster.
-
LE Audio readiness is weak because one reviewer specifically complains that low-energy goodies are still missing.
-
The lack of a low-latency dongle is a drawback when compared with more flexible rivals.
-
Streaming integration is a limitation because the app lacks built-in music service or internet radio integration.
-
EQ customization is one of the most repeated complaints because Bose still relies on a simple three-band EQ.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Wear detection performance, Auto-play/wear detection, ANC sound impact on audio, near average in Bass performance, Integrated microphone, below average in Dongle, LE Audio readiness, Streaming service integration.
Comparison summary
72 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher31 (43%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts23 (32%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower18 (25%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dongle | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| Wear detection performance | 4.8 | 3.1 | +1.7 |
| Auto-play/wear detection | 4.8 | 3.2 | +1.6 |
| LE Audio readiness | 1.8 | 3.3 | -1.5 |
| Streaming service integration | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| Preset EQ profile quality | 2.3 | 3.6 | -1.3 |
| ANC sound impact on audio | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| aptX | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Immersive audio quality
Choose JBL Tour One M3 Headphones. It scores 5.0 vs 3.3 for Immersive audio quality, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better LE Audio readiness
Choose Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 1.8 for LE Audio readiness, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Value for money
Choose Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.7 vs 3.4 for Value for money, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: engaged music listening Tom's Guide says listeners seeking more involved music listening should pick Sennheiser HDB 630.
- Worse: sound after EQ With app tuning, the Bose is described as arguably better sounding than the Sennheiser HDB 630.
- Better: engaged music listening Tom's Guide names Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 as a better choice for involved music listening.
- Better: battery life The Bose battery life trails JBL Tour One M3.
FAQ
How good is the ANC on the Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2?
Reviewers consistently rate ANC as one of the best parts of the headphones, with several calling it elite, best-in-class, or among the strongest current options.
Are they comfortable enough for long flights or desk use?
Yes. Comfort is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers praising the light weight, plush padding, and ability to wear them for hours.
Do the Bose QC Ultra 2 sound good?
Most reviewers like the sound, especially the bass, spaciousness, and USB-C playback. The caveat is that tuning opinions vary, and some reviewers find the default profile too bassy, dark, or not detailed enough.
Is the USB-C audio upgrade useful?
Yes. Multiple reviewers treat USB-C audio as a meaningful upgrade because it enables lossless wired listening, charging while listening, and lower-latency playback.
Should Gen 1 owners upgrade?
Most reviewer evidence says the upgrade is not essential for current Gen 1 owners unless they specifically want USB-C lossless audio, improved battery life, better on/off behavior, or the newest Bose features.
Are they good workout headphones?
They are not ideal as workout headphones. Reviews mention no water resistance and only light-to-moderate stability, making them better for travel, commuting, and desk use.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.1
Article Reviews
techradar.com
- Review score
- 4.3
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 3.7
gizmodo.com
- Review score
- 4.0
pcmag.com
- Review score
- 4.1
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality
Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort
Cons: Volume output, aptX
Best for spacious, detailed home listening, excellent comfort, and premium construction. Skip it for commuting, private shared-space use, built-in voice chat, or subwoofer-like bass impact.
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Glasses and hat compatibility
Cons: Travel friendliness, Sound leakage
Choose the Strada for premium build, long-session comfort, strong isolation and an unusually spacious closed-back presentation. Skip it if you have a small head, dislike energetic treble, or want consistently...
Pros: Hinge durability, Durability over time
Cons: Ear cup swivel/rotation range, Portability/foldability