Compare Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones

P1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
P2 Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones

Comparison Takeaways

Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Frequency response accuracy is 4.1 vs 2.6. Tonality is often described as balanced or smooth rather than strictly neutral, with a coherent frequency integration that...
  • Ear cup padding quality is 4.6 vs 3.3. Velour/suede pads are commonly described as plush, breathable, and comfortable, helping distribute pressure and avoid hotspots. Some users...
  • Comfort during long use is 4.7 vs 3.5. Comfort is a consistent strength: the self-adjusting suspension design and soft pads enable long listening sessions for most...
  • Clamping force comfort is 4.2 vs 3.2. Clamp force is generally described as moderate and well-distributed, supporting stability without obvious pain. A handful of impressions...

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Noise isolation (passive) is 4.1 vs 2.2. Passive isolation benefits from a solid seal, but it does not fully replace top-tier ANC in louder environments.
  • Portability/foldability is 4.0 vs 2.5. Most reviews describe foldability that fits the headphones into a protective case, though at least one comparison notes...
  • aptX is rated 4.7 while the other product has no score yet. aptX support (including Lossless/Adaptive) is repeatedly cited as a key advantage, especially for Android and Snapdragon Sound users.
  • Battery is rated 4.7 while the other product has no score yet. Battery life is a headline strength: many cite around 50 hours with ANC on, and some tests report...
Average score
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.2
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.1
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.7

ANC performance ranges from decent to underwhelming for the price; it tends to handle low-frequency rumble better than mid and high-frequency noise, and trails class leaders. ANC settings are flexible, with multiple strength levels (and an adaptive mode) available via the app and on-headphone controls.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Android use is generally smooth, with modern codecs and stable pairing frequently mentioned as benefits for Android users.

App
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.1

The companion app is typically seen as clean and easy to navigate, though not feature-rich compared with the very best ecosystems.

aptX
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.7

aptX support (including Lossless/Adaptive) is repeatedly cited as a key advantage, especially for Android and Snapdragon Sound users.

Bass performance
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.2

Bass is generally controlled and textured, with some listeners hearing a fuller, pillowy low end and others calling it restrained or dry compared with bassier alternatives. Sub-bass is present but not the main emphasis, so slam-heads may want more weight.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Bass is a defining trait: commonly thick and boosted with good extension, but several reviewers call it boomy or overdone until EQ is applied.

Battery
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.7

Battery life is a headline strength: many cite around 50 hours with ANC on, and some tests report substantially higher real-world endurance.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Bluetooth stability is a strong point in most reviews, with few dropouts reported and Bluetooth 5.4 frequently highlighted.

Build quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.7

Build quality is consistently described as excellent, with premium materials, tight assembly, and a refined feel. Several reviews highlight serviceability and long-term durability as part of the value proposition.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Build quality is consistently highlighted, with metal components and a sturdy, low-creak feel that compares favorably to many all-plastic competitors.

Button control usability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.7

Physical buttons get mixed feedback: some find them small, mushy, or hard to distinguish by feel, while others report they work fine once learned.

Cable quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
3.9

Cable impressions are mixed: many find the stock cable sturdy and functional, but some report microphonics or less-than-ideal ergonomics, and several note the lack of a balanced stock option.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Accessories include both USB-C and 3.5mm cables (plus an adapter in several reviews) and are generally viewed as solid and practical.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.6

The included hard/semi-hard case is widely praised as well-made and protective, with room for cables/adapters and a secure zipper. It supports storage and occasional transport effectively.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.6

The carry case is frequently praised as premium and protective, and several reviewers like that a soft pouch or dust bag is also included.

Charging
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Charging over USB-C is straightforward, with fast-charge claims around 10 minutes for roughly 5 hours and full-charge times around two hours.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.2

Clamp force is generally described as moderate and well-distributed, supporting stability without obvious pain. A handful of impressions mention the clamp feeling a bit tight out of the box, with minor adjustment/break-in helping.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.2

Clamping force often skews tight, which helps stability and seal but can become fatiguing for larger heads.

Codec support
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.6

Codec support is a standout, commonly noted for including AAC plus higher-end options like aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, and LE Audio.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.7

Comfort is a consistent strength: the self-adjusting suspension design and soft pads enable long listening sessions for most people. A few note fit quirks (small cups for some ears or clamp that starts slightly tight).

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Long-session comfort is divisive: some find the fit pleasant, while others report discomfort after an hour or two due to clamp, heat, or ear clearance.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.8

Design is a standout, with walnut accents and Meze’s mid-century styling repeatedly called premium-looking and distinctive. Even critics of the tuning tend to praise the aesthetics and finish quality.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Design is generally seen as sleek and premium-looking, leaning understated rather than flashy; finish impressions vary from fingerprint-resistant to smudge-prone.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
3.9

The detachable dual 3.5mm system is convenient for replacement, yet recessed/narrow connector sizing can limit third-party cable compatibility compared with more universal designs. Connection security itself is generally praised.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Detachable wired options add flexibility for travel, low-latency use, and compatibility with sources that cannot use Bluetooth.

Dongle
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.1

The included USB-C DAC dongle/adapter is viewed as a nice convenience for modern devices, generally adequate for casual listening. Enthusiast reviewers still expect better performance from dedicated DAC/amps.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.6

Velour/suede pads are commonly described as plush, breathable, and comfortable, helping distribute pressure and avoid hotspots. Some users wish for a touch more ear room, but pad comfort is still rated highly.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.3

Pads are described as plush by some and stiff or shallow by others; deeper cups help, but heat build-up and ear contact show up in multiple accounts.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.0

Cup articulation is generally sufficient for a good seal/fit, with tilt helping the pads conform, though some describe movement as limited compared with more freely articulating designs.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Cup swivel and articulation are well regarded, allowing the headphones to lay flatter and fit a range of head shapes; a few note minor rocking from pad shape.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.7

EQ options center on a 5-band equalizer and presets; many appreciate the control, but measurement-focused reviewers argue it is not granular enough to correct all issues.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.1

Tonality is often described as balanced or smooth rather than strictly neutral, with a coherent frequency integration that avoids obvious bloat. Some characterize it as tastefully colored (warm-bright/W-shaped) rather than reference-flat.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
2.6

Frequency balance is polarizing: some call it even-handed, while measurement-driven reviews point to large deviations (bass and treble boosts and a vocal region dip).

Headband adjustability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.8

The auto/self-adjusting headband system is repeatedly singled out as one of the best parts of the design, requiring little to no fiddling while spreading pressure evenly. It also helps with consistent fit and comfort over time.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Adjustment mechanisms are generally praised for feeling secure and premium, including ratcheting steps that hold position well.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.7

Build discussions suggest robust hinges and a durable chassis, with spring-steel structures and solid joints expected to hold up well over years of use.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Hinges and joints are widely described as robust, with metal hardware that inspires confidence in long-term durability.

Included accessories
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.2

Accessories are generally seen as generous for the price: a protective case, cables, and adapters (often including USB-C). The main recurring complaint is the absence of a balanced cable in the box.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Included accessories are strong for the price, often including a hard case, soft pouch or bag, USB-C cable, USB-A adapter, and a 3.5mm cable.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Instrument separation and imaging are widely regarded as excellent for the price, helping complex mixes stay organized and making positional cues easy to track. Even reviewers who nitpick tuning tend to credit the Silva’s placement and delineation.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Imaging and separation are consistently strong, helping instruments stay distinct even when the overall frequency balance is debated.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.4

When pushed louder, reviewers who mention it report the presentation staying composed, with bass and treble control holding together without obvious strain.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.2

Noise reduction for the mic is serviceable but not elite; wind and traffic can still be audible unless you speak up.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.6

Call mic quality is usually fine in quiet conditions, but clarity drops in noisier streets or windy situations compared with the best phone-call headphones.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.1

Midrange is a highlight for many, with clear, forward vocals/instruments and an overall transparent character. A few note that certain vocal ranges can sound a bit thin, scooped, or pushed depending on recording and pairing.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Midrange quality is mixed: some hear warm, impressive mids, while others report recessed vocals or slightly unnatural timbre depending on tracks and tuning.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.4

Reviewers frequently describe good compatibility across sources (phones with dongles, laptops, DAPs, and desktop amps), helped by easy drivability. Some note it scales with source quality and can reveal harshness from poor gear.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Multi-device compatibility is a plus, spanning phones and computers and supported by both multipoint Bluetooth and wired inputs.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Multipoint generally works reliably, but usability varies: some note the app does not show connected devices or make switching as effortless as certain rivals.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
2.2

As open-backs, passive isolation is low and sound leakage is expected; a couple of reviewers note mild attenuation compared to very open designs, but these are still best for quiet rooms.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Passive isolation benefits from a solid seal, but it does not fully replace top-tier ANC in louder environments.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
2.5

Portability is mixed: they’re easy to drive and include a protective case, but the open-back design and size make them better suited to home or quiet environments than true travel/commute use.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Most reviews describe foldability that fits the headphones into a protective case, though at least one comparison notes limited folding for ultra-compact packing.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Preset profiles like Neutral or Smooth can be genuinely useful for dialing back bass or treble, though some report changes in perceived loudness when toggling EQ.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.8

Where discussed, earpads are replaceable and intended for long-term ownership, with guides or documentation supporting pad swaps and maintenance.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.6

Replaceable earpads (and sometimes the headband) are called out as a longevity-friendly design choice.

Sensors
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Wear-detection sensors support auto pause and resume; behavior can be a little too eager for some, but the feature set is generally appreciated.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Sidetone is available and adjustable, which can help calls for some users even if others prefer it turned off.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.9

Smudge resistance depends on finish and handling: some report minimal fingerprints, while others notice visible marks with regular contact.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Setup is typically painless, with straightforward pairing and a simple app layout; firmware updates are reported as quick and uncomplicated.

Sound quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.4

Across reviews, the 105 Silva is described as an engaging open-back with a premium “Meze” presentation: natural timbre, strong technicalities for the price, and a tuning that favors musical enjoyment over strict neutrality. A minority find the voicing less competitive on pure sound-per-dollar versus cheaper rivals without EQ.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Reviews disagree on the overall sound: many praise a warm, detailed, spacious presentation, while others criticize the stock tuning as overly colored and not reference-like. Wired listening via 3.5mm and USB-C is a valued feature; some reviewers prefer the USB-C wired mode for extra clarity and dynamics.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.0

Soundstage impressions vary: some describe it as expansive, airy, and three-dimensional, while others find it only moderately wide or a touch narrow with limited depth/layering. Imaging is commonly cited as more consistent than sheer stage size.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Soundstage is frequently described as wide and immersive, with an enveloping presentation; some report even better clarity and space when listening wired over USB-C.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Dolby Atmos and head tracking are a major feature: some find the effect subtle and well executed, while others dislike the tonal shift or report jumpy tracking behavior.

Stability
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.3

Fit stability is usually strong thanks to moderate clamp and the suspension design, with reports of little slippage and secure positioning. One review flags potential fit issues for smaller heads due to the frame geometry.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Sustainability materials
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.9

Sustainability is repeatedly tied to Meze’s serviceable approach: parts can be replaced rather than discarding the headphone, supporting longevity and repairability over time.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Touch controls are usually accurate and easy to learn, with occasional accidental triggers or misfires while moving or when handling the headphones.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Transparency mode is adjustable and generally useful, though some find the highest setting overly sharp or bright in the upper frequencies.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
3.9

Treble is typically praised for clarity and refinement, but several reviews note peaks/extra air that can sound a little spicy, sizzly, or less forgiving on bright or compressed tracks. Others hear it as smooth and well-balanced for long sessions.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.7

Treble is generally clear and energetic, but can bring sibilance or harshness for sensitive listeners; a few note slight top-end roll-off or prefer EQ to smooth it.

USB-C
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.1

USB-C support comes via an included adapter/dongle, enabling plug-and-play use with phones and computers lacking a headphone jack. It’s positioned as convenience rather than a high-end solution.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.4

USB-C is used for charging and, in several reviews, for wired audio playback, adding versatility beyond standard Bluetooth listening.

Volume output
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.7

Multiple reviews call the 105 Silva very easy to drive (high sensitivity, modest impedance) and capable of reaching loud listening levels from phones, dongles, laptops, and DAPs. Higher-quality sources can still improve refinement and control.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Volume headroom is ample, with multiple reviewers noting the headphones get very loud without obvious strain at typical listening levels.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.1

At roughly mid-300g, the Silva isn’t ultra-light, but reviewers frequently say it feels lighter on-head due to excellent weight distribution. Most report minimal fatigue from weight during extended sessions.

Product 2: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Wireless Headphones
3.4

At roughly 319g, weight is noticeable for some listeners and is part of the comfort complaints, though others still consider it manageable.