Compare Lockin Veno Pro Smart Deadbolt Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

Access logs are useful and complete in supportive reviews, with event records showing camera and entry activity.

Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.

The app is feature-rich and often praised as customizable or easy to use, but one reviewer hit reboots, force-quits, and rough software behavior.

The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.

Auto-lock is consistently praised or reported to work as intended, especially when paired with door-closed sensing.

Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.

Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.

Battery evidence is strong overall: reviewers praised solar charging and battery endurance, though the solar panel can affect door appearance.

Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.

Build quality is usually praised as solid, polished, or well-made, but one review criticized hardware machining during installation.

Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.

Camera and doorbell performance is highly mixed, ranging from sharp, colorful video and strong alerts to poor audio, weak night vision, and missing history.

Door-sense is a clear strength, with reviewers praising the hidden sensor and the ability to know whether the door is actually closed.

Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.

One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.

Software and update maturity is a concern: reviewers noted missing video history, rough edges, and a need for more firmware updates.

The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.

Fingerprint performance is generally good, but it is less effortless than palm scanning and one reviewer reported trouble registering a child’s fingerprint.

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

Finish durability is supported by praise for fingerprint resistance and a smudge-free reinforced glass touchscreen.

Geofencing is mixed: one reviewer liked the idea, while others said it only changes modes or does not automatically lock or unlock.

Guest access is useful for temporary and time-limited PIN access, but biometric access for temporary users is more limited.

Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.

Hub requirement is a strength for local AI and recording features, with one reviewer noting no hub or subscription is needed.

Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.

Industrial design is mixed: some reviewers loved the polished look and clean design, while others found the lock or solar panel bulky and unattractive.

Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.

Most reviewers found installation quick or easy, often around 10 to 15 minutes, though one reviewer had a very poor experience with bolts and assembly.

Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.

One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.

Key override reliability is supported by a reviewer noting the regular key remains a reliable fallback.

Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.

Keypad feedback is mostly positive for responsiveness, backlighting, and easy code access, but one reviewer found the outside lock button hard to discover.

Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.

Keyway quality gets positive evidence from a reviewer who found the concealed keyhole easy to access compared with other locks.

Lock and unlock speed is praised as very fast through the Veno app or Matter.

Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.

Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.

Locking reliability is split: several reviewers describe a secure, solid-performing lock, while one review said it felt too immature to trust fully.

Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.

Notifications are generally fast, useful, and customizable, though one reviewer disliked the all-or-nothing doorbell notification toggle.

Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.

Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.

Palm vein recognition is the standout attribute, repeatedly praised as fast, easy, touchless, and reliable, despite one reviewer seeing wake/register issues.

Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.

Physical attack resistance has limited positive support through residential durability language tied to the lock’s certification and construction.

Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.

Remote access is praised for convenient app control and seamless management from anywhere.

Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.

Security and privacy features are a major strength in positive reviews, especially local processing, P2P transmission, and no cloud dependency.

Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.

Smart-home integration is broadly supported across Matter and major platforms, but several reviewers found third-party control limited or messy.

Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.

Touchscreen evidence is positive, with praise for responsiveness and a smudge-free reinforced glass surface.

The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.

User access management is useful for families, but one review criticized the lack of partial access controls for regular users.

User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.

Value is mixed: reviewers appreciate the two-in-one design, discounted pricing, and no monthly fees, but some still consider it expensive.

Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.

Voice control receives positive support from reviewers using Siri, Alexa, or Google for lock commands.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.

Warranty and support evidence is weak, with one reviewer specifically wanting a better manual for novices.

Weather resistance receives positive support from reviewers who cited all-weather reliability or real-month use through rain, cool mornings, and dust.

Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.

Wi-Fi setup receives limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who said the lock connected immediately.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.