If you want better Durability over time
Choose Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for Durability over time, with a 4.2 overall score.
Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Sony WH-CH720N for lightweight comfort, long battery life, strong value and adjustable Sony app sound. Skip it if you need premium build, class-leading ANC, hi-res codec support, or a case for rough travel.
Best for
Best for budget-conscious listeners who want very light over-ear ANC headphones for commuting, desk work, calls, and casual music. The app EQ and long battery life make them especially appealing for users who want adjustable sound without paying flagship prices.
Not for
Not for buyers who need premium materials, fold-flat travel durability, class-leading ANC, hi-res codec confidence, or automatic wear detection. Several reviewers also warned that bass, mids, separation, and call noise reduction can fall short of higher-end options.
Verdict
Across the reviews, the Sony WH-CH720N comes across as a comfort-and-value play more than a miniature flagship. Reviewers repeatedly praised the featherweight fit, long battery life, useful app EQ, and enjoyable sound for the price, especially once tuned. The main tradeoff is that Sony’s cost cutting is obvious: several reviewers called out plasticky construction, limited accessories, no wear detection, and no real hi-res codec story. ANC lands in the useful middle ground, cutting everyday rumble and commute noise without matching Sony’s premium models or the best alternatives. Sound is generally fun, warm, and detailed enough for casual use, but bass can get boomy, mids can recess, and separation or dynamics lag behind pricier headphones.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
82 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.014 (17%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.436 (44%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.418 (22%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.48 (10%)
-
Very negative below 1.56 (7%)
Pros
-
Comfort was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly praising the light fit for long sessions, commuting, and desk use.
-
Battery life was a major consensus strength, with reviewers praising the 35-hour-plus ANC endurance and long real-world playback.
-
Charging was strongly praised, especially the quick-charge behavior that several reviews highlighted as fast and useful.
-
EQ customization was one of the strongest feature wins, repeatedly described as effective, useful, and capable of improving the sound.
-
Value was one of the strongest consensus positives, especially when the headphones were discounted below full retail.
-
Overall recommendations were mostly positive, especially for budget buyers who accept build and ANC compromises.
Cons
-
Hi-res playback support was a repeated weakness in the scored evidence, with reviewers saying there is no hi-res or LDAC support.
-
Auto-play and wear detection were clear missing features in several reviews.
-
LDAC evidence was mostly negative in the scored reviews, where multiple reviewers called out no LDAC or no hi-res LDAC streaming.
-
Sensor coverage was weak because reviewers noted missing ear-detection or wear-detection sensors.
-
Water and sweat resistance was a weakness, with reviewers noting no waterproof rating and limited exercise suitability.
-
Carry-case quality scored poorly because multiple reviewers noted that no case or pouch is included.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Headband padding quality, USB-C, Auto on/off reliability, near average in Comfort during long use, Battery, below average in Built-in DAC and hi-res playback, Sensors, Wear detection performance.
Comparison summary
82 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher16 (20%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts27 (33%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower39 (48%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built-in DAC and hi-res playback | 1.0 | 4.0 | -3.0 |
| Sensors | 1.0 | 3.4 | -2.4 |
| Wear detection performance | 1.0 | 3.3 | -2.3 |
| Auto-play/wear detection | 1.2 | 3.3 | -2.2 |
| Audio-video sync accuracy | 2.3 | 4.3 | -2.1 |
| Premium feel | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| LDAC | 1.2 | 3.1 | -2.0 |
| Durability over time | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Carry case quality
Choose Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 1.9 for Carry case quality, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better Premium feel
Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for Premium feel, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Sensors
Choose SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for Sensors, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: LDAC and case CNET notes the 1More SonoFlow has LDAC and a hard case at a lower price.
- Better: tonal realism The reviewer says the Sony lacks the uncolored realism of the 1More Sonoflow.
- More expensive: price TechRadar notes the Sony WH-1000XM5 costs more than three times as much.
- More expensive: price tier The reviewer frames the Sony as a cheaper option than the WH-1000XM5.
AKG NC60NC
- Better: tonal realism The reviewer says the Sony lacks the uncolored realism of the AKG NC60NC.
FAQ
Are the Sony WH-CH720N comfortable for long sessions?
Yes. Comfort was one of the strongest points across reviews, mainly because the headphones are extremely light and usually avoid heavy clamping pressure.
How good is the noise cancellation?
Reviewers generally found the ANC useful for everyday rumble, commuting, fans, and traffic, but not on the same level as Sony’s premium models. It is best viewed as good for the price rather than best-in-class.
Do they sound good?
Most reviewers found the sound enjoyable and better than expected for a budget ANC model, especially with EQ. The recurring tradeoff is that bass can be boomy, mids can feel recessed, and separation or dynamics are not premium-level.
Do the WH-CH720N support hi-res codecs like LDAC?
The review evidence is mixed, but several scored reviews criticized the lack of hi-res or LDAC support. The safest evidence-based takeaway is not to buy these mainly for hi-res wireless playback.
How is the battery life?
Battery life was a major strength. Reviewers repeatedly praised the 35-hour ANC rating, and some tests or impressions exceeded that claim.
Are they good for travel?
They work well for travel in terms of light weight, battery life, and useful ANC, but the non-folding design and missing carry case make them less bag-friendly than sturdier alternatives.
What are the biggest compromises?
The main compromises are plasticky build quality, no included case, no wear detection, limited premium features, and ANC or sound performance that does not fully match higher-end headphones.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 3.9
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.5
Article Reviews
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 3.7
gizmodo.com
- Review score
- 4.0
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality
Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort
Cons: Volume output, aptX
Best for spacious, detailed home listening, excellent comfort, and premium construction. Skip it for commuting, private shared-space use, built-in voice chat, or subwoofer-like bass impact.
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Glasses and hat compatibility
Cons: Travel friendliness, Sound leakage
Choose the Strada for premium build, long-session comfort, strong isolation and an unusually spacious closed-back presentation. Skip it if you have a small head, dislike energetic treble, or want consistently...
Pros: Hinge durability, Durability over time
Cons: Ear cup swivel/rotation range, Portability/foldability