Compare Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

P1 Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
P2 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • Auracast support is 4.5 vs 2.0. Auracast support is clearly present and repeatedly noted as useful for public or shared broadcasts.
  • Included accessories is 4.0 vs 2.5. Included-accessory evidence is limited to bundled ear tips and documentation.
  • Stability is 4.8 vs 3.5. Stability is strong for reviewers whose ears matched the shape, with evidence of perfect fit and secure wear.
  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.7 vs 3.5. Water and dust resistance is a strong point thanks to repeated IP57 evidence.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • LDAC is 4.5 vs 1.5. LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.
  • Multi-platform compatibility is 5.0 vs 2.8. Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.
  • Multipoint connectivity reliability is 4.8 vs 2.6. Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.
  • Android compatibility is 4.5 vs 3.1. Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.
Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

ANC is generally useful to strong, with several reviewers praising it, while others note it is not always class-leading or fit-proof.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.1

Android and Samsung compatibility is useful but restrictive, since the best features require Galaxy devices and some are Android-only.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

App
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

The app and settings experience is feature-rich, but one review called the Galaxy Wear app bare-bones and another notes a learning curve.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

aptX
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0

aptX support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with AptX hi-res formats.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.4

Latency evidence is mixed: common codecs are said to lag minimally, but hi-res settings and missing low-latency modes add caveats.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

Auracast support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Auracast support is clearly present and repeatedly noted as useful for public or shared broadcasts.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

Bass performance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Bass is a consistent strength, described as deep, energetic, punchy, and extended, though one review found it too strong on some tracks.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

Battery
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.3

Battery life is adequate but not a standout, with repeated six-hour ANC evidence and several concerns versus rivals.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Bluetooth support is modern and generally stable, centered on Bluetooth 6.1, with one review noting some dropouts.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

Build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Build quality evidence is limited but positive, including a reviewer saying the redesigned case feels more durable.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Hi-res playback is a strong Galaxy-specific feature, with repeated 24-bit/96kHz UHQ or SSC evidence.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

Button control usability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Pinch and stem controls are generally effective, though one review found the pinch area somewhat painful or awkward.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

The carry case is generally praised for its clear lid, magnetic feel, easier bud placement, and visibility.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

Charging
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Charging is a strength because reviewers cite wireless charging plus wired USB-C case charging.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

Codec support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Codec support is strong inside the Samsung ecosystem, but non-Samsung devices fall back to common lower codecs.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6

Comfort is widely praised, including long listening sessions, flights, and multi-hour use without fatigue for several reviewers.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Design sentiment is positive overall, with reviewers calling the buds premium, sleek, more polished, and better differentiated.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

Eartips fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.8

Fit is polarized: several reviewers found a secure seal, while others could not get the tips to seal or stay put.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.6

Ear-tip options are included, but proprietary tips and fit complaints reduce the practical flexibility.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

EQ customization is a major strength, with a nine-band EQ, custom mode, presets, and Wear app adjustment all supported.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

Find My
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Find My support is clearly present through Find My Earbuds and map-based finding references.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Frequency-response evidence is mixed: detail and clarity improve, but one review notes bass/high balance issues that may need EQ.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

Head gestures
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9

Head gestures are supported for calls and assistant interactions, though some reviewers had not fully tested them.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Included-accessory evidence is limited to bundled ear tips and documentation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

Instrument separation is repeatedly praised through comments about separated instruments, centered guitars, and textural detail.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Integrated microphones are clearly present and usable, but mic impressions range from ordinary to very good.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

LDAC
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.5

LDAC support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with LDAC formats.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

Lossless audio support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.2

Lossless support is mixed because Samsung hi-res playback is supported, but one review stresses true lossless Bluetooth is not available.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Reviewers who addressed clarity at output levels described clean, dynamic, distortion-free playback.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Microphone noise reduction is a clear strength in wind, traffic, and background-noise scenarios, though not every voice sample was perfect.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Call quality is usable to strong, but evidence is mixed because some reviewers heard fuzziness, digitization, or fit-related variability.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Midrange clarity is generally strong, with vocals, mids, and clear signatures receiving positive notes across several reviews.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.8

Multi-platform use is limited because non-Samsung devices can leave the product feeling incomplete.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.6

Multipoint is a weakness outside Samsung devices, with several reviews noting no true multipoint or manual switching limitations.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Passive isolation is strong when the tips seal well, but the benefit depends heavily on fit.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Portability is strong, with the case described as small, pocketable, and easy to carry.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

Preset EQ evidence is positive, especially for Samsung's Dynamic profile, which reviewers used to add punch or emphasize strengths.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

RGB lighting customization
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0

Lighting customization is not a feature here; evidence says the lighting element is gone.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Sensors
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Sensor-like smart features are strong, especially voice detection, siren detection, and adaptive behavior.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0

Sidetone support is present and lets users hear their own voice in the buds.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Smudge resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.2

Smudge resistance is a weakness because the transparent case section shows scratches and fingerprints.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.5

Setup and software access are workable, but reviewers note a learning curve around where controls live.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Sound quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6

Review evidence is strongly positive on overall sound, with reviewers calling the audio excellent, very good, or among Samsung's best.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

The available evidence points to a wider, more expansive stage rather than a cramped in-ear presentation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Spatial audio support is clearly present through 360 audio and head tracking, though some features are Android or Samsung-focused.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

Stability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8

Stability is strong for reviewers whose ears matched the shape, with evidence of perfect fit and secure wear.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3

Touch and gesture controls are mostly praised as responsive and easy to use once learned.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

Transparency and ambient modes are a highlight, often described as natural, clear, or useful for conversation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Treble is mostly praised for crispness, clarity, and sparkle, but one lab-style review found the highs weaker than ideal.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

USB-C
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5

USB-C support is consistently evidenced through case port mentions.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7

Value is context-dependent: Samsung users often get strong value, while non-Samsung users and upgraders face more caveats.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1

Voice assistant support is broad, with Bixby, Gemini, Google assistant, and built-in voice controls mentioned.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

Volume output
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8

Direct evidence is limited but positive, with one review saying maximum volume is far higher than needed.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.7

Water and dust resistance is a strong point thanks to repeated IP57 evidence.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4

The earbuds are described as light, with roughly 5g weight contributing to comfort.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.