If you want better Door-sense
Choose Lockin Veno Pro Smart Deadbolt Lock. It scores 4.5 vs 1.5 for Door-sense, with a 4.2 overall score.
Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Desloc D110 Plus for lots of entry options and built-in Wi-Fi at a budget price; Skip it if you need Apple HomeKit/Matter support or a true door sensor so auto-lock won’t throw the bolt while the door is open.
Best for
Budget-minded homeowners, renters, and Airbnb hosts who want multiple entry methods plus built-in Wi-Fi remote control and user scheduling without buying a separate hub.
Not for
Apple HomeKit or Matter households, or anyone who needs door-sense auto-locking that waits for the door to be closed before extending the deadbolt.
Verdict
The Desloc D110 Plus stands out in the budget tier by combining a helpful on-lock status screen with strong access and user controls, including schedules and one-time guest entry. Multiple reviews report dependable everyday locking, quick fingerprint entry for the price, and remote management without needing extra add-on hardware. The tradeoff is compatibility depth and refinement: automation support is largely limited to Alexa and Google, the auto-lock behavior is timer-based rather than tied to door-closed sensing, and at least one hands-on test flagged finicky mounting hardware plus only average keypad and scanner responsiveness. If you want maximum convenience per dollar for a household or rental, it delivers; if you want a more seamless ecosystem experience, pay more for a higher-end platform lock.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
No hub or separate gateway is required for remote features because Wi-Fi is integrated.
-
Firmware updates are a recurring theme in longer-term coverage, including improvements like a Wi-Fi toggle, better Wi-Fi stability, reduced power usage, and privacy tweaks like masking passcode entry.
-
Supports common backsets (2-3/8 and 2-3/4), matching typical residential door prep.
-
Many reviews frame the lock as strong value, especially when discounted under $100, due to built-in Wi-Fi and multiple entry methods, but one outlet argued the compromises (install quirks and scanner quality) reduce the perceived bargain.
-
Day-to-day locking/unlocking is generally reliable across reviews, including schedules and routines, though one reviewer characterized overall operation as only just OK despite not seeing jamming in testing.
-
User management is a strength, with support for multiple users, role-based sharing, and assigning different credentials per person.
-
Fingerprint access is a headline feature and is often described as quick and accurate for the price, with support for up to about 50 fingerprints; one review found it hit-or-miss and requiring multiple scans.
-
Guest access options commonly include always-on users, scheduled access windows, and one-time or one-pass codes, making it suitable for cleaners, visitors, and rentals.
-
The app generally earns good marks for straightforward control, logs, user setup, and modes, but some reviewers wanted clearer or more adjustable advanced settings (notably around lockout behavior and alerts).
-
Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi is a major advantage for remote access without extra hardware, but connection quality can affect responsiveness and battery use; updates and a Wi-Fi on/off toggle were noted as improvements in longer-term use.
-
Backup entry is well covered via a traditional keyway, and several reviews also liked the USB-C emergency power option as an extra failsafe when batteries die.
-
Remote locking/unlocking, status checks, and managing users from anywhere are consistently highlighted as strong points when the lock has a stable Wi-Fi connection.
-
Activity history is commonly available via an events or logs view showing locks and unlocks, though at least one review noted failed attempts may not always be logged unless a lockout triggers.
-
Most reviewers found installation straightforward and comparable to swapping a standard deadbolt, but one hands-on test reported overly tight/stiff hardware that made mounting difficult and another noted a short internal cable that can complicate assembly.
-
The backlit touchscreen keypad is usually described as clear and usable, and privacy features like anti-peeping or masked digits are appreciated; one review reported slow wake-up behavior requiring extra taps.
-
Security features mentioned include anti-peeping PIN entry, vacation-style restriction modes, failed-attempt lockouts, and anti-hijacking or SOS-style alerts; some sources also mention encrypted fingerprint storage, but overall physical security is positioned as budget-grade.
-
Touch controls and illumination are generally well liked, but responsiveness can vary, with one hands-on review calling the interface sluggish to wake.
-
Fits standard US deadbolt prep in most cases, including common door thickness ranges, but one reviewer noted it is less ideal for very thick doors without modification.
-
A 90-day outdoor follow-up and several user impressions suggest the exterior holds up reasonably well, but long-term finish wear is still lightly documented.
-
Voice control via Alexa and Google is generally reliable for locking and, with a voice code, unlocking, but it does not provide the broader cross-platform benefits of Matter ecosystems.
-
Multiple reviews cite an IP54-style dust/splash rating and reported normal rain exposure without issue, though a few creator claims vary; overall it is best treated as weather resistant rather than fully waterproof.
-
Build is generally described as solid for the price, with BHMA Grade 3 positioning and a mix of metal and plastic; one review questioned overall construction quality and budget compromises.
-
Battery life is commonly quoted around six months on four AA cells (often not included), with Wi-Fi potentially increasing drain; multiple reviews highlighted USB-C emergency power, and one follow-up credited firmware updates and a Wi-Fi toggle with improving battery impact.
-
Notifications are available for lock activity and some alarm states, but experiences vary: some reviewers wanted push alerts over email or found certain emergency emails unreliable.
-
Speed is often praised, especially for fingerprint unlock and remote commands, but one critical review found the keypad slow to wake and fingerprint reads inconsistent, and another noted it is not the fastest compared with pricier locks.
-
Failed-attempt protection can trigger a temporary lockout after repeated wrong codes, and at least one review described adjustable thresholds, though another noted limited transparency or controls.
-
The motor is generally described as smooth and reasonably quiet, but over-tightening during install can cause the bolt to struggle to slide smoothly.
-
Auto-lock is available with a short delay range (often cited as 5 to 120 seconds) and works as intended for many users, but its time-based nature and limited delay range drew criticism in a few reviews.
-
Bluetooth appears mainly in setup and onboarding flows for pairing and Wi-Fi bridging, rather than as the primary day-to-day control method.
-
This is a full deadbolt replacement, so you generally swap existing hardware; one reviewer chose to reuse a preferred deadbolt piece, but reuse options are limited versus retrofit-style locks.
-
Anti-hijacking or alarm-style features are described as a way to signal distress or tampering, but detailed sensitivity or false-alarm behavior is not well documented in the reviews.
Cons
-
Physical robustness is most often framed around BHMA Grade 3, which is a baseline residential-grade rating; it is not positioned as a high-security, hardened deadbolt.
-
Smart-home support is consistently limited to Alexa and Google ecosystems, with repeated callouts that Apple HomeKit and Matter support are not available.
-
Reviews repeatedly note the lack of a true door sensor, meaning auto-lock can extend the bolt even if the door is open, which can be inconvenient and potentially hard on door trim.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Hub requirement, Wi-Fi, Fingerprint, below average in Door-sense, Physical attack resistance, Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread).
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Door-sense | 1.5 | 3.1 | -1.6 |
| Hub requirement | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| Physical attack resistance | 3.0 | 4.1 | -1.1 |
| Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) | 2.9 | 3.8 | -0.9 |
| Wi-Fi | 4.1 | 3.6 | +0.5 |
| Fingerprint | 4.2 | 3.7 | +0.5 |
| Value and Price | 4.3 | 3.8 | +0.5 |
| Auto-lock | 3.7 | 4.2 | -0.4 |
FAQ
Does it work with Apple HomeKit or Matter?
No. Reviews consistently describe smart-home support centered on Amazon Alexa and Google/Google Home, without Apple HomeKit or Matter compatibility.
Do I need a separate hub for remote control?
No. The D110 Plus has built-in Wi-Fi (commonly described as 2.4GHz), so remote lock control and management work without a separate bridge or gateway.
Will auto-lock wait until the door is closed?
Not reliably. Multiple reviews note there is no true door sensor, so auto-lock is time-based and can extend the bolt even if the door is still open.
How many users and credentials can it store?
Several reviews cite support for up to about 50 fingerprints and up to 100 PIN codes, along with IC fobs/cards and a traditional key for backup access.
What if the batteries die while I am outside?
You can use the physical key, and many reviews also mention a USB-C port on the exterior for emergency power from a power bank.
Can I create temporary or scheduled guest access?
Yes. Reviews describe always-on users, scheduled access windows, and one-time or one-pass codes, which is helpful for visitors, cleaners, and rentals.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread)
Choose Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400. It scores 4.8 vs 2.9 for Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread), with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Physical attack resistance
Choose Schlage Encode Smart Lock. It scores 4.8 vs 3.0 for Physical attack resistance, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Build quality and durability
Choose Schlage Encode Plus Smart Lock. It scores 4.8 vs 3.9 for Build quality and durability, with a 3.8 overall score.
Overall Top Smart Locks Alternatives
Choose the Tapo DL110 for fast fingerprint entry and solid Wi-Fi remote control at a budget price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is finicky or if you need deep...
Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Geofencing
Choose the FamiLock S3 Max if you want a single lock + doorbell with an indoor screen and fast palm unlock; Skip it if you need full-featured Matter/HomeKit control or...
Pros: Physical attack resistance, Weather resistance
Cons: Value and Price
Choose the U400 if you want hands-free Apple Home unlocking with strong fallback access methods. Skip it if you need a compact lock, higher BHMA rating, no hub requirements, or...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Smart-home integration (Alexa
Cons: Physical attack resistance, Hub requirement
Choose Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for remote control plus fingerprint entry at a budget price. Skip it if you need door-ajar sensing or wide ecosystems like HomeKit or Matter.
Pros: Hub requirement, Value and Price
Cons: Door-sense