Average score
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1
ANC is generally useful to strong, with several reviewers praising it, while others note it is not always class-leading or fit-proof.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.1
Android and Samsung compatibility is useful but restrictive, since the best features require Galaxy devices and some are Android-only.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.
App
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7
The app and settings experience is feature-rich, but one review called the Galaxy Wear app bare-bones and another notes a learning curve.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4
The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.
aptX
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0
aptX support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with AptX hi-res formats.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0
aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.4
Latency evidence is mixed: common codecs are said to lag minimally, but hi-res settings and missing low-latency modes add caveats.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.
Auracast support
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
Auracast support is clearly present and repeatedly noted as useful for public or shared broadcasts.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0
Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Bass is a consistent strength, described as deep, energetic, punchy, and extended, though one review found it too strong on some tracks.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.
Battery
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.3
Battery life is adequate but not a standout, with repeated six-hour ANC evidence and several concerns versus rivals.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Bluetooth support is modern and generally stable, centered on Bluetooth 6.1, with one review noting some dropouts.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.
Build quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
Build quality evidence is limited but positive, including a reviewer saying the redesigned case feels more durable.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6
Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.
Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
Hi-res playback is a strong Galaxy-specific feature, with repeated 24-bit/96kHz UHQ or SSC evidence.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8
Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.
Button control usability
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0
Pinch and stem controls are generally effective, though one review found the pinch area somewhat painful or awkward.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.
Carry case quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
The carry case is generally praised for its clear lid, magnetic feel, easier bud placement, and visibility.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5
Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.
Charging
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
Charging is a strength because reviewers cite wireless charging plus wired USB-C case charging.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
Codec support is strong inside the Samsung ecosystem, but non-Samsung devices fall back to common lower codecs.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6
Comfort is widely praised, including long listening sessions, flights, and multi-hour use without fatigue for several reviewers.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Design sentiment is positive overall, with reviewers calling the buds premium, sleek, more polished, and better differentiated.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.
Eartips fit
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.8
Fit is polarized: several reviewers found a secure seal, while others could not get the tips to seal or stay put.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.
Ear tip size options
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.6
Ear-tip options are included, but proprietary tips and fit complaints reduce the practical flexibility.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
EQ customization is a major strength, with a nine-band EQ, custom mode, presets, and Wear app adjustment all supported.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.
Find My
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Find My support is clearly present through Find My Earbuds and map-based finding references.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7
Frequency-response evidence is mixed: detail and clarity improve, but one review notes bass/high balance issues that may need EQ.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.
Head gestures
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.9
Head gestures are supported for calls and assistant interactions, though some reviewers had not fully tested them.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetIncluded accessories
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0
Included-accessory evidence is limited to bundled ear tips and documentation.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5
Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.
Instrument separation
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4
Instrument separation is repeatedly praised through comments about separated instruments, centered guitars, and textural detail.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9
Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.
Integrated microphone
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7
Integrated microphones are clearly present and usable, but mic impressions range from ordinary to very good.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetInterchangeable left/right bud design
P1Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.
LDAC
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.5
LDAC support is effectively absent based on evidence that the buds are not compatible with LDAC formats.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.
Lossless audio support
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.2
Lossless support is mixed because Samsung hi-res playback is supported, but one review stresses true lossless Bluetooth is not available.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetMaximum volume clarity
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
Reviewers who addressed clarity at output levels described clean, dynamic, distortion-free playback.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1
Microphone noise reduction is a clear strength in wind, traffic, and background-noise scenarios, though not every voice sample was perfect.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0
Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7
Call quality is usable to strong, but evidence is mixed because some reviewers heard fuzziness, digitization, or fit-related variability.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7
Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Midrange clarity is generally strong, with vocals, mids, and clear signatures receiving positive notes across several reviews.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.8
Multi-platform use is limited because non-Samsung devices can leave the product feeling incomplete.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.6
Multipoint is a weakness outside Samsung devices, with several reviews noting no true multipoint or manual switching limitations.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8
Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
Passive isolation is strong when the tips seal well, but the benefit depends heavily on fit.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
Portability is strong, with the case described as small, pocketable, and easy to carry.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4
Preset EQ evidence is positive, especially for Samsung's Dynamic profile, which reviewers used to add punch or emphasize strengths.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.
RGB lighting customization
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
1.0
Lighting customization is not a feature here; evidence says the lighting element is gone.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetSensors
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Sensor-like smart features are strong, especially voice detection, siren detection, and adaptive behavior.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetSidetone adjustment quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.0
Sidetone support is present and lets users hear their own voice in the buds.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetSmudge resistance
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
2.2
Smudge resistance is a weakness because the transparent case section shows scratches and fingerprints.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetSoftware/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.5
Setup and software access are workable, but reviewers note a learning curve around where controls live.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.
Sound leakage
P1Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5
Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.6
Review evidence is strongly positive on overall sound, with reviewers calling the audio excellent, very good, or among Samsung's best.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.
Soundstage depth
P1Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
The available evidence points to a wider, more expansive stage rather than a cramped in-ear presentation.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2
Spatial audio support is clearly present through 360 audio and head tracking, though some features are Android or Samsung-focused.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6
Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.
Stability
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8
Stability is strong for reviewers whose ears matched the shape, with evidence of perfect fit and secure wear.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5
Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.
Touch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.3
Touch and gesture controls are mostly praised as responsive and easy to use once learned.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.
Transparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
Transparency and ambient modes are a highlight, often described as natural, clear, or useful for conversation.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6
Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1
Treble is mostly praised for crispness, clarity, and sparkle, but one lab-style review found the highs weaker than ideal.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.5
USB-C support is consistently evidenced through case port mentions.
P2Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yetValue for money
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
3.7
Value is context-dependent: Samsung users often get strong value, while non-Samsung users and upgraders face more caveats.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.
Voice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.1
Voice assistant support is broad, with Bixby, Gemini, Google assistant, and built-in voice controls mentioned.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.8
Direct evidence is limited but positive, with one review saying maximum volume is far higher than needed.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.
Water/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.7
Water and dust resistance is a strong point thanks to repeated IP57 evidence.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5
Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.4
The earbuds are described as light, with roughly 5g weight contributing to comfort.
P2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.