Compare myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock vs ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint Smart Lock

The app can associate access with individual PINs or users, giving at least basic visibility into who opened the door.

Access logs are supported by multiple reviewers, including event timelines and logs showing who entered, exited, and how the lock was used.

Reviewers consistently describe the myQ app as central to setup, settings, unlocking, device management, and camera/lock control.

The app experience is mixed: several reviewers found it simple or easy, while one reported bugs, unreliable connection, and a need for software improvements.

Auto-lock evidence is strong, including unknown-person locking, face-based lock/unlock automation, and a configurable 90-second autolock delay.

Auto-lock is a major supported feature and usually worked well, though one reviewer could not enable it reliably in the U Home app.

The hands-on install shows adjustable backset handling, including the common 2-3/8 and 2-3/4 inch style positions.

Backset adjustability is directly shown in installation walkthroughs, including standard 2-3/8-inch sizing and twist/expand adjustment.

Battery feedback is mostly positive around six-month claims and rechargeable design, with one caveat that the initial charge took several hours.

Battery evidence centers on eight AA batteries and a claimed roughly one-year life, though reviewers generally had limited long-term testing.

Bluetooth appears during setup or internal hardware discussion, but the review evidence is limited and not performance-focused.

Bluetooth is supported as part of the lock's connectivity and HomeKit behavior, but Bluetooth-only control can mean standing near the lock or slower Apple Home response.

Hands-on reviewers describe the exterior as dense, secure, and well built, with general quality impressions that are strongly positive.

Build impressions are mostly positive, with zinc alloy, sturdy feel, better materials, and higher-quality plastics noted across reviews.

Camera and doorbell evidence is broad: reviewers cite 2K HDR video, wide-angle viewing, color night vision, two-way audio, and doorbell/camera consolidation.

Door-sense is supported by the included magnetic open/closed sensor and app feedback that distinguishes a door being ajar from closed.

Door-sense is frequently supported by the included sensor, open/closed status, notification behavior, and auto-lock prevention when the door is ajar.

Door fit is workable for deadbolt-style installs, though one reviewer needed to drill and prep a door that did not already have a deadbolt.

Door fit is generally favorable for standard deadbolt setups, but reviewers note this is a full lock replacement rather than a retrofit device.

Existing hardware reuse is limited because the lock replaces the deadbolt and may require new drilling if the door is not already prepared.

Existing hardware reuse is limited: one reviewer reused the strike plate, another was slowed by trying to reuse hardware, and Tom's Guide stresses full lock removal.

Fingerprint support is repeatedly mentioned and tested, with reviewers treating it as one of the main everyday unlock methods.

Fingerprint access is the strongest consensus feature, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, and reliable across nearly every review.

Finish durability evidence is limited to one reviewer noting the updated keypad material should hold up better than an older rubber keypad.

Geofencing and auto-unlock are useful but inconsistent: several reviewers liked hands-free arrival, while others found it slow or not always reliable.

Guest and temporary access are supported through PIN codes, user-specific pins, and quick passes for short-term access.

Guest access is a clear strength, with one-time, temporary, scheduled, and code-based access supported for neighbors, cleaners, or recurring users.

Review evidence points to direct Wi-Fi setup and optional accessories rather than a clearly required hub, though no review gives a formal no-hub statement.

Hub requirements vary by model and platform, ranging from no added Wi-Fi hub to needing a Matter hub or optional bridge for certain remote setups.

Setup is usually described as clear or easy, but the most detailed install shows extra work for drilling, strike prep, calibration, and alignment.

Reviewers broadly found installation easy or straightforward, often taking only minutes on compatible deadbolt doors, with one reviewer slowed by attempting to reuse hardware.

A physical key remains available as a backup, with reviewers noting included keys and a concealed keyhole under the doorbell cover.

The physical key backup is consistently present and usable, though one review warns there is no emergency power port so keys matter.

The keypad supports PIN entry and is described as visible during setup, with one reviewer noting the touch-sensitive design instead of physical buttons.

The keypad receives strong feedback for tactile physical buttons, anti-peep code entry, and responsive operation rather than a smooth touchscreen interface.

Mechanical keyway quality is a weak point in the lock-picking review, which describes an odd Quickset-style blade and Schlage-like bow mismatch.

Speed evidence is strong, including two-second unlock claims and hands-on praise for fast facial recognition.

Speed is strong for fingerprint and app use in several reviews, but one reviewer saw slow app connection and PCWorld found Matter actions a few seconds slower.

Motor operation is described positively overall, with smooth inside locking and working app lock/unlock, though one install needed strike cleanup.

Only PCWorld directly evaluated the motor, and it was sharply negative because the Matter unit made a grinding, whining sound.

Hands-on testing found the unlock methods working after setup, with reliability depending partly on correct strike alignment.

Locking reliability is mostly strong in hands-on tests, but one reviewer reported app commands failing and another noted Apple Home could be slow.

Notifications include context-aware alerts, motion alerts, access alerts, and paid detection labels that identify what triggered an alert.

Notifications are well covered, including smart notifications, user-specific alerts, and open-door or locked/unlocked status alerts.

Physical resistance evidence is limited: one review says no BHMA/ANSI grade is disclosed, while another notes a stronger strike component.

Physical security evidence is positive but mixed in scope, with ANSI Grade 1 claims and bump resistance weighed against lock-picking concerns.

Pick or drill resistance is not independently tested; the only related evidence is the lack of a disclosed BHMA/ANSI grade.

Pick/drill resistance evidence comes only from the lock-picking review, which criticized anti-pick features while praising bump resistance.

Remote access is well supported, with app-based lock/unlock control described for letting someone in when the owner is away.

Remote access can be useful through Apple/HomeKit, Wi-Fi, or apps, but evidence is split because one reviewer found remote access impossible when Wi-Fi failed.

Security evidence is strongest for biometric privacy because one reviewer says face scans stay on the device rather than the cloud.

Security-feature evidence centers on anti-peep/random digit PIN entry and PIN obfuscation; reviewers did not directly test encryption.

Integration is mixed: myQ ecosystem integration is presented as a strength, but popular third-party platforms are described as unsupported or previously restricted.

Smart-home integration is broad, with HomeKit, Alexa, Google, SmartThings, IFTTT, Matter, and Apple Home repeatedly mentioned, but Home Assistant and Home Key gaps remain.

The front keypad is touch-sensitive, though one reviewer notes physical buttons may be a personal preference for some users.

Touchscreen evidence is mostly negative or indirect because reviewers emphasize tactile buttons instead of digital touchscreens, and one notes no Apple Home Key support.

User management is strong, with evidence for managing users, assigning PINs, adding fingerprints, adding another user, and short-term access.

User access management is robust, with up to 50 users, admin/normal/temporary roles, app access, PINs, and fingerprint assignment.

Value is mixed: reviewers like the all-in-one design, but price, overkill for simple needs, and subscription-gated features create clear caveats.

Value depends on priorities: reviewers saw many features for the money, but several noted a high price, missing Home Key, Wi-Fi limitations, or motor noise.

Voice-control evidence is negative because reviewers cite removed Google Assistant support and lack of Amazon Alexa or Google Home integration.

Voice control works well in several demonstrations with Siri, Alexa, or Google, though one reviewer ended with a Siri command that did not respond.

Support evidence is a concern because one review highlights disabled third-party support and broader consumer skepticism about Chamberlain’s practices.

Support evidence is limited to one reviewer contacting U-tec, which reportedly appreciated the feedback and escalated the issue internally.

Weather evidence is positive, including the stated -4°F to 140°F range and hands-on praise for a moisture-sealing rubber gasket.

Weather resistance is supported by repeated IP65 references, including all-season protection and resistance to rain, dust, and extreme temperatures.

Wi-Fi support is directly shown in review evidence, including connection to a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network during setup.

Wi-Fi support is version-dependent and mixed: some reviews praised built-in Wi-Fi, while one had unreliable Wi-Fi and PCWorld's Matter unit lacked integrated Wi-Fi.