Compare Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones vs Gadhouse Wesley Retro Headphones

One review directly praised the product as visually appealing and authentic.

Aesthetic appeal is a major strength, centered on retro, vintage and statement-piece styling.

Audio-video sync benefits from the wired connection because the reviewer highlights avoiding Bluetooth-style delays.

Bass was generally praised for control, texture, punch, and warmth, with repeated caveats that sub-bass slam is limited or the low end can feel bloomy.

Bass performance is a weakness in the full listening review, where the low end muddied when volume and energy rose.

Battery concerns are essentially avoided by the wired design, which a reviewer praises for not dying mid-commute.

Build quality was consistently praised as robust, premium, refined, and carefully assembled.

Build quality receives positive evidence through a more robust headband and durability-oriented comfort language.

The included USB-C DAC adapter was praised for convenience, but the evidence supports an external adapter rather than a fully built-in headphone DAC.

Hi-res playback is a consistent strength, with multiple sources praising or highlighting 48kHz lossless audio.

Button controls are a strength, described as simple, easy, tactile and intuitive across sources.

Cable feedback was mixed: some liked the sturdiness or low microphonics, while others criticized ergonomics, microphonics, or the lack of a balanced option.

Cable quality is a practical drawback because the long wire is described as easily tangled.

The included case was consistently praised as robust, well-made, useful, and attractive.

Carry case quality is poor because the full review notes that no carry case or dustbag is included.

Charging convenience is excellent because reviewers treat no-charge operation as a major plug-and-play benefit.

Clamp was mostly comfortable and well distributed, though one review found it a bit tight at first.

Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising long-session wearability and Meze’s ergonomics.

Long-use comfort is consistently positive thanks to light weight, soft pads and all-day comfort language.

Connectivity was mixed because USB-C/3.5mm convenience was offset by narrow connectors and the absence of a balanced stock cable.

Connectivity options are a strength, with adapters and plug-straight-in usefulness praised across sources.

Design was a major strength, with reviewers praising the walnut-accented look, vintage-modern styling, and overall visual execution.

Design is the strongest consensus point, with every source praising or emphasizing the retro 80s look.

Detachable cable use was mixed, with secure connection praised but aftermarket cable fit called harder due to the recessed/narrow connectors.

The USB-C dongle/DAC was received positively as a convenient and classy included accessory.

Durability expectations were positive due to flexibility and a design intended for long-term ownership.

Earpads were widely praised as soft, plush, comfortable, and well made.

Ear cup padding is a standout comfort point, with foam pads described as very soft and squishy.

Cup articulation was praised for helping fit and seal, with one review noting broad pivoting movement.

Tuning was described as smooth, balanced, and coherent by many, but not neutral; several reviewers noted colorations and divisive response traits.

The self-adjusting headband was repeatedly praised for fit, convenience, and comfort.

Headband adjustability is positive, with easy sizing and a snug adjustable fit both noted.

One review praised the headband’s pressure distribution across the top of the head.

Immersive audio was a repeated strength, with reviewers describing lifelike, emotional, three-dimensional, or enveloping presentation.

Immersive audio has limited positive evidence from one source that calls notes crisp and immersive.

Included accessories were positively viewed, especially when tied to the case, adapters, cable, and overall value.

Included accessories are useful because adapters help compatibility, though the missing carry case remains a separate drawback.

Instrument separation and imaging were consistently praised, with reviewers highlighting precise placement, strong layering, and easy focus on individual sounds.

Instrument separation is mixed, with some good separation but weaker separation at higher volumes.

The integrated microphone is useful for hands-free calls and casual gaming communication, with intuitive control support.

One review specifically said the headphones kept dynamics intact at louder volumes.

Maximum-volume clarity is a repeated drawback, with higher-volume listening described as muddy.

Midrange was often treated as a strength, especially for clarity, timbre, and vocals, but a few reviewers noted forwardness, hollowness, or harshness with some voices.

Midrange clarity is positive, with vocals described as clear through a full song.

Source and platform compatibility was strong overall, with reviewers saying it works well from phones, laptops, DAPs, and varied sources.

Multi-platform compatibility is positive, with support framed around phones, laptops and vintage audio setups.

Passive isolation was considered weak or reduced, which reviewers framed as expected for an open-back design.

Passive isolation has limited positive evidence, described only as decent in one source.

Overall recommendation was positive across most reviews, though not unanimous; one reviewer found it not fully competitive on sound alone.

Overall recommendations favor retro style, simplicity and comfort, but one review is cautious about everyday listening.

One review framed the headphones as relatively portable-friendly for an open-back design.

Portability is mixed: the headphones are not bulky, but the long cable makes bag use awkward.

Premium feel was a clear strength, with reviewers emphasizing luxury materials, refined styling, and ownership experience.

One review confirmed removable pads as part of the serviceable construction.

Replaceable pads/headband were praised as part of the long-term serviceable design.

Software and setup simplicity are strong because the wired design avoids firmware fuss and works plug-and-play.

One review found leakage lower than expected for an open-back headphone.

Most reviewers praised the 105 Silva’s sound as musical, engaging, and refined, though one measurement-focused review found it less competitive acoustically.

Sound quality evidence is split: one review found muddy high-volume playback, while other sources praised held-up or exceptional sound.

Soundstage impressions were mixed: several heard expansive or organized staging, while others found the stage narrower, modest, or not especially deep.

Soundstage width is limited, with one track sounding hollow and underfilled.

One review praised the front-to-back and left-to-right spatial definition.

Fit stability was praised in the reviews that addressed it, with no slippage and secure head fit noted.

Repairability and sustainability were strong positives, with reviewers emphasizing disassembly, serviceability, and replaceable parts.

Sustainability receives limited positive evidence from one source crediting wired gear with lasting longer and being better for the planet.

Travel friendliness was mixed: reviewers liked the case and some outdoor practicality, but open-back leakage and size limited true portable use.

Travel friendliness is mixed: one source calls it commute-friendly, while another warns the cable tangles in bags.

Treble drew strong praise for clarity, air, and refinement, while several reviewers warned about spice, sizzle, or timbral issues on brighter recordings.

Treble clarity is positive in the main test, where treble, bass and mids were all described as clear.

USB-C support through the included adapter was positively received for convenience and pleasant out-of-box use.

USB-C support is positive where it is tied to universal compatibility through included adapters.

Value was mostly positive, especially for build, sound, accessories, and price, though competition at $500 was noted.

Value is context-dependent: reasonable for fashion-first buyers, less convincing for audio-first buyers, and low-priced in one preview.

Reviewers repeatedly found the headphones easy to drive and capable of high volume from modest devices.

Weight comfort was praised because the headphone feels lighter than expected and distributes weight well.

Weight comfort is a clear strength, with multiple sources emphasizing the very light build.