Compare Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones vs Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones

One review specifically said the headphones kept dynamics intact at louder volumes.

Maximum-volume clarity was limited by irritating bass crackle at louder listening levels.

Passive isolation was considered weak or reduced, which reviewers framed as expected for an open-back design.

Passive isolation was praised through the protein-leather seal's ability to reduce outside noise.

Travel friendliness was mixed: reviewers liked the case and some outdoor practicality, but open-back leakage and size limited true portable use.

Travel friendliness was praised through the slim case, foldable design, commuting fit, and compact storage.

One review praised the front-to-back and left-to-right spatial definition.

Spatial and theater-style audio was mixed: theater mode impressed one reviewer, while another did not find extra modes useful.

Connectivity was mixed because USB-C/3.5mm convenience was offset by narrow connectors and the absence of a balanced stock cable.

Connectivity options were praised for dual-device use without constant reconnecting.

The self-adjusting headband was repeatedly praised for fit, convenience, and comfort.

Headband adjustment was mixed, with one reviewer finding the slider slightly awkward and another praising the defined clicks.

Bass was generally praised for control, texture, punch, and warmth, with repeated caveats that sub-bass slam is limited or the low end can feel bloomy.

Bass feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked the punch and quantity, while one found heavy-bass tracks crackly and another called it bassy.

USB-C support through the included adapter was positively received for convenience and pleasant out-of-box use.

USB-C charging was explicitly welcomed as the expected modern standard.

Fit stability was praised in the reviews that addressed it, with no slippage and secure head fit noted.

Stability was praised during running, with no distracting or unstable feel.

Clamp was mostly comfortable and well distributed, though one review found it a bit tight at first.

Clamp comfort was split: some reviewers found the fit gentle or glasses-friendly, while another warned that clamp force builds over time.

One review directly praised the product as visually appealing and authentic.

Reviewers consistently liked the understated, stylish, premium-looking design.

Durability expectations were positive due to flexibility and a design intended for long-term ownership.

The reinforced steel headband was credited with giving a durable impression.

Soundstage impressions were mixed: several heard expansive or organized staging, while others found the stage narrower, modest, or not especially deep.

Soundstage was praised as surprisingly wide for closed-back headphones.

Design was a major strength, with reviewers praising the walnut-accented look, vintage-modern styling, and overall visual execution.

Design was praised as sleek, understated, stylish, and elegant.

Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising long-session wearability and Meze’s ergonomics.

Long-use comfort was mostly praised, but the rigid headband created a notable comfort caveat in one review.

Value was mostly positive, especially for build, sound, accessories, and price, though competition at $500 was noted.

Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly comparing performance favorably against the price.

The included USB-C DAC adapter was praised for convenience, but the evidence supports an external adapter rather than a fully built-in headphone DAC.

Hi-res playback and LDAC were praised for capability, but one iPhone-focused reviewer found LDAC less useful.

One review framed the headphones as relatively portable-friendly for an open-back design.

Portability was praised for compact folding and easy case storage.

Overall recommendation was positive across most reviews, though not unanimous; one reviewer found it not fully competitive on sound alone.

Overall recommendations were strongly positive, especially for value-focused buyers.

One review praised the headband’s pressure distribution across the top of the head.

Headband padding was praised as soft and comfortable.

Earpads were widely praised as soft, plush, comfortable, and well made.

Ear cup and pad comfort drew consistent praise for plushness, softness, and a comfortable seal.

Instrument separation and imaging were consistently praised, with reviewers highlighting precise placement, strong layering, and easy focus on individual sounds.

Instrument separation was praised for revealing individual instruments and layers clearly.

Premium feel was a clear strength, with reviewers emphasizing luxury materials, refined styling, and ownership experience.

Premium feel was a repeated strength, with reviewers saying the headphones feel more expensive than they are.

Most reviewers praised the 105 Silva’s sound as musical, engaging, and refined, though one measurement-focused review found it less competitive acoustically.

Sound quality was generally praised as good, engaging, clear, and strong for the price.

Immersive audio was a repeated strength, with reviewers describing lifelike, emotional, three-dimensional, or enveloping presentation.

Immersive listening was praised in theater use, where one reviewer felt the experience resembled a big-screen setup.

Midrange was often treated as a strength, especially for clarity, timbre, and vocals, but a few reviewers noted forwardness, hollowness, or harshness with some voices.

Midrange and vocal clarity were generally praised, though one reviewer found the mids less refined than the Sony XM6.

Build quality was consistently praised as robust, premium, refined, and carefully assembled.

Build quality was described as solid, sturdy, and more premium than the price suggests.

Weight comfort was praised because the headphone feels lighter than expected and distributes weight well.

Weight comfort was praised as balanced and not heavy.

Included accessories were positively viewed, especially when tied to the case, adapters, cable, and overall value.

Included accessories were praised as a thoughtful, complete bundle.

Treble drew strong praise for clarity, air, and refinement, while several reviewers warned about spice, sizzle, or timbral issues on brighter recordings.

Treble and high-end clarity were praised as clear, detailed, and able to let guitar layers shine.

Cup articulation was praised for helping fit and seal, with one review noting broad pivoting movement.

Ear cup rotation and tilt were praised for helping the headphones fit the user's head shape.

Tuning was described as smooth, balanced, and coherent by many, but not neutral; several reviewers noted colorations and divisive response traits.

Frequency balance was described positively as well balanced.

The included case was consistently praised as robust, well-made, useful, and attractive.

The travel case was repeatedly praised as sturdy, stylish, and protective.

Reviewers generally found ANC effective for daily noise and low-frequency sounds, though one reviewer said it does not block everything.

Software features were praised for giving broad control over listening modes, EQ, sound limits, and other headphone functions.

ANC background-noise handling was praised for treadmill, commute, and low-frequency noise reduction.

Android users were presented as getting the strongest wireless-quality benefit from LDAC support.

The app was praised for fun listening control and useful ANC adjustment.

Battery life drew some of the strongest praise across reviews, including long weekly use and strong remaining charge after hours.

Bluetooth range was praised as a practical bonus in everyday movement around the home.

Bluetooth 5.4 was framed as a future-proofing improvement.

Onboard button controls were criticized as frustrating and confusing because functions are doubled up.

Cable feedback was mixed: some liked the sturdiness or low microphonics, while others criticized ergonomics, microphonics, or the lack of a balanced option.

Fast charging was viewed positively, especially the short top-ups that provide several hours of playback.

Codec support was valued for LDAC and hi-res audio, with the main caveat being limited benefit for iPhone users.

Detachable cable use was mixed, with secure connection praised but aftermarket cable fit called harder due to the recessed/narrow connectors.

The USB-C dongle/DAC was received positively as a convenient and classy included accessory.

One reviewer noted earpad or fit-related walking noise and faint rustle as a limitation.

EQ customization was praised for letting listeners reshape the sound to their preferences.

Gaming or mode presets were not strongly convincing, with reviewers either noticing no difference or not finding the modes useful.

The integrated microphones were praised as surprisingly excellent.

LDAC support was praised for higher-quality Bluetooth streaming, though one reviewer noted it was wasted on iPhone.

Microphone noise reduction was mostly strong, separating voice from background chaos, with minor ambient noise leakage noted.

Call microphone quality was praised, including calls going smoothly and the mics sounding excellent.

Source and platform compatibility was strong overall, with reviewers saying it works well from phones, laptops, DAPs, and varied sources.

Multipoint connectivity was useful and mostly seamless, with only minor reminders needed in one review.

Preset EQ feedback was positive for Dynamic and Rock settings, which reviewers found more enjoyable or lively.

One review confirmed removable pads as part of the serviceable construction.

Replaceable pads/headband were praised as part of the long-term serviceable design.

Smart listening features such as hearing protection and sound limits were viewed as useful additions.

Software setup and control were praised as easy through the Edifier app.

One review found leakage lower than expected for an open-back headphone.

Repairability and sustainability were strong positives, with reviewers emphasizing disassembly, serviceability, and replaceable parts.

Transparency or ambient mode was praised as useful for awareness and dialing in outside sound.

Reviewers repeatedly found the headphones easy to drive and capable of high volume from modest devices.

Wind handling was mixed: one reviewer found minimal interference, while another did not find wind reduction especially useful.