Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Lockly Visage if you want fast hands-free facial unlocking, Apple Home Key, and many backup access methods. Skip it if the price, exposed door sensor, app quirks, or battery drain with always-on scanning will bother you.
Best for
Best for smart-home users who want the most frictionless entry possible and will use facial recognition, Apple Home Key, fingerprint access, keypad codes, and app/voice controls. It is especially compelling for Apple Home users who value Home Key and automations.
Not for
Not for shoppers who mainly want a simple low-cost deadbolt, a built-in video doorbell, or a clean hidden door-sensor design. It is also less ideal if you need flawless Wi-Fi remote access or long battery life with always-on face scanning.
Verdict
The Lockly Visage Zeno Series earns strong reviewer praise for turning facial recognition into a practical front-door feature rather than a gimmick. Testers repeatedly found face unlock fast, accurate, and hard to fool, with fingerprint, keypad, Apple Home Key, app, voice, and physical-key access adding useful backups. The tradeoff is that all this tech brings a high price, a visible door sensor, occasional app or Wi-Fi rough edges, and battery-life compromises if always-on face scanning is used. It comes across as a highly capable smart lock whose best feature is also the one most likely to justify its cost.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
31 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.09 (29%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.416 (52%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (16%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (3%)
-
Very negative below 1.50 (0%)
Pros
-
Facial recognition was the clearest consensus win, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as fast, accurate, reliable, and difficult to fool.
-
Review evidence for hub requirement was positive: TechRadar specifically liked not needing a separate hub.
-
Touchscreen evidence was limited but positive, with PCMag reporting touchpad entries were processed immediately.
-
Overall locking reliability was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers saying the lock worked perfectly, performed well, or kept working every time.
-
Security evidence was strong for anti-spoofing and privacy, with reviewers unable to fool face unlock using photos and one citing encryption as a strength.
-
Lock and unlock speed was a major strength, especially facial recognition, with reviewers repeatedly describing access as nearly instant, quick, or within seconds.
-
Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, sleek, and more substantial than some alternatives.
-
Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, with PCMag and Tom's Guide reporting responsive or snappy results.
-
Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer valuing real-time lock-activity monitoring.
-
Smart-home integration was broadly praised, especially Apple HomeKit/Home Key and Alexa routines, though one reviewer noted Matter and Thread were absent.
-
The physical keys were a reliable backup in the reviews that discussed them, with one saying they were easy to use and another saying they turned smoothly.
-
Fingerprint performance was mostly strong, but not universal: several reviewers found it fast and accurate, while others disliked placement or had hit-and-miss scans.
-
Guest access was useful for family or visitors, with reviewers praising custom codes, iCloud sharing, and easier guest entry.
-
Battery impressions were split between praise for the two rechargeable packs and complaints about short life under always-on scanning or default settings.
-
Installation was usually described as easy, painless, or straightforward, but several reviewers noted setup pain from cabling, Bluetooth timing, or deadbolt alignment.
-
The keypad was viewed as secure thanks to PIN Genie, though reviewers also said it can slow entry or make code entry less convenient.
-
User access management was generally strong after app updates, but initial user setup could be confusing.
-
Feature-update evidence was limited to ZDNET, which said app updates improved user management and usability.
-
Value opinions were context-dependent: reviewers saw strong feature value, but the high price, missing video, and battery caveats kept it from being an easy buy for everyone.
-
Auto-lock worked well in favorable installs, but one reviewer warned it becomes unreliable when the deadbolt does not slide smoothly.
-
Motor feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised the quieter operation, while another said the deadbolt mechanism was not as smooth as a cheaper alternative.
-
The app drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the newer interface or slick setup tools, but several found it undercooked, confusing, or only mostly reliable.
-
Deadbolt fit was mostly manageable as a direct swap, but reviewers warned that the door and bolt need to move smoothly or the lock may struggle to auto-lock.
-
Remote access was divided, with quick on-demand actions in one review and Wi-Fi inaccessibility in another.
-
Keyway quality evidence was limited to one reviewer who said rekeying was possible but harder and more time-consuming than expected.
Cons
-
Bluetooth feedback was mixed, with complaints about short setup windows and Bluetooth 4.2 alongside one Apple Home user finding response times surprisingly good.
-
Notifications worked, but reviewers could find them excessive when both lock and smart-home platforms sent alerts.
-
Wi-Fi was a recurring caveat, including failed syncing, 2.4GHz-only support, spotty remote access, and battery-drain tradeoffs.
-
Reviewers split on the design: one called it Lockly's least attractive smart lock, another saw the newer design as more attractive, and a video reviewer still found it not especially attractive.
-
Door-sense was the most consistent hardware complaint: it worked accurately for some reviewers, but many disliked the exposed wired sensor or complicated sensor alternatives.
-
Camera and doorbell feedback was mostly about absence: reviewers liked the lock but wished the price included video surveillance, package awareness, or doorbell-style features.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Facial recognition, Hub requirement, Touchscreen, below average in Camera and doorbell performance, Industrial design, Notifications.
Summary
8 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher4 (50%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts0 (0%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower4 (50%)
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camera and doorbell performance | 2.3 | 4.2 | -2.0 |
| Facial recognition | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| Hub requirement | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| Touchscreen | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| Industrial design | 3.0 | 4.1 | -1.1 |
| Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) | 4.4 | 3.6 | +0.8 |
| Notifications | 3.3 | 4.1 | -0.9 |
| Wi-Fi | 3.0 | 3.8 | -0.8 |
FAQ
Does the Lockly Visage facial recognition actually work well?
Yes. Reviewers consistently found it fast and accurate, including in bright light, darkness, sunglasses, and anti-photo tests.
Is the Lockly Visage worth the high price?
It can be if facial recognition, Apple Home Key, fingerprint access, keypad entry, app control, and voice control matter to you. Reviewers still called out the price as a major tradeoff.
Does it need a separate hub?
Reviewers liked that it has built-in Wi-Fi and does not require the older separate hub setup. Apple Home users can also rely heavily on HomeKit/Home Key workflows.
What are the biggest complaints?
The most repeated complaints were the exposed door sensor, app rough edges, occasional Wi-Fi issues, high price, and battery drain when face scanning is left always on.
How good is the fingerprint reader?
Most reviewers found it fast and accurate, but a few disliked the placement or said alignment made scans less consistent.
Does it replace a video doorbell?
No. Reviewers noted that the Visage uses face-recognition sensors, but it does not provide a normal video feed, doorbell, or package-viewing experience.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.1
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.1
YouTube - Youtube
Article Reviews
slashgear.com
- Review score
- 3.3
zdnet.com
- Review score
- 4.2
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 3.8
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Aqara U100
- Worse: overall performance ZDNET said the Visage clearly outperformed the Aqara U100.
- Worse: build sturdiness ZDNET found the Visage sturdier than the Aqara U100, despite the Aqara being cheaper.
August Smart Lock Pro
- Worse: feature breadth TechRadar said the cheaper August model lacks headline features such as facial recognition and fingerprint unlocking.
August Wi-Fi Smart Lock
- Better: IFTTT support PCMag noted that August's lock supports IFTTT, which the Visage lacks, while the broader sentence contrasts feature sets.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Camera and doorbell performance
Choose eufy Video Smart Lock E330. It scores 4.4 vs 2.3 for Camera and doorbell performance, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Wi-Fi
Choose eufy Video Smart Lock S330. It scores 5.0 vs 3.0 for Wi-Fi, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better App
Choose SwitchBot Lock Ultra. It scores 4.8 vs 3.6 for App, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Auto-lock
Choose Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock. It scores 5.0 vs 3.8 for Auto-lock, with a 3.8 overall score.
Top Smart Locks to Consider
Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is...
Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Existing hardware reuse, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)
Choose the Lockin Veno Pro if you want touchless palm unlocking, local video storage, and one device for lock plus doorbell. Skip it if you need polished Matter features, discreet...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Wi-Fi
Cons: Feature additions via updates, Warranty and support
Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad
Cons: Door-sense, Battery
Choose it if you want a fast, camera-equipped smart lock with strong biometric options and myQ ecosystem control. Skip it if open smart-home integrations, subscription-free advanced alerts, or a basic...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Locking motor
Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google