Compare Kwikset Obsidian Smart Lock vs myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting individual pins can show who opened the door.

Reviewers liked app-based control when a compatible platform supported it, but the lock lost points because it lacks its own app and some hub apps could not manage codes.

The app setup experience was praised as simple, with phone control presented as easy to use.

Auto-lock was reliable and easy to set up in stronger reviews, though one transcript noted that changing related customization switches required a screwdriver.

Auto-lock support was viewed as useful and configurable, though the evidence centers on one reviewer’s setup experience.

Battery feedback was mixed: one preview praised warning before batteries died, while later user-oriented evidence reported six-month or five-month battery life concerns.

Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the rechargeable pack, but one noted a long initial charge time.

Bluetooth was a mild drawback rather than a dealbreaker: one reviewer did not mind its absence, but warned it could deter buyers who want phone proximity unlocking.

Build quality was praised in the clearest durability evidence, with the lock described as sturdy and jam-free during testing.

Reviewers praised the physical construction, describing the lock as a great quality product and super well built.

Camera and doorbell evidence was positive, with praise for clear visitor video, a wide-angle view, and the integrated 2K camera-doorbell design.

Door-sense worked in the reviewer’s test, with the app state updating once the door closed.

Door fit looked favorable for standard replacements, with the reviewer saying it should be almost as easy to install in most standard lock enclosures.

Door-fit evidence was limited but positive: one reviewer’s older steel door prep worked with the included jig and deadbolt drilling guidance.

Existing hardware reuse was a strength in the replacement scenario, where the reviewer installed it easily after removing a prior Kwikset lock.

Facial recognition drew some of the strongest praise, with reviewers calling it cool, incredible, and very fast.

Fingerprint-related security earned consistent praise because SecureScreen and coating features reduced the risk of visible touch patterns revealing codes.

Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.

Guest access was one of the most mixed areas: reviewers liked multiple codes and temporary scheduling in some versions, but criticized limited code counts and remote-code gaps in others.

Guest access was praised for service or pet-care scenarios where the owner could let someone in without sharing a key.

Hub requirements split reviewers: Z-Wave was welcomed by smart-home users, while others treated the required hub as an added burden.

Design was the strongest consensus attribute, with repeated praise for the sleek, minimalist, modern, key-free look.

The lock’s integrated design was praised for reducing separate-device clutter and for looking slick and well designed.

Installation ranged from simple and thoughtfully guided to frustrating, with one reviewer blaming unclear instructions and bolt machining while others completed setup easily.

Hands-on reviewers generally found installation approachable, praising complete hardware, easy installation, clear directions, and a smooth process, with one longer install still going fairly smoothly.

The hidden key backup was viewed positively, and another reviewer liked that the lock still had multiple fallback options.

The keypad was praised for intuitive everyday locking and unlocking.

Keypad evidence was mixed: one reviewer preferred physical buttons, while another confirmed the pin code worked.

Locking speed was mixed, with one review praising prompt Alexa locking while another noticed the lock ran a bit slower than normal.

Speed was a standout: one article cited two-second unlock latency, while a hands-on reviewer found face recognition extremely fast.

The locking motor drew a clear complaint for being quite loud, even though the same review did not report jams.

The interior locking action received strong praise from a reviewer who described it as super smooth.

Locking reliability was positive overall, with reviewers reporting that auto-relock worked every time, the bolt worked fine after setup, and the mechanism did not jam.

A hands-on reviewer tested multiple unlock methods and found them working successfully.

Notification evidence was mixed: one review praised context-aware alerts, while another noted unsubscribed alerts lacked detection details.

Physical attack resistance was praised because the keywayless design removes common keyed-entry attack paths.

Pick and bump-key resistance was praised because ditching the keyway removed the risk of picking or forced entry with a bump key.

Remote access depended heavily on the platform: it worked well through Wink in one review, but other evidence tied remote control to a more expensive hub-enabled setup.

Remote access was praised for letting someone enter without needing a physical key handoff.

Security features were praised across reviews, especially SecureScreen, which reviewers said worked well and helped prevent code guessing from fingerprints.

Security handling for face scans was praised because the reviewer said scans stay on the device rather than going to the cloud.

Smart-home integration was useful but ecosystem-dependent: Z-Wave, SmartThings, Wink, Alexa, and other platforms worked well in some cases, while HomeKit and Google limitations hurt compatibility.

Integration evidence was split: myQ ecosystem control was praised, but multiple reviews criticized or warned about limited popular smart-home platform support.

Touchscreen feedback was mostly positive for responsiveness and security, but reviewers also noted wake-up misses and glossy smudging.

The touch-sensitive keypad divided preference, with one reviewer noting some people may prefer physical buttons instead.

User access management varied sharply by version and platform, from strong scheduled and one-time code support to complaints about no expiring codes or no app-based code changes.

User access management was described as easy for users, PIN codes, and alerts.

Value was divided: some reviewers considered it expensive once hubs or non-connected limitations were included, while one YouTube reviewer called the price good for a keyless Z-Wave lock.

Value depends heavily on use case: reviewers praised the feature bundle and recommendations, but flagged overkill, subscriptions, and fee concerns.

Voice control worked well when supported, especially Alexa locking and status checks, but other reviews emphasized that Alexa or Google control required a Z-Wave hub.

Sun and heat exposure was a concern in one user review because the black exterior became uncomfortable for children to touch.

Weather protection was praised through the exterior gasket, which a reviewer said sealed well to keep moisture out.