Choose the Meze 105 Silva for a beautifully built, comfortable open-back with warm detail and easy source matching. Skip it if you need wireless features, strong isolation, huge staging, or bass-heavy slam.
Best for home listeners who value comfort, walnut-accented design, easy wired source matching, and a musical presentation with strong midrange, treble detail, and imaging. It especially suits buyers who want premium build and repairability without moving into flagship pricing.
Not for shoppers who need ANC, Bluetooth, app controls, strong passive isolation, or commuter-friendly leakage control. It may also disappoint listeners who prioritize sub-bass slam, huge HD800-style staging, or a strictly neutral studio response.
The Meze 105 Silva earns broad praise as a premium-feeling open-back headphone with standout comfort, refined walnut styling, and a sound that favors natural timbre, midrange expression, and articulate treble over strict neutrality. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as easy to drive and well accessorized, with useful 3.5mm and USB-C options. The tradeoff is that its tuning is not universally loved: some hear controlled, textured bass and immersive imaging, while others find the stage narrower than expected, the low end less authoritative, or the upper treble too shiny on bright recordings. It works best as a musical, design-forward home headphone rather than a feature-packed travel or wireless option.
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Dongle, Sustainability and repairability, Spatial audio, below average in Advanced software features, Noise isolation (passive).
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced software features | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| Dongle | 4.6 | 2.9 | +1.7 |
| Noise isolation (passive) | 2.2 | 3.8 | -1.6 |
| Sustainability and repairability | 4.9 | 3.4 | +1.5 |
| Spatial audio | 4.6 | 3.0 | +1.6 |
| Carry case quality | 4.7 | 3.3 | +1.4 |
| Replaceable pads/headband | 4.9 | 3.7 | +1.2 |
| Durability over time | 4.8 | 3.7 | +1.1 |
No. The reviews describe it as a passive wired open-back headphone with 3.5mm connections and included adapter options, not a Bluetooth headphone.
Reviewers generally found it easy to drive from modest sources, including computers, DAPs, and dongle DACs. Several also said it scales or improves with better amplification.
Comfort is one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers repeatedly praised the self-adjusting headband, plush velour pads, weight distribution, and low stress during extended listening.
The bass is described as controlled, textured, punchy, and warm by many reviewers. Some reviewers also note that it is not a sub-bass or slam-focused headphone.
Opinions are mixed. Some reviewers call the stage expansive or well organized, while others describe it as moderately wide, narrower than expected, or more intimate than large-stage open-backs.
It has a good case and is easy to drive, but the open-back design makes it better suited to home listening. Reviewers caution that it leaks sound and does not isolate like a closed-back or ANC headphone.
Reviewers generally place it between them: more detailed, controlled, or visually premium than the 105 AER, but not always as complete, versatile, or expansive as the 109 Pro.
Choose JBL Tour One M3 Headphones. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Advanced software features, with a 4.2 overall score.
Choose Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 2.2 for Noise isolation (passive), with a 4.2 overall score.
Choose JLab Epic Lux Lab Edition Wireless Headphones. It scores 5.0 vs 2.9 for Travel friendliness, with a 4.1 overall score.
Choose Sony WH-1000XM5 Premium Noise Canceling Headphones. It scores 4.7 vs 2.9 for Sound leakage, with a 4.0 overall score.
Choose the Meze 105 Silva for a beautifully built, comfortable open-back with warm detail and easy source matching. Skip it if you need wireless features, strong isolation, huge staging, or...
Pros: Sustainability and repairability, Replaceable pads/headband
Cons: Advanced software features, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose the Px7 S3 for premium build, superb sound, USB-C listening, and strong comfort. Skip it if you need class-leading ANC, LDAC, or the smallest travel case.
Pros: aptX, Bluetooth version
Cons: LDAC, Water/sweat resistance rating
Choose the Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 for strong ANC, plush comfort, LDAC, huge battery life, and travel-ready value. Skip it if you need booming bass, foolproof onboard controls, or zero...
Pros: Award recognition, Battery
Cons: Button control usability, Maximum volume clarity
Choose the JBL Tour One M3 if you travel often and want long battery life, comfort, ANC, and Smart Tx flexibility. Skip them if premium materials, best-in-class ANC, or pure...
Pros: Travel friendliness, Connectivity options
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, Replaceable earpads