Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.7
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

ANC is frequently described as a standout for the price and, in some reviews, competitive with or better than more expensive Samsung models. However, at least one reviewer found it only marginal in very loud subway conditions, so expectations should be tempered versus best-in-class ANC leaders. ANC and ambient intensity are described as adjustable via Samsung settings/app controls, often with multiple levels or sliders. Some note the lack of certain adaptive/conversation features found on higher-end models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

ANC is the main weakness. The open design limits sealing, so the effect is modest against chatter and steady noise and much less convincing against higher-frequency or sudden sounds, even if it appears somewhat improved over Buds 3.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.5

Compatibility and feature completeness are repeatedly framed as best on Samsung Galaxy phones (and often Samsung tablets/TVs), acceptable on other Android phones with some limitations, and highly restricted on iPhone.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.6

Android compatibility is strong, and Galaxy phones get the most complete experience. Non-Samsung Android users still get meaningful control through Samsung's software, but the best extras remain Galaxy-first.

App
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.9

The Samsung Wearable/settings integration is portrayed as essential for unlocking key features like EQ, ANC/ambient tuning, firmware updates, Find My, and AI features. iOS support is repeatedly called very limited beyond basic Bluetooth audio.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Samsung's settings integration and Wearables app expose useful controls, EQ options, and ANC adjustments. The software feels feature-rich, though some advanced features stay exclusive to Galaxy phones.

aptX
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
1.0

Multiple reviews explicitly state there is no aptX support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.5

At least one hands-on video reviewer reports no noticeable lip-sync delay when watching video, suggesting good real-world A/V sync in common streaming playback.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Bass is generally portrayed as well-defined with a mild boost; it competes with outside noise without dominating vocals for most listeners. Some reviewers wanted more bass punch, while others felt the boosted low end contributed to a muddier presentation on certain tracks.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Bass is a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it punchy, warm, and satisfyingly deep for an open-fit earbud. It is not as textured as the Pro model, but it gives the Buds 4 a lively, full sound.

Battery
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.7

Battery life is consistently characterized as average for the category: roughly mid-4 to ~6 hours with ANC on depending on volume, with totals rising into the mid-20s to ~30 hours with the case and ANC off.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.5

Battery life is acceptable rather than exceptional at roughly 5 to 6 hours from the buds and up to 30 hours with the case. Reviewers treat endurance as serviceable, not a category advantage.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.2

Connectivity is generally described as stable in testing, with quick pairing for Samsung phones and smooth day-to-day use. Auto-switch behavior is ecosystem-dependent and not always perfect.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Connectivity looks strong overall, helped by Bluetooth 6.1 and solid range in real-world use. The bigger limitation is not dropouts but that the smartest switching behavior is mostly reserved for Samsung-centric setups.

Build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.2

Build quality is usually described as sturdy and premium-feeling for the price. A recurring caution is that the case lid may loosen over time with regular use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2

Build and finish are seen as more refined than the previous generation, with a more polished stem design and cleaner execution. The Buds 4 feel premium enough for the price, though not especially rugged.

Button control usability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.7

Pinch and swipe controls are generally liked for reducing accidental touches, but the stem shape and required pinch force are cited as less ergonomic than some rivals, and can shift the earbuds slightly in-ear.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Carry case quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.7

The case is generally described as compact and pocket-friendly with a firm snap early on, but there are repeated cautions that the hinge/lid may loosen with time, and wireless charging is repeatedly noted as missing.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

The case earns positive marks for its flatter layout, translucent lid, and practical physical pairing button. It feels useful and better thought out than a generic accessory shell.

Charging
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
2.5

Charging is USB-C only with repeated notes that wireless charging is not supported and that a charging cable may be omitted in the box. Some hands-on impressions report a roughly around-one-hour top-up for the case in normal charging.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Codec support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.0

Codec support is consistently described as SBC and AAC plus Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC) for compatible Samsung devices; this is framed as a Samsung-first product choice that affects cross-device consistency.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Comfort during long use
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.4

Comfort is generally rated highly for long listening sessions, helped by low earbud weight and a familiar stem-based in-ear fit, though comfort still depends on tip sizing and seal.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1

Comfort is one of the Buds 4's biggest wins, especially for listeners who prefer open-fit earbuds or have smaller ears. The only caveat is that the looser fit can require occasional readjustment.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.2

The matte, understated look is repeatedly praised, with many liking the premium-feeling Buds 3 Pro-like shape while noting the absence of decorative blade lights as a cost-saving simplification.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Design feedback is favorable overall: slimmer stems, a cleaner case, and a more polished look improve the presentation. The main knock is that the styling still feels very close to Apple's template.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.4

Ear tip options are a common complaint: some sources mention three sizes, others only two additional sizes, and multiple reviewers wish an XL tip existed. Getting a tight seal is repeatedly emphasized as critical for best sound and ANC.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Equalizer customization
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.9

Reviews commonly mention multiple EQ presets plus a custom multi-band EQ (often described as 9-band) to tailor sound. Some note the absence of certain personalized tuning tests found on competitors.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.7

EQ flexibility is unusually strong for mainstream earbuds, with both a multi-band equalizer and preset options available. This gives listeners real room to tailor the sound signature.

Find My
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.0

Find My-style locating is mentioned through Samsung tools (often tied to SmartThings/Find My Earbuds). Some sources note the lack of ultra-wideband precision finding compared to higher-end models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.5

One detailed measurement-focused review describes the default tuning tracking a target curve closely, with only a modest bass emphasis and less problematic treble emphasis than some pricier siblings.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.0

Included accessories typically cover multiple ear tip sizes, but several reviews criticize limited sizing (sometimes only small/large beyond the default) and frequently mention that a charging cable is not included.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
2.8

Instrument separation is generally described as competent, but at least one long-term reviewer felt fine detail and separation lag behind some competitors and the Buds 3 Pro.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

The Buds 4 separate vocals, synths, percussion, and layered mixes well for the class. They are not hyper-analytical, but they rarely sound congested or smeared.

LDAC
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
1.0

Multiple reviews explicitly state there is no LDAC support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.2

Clarity at higher volumes is usually reported as solid with limited obvious distortion, but best results are tied to a good seal and reasonable listening levels; some note performance assumptions change with volume settings.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Background noise reduction for calls is often praised as improved and effective in office/street noise, though very windy scenarios remain a weak spot and a few reviewers describe occasional muffling depending on conditions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2

Noise reduction during calls performs better than expected and can suppress loud background noise effectively. The tradeoff is that strong processing can make the speaker sound a bit digitized.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.2

Call mic quality is commonly reported as a strong point, with clear voice pickup and generally good intelligibility in everyday environments. Wind can still degrade clarity in harsher conditions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9

Call quality is good in quiet spaces and usable in noisier ones, but it is not best-in-class. Voices remain understandable, though they can sound slightly muffled or processed compared with stronger premium rivals.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Midrange performance is commonly praised for clear, present vocals and good everyday clarity, helping speech and music remain intelligible even at moderate volumes.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Midrange tuning is clear and well judged, keeping vocals and core instruments present even with the Buds 4's fuller bass. This helps the earbuds sound richer than many entry-level competitors.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
2.3

They connect to multiple platforms via Bluetooth, but advanced features and seamless switching are consistently described as ecosystem-dependent, working best inside Samsung’s device lineup.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.4

Basic listening works across devices, but the overall experience is plainly Samsung-centric. iPhone users and people mixing Apple, Windows, and Galaxy hardware lose access to several of the best features.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
1.0

True multipoint is repeatedly noted as missing. Samsung Auto Switch can approximate device switching within the Galaxy ecosystem but does not replace simultaneous two-device connections.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.0

Automatic switching is strongest inside the Galaxy ecosystem and notably less convenient elsewhere. Mixed-device users should expect more manual intervention than they would want at this price.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.6

Sealed ear tips are repeatedly credited for strong passive isolation and more consistent fit compared with unsealed designs. Seal quality varies by ear shape and included tip sizing, and some users may need third-party tips.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.1

Passive isolation is weak because the open design does not create a proper seal. That physical limitation is a big reason the ANC never becomes truly class-competitive.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Preset EQ profiles are generally seen as useful and well-implemented, with several reviewers preferring specific presets (for example, Dynamic) for a more engaging sound.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Sensors
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
2.7

Wear sensors are mentioned, but auto-pause behavior is described as limited or inconsistent (some note it does not auto-pause music reliably, or is used mainly for calls rather than playback controls).

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Smudge resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Matte finishes on buds/case are repeatedly described as less prone to fingerprints and smudges than glossier alternatives.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Setup and customization are straightforward on Galaxy phones and still manageable on other Android devices through Wearables. The biggest friction comes from Galaxy-only options rather than a confusing interface.

Sound quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.3

Sound is widely described as smooth, balanced, and surprisingly high quality for the price, with some reviewers preferring it to pricier Samsung buds. A minority found it less detailed or a bit muddy/v-shaped out of the box, and Samsung-only codec/settings can make a noticeable difference.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Sound quality is the clearest reason to buy the Buds 4. Across the reviews, the earbuds are praised for rich tuning, strong bass, clear vocals, and a presentation that beats many direct price rivals.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.3

Several reviews note a pleasantly wide, open soundstage for the price, with decent separation between elements, though not always matching more premium dual-driver models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

For everyday earbuds, the Buds 4 sound fairly open and spacious, especially with higher-quality Galaxy playback modes enabled. They do not sound huge, but they avoid the boxed-in feel common at this tier.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.3

Samsung 360 Audio/spatial features are mentioned as supported, but head tracking is repeatedly noted as missing on the FE. The effect is described as situationally enjoyable but sometimes diluting sound on music.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

Spatial audio is present as a headline feature, but clear enthusiasm is limited. It adds another box to the feature list more than it defines the Buds 4 listening experience.

Stability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.0

Stability is generally good for everyday wear with a proper seal, but at least one review warns they may not be rock-solid for high-impact activities like running compared with winged/fin-style designs.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

Fit stability is acceptable for regular daily use, but the open shape can shift enough to require adjustment. This is not the best pick for people who prioritize a locked-in feel.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.8

Pinch-and-swipe control responsiveness is often described as good once learned, but at least one reviewer reports finicky tap behavior (especially double/triple actions) and occasional jostling due to the light fit.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.5

Touch and stem-based controls are a strength. Reviewers repeatedly call them easy to locate, responsive, and customizable, with the flatter stem helping usability.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.1

Transparency/ambient mode is consistently rated as clear and natural for conversations and awareness, with adjustability. A light hiss/white noise at higher gain levels is mentioned by some reviewers.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.0

Treble is often characterized as clear but not overly fatiguing compared with some flagship tunings. A few reviewers reported the highs could sound splashy or less controlled depending on fit, EQ, and expectations.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.6

Treble comes through cleanly with good detail and vocal presence. Reviewers do not describe it as harsh or thin, which helps the Buds 4 avoid sounding brittle despite their lively tuning.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.0

Voice assistant integration is frequently referenced via hands-free Gemini and Samsung Bixby on compatible devices, alongside Samsung/Google AI features like interpreter and translation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0

Voice assistant support is solid on paper, with access to Bixby and Gemini plus Galaxy-focused conveniences. It adds real hands-free utility, even if reviewers do not treat it as the product's main selling point.

Volume output
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
4.8

Multiple reviewers describe very high loudness potential, sometimes bordering on too loud, making it easy to overpower noisy environments when needed.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE...
3.6

Buds 3 FE are repeatedly described as IP54-rated, suitable for sweat and light rain but not submersion. One included older Galaxy Buds FE review highlights much lower water resistance for that different model, underscoring model confusion in mixed sources.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.1

IP54 is enough for sweat and light splashes, making the Buds 4 workable for everyday workouts and commuting. Still, the rating is not especially rugged and is a downgrade from tougher earlier protection.