Compare Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Earbuds vs Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Earbuds

Reviewers broadly found ANC useful, especially for steady noise, but several said it trails the best earbuds, depends on seal, or struggles with wind and voices.

ANC was broadly useful but not universally class-leading; some reviewers called it excellent or effective, while others found it merely decent or underwhelming.

AI translation was mixed: reviewers found it cool or decent, but several questioned whether the earbuds added much beyond the phone feature.

Android support was generally viewed as workable or even strong, though one fitness-focused review found the heart-rate path worked better on Android after Apple-side pairing trouble.

Android compatibility was generally favorable, especially for Samsung and broader Android users, though the best experience was still Samsung-centered.

The software/app experience drew mixed reactions: Android and iOS controls exist, but reviewers criticized limited iOS heart-rate app support and missing EQ.

The companion app was important and generally useful for EQ, controls, fit tests, and settings, though some reviewers called it barebones or less intuitive.

Reviewers consistently praised the H2 chip for Apple ecosystem pairing, switching, and feature integration.

One reviewer reported excellent video sync with no lip-sync delay.

Gaming latency was praised in one review after Game Mode delivered phone gaming without noticeable delay.

Auracast support was criticized as absent, with a reviewer noting that could limit public-device pairing features.

Auracast support was viewed positively as a forward-looking or standout Bluetooth feature.

Bass was usually described as strong, energetic, and well controlled, though one audio-focused reviewer wanted tighter punch.

Bass was generally viewed as strong, punchy, and satisfying, though a few reviewers found it loud, thumpy, or overcooked depending on volume and preset.

Battery life was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly reporting all-day or multi-workout endurance and strong case capacity.

Battery life was one of the most divided areas: some reviewers called it decent or accurate, while others found it short or disappointing versus rivals.

Bluetooth stability was praised where discussed, with reviewers reporting stable range and no regular stutters or dropouts.

Bluetooth reliability was praised for stable connections, long range, and a lack of dropouts in several tests.

Build quality was mostly viewed positively, especially the flexible hook and durability, though case durability drew separate criticism.

Build quality was mixed, with some praise for premium materials and great build, but several complaints about plasticky or cheap-feeling finishes.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback drew positive comments for impressive hi-res capability and studio-like detail, while still depending on Samsung support.

Physical button controls were a standout strength, especially for workouts, gloves, and running.

Physical control usability was mixed-to-positive: many liked the pinch and swipe system, while others found the angular stems awkward or tricky.

The case drew mixed opinions: smaller and better equipped than before, but still bulky, pocket-unfriendly, and in one review flimsy.

Carry case quality was mixed: some liked the solid feel, transparency, and click, while others found it cheap-looking, clunky, slippery, or awkward.

Charging was praised for wireless support, fast top-ups, USB-C, and low battery anxiety.

Charging was mostly positive due to USB-C and wireless charging, but the lack of quick charging hurt one reviewer's score.

Codec support was a limitation for reviewers who noted only AAC/SBC and no higher-res Bluetooth codec support for Android.

Codec support was a recurring compromise: Samsung's codec was appreciated, but reviewers criticized the ecosystem lock-in and lack of wider high-res codec options.

Comfort was split: many found the redesign comfortable for workouts, while others reported hook pressure, fit fatigue, or outright discomfort.

Comfort was a consistent highlight, with reviewers describing the earbuds as light, easy to wear for long sessions, and more comfortable than earlier Galaxy Buds.

Design was generally praised as a major, slimmer, more comfortable redesign with meaningful upgrades over the original.

Design opinions were split between stylish, distinctive, and functional versus derivative, generic, or gimmicky.

Fit and sealing varied by reviewer: some achieved a tight, sound-improving seal, while others could not seal well with the included tips.

Eartip fit was inconsistent: some reviewers got a good seal and comfort, while others criticized difficult removal, fragile tips, or easy dislodging.

Ear tip options were mixed because several reviewers liked the expanded sizes, while one found all five too large.

Ear tip size options were a limitation, with reviewers wanting more than the included sizes for a better seal.

EQ customization was a repeated weakness, with reviewers criticizing the lack of a real custom or adjustable EQ.

Equalizer customization was a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the 9-band EQ and the ability to tune sound globally.

Find My was viewed as useful but basic compared with AirPods Pro 2 Precision Finding.

Find My was helpful but imperfect: reviewers liked flashing lights and improved recovery, but disliked imprecision or odd notifications.

Frequency-response evidence was mixed, with testing noting a sound-quality hit and U-shaped balance when ANC was disabled.

Frequency response evidence was positive, with one reviewer finding a close Harman-curve match and another saying lab results tracked the target closely except for bass.

Head gestures received limited positive evidence as a useful hands-free notification/reply feature.

Included accessories were mixed: reviewers liked having five tip sizes, but one criticized the lack of a charging cable.

Instrument separation was usually praised as clear and detailed, though one reviewer wanted more separation in orchestral music.

Instrument separation was consistently praised, with reviewers hearing layered cues, separated instruments, and fine detail across orchestral, rock, and pop tracks.

The integrated microphone design was praised in one review for helping deliver top-notch voice-calling performance.

LDAC support was viewed negatively because reviewers explicitly wished Samsung had included LDAC or noted its absence as disappointing.

Lossless or hi-res audio support was valued but limited by Samsung-device requirements and only subtle perceived improvements in some tests.

Maximum-volume clarity was praised in one lab-style review for staying controlled at higher volume.

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed because one reviewer said higher volumes could make bass aggressive and boomy.

Microphone noise reduction was a strength in most supporting reviews, especially with background noise filtering on Apple devices.

Microphone noise reduction was split: some reviewers heard strong voice isolation, while others found background clutter or app-based recordings less impressive.

Call microphone quality was mostly positive, but results ranged from excellent calls to one strongly negative lab-style experience.

Call microphone quality was one of the strongest attributes overall, with many reviewers praising clear, natural calls, though a few measured softer or average results.

Midrange clarity was generally acceptable to strong, with vocals cutting through and body present, though one reviewer wanted more midrange.

Midrange clarity was a recurring strength: reviewers heard natural vocals, realistic timbre, defined instruments, and meaningful improvements over earlier Samsung buds.

Multi-platform compatibility was mixed: Beats works across Apple and Android, but Apple/non-Apple switching and heart-rate routing created frustrations.

Multi-platform compatibility was a major weakness because iPhone users lack app support and many advanced features remain Samsung-exclusive.

Multipoint reliability was a clear weakness because reviewers noted no Bluetooth multipoint and conflicts between phone audio and heart-rate pairing.

Multipoint and switching worked well inside Samsung's ecosystem, but reviewers disliked that seamless switching was limited outside Samsung devices.

Passive isolation received positive evidence when the seal was secure, dulling low machinery and bike sounds.

Passive isolation was mixed: a good seal blocked some sound, but reviewers said the design did not isolate as well as deeper in-ear or foam-tip alternatives.

Portability was praised because reviewers found the case small, pocketable, and easy to carry.

Preset EQ quality was praised in one review, especially the Clear preset and Samsung's unusually useful preset choices.

Sensors were the most divided area: some reviewers found heart-rate readings accurate or useful, while fitness-focused testers reported dropouts and unreliable execution.

Sensors and automatic detection features were useful in concept but inconsistent, with some reviewers calling voice detect helpful and others finding adaptive behavior gimmicky or wonky.

Smudge resistance received one strong positive note for resisting fingerprints and scratches.

Setup and software were split between very seamless iCloud pairing and frustrating heart-rate/software limitations.

Setup and software basics were praised where tested, with reviewers calling setup easy and gestures simple once learned.

Sound quality was mostly praised as energetic and good for workouts, but not every reviewer found it class-leading or worth the price.

Reviewers strongly praised the Buds3 Pro's overall sound, often calling it excellent, lively, detailed, or among the best in its class, with only a few tuning caveats.

Soundstage depth/immersiveness was only mildly positive, with testing noting immersiveness as a shortcoming even if still borderline good.

Soundstage width was mostly praised as bigger, open, and expansive, though one reviewer found it somewhat compressed.

The soundstage was described as open, broad, and improved, giving music more separation and breadth than expected from true wireless earbuds.

Spatial audio was mixed: several reviewers liked the feature and head tracking, while one found it harsh for music.

Spatial audio was mixed: some reviewers found it immersive or useful, while others called it hit-or-miss, compressed, or only occasionally worthwhile.

Stability was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly saying the earbuds stayed locked in during runs, workouts, and vigorous movement.

Stability ranged from excellent during workouts to weaker in active use, depending on reviewer fit and facial movement.

Touch and swipe responsiveness was strong where tested, especially for volume controls that reviewers called responsive, quick, and useful.

Transparency mode was widely praised as natural and useful outdoors, though a few reviewers found AirPods Pro 2 better.

Transparency and ambient modes were a major strength, often described as natural, clear, convincing, and among the best some reviewers had heard.

Treble clarity was mixed, ranging from crisp highs to harsh, bright, muted, or missing sparkle depending on reviewer and device.

Treble drew mostly positive comments for clarity, detail, and quick transients, but some reviewers heard fatigue, sharpness, or a darker default tuning that needed EQ.

USB-C was positively received as part of the improved charging case, especially compared with the older Lightning case.

USB-C was positively tied to charging convenience in one review that praised USB-C plus Qi wireless charging.

Value opinions were mixed: many called the feature set worth it for athletes, while others found the price hard to justify.

Value was mixed: reviewers saw a premium, capable product, but many warned against full price or called the cost high.

Voice assistant integration received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who demonstrated Siri access.

Voice assistant and voice-control evidence was mixed: reviewers liked no-wake-word commands, but Bixby and prankable or awkward voice behavior remained concerns.

Volume output was praised where discussed, with reviewers noting loud output and extra energy.

Volume output was considered strong enough for normal and loud listening, though one test noted boominess at higher levels.

Water/sweat resistance was mixed to negative: it was considered adequate for sweat and light rain, but several reviewers criticized IPX4 as weak for sport earbuds.

Water and sweat resistance drew positive comments, especially for workouts and durability, with reviewers treating the IP57 rating as above average or reassuring.

Weight comfort had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer finding the earbuds surprisingly light for their size.

Weight comfort was positive, with reviewers saying the light stems helped the buds stay in place and reduced ear pressure.