Compare Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

Reviewers who discussed logs liked the recordkeeping, citing accurate history entries and even a year of usable activity history.

Reviewers who evaluated event history found it useful for checking clips and seeing who came or went, especially for family awareness.

The app was generally considered easy, clear, and responsive, though one review separated that from a difficult guest-code workflow.

The app was consistently praised as simple, polished, and useful for setup, live view, lock control, access management, and monitoring.

Auto-lock has limited but strong evidence, with PCMag reporting that the feature worked very well in testing.

Auto-lock drew strong praise for reliably relocking after a set time and reducing worry about whether the door was left unlocked.

The failed-attempt lockout behavior was viewed as a strong security safeguard when someone keeps entering wrong codes or fingerprints.

Battery evidence is limited to one long-term review, but that reviewer called performance stellar after about a year of use.

Battery feedback was the most divided area: some reviewers liked the removable rechargeable pack, while others reported short runtime or slow charging.

Bluetooth evidence is positive, with stable connectivity and unusually quick app response over Bluetooth range.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as sturdy, well-built, strong, and rock solid.

Build quality was rated very highly, with reviewers repeatedly describing the lock as metal, sturdy, well made, durable, and high quality.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, with sharp 2K video, good night vision, fast loading, and useful two-way features, though field of view and door placement limited some setups.

Door-sense was weakly supported because a reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door was open or closed.

Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting standard-door fit and successful single-doorknob replacement.

Door compatibility was a major caveat because screen doors, storm doors, deep jambs, and awkward door angles could compromise the camera or overall fit.

Existing hardware reuse scored well in the one clear opinionated case, where the lock worked with an existing strike plate and the reviewer called that nice.

Facial recognition was mixed: HomeBase-linked identification worked in one test, while another reviewer wanted face-based unlocking added.

Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, convenient, and the preferred unlock method.

Guest access is mixed: several reviewers liked the flexible access options, while one found temporary-code delivery convoluted and buggy.

Guest access was praised when reviewers could give temporary or remote user access without handing over physical keys.

The hub requirement is a drawback because remote and voice features require added hardware and cost.

Hub requirement was mixed because the lock can work without a HomeBase, but one reviewer disliked needing a separate chime when used alone.

Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the attractive, premium look, but several also called the lock large, bulky, or obvious.

Industrial design was well liked, with reviewers calling the lock sleek, compact, sharp, premium-looking, and attractive.

Installation is sharply mixed, ranging from simple, app-guided, and quick to unusually complicated and frustrating.

Installation and setup were consistently praised as quick, easy, straightforward, foolproof, or among the easiest smart-lock setups reviewers had tried.

Key backup evidence is positive, with reviewers valuing physical-key and backup access as a practical fallback.

Key override reliability scored well because reviewers appreciated the hidden physical key and backup power options for dead-battery situations.

The keypad and PIN Genie concept were widely praised for security and usability, although one reviewer found the shifting layout disorienting.

The keypad was viewed positively for reliability, passcode flexibility, and backlighting, although one reviewer treated keypad access as less preferred than fingerprint.

Keyway quality was a recurring weakness because multiple reviewers noted the lock cannot be rekeyed or needs a locksmith for extra keys.

Lock and unlock speed was consistently positive, with instant app response or unlocks taking only a couple of seconds.

Lock and unlock speed scored strongly in the one clear opinionated review that called the lock fast and quiet.

Motor evidence is limited, but PCMag praised the lock for relatively quiet operation.

The locking motor was praised as smooth and responsive in hands-on use.

Locking reliability is mixed: some testing found smooth, great performance, while Digital Trends encountered unresolved calibration errors.

Locking reliability scored highly where reviewers focused on the smart-lock half, calling it responsive and saying it worked as advertised.

Notifications are a weakness in the limited evidence, with PCMag specifically missing push notification support.

Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers describing alerts as nearly instant, responsive, fast, or consistent.

Remote access is a repeated limitation because the lock lacks built-in internet control and needs extra Wi-Fi hardware.

Remote access was rated very highly because reviewers liked being able to view, unlock, greet visitors, or control the lock from the app remotely.

Security evidence is positive, with praise for hack resistance and unusually comprehensive account-security setup.

Security features such as scramble passcode and failed-attempt protections were praised as sensible, useful, and security-enhancing.

Smart-home integration is one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated criticism of missing or limited platform support.

Smart-home integration was mixed-positive: Alexa, Google, Apple Watch, and Eufy ecosystem links were appreciated, but lack of HomeKit hurt one review.

The touchscreen evidence is positive, with reviewers praising seamless operation and responsive keypad behavior.

Touchscreen visibility scored poorly in the one clear opinionated review because the keypad and doorbell button were hard to find in the dark.

User access management is mixed, combining flexible access options with one strong complaint about difficult PIN assignment.

User access management scored well where reviewers valued adding users, codes, and fingerprints with access rules.

Value is a common concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the lock, hub path, or overall package as expensive.

Value was mostly positive thanks to all-in-one convenience and savings versus higher-tier models, though one reviewer stressed that the lock is not cheap.

Voice control is limited because it is not built in and depends on extra Wi-Fi hardware that reviewers criticized.

Voice control was positively received, especially Alexa integration, chime support, and hands-free unlocking through assistants.

Warranty evidence is strongly positive, with Digital Trends calling it one of the best in the smart-lock market.

Weather resistance evidence is positive but limited to one review that judged the casing able to handle harsh conditions.

Weather resistance scored strongly where reviewers found the lock handled rain, hot conditions, or outdoor exposure well.

Wi-Fi is mixed: the lack of built-in Wi-Fi is criticized, but one review found hub-connected Wi-Fi response very fast.

Wi-Fi was mixed-positive: one reviewer saw fast alerts even on weak 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, while another warned experience depends on network strength.