If you want better Notifications
Choose Schlage Encode Plus Smart Lock. It scores 4.8 vs 1.5 for Notifications, with a 3.8 overall score.
Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Lockly Secure Plus if you want fast fingerprint entry plus a keypad that hides your code; Skip it if you need built-in Wi-Fi and voice control or want a slimmer, cheaper lock.
Best for
Households, rentals, or small offices that want fast fingerprint entry, a privacy-focused keypad, and flexible guest access without needing always-on internet control.
Not for
Smart-home power users who want native Wi-Fi, HomeKit/Matter-style automation, or anyone who prioritizes the simplest setup and best price over advanced entry options.
Verdict
Lockly Secure Plus stands out for its genuinely useful biometric unlock: the 3D fingerprint reader is consistently described as quick and accurate, and the PIN Genie keypad helps reduce the risk of code smudge or shoulder-surfing. The companion app adds flexible access management, activity logs, and dependable auto-locking, backed by a solid, weather-ready build and fail-safes like a physical key and 9V jump power. The tradeoff is ecosystem depth: out of the box it is Bluetooth-only, so remote control and voice assistants require an extra hub, and HomeKit or IFTTT-style automation support is limited. Setup can also be more demanding than average on some doors and for some PIN workflows.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
The 3D fingerprint reader is repeatedly called fast and accurate; enrollment takes multiple scans but day-to-day unlocking is a standout convenience.
-
One review cites strong finish coverage, including a lifetime warranty on exterior finishes, supporting long-term cosmetic durability expectations.
-
Motor operation is described as relatively quiet compared with typical smart deadbolts.
-
Warranty coverage is described as strong (including finish and electronics coverage), but reviewers also flag usability and setup complexity as an area needing improvement.
-
Security is a core theme: reviewers cite AES256/BLE security claims, the PIN-shuffling keypad, biometric anti-spoofing, lockout behavior, and privacy mode style controls.
-
The PIN Genie keypad that shuffles digit positions is consistently praised for improving code privacy, though a reviewer notes it can feel disorienting for people who remember codes by shape.
-
Reviews highlight detailed event history in the app, with lock/unlock entries tied to user and method; one reviewer notes being able to review long windows of history for shared spaces.
-
Lock/unlock actions are commonly described as quick, including near-instant app commands within Bluetooth range and a few-second mechanical cycle.
-
One review explicitly praises weather toughness across extreme temperatures, suggesting good outdoor suitability when installed correctly.
-
The touchscreen is generally responsive and easy to read, but its glossy surface can show fingerprints; its main value is supporting the dynamic PIN layout.
-
Auto-locking is widely praised and configurable (often cited in the 5–300 second range), helping the door re-secure itself without relying on habits.
-
Multiple reviews describe the hardware as sturdy and premium, but also noticeably large and heavy compared with sleeker competitors.
-
The Lockly app is generally described as clean and responsive for basic lock/unlock, logs, and settings, but some reviewers found PIN and guest workflows overly complicated compared with rivals.
-
Battery life is described as strong on four AA cells, and the external 9V jump option reduces the risk of lockouts when batteries die.
-
Backup entry options are well covered, with a traditional key cylinder and an exterior 9V jump-power method noted for dead batteries.
-
A lockout style safeguard is described that disables keypad input after too many failed attempts, reducing brute-force code guessing.
-
Access sharing is a strength: reviews mention temporary, scheduled, one-time, offline codes, and app-based sharing options; however, some find the onboarding and messaging flow confusing for casual guests.
-
Bluetooth performance is usually fast and stable for in-range control, though at least one review reports occasional trouble discovering the lock on some phones during setup.
-
User and guest management is feature-rich, offering multiple access types and schedules, but the depth can feel like overkill and harder to administer for short-term visitors.
-
At least one review describes multi-step account or device activation verification (codes via SMS and email), indicating stronger account protection than many simple Bluetooth locks.
-
Installation experiences vary from quick (around 15 minutes) to frustrating; the app guidance helps, but the heavy hardware and documentation can make assembly and alignment harder than average.
-
Most reviewers report compatibility with standard doors, but at least one install required extra door prep (strike/side bracket work) and the weight can make alignment more sensitive.
-
Most reviews describe solid day-to-day operation, but one outlet reports calibration/status mismatches that made locked vs unlocked reporting unreliable in their testing.
Cons
-
A door sensor is mentioned as an optional add-on to report open/closed state, but it is not consistently tested across reviews.
-
Value is the most common knock: reviewers call it expensive for a Bluetooth-first lock, especially once the Wi-Fi hub accessory is added.
-
Remote locking/unlocking is not available without the optional Wi-Fi hub; with the hub, reviews describe convenient anywhere access through the app.
-
Voice control is not native; Alexa and Google voice commands are described as available only when paired with the Wi-Fi hub.
-
Out of the box the lock is Bluetooth-first, and multiple reviews note that a separate Wi-Fi hub is needed for remote control and voice assistants.
-
There is no built-in Wi-Fi in the base lock; Wi-Fi connectivity is achieved through an add-on hub or bundled variant, which affects total cost and complexity.
-
Smart-home integration is limited without accessories; Alexa and Google support is tied to the Wi-Fi hub, while HomeKit, Matter, Thread, and IFTTT-style automation are repeatedly noted as absent or limited.
-
Push notifications are specifically called out as missing versus competing smart locks.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Fingerprint, below average in Notifications, Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread), Hub requirement.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notifications | 1.5 | 4.1 | -2.6 |
| Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) | 2.1 | 3.8 | -1.7 |
| Hub requirement | 2.4 | 4.0 | -1.7 |
| Remote access | 2.5 | 4.1 | -1.6 |
| Voice control | 2.4 | 3.8 | -1.4 |
| Wi-Fi | 2.3 | 3.7 | -1.4 |
| Value and Price | 2.7 | 3.8 | -1.2 |
| Fingerprint | 4.7 | 3.7 | +1.0 |
FAQ
Does it work without internet?
Yes. Core unlocking methods (fingerprint, keypad PINs, and a physical key) work locally, and the app can control the lock when you are within Bluetooth range.
Can I lock or unlock it remotely?
Not with the base lock alone. Remote control is tied to adding the Secure Link Wi-Fi hub (or buying a bundled Wi-Fi variant), which connects the lock to your home network.
How many fingerprints can it store?
Reviews cite storage for up to 99 fingerprints, with enrollment requiring multiple scans per finger to improve recognition.
What if the batteries die while I am outside?
You can use the physical key as a fail-safe, and several reviews note exterior 9V terminals that can temporarily power the lock so you can enter a code or use the reader.
How were these scores derived?
They reflect sentiment and specifics stated across the provided expert-review transcripts in the supplied reviews.json file.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread)
Choose Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400. It scores 4.8 vs 2.1 for Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread), with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Hub requirement
Choose Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock. It scores 5.0 vs 2.4 for Hub requirement, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Wi-Fi
Choose Schlage Encode Smart Lock. It scores 4.4 vs 2.3 for Wi-Fi, with a 4.1 overall score.
Overall Top Smart Locks Alternatives
Choose the Tapo DL110 for fast fingerprint entry and solid Wi-Fi remote control at a budget price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is finicky or if you need deep...
Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Geofencing
Choose the FamiLock S3 Max if you want a single lock + doorbell with an indoor screen and fast palm unlock; Skip it if you need full-featured Matter/HomeKit control or...
Pros: Physical attack resistance, Weather resistance
Cons: Value and Price
Choose the U400 if you want hands-free Apple Home unlocking with strong fallback access methods. Skip it if you need a compact lock, higher BHMA rating, no hub requirements, or...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Smart-home integration (Alexa
Cons: Physical attack resistance, Hub requirement
Choose Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for remote control plus fingerprint entry at a budget price. Skip it if you need door-ajar sensing or wide ecosystems like HomeKit or Matter.
Pros: Hub requirement, Value and Price
Cons: Door-sense