Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones

Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones Review

Brand: Meze
Released: August 18, 2025
Updated: 3 weeks ago
4.3
Consolidated expert score
252
Review insights
42
Scored features
16
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the 105 Silva for premium comfort, repairable build, musical mids, and immersive home listening. Skip it if you need ANC, Bluetooth, strong isolation, or the most neutral sound at $500.

Best for

Best for at-home listeners who want a comfortable, repairable, premium-feeling open-back headphone with warm musicality, strong imaging, and a visually distinctive walnut-accented design.

Not for

Not for commuters, wireless/ANC shoppers, bassheads seeking sub-bass slam, or listeners who prioritize strict neutrality and maximum technical detail over comfort and character.

Verdict

The Meze Audio 105 Silva lands as a design-led open-back headphone with unusually strong agreement around comfort, build, repairability, and visual appeal. Reviewers repeatedly praised its musical, immersive presentation, clear midrange, textured bass, and refined treble, with imaging and separation often standing out more than sheer soundstage size. The tradeoff is that its tuning is not universally neutral: some heard dry or limited bass weight, spicy upper treble, narrowed staging, or less acoustic competitiveness than cheaper alternatives. It also remains a wired, open-back home-listening headphone, so isolation, commuting, wireless features, and ANC are not part of the value proposition.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

105 AER

  • Worse: bass control and warmth The Silva is described as trimming 105 AER warmth for a cleaner and more controlled low end.
  • Compared: warmth versus detail The 105 AER is described as warmer and more inviting, while Silva is positioned as the more detailed counterpart.
  • Compared: sound tuning position The Silva is framed as combining some 105 AER warmth and versatility with other technical influences.

109 Pro

  • Compared: treble shaping The 109 Pro is described as more aggressively shaped in the treble region than Silva.
  • Better: complete and versatile sound The 109 Pro is still described as more complete and versatile than Silva.
  • Better: absolute sound quality The reviewer says Silva is refined but still below the 109 Pro and higher-tier open-backs in absolute performance.

109 Pros

  • Similar: technical performance The reviewer says the 105 Silvers approach the 109 Pros in technical performance.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 52% 22 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 40% 17 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 7% 3 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    Sustainability and repairability: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    Repairability and sustainability were strong positives, with reviewers emphasizing disassembly, serviceability, and replaceable parts.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Replaceable pads/headband: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Replaceable pads/headband were praised as part of the long-term serviceable design.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    Replaceable earpads: 4.8, based on 1 review
    One review confirmed removable pads as part of the serviceable construction.
  • 4.8
    based on 5 reviews
    Volume output: 4.8, based on 5 reviews
    Reviewers repeatedly found the headphones easy to drive and capable of high volume from modest devices.
  • 4.7
    based on 10 reviews
    Build quality: 4.7, based on 10 reviews
    Build quality was consistently praised as robust, premium, refined, and carefully assembled.
  • 4.7
    based on 6 reviews
    Headband adjustability: 4.7, based on 6 reviews
    The self-adjusting headband was repeatedly praised for fit, convenience, and comfort.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    Aesthetics / discreet profile: 4.7, based on 1 review
    One review directly praised the product as visually appealing and authentic.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    Headband padding quality: 4.7, based on 1 review
    One review praised the headband’s pressure distribution across the top of the head.
  • 4.7
    based on 14 reviews
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.7, based on 14 reviews
    Design was a major strength, with reviewers praising the walnut-accented look, vintage-modern styling, and overall visual execution.
  • 4.7
    based on 13 reviews
    Comfort during long use: 4.7, based on 13 reviews
    Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising long-session wearability and Meze’s ergonomics.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Stability: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    Fit stability was praised in the reviews that addressed it, with no slippage and secure head fit noted.
  • 4.6
    based on 9 reviews
    Premium feel: 4.6, based on 9 reviews
    Premium feel was a clear strength, with reviewers emphasizing luxury materials, refined styling, and ownership experience.
  • 4.6
    based on 10 reviews
    Instrument separation: 4.6, based on 10 reviews
    Instrument separation and imaging were consistently praised, with reviewers highlighting precise placement, strong layering, and easy focus on individual sounds.
  • 4.6
    based on 8 reviews
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.6, based on 8 reviews
    Earpads were widely praised as soft, plush, comfortable, and well made.
  • 4.6
    based on 6 reviews
    Immersive audio quality: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
    Immersive audio was a repeated strength, with reviewers describing lifelike, emotional, three-dimensional, or enveloping presentation.
  • 4.6
    based on 2 reviews
    Included accessories: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
    Included accessories were positively viewed, especially when tied to the case, adapters, cable, and overall value.
  • 4.6
    based on 1 review
    Spatial audio: 4.6, based on 1 review
    One review praised the front-to-back and left-to-right spatial definition.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    Weight comfort: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Weight comfort was praised because the headphone feels lighter than expected and distributes weight well.
  • 4.6
    based on 2 reviews
    Durability over time: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
    Durability expectations were positive due to flexibility and a design intended for long-term ownership.
  • 4.5
    based on 6 reviews
    Carry case quality: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
    The included case was consistently praised as robust, well-made, useful, and attractive.
  • 4.5
    based on 7 reviews
    Multi-platform compatibility: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
    Source and platform compatibility was strong overall, with reviewers saying it works well from phones, laptops, DAPs, and varied sources.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Ear cup swivel/rotation range: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Cup articulation was praised for helping fit and seal, with one review noting broad pivoting movement.
  • 4.4
    based on 1 review
    Maximum volume clarity: 4.4, based on 1 review
    One review specifically said the headphones kept dynamics intact at louder volumes.
  • 4.4
    based on 15 reviews
    Sound quality: 4.4, based on 15 reviews
    Most reviewers praised the 105 Silva’s sound as musical, engaging, and refined, though one measurement-focused review found it less competitive acoustically.
  • 4.4
    based on 12 reviews
    Value for money: 4.4, based on 12 reviews
    Value was mostly positive, especially for build, sound, accessories, and price, though competition at $500 was noted.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Built-in DAC and hi-res playback: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    The included USB-C DAC adapter was praised for convenience, but the evidence supports an external adapter rather than a fully built-in headphone DAC.
  • 4.3
    based on 13 reviews
    Overall recommendation: 4.3, based on 13 reviews
    Overall recommendation was positive across most reviews, though not unanimous; one reviewer found it not fully competitive on sound alone.
  • 4.3
    based on 15 reviews
    Bass performance: 4.3, based on 15 reviews
    Bass was generally praised for control, texture, punch, and warmth, with repeated caveats that sub-bass slam is limited or the low end can feel bloomy.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Dongle: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    The USB-C dongle/DAC was received positively as a convenient and classy included accessory.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    USB-C: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    USB-C support through the included adapter was positively received for convenience and pleasant out-of-box use.
  • 4.3
    based on 13 reviews
    Midrange clarity: 4.3, based on 13 reviews
    Midrange was often treated as a strength, especially for clarity, timbre, and vocals, but a few reviewers noted forwardness, hollowness, or harshness with some voices.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Clamping force comfort: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Clamp was mostly comfortable and well distributed, though one review found it a bit tight at first.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Portability/foldability: 4.2, based on 1 review
    One review framed the headphones as relatively portable-friendly for an open-back design.
  • 4.2
    based on 14 reviews
    Treble clarity: 4.2, based on 14 reviews
    Treble drew strong praise for clarity, air, and refinement, while several reviewers warned about spice, sizzle, or timbral issues on brighter recordings.
  • 4.2
    based on 11 reviews
    Soundstage width: 4.2, based on 11 reviews
    Soundstage impressions were mixed: several heard expansive or organized staging, while others found the stage narrower, modest, or not especially deep.
  • 4.0
    based on 8 reviews
    Frequency response accuracy: 4.0, based on 8 reviews
    Tuning was described as smooth, balanced, and coherent by many, but not neutral; several reviewers noted colorations and divisive response traits.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Sound leakage: 4.0, based on 1 review
    One review found leakage lower than expected for an open-back headphone.
  • 3.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Detachable cable convenience: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
    Detachable cable use was mixed, with secure connection praised but aftermarket cable fit called harder due to the recessed/narrow connectors.
  • 3.5
    based on 7 reviews
    Cable quality: 3.5, based on 7 reviews
    Cable feedback was mixed: some liked the sturdiness or low microphonics, while others criticized ergonomics, microphonics, or the lack of a balanced option.

Cons

  • 3.2
    based on 4 reviews
    Travel friendliness: 3.2, based on 4 reviews
    Travel friendliness was mixed: reviewers liked the case and some outdoor practicality, but open-back leakage and size limited true portable use.
  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Connectivity options: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    Connectivity was mixed because USB-C/3.5mm convenience was offset by narrow connectors and the absence of a balanced stock cable.
  • 2.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Noise isolation (passive): 2.7, based on 2 reviews
    Passive isolation was considered weak or reduced, which reviewers framed as expected for an open-back design.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Sustainability and repairability, Carry case quality, Replaceable pads/headband, below average in Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 75% 6 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 25% 2 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Sustainability and repairability 4.8 3.5 +1.3
Noise isolation (passive) 2.7 3.9 -1.3
Carry case quality 4.5 3.5 +1.0
Replaceable pads/headband 4.8 3.7 +1.1
Connectivity options 3.2 4.3 -1.1
Included accessories 4.6 3.5 +1.1
Volume output 4.8 3.8 +0.9
Replaceable earpads 4.8 3.8 +1.0

FAQ

Are the Meze 105 Silva good for long listening sessions?

Yes. Comfort was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising the self-adjusting headband, soft pads, weight distribution, and all-day ergonomics.

Do the 105 Silva isolate outside noise?

No. Reviewers treated isolation as limited because these are open-back headphones, though one review noted leakage was not excessive for the design.

How is the bass on the 105 Silva?

The bass is generally described as controlled, textured, punchy, and clean. It is not the best choice for listeners who want heavy sub-bass rumble or maximum slam.

Are the 105 Silva easy to drive?

Yes. Multiple reviewers said they get loud easily and work well from modest sources, phones, laptops, dongles, DAPs, and desktop setups.

Is the soundstage wide?

Opinions are mixed. Some reviewers heard an expansive, organized stage with strong imaging, while others found the stage narrow, modest, or less deep than expected.

Are the 105 Silva worth the price?

Most reviewers saw strong value because of the comfort, build, accessories, repairability, and sound, but a few warned that similarly priced or cheaper competitors may beat it for pure sound quality.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Over-Ear Headphones Alternatives

#1 Current product Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.3

Choose the 105 Silva for premium comfort, repairable build, musical mids, and immersive home listening. Skip it if you need ANC, Bluetooth, strong isolation, or the most neutral sound at...

Pros: Sustainability and repairability, Replaceable pads/headband

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Travel friendliness

#2 Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 Headphones
4.2

Choose the Px7 S3 if sound quality, premium build, and a slim stylish design matter most. Skip it if you need the strongest ANC, fold-flat travel compactness, LDAC, or feature-heavy...

Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Multipoint connectivity reliability

Cons: LDAC, Wear detection performance

#3 Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SE Headphones
4.2

Choose the P100 SE for huge battery life, strong sound, useful EQ, and standout value. Skip it if you need class-leading ANC, the lightest comfort, spatial audio, or a compact...

Pros: Codec support, aptX

Cons: LDAC, Water/sweat resistance rating

#4 Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Choose the WH950NB Gen 2 for strong value, long battery life, comfortable padding, useful app control and effective everyday ANC. Skip it if heavy-bass clarity, simple onboard controls or guaranteed...

Pros: Instrument separation, USB-C

Cons: Button control usability, Maximum volume clarity