- Compared: noise cancellation class WIRED places Powerbeats Pro 2 among similarly priced ANC contenders like Sony’s WF-1000XM5.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Powerbeats Pro 2 if you want secure workout earbuds with long battery life, physical controls, ANC and deep Apple features. Skip them if you need a tiny case, audiophile tuning, stronger waterproofing or dependable heart-rate broadcasting.
Best for
Best for runners, gym users, and Apple-focused listeners who want earbuds that stay locked in place, last a long time, and offer physical controls with modern ANC and transparency.
Not for
Not for buyers who need a pocket-small case, neutral audiophile tuning, higher waterproofing, custom EQ, or heart-rate tracking they can trust across every workout setup.
Verdict
The Powerbeats Pro 2 come across as purpose-built sport earbuds that finally modernize the Powerbeats line. Reviewers repeatedly praise the secure earhook fit, physical controls, long battery life, USB-C and wireless charging, and H2-powered Apple integration. Sound is usually described as energetic, bass-forward, and clearer than older Beats, while transparency mode earns especially strong marks. The tradeoff is that the sport-first design brings a bulky case, IPX4-only durability, and comfort that depends on ear shape and hook tolerance. ANC is useful but not class-leading, EQ control is limited, and heart-rate tracking ranges from accurate in some reviews to frustratingly unreliable in fitness-focused testing.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
AirPods Pro 2
- Better: noise cancellation and sound quality PCMag prefers AirPods Pro 2 for sound and ANC if ear hooks and heart-rate tracking are unnecessary.
- Worse: battery life CNET said the Powerbeats Pro 2 have almost double the battery life of AirPods Pro 2.
- Better: noise cancellation consistency CNET found the AirPods Pro 2 slightly better for noise canceling because the seal was more consistent.
Beats Fit Pro
- More expensive: lower-cost Beats alternative SoundGuys suggests Beats Fit Pro for buyers who want Beats but do not need heart-rate monitoring.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
53 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 36% 19 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 38% 20 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 17% 9 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 6% 3 features
- Very negative below 1.5 4% 2 features
Pros
-
USB-C is repeatedly confirmed and welcomed as an upgrade over Lightning.
-
One reviewer found video watching clean, with no lip-sync delay.
-
The H2 chip is a consistent strength, enabling Apple-style pairing, switching, Siri, spatial audio, and other ecosystem features.
-
Fit stability is the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly say the earhook design keeps the buds secure during running and workouts.
-
Maximum-volume clarity is strong in the one review that directly tested volume, with loud output retaining control.
-
Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with repeated praise for 8-10 hour buds, long total case life, and some tests exceeding claims.
-
Charging is strong thanks to USB-C, Qi wireless charging, and quick-charge claims that reviewers highlighted positively.
-
Volume output is strong, with reviewers praising physical volume controls and loud output that stays controlled.
-
The orange model was praised by WIRED for resisting fingerprints and scratches.
-
Voice assistant support is present through hands-free Siri or voice-assistant access.
-
Most reviews confirm five silicone tip sizes, which is generous for fit tuning.
-
The earbuds include multiple integrated microphones, with reviews noting six total mics or up to five used for calls.
-
Physical buttons and volume rockers are widely praised for workouts, gloves, and on-the-run control, with one reviewer noting accidental taps while inserting the buds.
-
Spatial audio with head tracking is supported and generally treated as a useful Apple/Beats feature, though not every reviewer preferred it for music.
-
Instrument separation is mostly praised, with reviewers hearing better separation and clearer spacing than expected for sport earbuds.
-
Head gestures are supported for hands-free notification responses in at least one review.
-
One review confirms either earbud can be used independently, supporting flexible single-bud use.
-
Weight comfort improved versus the original, with multiple reviewers citing lighter buds and reduced earhook weight.
-
Transparency mode is consistently praised as natural, useful outdoors, and close to AirPods-level, though some still rank AirPods slightly higher.
-
The redesign is widely seen as a meaningful upgrade, with smaller hooks, lighter buds, and a more refined sport-focused form.
-
Bluetooth 5.3 is supported and generally stable, but the connection story is held back by single-device or multipoint limitations.
-
Bass is a major strength: most reviewers describe it as powerful, energetic, clean, or well-defined rather than muddy, though it is still tuned for workouts.
-
Android support is real through the Beats app and standard Bluetooth, though several reviewers note iOS gets more features and some heart-rate workflows are easier or better integrated.
-
Overall sound quality is usually praised as lively, clear, and workout-friendly, but not every reviewer considered it audiophile-grade or best-in-class.
-
Comfort is generally positive for sport use and multi-hour wear, though long sessions and earhooks bothered some reviewers.
-
Midrange clarity is generally good, with vocals and instruments cutting through, although one review mentions muddiness.
-
Microphone noise reduction is often praised for background filtering, though one review reports garbled calls and poor consistency.
-
Call quality is mixed but mostly positive, with several reviewers reporting clear calls and a few noting wind or inconsistent call clarity.
-
Soundstage width is mixed: some reviewers heard a bigger or expansive stage, while one found it less open than better earbuds.
-
Software controls live in iOS settings or the Beats app on Android; reviewers found the app/settings useful, but not as feature-rich as AirPods in some areas.
-
ANC is broadly present and usually described as solid or strong, but reviewers repeatedly note it trails the best AirPods/Bose results and can struggle with voices, wind, or imperfect seals.
-
Find My support exists, but reviewers describe it as more basic than AirPods Pro 2 precision finding.
-
Passive isolation can help when the seal is secure, but both passive and ANC performance depend heavily on fit.
-
The case is improved with stronger magnets and smaller dimensions, but it remains large and one review called the lid flimsy.
-
Eartip fit is important and polarizing: many get a strong seal, while several reviewers could not seal well with the included tips.
-
Value depends on use case: reviewers like the package for serious workouts and Apple users, but price, HR issues, and alternatives make it mixed.
-
Lossless support is narrow and tied to Apple Vision Pro, not general Bluetooth lossless playback.
-
The IPX4 sweat/splash rating is acceptable for workouts, but reviewers often frame it as underwhelming for sport earbuds.
-
Build impressions are mixed: one reviewer found the product robust, while another criticized the case lid as flimsy.
Cons
-
Sensor feedback is sharply mixed: mainstream reviewers saw accurate or useful heart-rate readings, while fitness-focused reviewers reported dropouts, pairing friction, and limited execution.
-
Multi-platform compatibility is workable across Apple, Android, and some fitness gear, but reviewers note restrictions around heart-rate pairing and simultaneous use.
-
Portability is mixed: the case is smaller than before, yet still not very pocket-friendly compared with conventional earbuds.
-
Treble is mixed, with praise for retained detail from some reviewers but complaints of muted highs, sharpness, or harsh brightness from others.
-
Frequency response is not neutral: reviewers describe a U-shaped or measured departure from preferred target ranges.
-
Soundstage depth receives limited support and one review found the presentation somewhat compressed.
-
Codec support is limited to SBC and AAC, with no higher-res Bluetooth codec support noted.
-
Hook pressure is a comfort tradeoff: the secure earhook can create pressure behind or at the base of the ear during longer use.
-
Setup is easy for core pairing, but heart-rate setup and native fitness integration create friction in several reviews.
-
Included accessories are limited; one reviewer specifically notes the absence of a charging cable.
-
Multipoint is a clear limitation: reviewers note no Bluetooth multipoint or single-device behavior outside Apple switching.
-
EQ customization is a consistent weakness because reviewers note no true custom or basic EQ control, only adaptive or external preset workarounds.
-
Auracast is explicitly absent, so public broadcast-audio support is a weakness.
-
Preset EQ support is poor because one review directly states there are no true audio presets.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbud Headphones, this product is above average in Spatial audio, Button control usability, below average in Preset EQ profile quality, Auracast support, Equalizer customization.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 25% 2 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 75% 6 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preset EQ profile quality | 1.0 | 3.7 | -2.7 |
| Auracast support | 1.0 | 3.7 | -2.7 |
| Equalizer customization | 1.5 | 3.7 | -2.2 |
| Multipoint connectivity reliability | 1.8 | 3.9 | -2.0 |
| Included accessories | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| Spatial audio | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| Software/setup simplicity | 2.6 | 4.0 | -1.4 |
| Button control usability | 4.6 | 3.5 | +1.1 |
FAQ
Are the Powerbeats Pro 2 good for workouts?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly say the earhook design keeps the buds secure during running, gym sessions, and other vigorous activity.
How is the battery life?
Battery life is one of the strongest areas. Reviews cite up to 10 hours from the buds, long case life, and useful quick charging.
Is the heart-rate tracking reliable?
It is mixed. Some reviewers found readings close to Apple Watch results, while fitness-focused reviews reported dropouts, pairing issues, and limited iOS app support.
Do they work with Android?
Yes. Reviewers confirm Android pairing and the Beats app, but iOS users get deeper Apple features and smoother ecosystem integration.
How good is the noise cancellation?
ANC is useful and often described as solid, but it is not consistently class-leading. Fit, voices, wind, and higher-end competitors limit it.
Are they better than AirPods Pro 2?
They are better for secure workout fit and battery life, while AirPods Pro 2 are repeatedly favored for smaller size and some ANC or feature advantages.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Preset EQ profile quality
Choose Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for Preset EQ profile quality, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Auracast support
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for Auracast support, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Equalizer customization
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 4. It scores 4.6 vs 1.5 for Equalizer customization, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Multipoint connectivity reliability
Choose Sony WF-C510 Earbuds. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for Multipoint connectivity reliability, with a 3.7 overall score.
Overall Top Earbud Headphones Alternatives
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Codec support, Dongle
Cons: Sound leakage, Find My
Choose the Status Pro X if sound quality, LDAC, strong ANC, and secure comfort matter most. Skip them if you need all-day battery, best wind handling, or more premium smart...
Pros: LDAC, Android compatibility
Cons: Spatial audio, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a...
Pros: Volume output, Maximum volume clarity
Cons: aptX, Auracast support
Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...
Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability
Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction