Compare myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

The app can associate access with individual PINs or users, giving at least basic visibility into who opened the door.

Reviewers describe the app as keeping useful event history, including lock/unlock, doorbell, motion, and door open/close records.

One review states the E330 lacks a siren, so there is no supported siren loudness evidence beyond doorbell/chime behavior.

Reviewers consistently describe the myQ app as central to setup, settings, unlocking, device management, and camera/lock control.

The app is consistently described as easy to use for setup, live view, clips, event browsing, and lock management.

Auto-lock evidence is strong, including unknown-person locking, face-based lock/unlock automation, and a configurable 90-second autolock delay.

Auto-lock is repeatedly supported as a useful timer-based feature, with reviewers noting reliable locking after a set interval.

Wrong-try protection can lock the device down after incorrect PIN or fingerprint attempts, giving it a supported failed-attempt lockout feature.

The hands-on install shows adjustable backset handling, including the common 2-3/8 and 2-3/4 inch style positions.

Backset adjustment is supported by an extendable deadbolt mechanism that can be twisted to fit the door depth.

Battery feedback is mostly positive around six-month claims and rechargeable design, with one caveat that the initial charge took several hours.

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw weeks or two to three months, while one reported roughly six months.

Bluetooth appears during setup or internal hardware discussion, but the review evidence is limited and not performance-focused.

Bluetooth appears as a supported unlocking path in the review evidence, alongside physical key access.

Hands-on reviewers describe the exterior as dense, secure, and well built, with general quality impressions that are strongly positive.

Build quality is rated highly, with reviewers citing metal construction and durability claims around repeated lock/unlock cycles.

Camera and doorbell evidence is broad: reviewers cite 2K HDR video, wide-angle viewing, color night vision, two-way audio, and doorbell/camera consolidation.

Camera and doorbell performance is generally strong for 2K clarity, night vision, and detection, but field of view and placement limitations reduce consistency.

Door-sense is supported by the included magnetic open/closed sensor and app feedback that distinguishes a door being ajar from closed.

Door-sense is weakly supported because one reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door is open or closed.

Door fit is workable for deadbolt-style installs, though one reviewer needed to drill and prep a door that did not already have a deadbolt.

Door compatibility is conditional: standard deadbolt setups work, but screen doors, storm doors, spacing, strike plates, and door geometry can cause compromises.

Existing hardware reuse is limited because the lock replaces the deadbolt and may require new drilling if the door is not already prepared.

Several reviewers reused existing strike plates or avoided optional strike plates, though fit still depends on the door.

Fingerprint support is repeatedly mentioned and tested, with reviewers treating it as one of the main everyday unlock methods.

Fingerprint access is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it fast and accurate, though wet or sweaty fingers can affect readings.

Finish evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer noting the matte finish helps reduce visible fingerprints.

Guest and temporary access are supported through PIN codes, user-specific pins, and quick passes for short-term access.

Guest access is strong, with timed, temporary, single-entry, scheduled, and high-capacity passcode/fingerprint options described.

Review evidence points to direct Wi-Fi setup and optional accessories rather than a clearly required hub, though no review gives a formal no-hub statement.

A hub is not strictly required for recordings because onboard storage is available, though HomeBase can add functions and storage options.

Setup is usually described as clear or easy, but the most detailed install shows extra work for drilling, strike prep, calibration, and alignment.

Installation and setup receive broad praise, with multiple reviewers completing setup in about 10 to 15 minutes or calling it very easy.

A physical key remains available as a backup, with reviewers noting included keys and a concealed keyhole under the doorbell cover.

Key override support is reliable in the reviewed evidence, with included physical keys and emergency USB-C power options noted.

The keypad supports PIN entry and is described as visible during setup, with one reviewer noting the touch-sensitive design instead of physical buttons.

The keypad works well and is backlit, though one review found the dark doorbell/keypad area less obvious to visitors at night.

The keyway is a limitation because multiple reviews state the lock cannot be rekeyed or does not support common rekeying.

Speed evidence is strong, including two-second unlock claims and hands-on praise for fast facial recognition.

Lock and unlock speed is strong, especially through fingerprint access and the quiet, fast locking action.

Motor operation is described positively overall, with smooth inside locking and working app lock/unlock, though one install needed strike cleanup.

The locking motor is described as smooth, fast, and quiet in the review evidence.

Hands-on testing found the unlock methods working after setup, with reliability depending partly on correct strike alignment.

Locking reliability is positive, with reviewers citing reliable auto-locking and responsive smart-lock behavior.

Notifications include context-aware alerts, motion alerts, access alerts, and paid detection labels that identify what triggered an alert.

Notifications are consistently described as fast, including doorbell, motion, lock, and thumbnail alerts.

Physical resistance evidence is limited: one review says no BHMA/ANSI grade is disclosed, while another notes a stronger strike component.

Physical attack resistance has some support from BHMA-style durability and force/impact testing claims in review evidence.

Pick or drill resistance is not independently tested; the only related evidence is the lack of a disclosed BHMA/ANSI grade.

Remote access is well supported, with app-based lock/unlock control described for letting someone in when the owner is away.

Remote access is strong, with reviewers unlocking through the app from away from home or from live camera views.

Security evidence is strongest for biometric privacy because one reviewer says face scans stay on the device rather than the cloud.

Security features include scramble passcodes, wrong-attempt lockout, local storage, and a USB-C port that does not expose data in the reviewed evidence.

Integration is mixed: myQ ecosystem integration is presented as a strength, but popular third-party platforms are described as unsupported or previously restricted.

Smart-home integration is useful but incomplete: reviewers cite Alexa and Google support, while one explicitly notes no Apple HomeKit support.

The front keypad is touch-sensitive, though one reviewer notes physical buttons may be a personal preference for some users.

The touch-sensitive keypad/touchscreen area is functional and illuminated on interaction, though visibility depends on conditions.

User management is strong, with evidence for managing users, assigning PINs, adding fingerprints, adding another user, and short-term access.

User access management is flexible, with admin sharing, other users, codes, fingerprints, and family/friend access described.

Value is mixed: reviewers like the all-in-one design, but price, overkill for simple needs, and subscription-gated features create clear caveats.

Value opinions are mixed: some call it pricey, while others view it as a saving versus separate devices or a good value versus S330.

Voice-control evidence is negative because reviewers cite removed Google Assistant support and lack of Amazon Alexa or Google Home integration.

Voice control is supported through Alexa and Google, including voice-assistant lock control in the review evidence.

Support evidence is a concern because one review highlights disabled third-party support and broader consumer skepticism about Chamberlain’s practices.

Warranty/support evidence is limited, but one review includes one-year warranty and customer service contact information; another reviewer contacted support.

Weather evidence is positive, including the stated -4°F to 140°F range and hands-on praise for a moisture-sealing rubber gasket.

Weather resistance is supported by IP65/weatherproof claims and rain-use observations, with generally positive outdoor durability evidence.

Wi-Fi support is directly shown in review evidence, including connection to a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network during setup.

Wi-Fi is necessary and works well in some tests, but reviewers note 2.4 GHz setup and dependence on wireless network quality.