Compare Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones vs Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones

P1 Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
P2 Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones

Comparison Takeaways

Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Spatial audio is 3.8 vs 1.5.
  • Weight comfort is 4.8 vs 4.2. A consistent standout: reviewers repeatedly call these exceptionally light for over-ears (around the ~190g range) and easy to...
  • Equalizer customization is 4.5 vs 3.9. EQ control is frequently praised as effective, with several reviewers recommending EQ tweaks to reduce treble fatigue or...
  • Android compatibility is 4.5 vs 4.0. Compatibility is framed as mainstream-friendly across phones and computers via Bluetooth and a 3.5mm jack; Android-specific advantages are...

Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Carry case quality is 4.4 vs 1.0. The carry case is repeatedly praised as protective, slim, and premium, even if a few users still find...
  • aptX is 4.2 vs 1.0. aptX support is a clear plus and is repeatedly listed as part of the headphone's strong everyday wireless...
  • Portability/foldability is 4.2 vs 2.1. Portability is decent for a premium over-ear: the headphone folds flat and the revised case is slimmer, but...
  • Hinge durability is 4.5 vs 2.5. The yokes and hinge-related hardware are widely described as sturdy, well finished, and built to last.
Average score
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.5
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.1
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.9

ANC is generally rated as strong for the price and especially helpful against low-frequency hum/rumble, but it is not consistently described as flagship-grade and can let in some noise (notably on flights or distant traffic). Some reviews highlight granular ambient/ANC controls in the app and adaptive behaviors, while others focus on simple mode toggling. Overall adjustability is viewed as good for the price.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.0

ANC is good to very good and clearly improved over the original, but the consensus is that Sony and Bose still cancel more noise overall, especially in the mids. The three-mode ANC system gives useful control with Silent, Soft, and Transparency options, even though there is no true ANC-off mode.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.5

Compatibility is framed as mainstream-friendly across phones and computers via Bluetooth and a 3.5mm jack; Android-specific advantages are primarily discussed in the context of codec support in one source.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.0

Android support is straightforward, with repeated references to Android compatibility in specs, pairing, and app support.

App
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.4

The Sony companion app is repeatedly cited as a major value add, offering EQ, feature toggles, and adaptive behaviors; one review notes account requirements for full access.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.9

The Focal & Naim app is useful for basics like ANC, EQ, personalization, lighting, and battery view, but several reviewers find it limited or occasionally glitchy.

aptX
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
1.0

Multiple reviews explicitly call out that aptX (including low-latency variants) is not supported, positioning these as more mainstream than enthusiast-focused for codecs.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

aptX support is a clear plus and is repeatedly listed as part of the headphone's strong everyday wireless feature set.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.3

Several sources imply this is not a gaming/low-latency-focused headset, noting missing low-latency modes/codecs. At least one review says video sync issues are minimal for most people, but latency could be better.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.8

Bass is frequently emphasized: some praise punch and warmth, while others describe it as boomy/loose or overwhelming without EQ, and not as controlled as higher-end options.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

Bass is generally praised for depth, slam, texture, and control, though several reviewers note the default tuning can run a little warm, boomy, or heavy before EQ.

Battery
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.6

Battery life is a consistent strength. Multiple reviews cite around 35 hours with ANC on, and at least one measured test lands near 40 hours.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Battery life is solid rather than class-leading, with the commonly cited 30-hour Bluetooth figure generally holding up well in real use. Battery replacement appears possible through Focal service rather than as a user-swappable design, offering some serviceability without true end-user replaceability.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.3

Once paired, Bluetooth stability is generally reported as solid, with stable connections across typical use; a few note initial pairing quirks on some devices.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Bluetooth performance is usually stable with fast pairing and dependable everyday use, but a few reports mention quirks rather than flawless behavior.

Build quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.0

Build is the most common compromise: many describe a plasticky, budget feel (sometimes even 'toy-like'), while others find it sturdy enough with minimal creaks. Durability concerns come up often.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.8

Build quality is one of the strongest consensus positives, with premium materials, excellent finishing, and solid construction throughout.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.8

The built-in DAC and hi-res USB playback are among the headphone's clearest differentiators, and many reviewers treat DAC mode as a headline feature.

Button control usability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.4

Physical buttons are broadly seen as reliable and easy to use. Multiple reviewers note the buttons can feel similar, causing occasional mis-presses until you learn them.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.5

Physical controls are a strength, with tactile buttons and switches that are generally easier to trust than touch panels.

Cable quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.2

Cables are generally considered usable, though at least one review calls out the included cables as short for some desk/PC setups.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

The included cables are generally described as acceptable to durable, even if they are not luxurious extras.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
1.0

A recurring complaint is the lack of an included carrying case/pouch, pushing buyers toward aftermarket protection if traveling.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

The carry case is repeatedly praised as protective, slim, and premium, even if a few users still find it bulky in a bag.

Charging
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.6

Fast top-ups are a highlight across several sources, commonly described as roughly an hour of playback from a very short charge. Full recharge times are described as reasonable for the class.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

Fast charging is a practical plus, with the widely repeated 15-minute top-up for roughly five hours of playback.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.4

Most describe a secure but not crushing clamp that stays put; a minority warn glasses wearers may feel pressure.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.5

Clamp is generally better judged than on the original Bathys, feeling secure without being overly oppressive for most listeners.

Codec support
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
2.2

Codec support is commonly described as limited at this price tier (often AAC/SBC), with repeated mentions that premium/low-latency options are missing.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.3

Codec support is serviceable rather than cutting-edge: aptX and aptX Adaptive are welcome, but multiple reviews call out the lack of broader premium codec coverage.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.5

Comfort is widely praised, especially for all-day desk use and commuting. A few note heat/stickiness over time or fit sensitivity (glasses pressure, ear contact for some).

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.6

Long-session comfort is one of the Bathys MG's most consistent wins, with many reviewers praising fatigue-free wear over flights, workdays, or extended listening.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.2

Design is generally described as minimalist and attractive enough for everyday wear, with common color options and a clean look that reads more understated than flashy.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.7

Design is a major selling point, with the chestnut finish, leather, metal accents, and illuminated logo giving the Bathys MG a clearly luxurious identity.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

The included 3.5mm and USB-C wired options add real convenience for travel, desk use, and higher-quality listening beyond Bluetooth.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.7

Padding is generally described as decent for the price, though several reviews call it thinner/less plush than premium models and some mention it can feel sticky with longer wear.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.7

Softer, more supple pads are a meaningful upgrade, improving comfort, seal, and overall premium feel.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.8

No summary yet.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.5

The cups offer enough articulation to sit comfortably and fold flat, but the headphone is not especially compact and does not fold into a tighter travel shape.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.5

EQ control is frequently praised as effective, with several reviewers recommending EQ tweaks to reduce treble fatigue or rebalance bass/mids.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.9

EQ is helpful and usable, but the five-band structure is repeatedly described as limited compared with fuller parametric options.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.7

Reviewers consistently describe the tonal balance as natural, balanced, or close to reference in the better presets, with cleaner frequency relationships than the original Bathys.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

The headband and slider system is easy to adjust and feels premium, helping users dial in fit without fuss.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
2.5

Hinge/long-term durability is frequently treated as a watch-out due to light plastics and the non-folding design; at least one review warns pressure on the swivel/hinge could risk breakage.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.5

The yokes and hinge-related hardware are widely described as sturdy, well finished, and built to last.

Included accessories
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
2.5

In-box accessories are usually described as basic: commonly a USB-C charging cable and a 3.5mm audio cable, with no case included.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

The included bundle is straightforward but useful, typically covering the hard case plus 3.5mm and USB-C cables.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.7

Instrument separation is generally framed as good for casual listening but not class-leading; several reviews explicitly say separation/resolution trails more expensive models.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.8

Instrument separation is frequently singled out as excellent, with strong channel separation, precise placement, and the ability to keep dense mixes organized.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

The built-in mic setup is a practical part of the package, handling calls, assistants, and ANC duties without standing out as a weak point.

LDAC
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
1.5

Most reviews state there is no LDAC/hi-res support, but one review explicitly lists LDAC among available codecs. Treat LDAC support as inconsistent across sources and confirm if it matters to you.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
1.5

LDAC is a notable omission and one of the most commonly cited feature complaints at this price.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.0

At louder playback levels the Bathys MG generally stays composed and detailed, but some reviewers still hear treble edge on bright material, so max-volume behavior is good rather than perfect.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.6

Noise reduction for calls is described as above average for the class (including some wind handling), but multiple sources say it can struggle in very noisy settings like loud cafes or heavy traffic.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

The microphone array does a respectable job suppressing background noise and keeping speech intelligible, though wind and harsher noise are not fully erased.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.9

Call mic quality is generally reported as good for a built-in headphone mic, with clear speech in typical environments.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

Call quality is generally solid, with voices coming through clearly and naturally even if the very best Sony-style call performance is still a step ahead.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.5

Midrange is a mixed bag: several say vocals can be strong or pleasant (especially after EQ), while others report recessed or slightly muffled mids in the default tuning.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.6

Midrange performance is a major strength, delivering clear, rich, weighty instruments and improved vocal/instrument resolution over the original, even if a few reviewers wanted vocals pushed further forward.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

The Bathys MG works broadly across phones, computers, tablets, and wired sources, making it easy to use across mixed-device setups.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.1

Multipoint is repeatedly mentioned as a key convenience feature and usually works well, though some report occasional switching wobbles that resolve on a second try or after enabling it in-app.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

Multipoint is supported and often works well, though several reviewers mention occasional switching quirks that keep it from feeling completely polished.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.2

Passive isolation is typically described as decent but limited by lighter padding versus premium models, making ANC do more of the heavy lifting.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.1

Passive isolation benefits from the over-ear seal and softer pads, though seal sensitivity with glasses is noted by at least one reviewer and total isolation still leans on ANC.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
2.1

Most sources emphasize the headphones do not fold, typically only swiveling flat, which hurts packability even though the low weight makes them easy to carry.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

Portability is decent for a premium over-ear: the headphone folds flat and the revised case is slimmer, but it still is not a truly compact travel design.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.3

Preset EQ profiles are described as useful but can be taste-dependent; at least one review notes a preset can make bass or treble feel overcooked until adjusted.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.4

Preset profiles, especially Dynamic, are viewed positively and can materially improve tonal balance depending on listener taste.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Replaceable earpads are explicitly mentioned and add welcome long-term serviceability.

Sensors
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
1.0

Wear-detection sensors are repeatedly called out as missing, and auto-pause features are often described as reserved for higher-end Sony models.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
2.0

Convenience sensors are sparse, with at least one reviewer specifically calling out the lack of wear detection.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.9

Sidetone adjustment is present in the app, but it is not explored deeply enough in reviews to suggest anything beyond basic usefulness.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.2

Finish-related notes vary: some mention a matte texture that helps with fingerprints, while at least one review warns lighter colorways can pick up dirt and need cleaning.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.0

Setup is usually straightforward, but the app and feature set are not always as polished or flexible as the best consumer-audio ecosystems.

Sound quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.9

Overall sound is described as enjoyable and competitive for the price, often bass-forward and lively. Many recommend using EQ to refine balance; multiple reviews still note limits in dynamics, resolution, or naturalism versus premium models. Wired listening via 3.5mm is supported and generally works well when powered. Some notes suggest passive/off listening changes the sound and is less impressive.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.7

Across the file, the Bathys MG is repeatedly described as one of the best-sounding wireless headphones available, with standout refinement, detail, dynamics, and realism. Wired listening is a real strength, especially in USB-DAC mode, with reviewers repeatedly hearing cleaner, higher-resolution playback than over standard Bluetooth.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.4

Soundstage impressions vary: some call it wider than expected for the price, while others describe it as narrower/compact compared to Sony flagships, with depth often the weaker dimension.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.5

For a closed-back wireless design, the Bathys MG earns unusually strong soundstage marks, with convincing width, layering, and better spatial openness than most ANC rivals.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.8

No summary yet.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
1.5

Spatial audio is absent, and several reviewers explicitly note that Focal prioritized core sound over that feature.

Stability
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
3.6

Fit stability is mostly good for seated use and commuting, but a few comments suggest movement-related thumping or shifting during more active use.

Sustainability materials
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.5

The packaging and material story show some environmental consideration, including recycled or FSC-style materials in the box and presentation.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
1.5

There are no touch controls here, so anyone wanting swipe gestures or tap controls will not find them.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.8

Transparency/ambient mode is often described as effective and natural for the price, though a few mention mild hiss or a slightly processed effect.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Transparency mode is considered effective and natural enough for conversations and situational awareness without removing the headphones.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
3.7

Treble is often described as clear but can be boosted/peaky and fatiguing for some listeners until EQ adjustments tame it; others find it smooth enough for longer sessions.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Treble is mostly clear, smooth, and detailed, but a few reviewers hear some edge or heat up top, especially on bright recordings or at louder levels.

USB-C
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
5.0

USB-C charging is repeatedly noted and treated as the expected modern standard for this model.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.7

USB-C is central to the product experience, handling charging and the high-value DAC mode for higher-resolution wired playback.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.5

Voice assistant support is mentioned across reviews (e.g., triggering assistants via button hold), and is treated as a standard convenience feature rather than a headline differentiator.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.3

Voice assistant access is built in and works as expected through the dedicated button and supported platforms.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
1.0

Water/sweat resistance is described as absent (no waterproof rating), and at least one review cautions against heavy sweat, making them a fair-weather choice.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Weight comfort
Product 1: Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones
4.8

A consistent standout: reviewers repeatedly call these exceptionally light for over-ears (around the ~190g range) and easy to wear for long sessions.

Product 2: Focal Bathys MG Wireless Headphones
4.2

At about 350g the Bathys MG is not especially light, but most reviewers still find the weight well managed and comfortable in practice.