Compare Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock vs myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer valuing real-time lock-activity monitoring.

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting individual pins can show who opened the door.

The app drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the newer interface or slick setup tools, but several found it undercooked, confusing, or only mostly reliable.

The app setup experience was praised as simple, with phone control presented as easy to use.

Auto-lock worked well in favorable installs, but one reviewer warned it becomes unreliable when the deadbolt does not slide smoothly.

Auto-lock support was viewed as useful and configurable, though the evidence centers on one reviewer’s setup experience.

Battery impressions were split between praise for the two rechargeable packs and complaints about short life under always-on scanning or default settings.

Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the rechargeable pack, but one noted a long initial charge time.

Bluetooth feedback was mixed, with complaints about short setup windows and Bluetooth 4.2 alongside one Apple Home user finding response times surprisingly good.

Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, sleek, and more substantial than some alternatives.

Reviewers praised the physical construction, describing the lock as a great quality product and super well built.

Camera and doorbell feedback was mostly about absence: reviewers liked the lock but wished the price included video surveillance, package awareness, or doorbell-style features.

Camera and doorbell evidence was positive, with praise for clear visitor video, a wide-angle view, and the integrated 2K camera-doorbell design.

Door-sense was the most consistent hardware complaint: it worked accurately for some reviewers, but many disliked the exposed wired sensor or complicated sensor alternatives.

Door-sense worked in the reviewer’s test, with the app state updating once the door closed.

Deadbolt fit was mostly manageable as a direct swap, but reviewers warned that the door and bolt need to move smoothly or the lock may struggle to auto-lock.

Door-fit evidence was limited but positive: one reviewer’s older steel door prep worked with the included jig and deadbolt drilling guidance.

Facial recognition was the clearest consensus win, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as fast, accurate, reliable, and difficult to fool.

Facial recognition drew some of the strongest praise, with reviewers calling it cool, incredible, and very fast.

Feature-update evidence was limited to ZDNET, which said app updates improved user management and usability.

Fingerprint performance was mostly strong, but not universal: several reviewers found it fast and accurate, while others disliked placement or had hit-and-miss scans.

Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.

Guest access was useful for family or visitors, with reviewers praising custom codes, iCloud sharing, and easier guest entry.

Guest access was praised for service or pet-care scenarios where the owner could let someone in without sharing a key.

Review evidence for hub requirement was positive: TechRadar specifically liked not needing a separate hub.

Reviewers split on the design: one called it Lockly's least attractive smart lock, another saw the newer design as more attractive, and a video reviewer still found it not especially attractive.

The lock’s integrated design was praised for reducing separate-device clutter and for looking slick and well designed.

Installation was usually described as easy, painless, or straightforward, but several reviewers noted setup pain from cabling, Bluetooth timing, or deadbolt alignment.

Hands-on reviewers generally found installation approachable, praising complete hardware, easy installation, clear directions, and a smooth process, with one longer install still going fairly smoothly.

The physical keys were a reliable backup in the reviews that discussed them, with one saying they were easy to use and another saying they turned smoothly.

The hidden key backup was viewed positively, and another reviewer liked that the lock still had multiple fallback options.

The keypad was viewed as secure thanks to PIN Genie, though reviewers also said it can slow entry or make code entry less convenient.

Keypad evidence was mixed: one reviewer preferred physical buttons, while another confirmed the pin code worked.

Keyway quality evidence was limited to one reviewer who said rekeying was possible but harder and more time-consuming than expected.

Lock and unlock speed was a major strength, especially facial recognition, with reviewers repeatedly describing access as nearly instant, quick, or within seconds.

Speed was a standout: one article cited two-second unlock latency, while a hands-on reviewer found face recognition extremely fast.

Motor feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised the quieter operation, while another said the deadbolt mechanism was not as smooth as a cheaper alternative.

The interior locking action received strong praise from a reviewer who described it as super smooth.

Overall locking reliability was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers saying the lock worked perfectly, performed well, or kept working every time.

A hands-on reviewer tested multiple unlock methods and found them working successfully.

Notifications worked, but reviewers could find them excessive when both lock and smart-home platforms sent alerts.

Notification evidence was mixed: one review praised context-aware alerts, while another noted unsubscribed alerts lacked detection details.

Remote access was divided, with quick on-demand actions in one review and Wi-Fi inaccessibility in another.

Remote access was praised for letting someone enter without needing a physical key handoff.

Security evidence was strong for anti-spoofing and privacy, with reviewers unable to fool face unlock using photos and one citing encryption as a strength.

Security handling for face scans was praised because the reviewer said scans stay on the device rather than going to the cloud.

Smart-home integration was broadly praised, especially Apple HomeKit/Home Key and Alexa routines, though one reviewer noted Matter and Thread were absent.

Integration evidence was split: myQ ecosystem control was praised, but multiple reviews criticized or warned about limited popular smart-home platform support.

Touchscreen evidence was limited but positive, with PCMag reporting touchpad entries were processed immediately.

The touch-sensitive keypad divided preference, with one reviewer noting some people may prefer physical buttons instead.

User access management was generally strong after app updates, but initial user setup could be confusing.

User access management was described as easy for users, PIN codes, and alerts.

Value opinions were context-dependent: reviewers saw strong feature value, but the high price, missing video, and battery caveats kept it from being an easy buy for everyone.

Value depends heavily on use case: reviewers praised the feature bundle and recommendations, but flagged overkill, subscriptions, and fee concerns.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, with PCMag and Tom's Guide reporting responsive or snappy results.

Weather protection was praised through the exterior gasket, which a reviewer said sealed well to keep moisture out.

Wi-Fi was a recurring caveat, including failed syncing, 2.4GHz-only support, spotty remote access, and battery-drain tradeoffs.