- Similar: noise cancellation Sony WF-1000XM5 was named among similarly priced buds the Powerbeats stood with.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Powerbeats Pro 2 for workouts that need locked-in fit, long battery life, tactile controls, and Apple-friendly features. Skip them if you want pocketable everyday buds, custom EQ, stronger ANC, or reliable heart-rate tracking.
Best for
Best for athletes and frequent exercisers who want earbuds that stay put, last through long sessions, offer physical controls, and work especially smoothly with Apple devices.
Not for
Not for buyers who want a small pocket case, adjustable EQ, top-tier ANC in every setting, stronger sport durability ratings, or a heart-rate sensor they can fully trust.
Verdict
Across the reviews, the Powerbeats Pro 2 land as premium workout earbuds built around security, endurance, and Apple ecosystem convenience. Reviewers repeatedly praised the locked-in ear-hook fit, long battery life, physical controls, lively bass-forward sound, and natural transparency mode. The tradeoff is that they are not the cleanest everyday all-rounder: the case remains large, EQ control is limited, ANC is useful but not always class-leading, and heart-rate tracking is sharply divisive. Some reviewers found the sensor accurate and useful, while fitness specialists reported pairing trouble, dropouts, and weak real-world reliability. They make the most sense when workout stability matters more than pocketability or audiophile tuning.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
AirPods Pro 2
- Alternative: general everyday choice versus workout fit AirPods Pro 2 were called the obvious general choice, while Powerbeats Pro 2 fit workouts better.
- Better: noise cancellation and sound quality PCMag preferred AirPods Pro 2 for superior noise cancellation and sound.
- Compared: Apple feature foundation Powerbeats Pro 2 were described as using the same H2 foundation as AirPods Pro 2.
Beats Fit Pro
- Worse: comfort Powerbeats Pro 2 were described as more comfortable than Beats Fit Pro.
- Worse: detail and soundstage The Powerbeats Pro 2 were described as more detailed with a bigger soundstage.
- Alternative: cheaper Beats alternative Beats Fit Pro was suggested for buyers who do not need heart-rate monitoring.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
47 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 17% 8 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 51% 24 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 26% 12 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 6% 3 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
One reviewer reported excellent video sync with no lip-sync delay.
-
Smudge resistance received one strong positive note for resisting fingerprints and scratches.
-
Stability was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly saying the earbuds stayed locked in during runs, workouts, and vigorous movement.
-
Battery life was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly reporting all-day or multi-workout endurance and strong case capacity.
-
Physical button controls were a standout strength, especially for workouts, gloves, and running.
-
Charging was praised for wireless support, fast top-ups, USB-C, and low battery anxiety.
-
Microphone noise reduction was a strength in most supporting reviews, especially with background noise filtering on Apple devices.
-
Bluetooth stability was praised where discussed, with reviewers reporting stable range and no regular stutters or dropouts.
-
Reviewers consistently praised the H2 chip for Apple ecosystem pairing, switching, and feature integration.
-
Design was generally praised as a major, slimmer, more comfortable redesign with meaningful upgrades over the original.
-
Build quality was mostly viewed positively, especially the flexible hook and durability, though case durability drew separate criticism.
-
USB-C was positively received as part of the improved charging case, especially compared with the older Lightning case.
-
Volume output was praised where discussed, with reviewers noting loud output and extra energy.
-
Transparency mode was widely praised as natural and useful outdoors, though a few reviewers found AirPods Pro 2 better.
-
Bass was usually described as strong, energetic, and well controlled, though one audio-focused reviewer wanted tighter punch.
-
Instrument separation was usually praised as clear and detailed, though one reviewer wanted more separation in orchestral music.
-
Android support was generally viewed as workable or even strong, though one fitness-focused review found the heart-rate path worked better on Android after Apple-side pairing trouble.
-
Head gestures received limited positive evidence as a useful hands-free notification/reply feature.
-
Maximum-volume clarity was praised in one lab-style review for staying controlled at higher volume.
-
Passive isolation received positive evidence when the seal was secure, dulling low machinery and bike sounds.
-
Voice assistant integration received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who demonstrated Siri access.
-
Weight comfort had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer finding the earbuds surprisingly light for their size.
-
Sound quality was mostly praised as energetic and good for workouts, but not every reviewer found it class-leading or worth the price.
-
Call microphone quality was mostly positive, but results ranged from excellent calls to one strongly negative lab-style experience.
-
Soundstage width was mostly praised as bigger, open, and expansive, though one reviewer found it somewhat compressed.
-
Comfort was split: many found the redesign comfortable for workouts, while others reported hook pressure, fit fatigue, or outright discomfort.
-
Midrange clarity was generally acceptable to strong, with vocals cutting through and body present, though one reviewer wanted more midrange.
-
Spatial audio was mixed: several reviewers liked the feature and head tracking, while one found it harsh for music.
-
Reviewers broadly found ANC useful, especially for steady noise, but several said it trails the best earbuds, depends on seal, or struggles with wind and voices.
-
Value opinions were mixed: many called the feature set worth it for athletes, while others found the price hard to justify.
-
Frequency-response evidence was mixed, with testing noting a sound-quality hit and U-shaped balance when ANC was disabled.
-
Soundstage depth/immersiveness was only mildly positive, with testing noting immersiveness as a shortcoming even if still borderline good.
Cons
-
Fit and sealing varied by reviewer: some achieved a tight, sound-improving seal, while others could not seal well with the included tips.
-
Ear tip options were mixed because several reviewers liked the expanded sizes, while one found all five too large.
-
Setup and software were split between very seamless iCloud pairing and frustrating heart-rate/software limitations.
-
Sensors were the most divided area: some reviewers found heart-rate readings accurate or useful, while fitness-focused testers reported dropouts and unreliable execution.
-
The case drew mixed opinions: smaller and better equipped than before, but still bulky, pocket-unfriendly, and in one review flimsy.
-
Water/sweat resistance was mixed to negative: it was considered adequate for sweat and light rain, but several reviewers criticized IPX4 as weak for sport earbuds.
-
Treble clarity was mixed, ranging from crisp highs to harsh, bright, muted, or missing sparkle depending on reviewer and device.
-
Multi-platform compatibility was mixed: Beats works across Apple and Android, but Apple/non-Apple switching and heart-rate routing created frustrations.
-
Included accessories were mixed: reviewers liked having five tip sizes, but one criticized the lack of a charging cable.
-
Find My was viewed as useful but basic compared with AirPods Pro 2 Precision Finding.
-
The software/app experience drew mixed reactions: Android and iOS controls exist, but reviewers criticized limited iOS heart-rate app support and missing EQ.
-
Codec support was a limitation for reviewers who noted only AAC/SBC and no higher-res Bluetooth codec support for Android.
-
Auracast support was criticized as absent, with a reviewer noting that could limit public-device pairing features.
-
EQ customization was a repeated weakness, with reviewers criticizing the lack of a real custom or adjustable EQ.
-
Multipoint reliability was a clear weakness because reviewers noted no Bluetooth multipoint and conflicts between phone audio and heart-rate pairing.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbud Headphones, this product is above average in Smudge resistance, Button control usability, below average in Multipoint connectivity reliability, Equalizer customization, Auracast support.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 25% 2 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 75% 6 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multipoint connectivity reliability | 1.8 | 4.0 | -2.2 |
| Equalizer customization | 1.8 | 3.7 | -1.9 |
| Smudge resistance | 5.0 | 3.1 | +1.9 |
| Auracast support | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| App | 2.7 | 4.0 | -1.4 |
| Button control usability | 4.5 | 3.7 | +0.8 |
| Treble clarity | 3.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 |
| Codec support | 2.5 | 3.5 | -1.0 |
FAQ
Are the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 good for running and workouts?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised the ear-hook design for staying locked in during runs, gym sessions, and vigorous movement.
How good is the noise cancellation?
ANC is useful and often strong for steady noise, but it is not uniformly class-leading. Several reviewers said it depends heavily on getting a tight seal and can struggle with wind, voices, or sharper sounds.
Is the heart-rate monitor reliable?
Reviewer evidence is split. Some found it accurate or useful, while fitness-focused reviewers reported pairing trouble, dropouts, limited app support, and readings they would not rely on.
Do the Powerbeats Pro 2 sound good?
Most reviewers liked the energetic, bass-forward sound for workouts, with several praising improved clarity and separation. A few found the sound less impressive for critical listening or disliked treble behavior.
Are they comfortable for long use?
Comfort depends on ears and accessories. Many reviewers found the redesign comfortable, but others reported hook pressure, inner-ear pressure, or trouble getting a good seal.
Are they better than AirPods Pro 2?
They are stronger for secure workout fit and often battery life, but AirPods Pro 2 were preferred by some reviewers for everyday pocketability, ANC consistency, sound quality, or extra Apple features.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.0/5
Article Reviews
I ran 150 miles with the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 — here are 5 things I like and 3 things I don’t like
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 4.1/5
dcrainmaker.com
- Review score
- 2.0/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better Multipoint connectivity reliability
Choose Sony WF-C510 Earbuds. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for Multipoint connectivity reliability, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better Equalizer customization
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 1.8 for Equalizer customization, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Codec support
Choose Edifier NeoBuds Planar Earbuds. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Codec support, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Auracast support
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Earbuds. It scores 4.3 vs 2.0 for Auracast support, with a 3.9 overall score.
Overall Top Earbud Headphones Alternatives
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Codec support, Dongle
Cons: Sound leakage, Find My
Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a...
Pros: Volume output, Maximum volume clarity
Cons: aptX, Auracast support
Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...
Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability
Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction
Choose the Sennheiser CX 80U for detailed, comfortable USB-C wired listening at a low price. Skip them if you need deep sub-bass, waterproofing, wireless features, volume buttons, or a cleaner...
Pros: Comfort during long use, USB-C
Cons: Microphone noise reduction, Water/sweat resistance rating