If you want better Noise isolation (passive)
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE Earbuds. It scores 4.6 vs 2.1 for Noise isolation (passive), with a 3.7 overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Galaxy Buds 4 for warm, comfortable everyday listening on Samsung and Android devices. Skip them if strong ANC or seamless switching across mixed-device setups matters more than sound quality.
Best for
Samsung and Android users who want open-fit earbuds with strong sound, easy controls, and plenty of tuning options. They fit everyday listening, commuting, office use, and casual calls better than heavy-noise environments.
Not for
Shoppers who need Bose-level ANC, long battery life, or effortless switching across Apple, Windows, and Galaxy hardware. They are also a weaker fit for people who want a sealed in-ear design for stronger passive isolation.
Verdict
The Galaxy Buds 4 succeed by focusing on the parts people notice most every day: rich, energetic sound, very good comfort, polished controls, and a feature set that feels deepest inside the Galaxy ecosystem. They are especially compelling for Samsung phone owners who want premium-feeling open earbuds without paying Pro prices. The tradeoff is clear: sound quality is a real strength, but noise canceling is only modest and ecosystem lock-in limits the experience on iPhone, Mac, and mixed-device setups. Battery life is acceptable rather than class-leading, and calls are usable but not best-in-class. For Android users who value audio quality and comfort over isolation, they land as a smart mainstream pick.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
EQ flexibility is unusually strong for mainstream earbuds, with both a multi-band equalizer and preset options available. This gives listeners real room to tailor the sound signature.
-
Android compatibility is strong, and Galaxy phones get the most complete experience. Non-Samsung Android users still get meaningful control through Samsung's software, but the best extras remain Galaxy-first.
-
Treble comes through cleanly with good detail and vocal presence. Reviewers do not describe it as harsh or thin, which helps the Buds 4 avoid sounding brittle despite their lively tuning.
-
Touch and stem-based controls are a strength. Reviewers repeatedly call them easy to locate, responsive, and customizable, with the flatter stem helping usability.
-
Sound quality is the clearest reason to buy the Buds 4. Across the reviews, the earbuds are praised for rich tuning, strong bass, clear vocals, and a presentation that beats many direct price rivals.
-
Connectivity looks strong overall, helped by Bluetooth 6.1 and solid range in real-world use. The bigger limitation is not dropouts but that the smartest switching behavior is mostly reserved for Samsung-centric setups.
-
For everyday earbuds, the Buds 4 sound fairly open and spacious, especially with higher-quality Galaxy playback modes enabled. They do not sound huge, but they avoid the boxed-in feel common at this tier.
-
Bass is a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it punchy, warm, and satisfyingly deep for an open-fit earbud. It is not as textured as the Pro model, but it gives the Buds 4 a lively, full sound.
-
Design feedback is favorable overall: slimmer stems, a cleaner case, and a more polished look improve the presentation. The main knock is that the styling still feels very close to Apple's template.
-
The case earns positive marks for its flatter layout, translucent lid, and practical physical pairing button. It feels useful and better thought out than a generic accessory shell.
-
Midrange tuning is clear and well judged, keeping vocals and core instruments present even with the Buds 4's fuller bass. This helps the earbuds sound richer than many entry-level competitors.
-
The Buds 4 separate vocals, synths, percussion, and layered mixes well for the class. They are not hyper-analytical, but they rarely sound congested or smeared.
-
Setup and customization are straightforward on Galaxy phones and still manageable on other Android devices through Wearables. The biggest friction comes from Galaxy-only options rather than a confusing interface.
-
Samsung's settings integration and Wearables app expose useful controls, EQ options, and ANC adjustments. The software feels feature-rich, though some advanced features stay exclusive to Galaxy phones.
-
Noise reduction during calls performs better than expected and can suppress loud background noise effectively. The tradeoff is that strong processing can make the speaker sound a bit digitized.
-
Build and finish are seen as more refined than the previous generation, with a more polished stem design and cleaner execution. The Buds 4 feel premium enough for the price, though not especially rugged.
-
Comfort is one of the Buds 4's biggest wins, especially for listeners who prefer open-fit earbuds or have smaller ears. The only caveat is that the looser fit can require occasional readjustment.
-
Voice assistant support is solid on paper, with access to Bixby and Gemini plus Galaxy-focused conveniences. It adds real hands-free utility, even if reviewers do not treat it as the product's main selling point.
-
Call quality is good in quiet spaces and usable in noisier ones, but it is not best-in-class. Voices remain understandable, though they can sound slightly muffled or processed compared with stronger premium rivals.
-
Battery life is acceptable rather than exceptional at roughly 5 to 6 hours from the buds and up to 30 hours with the case. Reviewers treat endurance as serviceable, not a category advantage.
Cons
-
IP54 is enough for sweat and light splashes, making the Buds 4 workable for everyday workouts and commuting. Still, the rating is not especially rugged and is a downgrade from tougher earlier protection.
-
Automatic switching is strongest inside the Galaxy ecosystem and notably less convenient elsewhere. Mixed-device users should expect more manual intervention than they would want at this price.
-
ANC is the main weakness. The open design limits sealing, so the effect is modest against chatter and steady noise and much less convincing against higher-frequency or sudden sounds, even if it appears somewhat improved over Buds 3.
-
Spatial audio is present as a headline feature, but clear enthusiasm is limited. It adds another box to the feature list more than it defines the Buds 4 listening experience.
-
Fit stability is acceptable for regular daily use, but the open shape can shift enough to require adjustment. This is not the best pick for people who prioritize a locked-in feel.
-
Basic listening works across devices, but the overall experience is plainly Samsung-centric. iPhone users and people mixing Apple, Windows, and Galaxy hardware lose access to several of the best features.
-
Passive isolation is weak because the open design does not create a proper seal. That physical limitation is a big reason the ANC never becomes truly class-competitive.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbud Headphones, this product is above average in Equalizer customization, below average in Noise isolation (passive), Multi-platform compatibility, Stability.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise isolation (passive) | 2.1 | 4.0 | -1.9 |
| Multi-platform compatibility | 2.4 | 3.9 | -1.5 |
| Stability | 2.8 | 4.2 | -1.4 |
| Active noise cancellation | 2.8 | 3.9 | -1.1 |
| Equalizer customization | 4.7 | 3.7 | +1.0 |
| Water/sweat resistance rating | 3.1 | 4.0 | -0.9 |
| Battery | 3.5 | 4.1 | -0.7 |
| Multipoint connectivity reliability | 3.0 | 3.6 | -0.6 |
FAQ
Are the Galaxy Buds 4 good for Samsung phones?
Yes. The reviews consistently describe the Buds 4 as most rewarding with Galaxy phones, where features like UHQ audio, deeper settings integration, and seamless ecosystem behavior are strongest.
How good is the ANC on the Galaxy Buds 4?
It is usable but not a standout. Multiple reviews say the open fit limits isolation, so ANC helps somewhat with chatter and steady noise but does not create a truly sealed, quiet experience.
Do the Galaxy Buds 4 work well with iPhone or mixed-device setups?
They work for basic listening, but the best features are tied to Samsung devices. Automatic switching and some advanced functions are limited outside the Galaxy ecosystem, so mixed-platform users get less value.
Is the sound quality better than the weak ANC?
For most reviewers, yes. The strongest praise goes to the Buds 4 sound, especially bass warmth, vocal clarity, and an expansive presentation, while ANC is usually described as the main compromise.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Multi-platform compatibility
Choose Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.4 for Multi-platform compatibility, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Active noise cancellation
Choose Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for Active noise cancellation, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Stability
Choose JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds. It scores 4.9 vs 2.8 for Stability, with a 3.8 overall score.
Overall Top Earbud Headphones Alternatives
Choose Sony WF-1000XM6 for top-tier noise canceling and a spacious, punchy sound; Skip if you struggle with foam-tip comfort/fit or want the most natural transparency and effortless Apple-first features.
Pros: USB-C, LDAC
Cons: None
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 for feature-hungry listeners who want a smart-case transmitter and lively sound. Skip if you need the smallest, most secure fit or demand best-in-class ANC and...
Pros: Dongle, Codec support
Cons: None
Choose for top-tier sound and a feature-rich, future-proof codec stack; Skip if you prioritize the very best ANC or consistently clean calls in wind/noise (especially on iPhone).
Pros: Codec support, aptX
Cons: Spatial audio, Find My
Choose Nothing Ear (a) if you want standout design, very good sound, and easy daily comfort for under $100. Skip it if you need class-leading transparency or wireless charging.
Pros: Comfort during long use, Software/setup simplicity
Cons: none