Compare Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

Access logs and history views are available in-app, though one reviewer noted multiple log views can be confusing rather than helpful.

Event history is a consistent strength, with multiple reviewers highlighting detailed lock and camera logs that can identify who unlocked the door by fingerprint or code.

Lockly Home offers a cleaner interface than older Lockly apps, but setup and navigation still feel uneven, with some settings hard to find and occasional crashes or quirks reported.

The Eufy app is broadly praised for setup, live view, quick lock controls, access management, and clear event history, with few complaints beyond battery-related settings tradeoffs.

Auto-lock is configurable and works well when the door and strike are well-aligned, but some reports suggest it can fail or beep if the deadbolt does not slide smoothly. Facial recognition auto-unlock is the headline feature and is widely described as fast, reliable, and hard to spoof, working in bright sun, low light, and with sunglasses in most tests.

Auto-lock is widely described as reliable and flexible, with adjustable timers and scheduling, though it is timer-based rather than true door-position sensing.

Wrong-try protection appears well implemented, letting owners lock out further attempts after repeated bad fingerprints or PIN entries.

Backset appears adjustable for common 2 3/8-inch and 2 3/4-inch configurations, as shown in installation guidance.

The adjustable deadbolt and removable fit pieces help it adapt to common backset and bore variations on standard doors.

Rechargeable battery packs (often with a spare included) reduce downtime, but real-world longevity varies by settings like always-on face scanning and Wi-Fi usage, ranging from weeks in max scanning mode to months with power saving.

Battery life is the biggest unresolved weakness: light use can be respectable, but several reviewers saw much shorter runtimes than the 8-12 month marketing claim once motion, video, and notifications were active.

Bluetooth is required for initial setup and enrolling faces/fingerprints; it usually works, though some reviewers reported short connection windows or limited range (and noted the use of older Bluetooth versions).

Bluetooth helps with setup and is mentioned by some reviewers as an available unlock path, though Wi-Fi and fingerprint are the primary day-to-day methods.

Build quality is often described as sturdy and premium (zinc alloy and a substantial feel), even when reviewers disagree about the aesthetics or bulk.

Build quality is generally rated highly, with reviewers calling the exterior solid, premium-looking, and well made for a lock-camera combo.

Reviewers generally liked the sharp 2K image, usable night vision, fast live view, and subscription-free local storage, but the camera side remains more compromised than a dedicated video doorbell because field of view, package visibility, and button discoverability can vary a lot by door layout.

The included wired door-sense/contact sensor is accurate but often criticized for looking inelegant and adding extra wiring; some users wish it were built-in or removable.

Reviews indicate the E330 lacks true door-open and door-closed sensing, so auto-lock relies on timers instead of confirming the door position.

Door compatibility is typical for a full deadbolt swap, but the lock performs best when the door closes cleanly and the bolt slides smoothly into the strike.

It fits standard deadbolt doors well, but compatibility gets worse with deep jambs, screen doors, unusual spacing, or layouts that block the camera's view.

It installs as a standard deadbolt replacement, and some reviewers noted they could reuse existing cutouts or sensor placements from prior locks, reducing additional door work.

Some installations reuse the existing strike plate or fit the current bore cleanly, but others require minor modification or a new strike fit.

Several reviewers referenced firmware/app updates (or promised updates) aimed at improving setup reliability and usability, suggesting the experience can change over time.

Fingerprint unlock is typically quick and accurate, though at least one reviewer found it hit-or-miss depending on finger angle and the scanner’s placement.

Fingerprint entry is one of the product's clearest wins, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, and the preferred way to unlock.

Lineup comparisons indicate the E330 does not offer the location-based auto features found on higher-tier Eufy models.

Guest access is robust, including multiple user PINs, time-restricted or one-time codes, and in some cases offline codes or shared digital keys depending on platform.

Guest access is flexible, with permanent, temporary, scheduled, and one-time code options that reviewers found genuinely useful.

The Visage’s built-in Wi-Fi means no separate hub is required, a clear upgrade over older hub-dependent smart locks.

A hub is optional rather than required: the lock works on its own, while HomeBase 3 mainly adds AI features, storage flexibility, and ecosystem extras.

Installation is generally DIY-friendly with good templates and guides, but several reviewers said the process can be lengthy and cable management inside the housing can be frustrating.

Installation is usually quick and straightforward for standard doors, often landing in the 10-20 minute range, though edge cases can require minor door work.

Jam detection/alerts are mentioned as part of the notification set, allowing you to be warned if the lock reports a jam or locking issue.

Backup entry options include a physical key and a USB-C emergency power port, which reviewers view as important failsafes.

The hidden physical key and external USB-C emergency power option give the E330 credible backup access if the battery runs down.

The PIN Genie keypad improves security by shuffling digits, but it can slow entry and increase mistakes compared with a normal keypad.

The keypad works well and supports scramble PIN entry, but several reviewers note that the button area can be hard for visitors to find in the dark.

The key cylinder is rekeyable (noted as a 5-pin style in some videos), though rekeying may take extra time due to seals and screws.

The physical key backup is useful, but the cylinder cannot be rekeyed, which several reviewers see as a practical downside.

Unlock speed is frequently described as near-instant for face and fingerprint (around 1–2 seconds), while keypad entry is slower due to the shuffled layout.

Locking and unlocking are generally quick, especially by fingerprint, with several reviewers describing the response as near-instant or sub-second.

Motor noise is still present, but at least one reviewer noted it is noticeably quieter than older Lockly models.

Limited direct commentary suggests the motor is reasonably quick and quiet, but this is not as heavily discussed as fingerprint speed or battery drain.

Day-to-day locking reliability is mostly strong, especially for face unlock, though a minority of reviewers mention occasional Wi-Fi/app reliability issues or mechanical smoothness sensitivities.

The lock mechanism itself is consistently dependable in reviews, with few complaints about failed locking or unlocking once properly installed and calibrated.

Notifications are flexible (lock/unlock, auto-lock, and sometimes jam alerts), but they can be noisy, leading some users to dial them back or disable duplicates across apps.

Notifications are a strong point, with repeated praise for fast alerts from motion events, doorbell presses, and lock actions.

Physical security is described as solid, with references to ANSI Level 2 requirements, though at least one review noted the lock may not be formally certified, making it harder to validate beyond manufacturer claims.

Evidence is limited but positive, including BHMA-related claims and durability figures that suggest a sturdier-than-average smart lock build.

Remote access via Wi-Fi/app is generally quick for lock/unlock and status checks, but some reviewers experienced occasional remote unavailability during testing.

Remote locking, unlocking, live view, and answering the door from the app all work well and are central to the product's appeal.

Security is reinforced by 3D facial scanning that resists photo spoofing, encrypted data handling claims, and the PIN Genie keypad design that reduces shoulder-surfing risk.

Integration is a major strength, with support for Apple Home/Home Key plus Alexa and Google; reviewers generally found commands and automations responsive once set up.

Integration is good but not universal: Alexa and Google are commonly supported, HomeBase 3 adds more capability, and HomeKit support is notably absent.

The touchscreen is used for PIN entry and Home Key tapping; reviewers generally describe it as responsive and easy to read.

The touch-sensitive keypad is responsive and modern, though nighttime discoverability is not as polished as on some dedicated doorbells.

User management is a strong point, with support for multiple users and methods (faces, fingerprints, PINs), though some reviewers found the workflow confusing at first until updates improved it.

User management is robust, supporting admins, shared users, remote passcode assignment, and sizeable limits for codes and fingerprints.

At roughly $349, it sits at the premium end; many reviewers feel the feature set earns the price, while others think it is hard to justify without built-in video doorbell functionality.

Value is mixed: the combined lock-camera-doorbell design and no-subscription local storage are appealing, but the price stings more when battery life or fit issues reduce the benefit.

Voice control works with Alexa, Google, and Siri (via Apple Home), and reviewers commonly reported responsive lock/unlock commands and routine support.

Voice control through Alexa or Google is commonly supported and useful for basic lock commands, though it is more of a convenience layer than a standout feature.

Support and warranty coverage look adequate rather than exceptional, with a one-year warranty mentioned and at least one battery-drain support interaction that did not fully solve the issue.

Weather protection is positioned as strong, with an IPX5 rating cited and settings like Rain mode intended to prevent false keypad triggers.

Weather resistance is generally viewed as solid for outdoor use, with repeated IP65 mentions and positive rain-use feedback, even if one comparison suggested a lower resistance tier than the S330.

Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub, but a few reviewers saw intermittent connectivity or early firmware hiccups; power-saving modes can reduce Wi-Fi use to extend battery life.

Wi-Fi performance is typically stable once connected, with fast remote access and alerts, but setup expects a 2.4 GHz network.