Compare Dreame H13 Pro Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner vs Bissell CrossWave OmniFind Cordless Vacuum

The included kit was praised as complete, with extras and detergent covering what users need to start.

Design impressions were consistently positive, with reviewers calling the vacuum sleek, stylish, modern, and high quality.

Smart/app feedback was a drawback overall: reviewers noted no app, though one said they did not miss it during testing.

Area rug performance was positive, with reviewers saying rugs cleaned well and did not feel overly wet.

Setup was easy across reviews, with assembly and initial preparation described as quick, straightforward, and direct.

Setup was consistently easy, with reviewers saying assembly was straightforward and instructions were clear.

Automatic standby behavior was a drawback because the machine can power off when it stands too upright.

Battery and charging were acceptable to good, with improved endurance and reasonable charging noted, but long charge time remained a caveat.

Battery feedback was mostly positive because it covered whole-home or hard-floor cleaning, though it was not class-leading.

The dirty-water collection design earned praise because the built-in strainer made disposal cleaner and easier.

Build quality was strongly praised, with workmanship described as visible and tangible.

Build quality was viewed positively, with reviewers describing the unit as sturdy, high-quality, and well-made.

Low-pile carpet performance was usable, especially for hair and dirt, though the product remained primarily a hard-floor cleaner.

Medium or fluffy carpet performance was poor enough that one reviewer said it did not make sense to use there.

Clogging risk appeared on medium or fluffy carpet testing, where dirt could block the suction hole and brush.

Comparative performance was mixed to positive: one reviewer preferred some competitors in feel, while another found the H13 Pro sensibly improved over its predecessor.

One reviewer found it much better than a previous Cross Wave, especially for drying.

Controls and display were generally praised, including useful turbo control, an informative LED display, and uncomplicated operation.

Controls were generally simple and intuitive, but mid-body button placement and upright shutoff were drawbacks.

Convertible design was a weakness because it does not transform into a dry vacuum like some related models.

The lack of handheld conversion limits above-floor and stair use.

Cordless operation was a recurring advantage, making the machine easier to move around rooms without being tethered.

Debris illumination was useful because it helped make hard-to-see dust visible.

Debris illumination was mostly praised for revealing fur and messes, though one reviewer was underwhelmed.

The dirty-water indicator was useful because it clearly prompted the user when the tank needed attention.

Dock noise was a drawback because the drying cycle was described as loud when running nearby.

Dock cleaning noise was a small drawback because the clean-out cycle was described as a little loud.

Dried-on stain removal was strong overall, though one reviewer needed several passes or minutes for difficult ketchup, coffee, and sauce tests.

Dried-on mess performance was mixed: some stubborn dirt came up well, but stuck-on food or tougher spots needed more scrubbing.

Ease of use was praised, including one-hand use and extremely easy guidance despite the machine's weight.

Ease of use was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers calling it intuitive, effortless, and life-easing.

Edge and baseboard cleaning was a strength, with reviewers praising dual-edge access and easy cleaning along walls.

Edges and corners were a repeated limitation, with reviewers saying it could not reach concealed crumbs or tight corners well.

Emptying and mess control were mixed: solids filtering helped, but one reviewer saw some debris fall back through the dirty-water tank filter.

Emptying and mess control were positive thanks to easy decanting, straining, and cleaner debris separation.

Auto mode was praised for improving power efficiency by avoiding full power when it is not needed.

The added dirty-water filter was welcomed, though the same review noted its implementation could be improved.

Drying feedback was mixed by surface: one reviewer found hard floors dried fast, while another found floors wetter than a mop.

Floorhead feedback was mixed, with one reviewer criticizing limited pivot and another finding the swiveling head pleasant.

The floorhead design was praised for its large brush roll and seal, which the reviewer linked to better drying.

The hard-floor seal was praised as part of why the machine dried floors well.

Fresh liquid pickup was strong, with milk, cereal, flour, egg, and similar wet messes handled well in testing.

Fresh liquid pickup was strong, with reviewers reporting fast pickup of spills and wet messes.

Hair-removal channel performance was praised because the roller scraper skillfully freed hair from the cleaning roller.

Hair pickup on carpets was positive on low carpet, where hair, fur, and dirt were picked up.

Carpet hair pickup was positive, with a reviewer saying it collected pet hair and crumbs well on carpets.

Hair pickup on floors was praised, including pet hair and long hair with no major issues reported.

Tangle resistance was a clear strength, with reviewers reporting no tangled pet hair or long-hair issues.

Hair-wrap resistance was a clear strength, with reviewers praising minimal hair wrap and easier detangling.

Fine dust pickup was praised through corner dust performance, helped by strong suction and illumination.

Large debris intake was strong, with cereal, milk, dirt, jam, and muesli handled successfully.

Large debris pickup was generally good, though cereal sometimes needed extra passes and could scatter.

LED/headlight performance was strongly praised for brightening the cleaning path and making dirt easier to see.

LED/headlight feedback was mostly positive, but one reviewer found the feature less impressive than on other power mops.

Heating-element feedback was split: one reviewer found the hot-water cleaning did not work, another had reservations, and another praised hot air and water self-cleaning.

Innovation was viewed as limited; one reviewer said it was not the most advanced or fancy floor cleaner.

The vacuum mop was viewed as useful for kid-related mealtime messes.

Low-profile design was a drawback because the unit cannot lie flat and reaches only a short distance under low furniture.

Maintenance was described as straightforward and limited, with most work reduced to tank cleaning and routine upkeep.

Maintenance was considered easier than similar machines, though users still need to empty, rinse, and dry parts.

Handling split reviewers: several praised easy steering and motor support, while one disliked the maneuverability and limited pivot.

Maneuverability was praised across reviews, with reviewers saying it glides, swerves around furniture, and feels easy to move.

Mopping performance earned strong praise across reviews for everyday floors, stubborn stains, and overall cleaning power.

Mopping performance was repeatedly praised for making floors visibly cleaner and handling everyday wet and dry messes.

Noise feedback was mixed to negative: one reviewer found operating volume standard, while another called prolonged use painful to the ears.

Noise was viewed positively during normal cleaning, with one reviewer saying it was quiet enough for nighttime use.

Odor control was praised after use, with no smell remaining on the rollers.

Odor feedback was mixed: cleaned floors could smell fresh, but the dirty tank can stink if it is not emptied.

Overall opinion was positive, but tempered by price; reviewers called it capable, convenient, and among the best while still noting cost issues.

Overall sentiment was strongly positive, with every reviewer recommending or praising the OmniFind despite caveats.

Packaging was praised as minimal, recyclable, and still protective.

Pet hair performance was praised, with the H13 Pro described as an excellent choice for homes with four-legged friends.

Pet hair pickup was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly praising its ability to lift hair and debris.

Value was a recurring caveat: reviewers liked the machine, but price made shortcomings harder to forgive and the product was not seen as a bargain.

Reviewers considered it worth considering for the price because of its two-in-one cleaning role and overall usefulness.

Runtime was generally positive, with reviewers citing respectable battery life, one-charge cleaning of about 80 m², and longer use time.

Runtime was generally enough for full-home or hard-floor cleaning, though the water tank could empty before the battery.

Sanitizing impressions were mixed: one reviewer doubted the practical utility of electrolysis, while another praised the bacteria-reduction system.

Surface safety was viewed positively because the reviewer said correct use would not damage delicate floor coverings.

Self-cleaning was usually praised as effective and low-effort, though one reviewer found the brush cleaning only average and another flagged battery gating.

The self-cleaning cycle was praised for simplifying cleanup and clearing hair, debris, and dirty water.

The self-propelled wheels were one of the clearest positives, repeatedly credited with easier pushing, gliding, and reduced arm strain.

The liquid system was limited by the lack of adjustable water-level control.

The liquid system earned praise for separating clean and dirty water, but reviewers disliked the lack of dry-only or water-off control.

Stair cleaning was a clear weakness because the machine is too large and does not convert to a handheld vacuum.

The compact charging station was viewed positively because it stayed small while still offering multiple functions.

Storage was mostly positive thanks to compact docking, though one reviewer found outlet placement frustrating.

Streaking and residue performance was excellent in the cited test, with no streaks left after floor cleaning.

Streaking and residue can occur if the cleaning-solution ratio is wrong.

Rug handling included a positive note that the machine did not get stuck at rug corners.

Reviewers who discussed suction described it as powerful, with one saying it devoured debris and another noting the higher suction made cleaning easier.

Reviewers generally found the suction effective for dirt and hair, though one noted there are limits to what it can pick up.

Heavy-duty suitability was supported by hard tests followed by effective self-cleaning.

Heavy-duty suitability is limited because reviewers framed it as a surface-cleaning tool rather than a deep scrubber.

Small-space suitability was positive thanks to a compact body and neat charging base.

Under-furniture cleaning was a weakness because the vacuum lacks the flexibility to reach far under sofas or flat furniture.

Versatility was supported by suction mode usefulness for vacuuming up liquids.

Reviewers valued the two-in-one vacuum-and-mop design, especially for everyday messes.

The large water tanks were appreciated, though one review noted a charging/self-cleaning dependency when the clean tank is empty.

Water tank feedback was mixed: the tank could run out quickly, but another reviewer used very little water during testing.

Weight feedback was mixed: the vacuum was heavy, but powered wheels and lighter feel helped offset it.

Weight was praised, with reviewers calling it lightweight and easy to carry or use.