Kwikset Obsidian Smart Lock

Kwikset Obsidian Smart Lock Review

Brand: Kwikset
Released: January 4, 2017
Updated: 2 weeks ago
3.8
Consolidated expert score
79
Review insights
26
Scored features
8
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Kwikset Obsidian for a sleek keyless touchscreen lock with strong SecureScreen and Z-Wave routines. Skip it if you need built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HomeKit/Google support, a physical key, or low-maintenance batteries.

Best for

Best for people who want a clean, key-free touchscreen deadbolt and already use, or are willing to use, a compatible Z-Wave, Wink, SmartThings, or Alexa setup. It also fits buyers who value SecureScreen-style code privacy over physical-key backup.

Not for

Not for shoppers who need a physical key, built-in Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, easy HomeKit or Google integration, or robust code scheduling on every platform. It is also less ideal for doors exposed to strong sun if heat buildup is a concern.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently framed the Kwikset Obsidian as a stylish, minimalist key-free lock with strong everyday keypad use and useful security extras, especially SecureScreen. Its best evidence comes from design praise, reliable locking, easy Z-Wave pairing, and app or voice control when the right hub or ecosystem is in place. The tradeoff is that its smart side is fragmented: some versions or platforms lack remote code creation, code scheduling, Bluetooth, built-in Wi-Fi, or broad HomeKit and Google support. Installation is another split area, ranging from simple to frustrating depending on fit and instructions. Battery life and hub costs also keep it from feeling universally easy.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Premis

  • Similar: user management approach Premis was cited as having the same solid user-management approach described for Obsidian.
  • Alternative: physical key or Bluetooth preference Premis was suggested as a better fit for buyers who want a physical key or Bluetooth capability.

August Home Smart Locks

  • Alternative: retrofit installation and manual key retention August Home Smart Locks were recommended for people who do not want to replace a deadbolt or lose a manual key.

August Wi-Fi Smart Lock

  • Better: built-in Wi-Fi, installation, and broad smart-home compatibility The review favored August Wi-Fi Smart Lock over Obsidian for built-in Wi-Fi and wider compatibility.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

26 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 27% 7 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 42% 11 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 31% 8 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Locking reliability: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Locking reliability was positive overall, with reviewers reporting that auto-relock worked every time, the bolt worked fine after setup, and the mechanism did not jam.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Build quality and durability: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Build quality was praised in the clearest durability evidence, with the lock described as sturdy and jam-free during testing.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Existing hardware reuse: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Existing hardware reuse was a strength in the replacement scenario, where the reviewer installed it easily after removing a prior Kwikset lock.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Keypad: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The keypad was praised for intuitive everyday locking and unlocking.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Physical attack resistance: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Physical attack resistance was praised because the keywayless design removes common keyed-entry attack paths.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Pick/drill resistance (if rated): 4.5, based on 1 review
    Pick and bump-key resistance was praised because ditching the keyway removed the risk of picking or forced entry with a bump key.
  • 4.5
    based on 6 reviews
    Industrial design: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
    Design was the strongest consensus attribute, with repeated praise for the sleek, minimalist, modern, key-free look.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Fingerprint: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Fingerprint-related security earned consistent praise because SecureScreen and coating features reduced the risk of visible touch patterns revealing codes.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Auto-lock: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Auto-lock was reliable and easy to set up in stronger reviews, though one transcript noted that changing related customization switches required a screwdriver.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Security features (encryption): 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Security features were praised across reviews, especially SecureScreen, which reviewers said worked well and helped prevent code guessing from fingerprints.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 4.0, based on 1 review
    Door fit looked favorable for standard replacements, with the reviewer saying it should be almost as easy to install in most standard lock enclosures.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    Touchscreen: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    Touchscreen feedback was mostly positive for responsiveness and security, but reviewers also noted wake-up misses and glossy smudging.
  • 3.8
    based on 7 reviews
    Guest Codes and Access: 3.8, based on 7 reviews
    Guest access was one of the most mixed areas: reviewers liked multiple codes and temporary scheduling in some versions, but criticized limited code counts and remote-code gaps in others.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Lock/unlock speed: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Locking speed was mixed, with one review praising prompt Alexa locking while another noticed the lock ran a bit slower than normal.
  • 3.7
    based on 5 reviews
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 3.7, based on 5 reviews
    Smart-home integration was useful but ecosystem-dependent: Z-Wave, SmartThings, Wink, Alexa, and other platforms worked well in some cases, while HomeKit and Google limitations hurt compatibility.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Voice control: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Voice control worked well when supported, especially Alexa locking and status checks, but other reviews emphasized that Alexa or Google control required a Z-Wave hub.
  • 3.5
    based on 5 reviews
    Installation and Setup: 3.5, based on 5 reviews
    Installation ranged from simple and thoughtfully guided to frustrating, with one reviewer blaming unclear instructions and bolt machining while others completed setup easily.
  • App
    3.5
    based on 4 reviews
    App: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
    Reviewers liked app-based control when a compatible platform supported it, but the lock lost points because it lacks its own app and some hub apps could not manage codes.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 8 reviews
    User access management: 3.4, based on 8 reviews
    User access management varied sharply by version and platform, from strong scheduled and one-time code support to complaints about no expiring codes or no app-based code changes.
  • 3.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Remote access: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
    Remote access depended heavily on the platform: it worked well through Wink in one review, but other evidence tied remote control to a more expensive hub-enabled setup.
  • 3.0
    based on 4 reviews
    Value and Price: 3.0, based on 4 reviews
    Value was divided: some reviewers considered it expensive once hubs or non-connected limitations were included, while one YouTube reviewer called the price good for a keyless Z-Wave lock.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Hub requirement: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Hub requirements split reviewers: Z-Wave was welcomed by smart-home users, while others treated the required hub as an added burden.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Bluetooth: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Bluetooth was a mild drawback rather than a dealbreaker: one reviewer did not mind its absence, but warned it could deter buyers who want phone proximity unlocking.
  • 2.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Battery: 2.8, based on 3 reviews
    Battery feedback was mixed: one preview praised warning before batteries died, while later user-oriented evidence reported six-month or five-month battery life concerns.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Locking motor: 2.5, based on 1 review
    The locking motor drew a clear complaint for being quite loud, even though the same review did not report jams.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Weather resistance: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Sun and heat exposure was a concern in one user review because the black exterior became uncomfortable for children to touch.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Pick/drill resistance (if rated), below average in Weather resistance, Locking motor, Value and Price.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 13% 1 feature
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 88% 7 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Weather resistance 2.5 4.3 -1.8
Locking motor 2.5 4.0 -1.5
Pick/drill resistance (if rated) 4.5 3.4 +1.1
Value and Price 3.0 4.0 -1.0
User access management 3.4 4.3 -0.9
Battery 2.8 3.7 -0.9
Lock/unlock speed 3.8 4.7 -0.9
Installation and Setup 3.5 4.3 -0.8

FAQ

Does the Kwikset Obsidian work well without a smart-home hub?

It can work as a keyless touchscreen deadbolt, but reviewers found the connected experience depends heavily on the version and platform. Remote control, voice control, and some code features generally require a compatible hub or ecosystem.

Is the touchscreen easy to use?

Most reviewers found keypad locking and unlocking intuitive or responsive. The main caveats were occasional wake-up touches and some glossy smudging.

How good are the security features?

SecureScreen received repeated praise because it helps hide code patterns from fingerprint trails. Reviewers also liked the keywayless design for removing pick and bump-key risks.

Can I create guest or temporary codes?

It depends on the version and platform. Some evidence praised temporary, scheduled, or one-time codes, while other reviews criticized limited code counts, no expiration, or no remote code creation.

Is installation easy?

Installation evidence was mixed. Some reviewers called it simple or easy with helpful hardware, while others lost time on door handling or found the instructions and machining frustrating.

What are the biggest drawbacks reviewers found?

The main drawbacks were hub dependence, limited ecosystem support, no Bluetooth, no physical key, inconsistent code management, battery-life concerns, and one report of heat buildup on the black exterior.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Smart Locks Alternatives

#1 Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110
4.4

Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is...

Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed

Cons: Existing hardware reuse, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)

#2 Lockin Veno Pro Smart Deadbolt Lock
4.3

Choose the Lockin Veno Pro if you want touchless palm unlocking, local video storage, and one device for lock plus doorbell. Skip it if you need polished Matter features, discreet...

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Wi-Fi

Cons: Feature additions via updates, Warranty and support

#3 Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock
4.3

Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad

Cons: Door-sense, Battery

#4 myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock
4.3

Choose it if you want a fast, camera-equipped smart lock with strong biometric options and myQ ecosystem control. Skip it if open smart-home integrations, subscription-free advanced alerts, or a basic...

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Locking motor

Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google