Compare Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock vs myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock

Remote access is a repeated limitation because the lock lacks built-in internet control and needs extra Wi-Fi hardware.

Remote access was praised for letting someone enter without needing a physical key handoff.

Notifications are a weakness in the limited evidence, with PCMag specifically missing push notification support.

Notification evidence was mixed: one review praised context-aware alerts, while another noted unsubscribed alerts lacked detection details.

The touchscreen evidence is positive, with reviewers praising seamless operation and responsive keypad behavior.

The touch-sensitive keypad divided preference, with one reviewer noting some people may prefer physical buttons instead.

Auto-lock has limited but strong evidence, with PCMag reporting that the feature worked very well in testing.

Auto-lock support was viewed as useful and configurable, though the evidence centers on one reviewer’s setup experience.

Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the attractive, premium look, but several also called the lock large, bulky, or obvious.

The lock’s integrated design was praised for reducing separate-device clutter and for looking slick and well designed.

Value is a common concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the lock, hub path, or overall package as expensive.

Value depends heavily on use case: reviewers praised the feature bundle and recommendations, but flagged overkill, subscriptions, and fee concerns.

Guest access is mixed: several reviewers liked the flexible access options, while one found temporary-code delivery convoluted and buggy.

Guest access was praised for service or pet-care scenarios where the owner could let someone in without sharing a key.

Installation is sharply mixed, ranging from simple, app-guided, and quick to unusually complicated and frustrating.

Hands-on reviewers generally found installation approachable, praising complete hardware, easy installation, clear directions, and a smooth process, with one longer install still going fairly smoothly.

Smart-home integration is one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated criticism of missing or limited platform support.

Integration evidence was split: myQ ecosystem control was praised, but multiple reviews criticized or warned about limited popular smart-home platform support.

Security evidence is positive, with praise for hack resistance and unusually comprehensive account-security setup.

Security handling for face scans was praised because the reviewer said scans stay on the device rather than going to the cloud.

Locking reliability is mixed: some testing found smooth, great performance, while Digital Trends encountered unresolved calibration errors.

A hands-on reviewer tested multiple unlock methods and found them working successfully.

Battery evidence is limited to one long-term review, but that reviewer called performance stellar after about a year of use.

Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the rechargeable pack, but one noted a long initial charge time.

Motor evidence is limited, but PCMag praised the lock for relatively quiet operation.

The interior locking action received strong praise from a reviewer who described it as super smooth.

User access management is mixed, combining flexible access options with one strong complaint about difficult PIN assignment.

User access management was described as easy for users, PIN codes, and alerts.

Lock and unlock speed was consistently positive, with instant app response or unlocks taking only a couple of seconds.

Speed was a standout: one article cited two-second unlock latency, while a hands-on reviewer found face recognition extremely fast.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as sturdy, well-built, strong, and rock solid.

Reviewers praised the physical construction, describing the lock as a great quality product and super well built.

Reviewers who discussed logs liked the recordkeeping, citing accurate history entries and even a year of usable activity history.

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting individual pins can show who opened the door.

The app was generally considered easy, clear, and responsive, though one review separated that from a difficult guest-code workflow.

The app setup experience was praised as simple, with phone control presented as easy to use.

Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.

Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.

The keypad and PIN Genie concept were widely praised for security and usability, although one reviewer found the shifting layout disorienting.

Keypad evidence was mixed: one reviewer preferred physical buttons, while another confirmed the pin code worked.

Key backup evidence is positive, with reviewers valuing physical-key and backup access as a practical fallback.

The hidden key backup was viewed positively, and another reviewer liked that the lock still had multiple fallback options.

Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting standard-door fit and successful single-doorknob replacement.

Door-fit evidence was limited but positive: one reviewer’s older steel door prep worked with the included jig and deadbolt drilling guidance.

Weather resistance evidence is positive but limited to one review that judged the casing able to handle harsh conditions.

Weather protection was praised through the exterior gasket, which a reviewer said sealed well to keep moisture out.

Bluetooth evidence is positive, with stable connectivity and unusually quick app response over Bluetooth range.

Camera and doorbell evidence was positive, with praise for clear visitor video, a wide-angle view, and the integrated 2K camera-doorbell design.

Door-sense worked in the reviewer’s test, with the app state updating once the door closed.

Facial recognition drew some of the strongest praise, with reviewers calling it cool, incredible, and very fast.

The hub requirement is a drawback because remote and voice features require added hardware and cost.

Voice control is limited because it is not built in and depends on extra Wi-Fi hardware that reviewers criticized.

Warranty evidence is strongly positive, with Digital Trends calling it one of the best in the smart-lock market.

Wi-Fi is mixed: the lack of built-in Wi-Fi is criticized, but one review found hub-connected Wi-Fi response very fast.