Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds Review

Brand: Technics
Released: January 7, 2025
Updated: 3 months ago
4.3
Overall review score
347
Review evidence points
50
Scored features
19
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a consistently secure workout fit.

Best for

Best for listeners who want detailed, spacious, bass-capable earbuds with strong ANC, long battery life, LDAC, deep EQ controls, and reliable multipoint across several devices.

Not for

Not for buyers who need consistently excellent call quality, the most natural transparency mode, top Bose-level silence, or a gym-first fit that stays locked during vigorous movement.

Verdict

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earn their strongest praise for sound: reviewers repeatedly describe the audio as clear, detailed, spacious, punchy, and unusually strong in bass for true wireless earbuds. ANC, battery life, LDAC support, multipoint, and EQ depth also stand out as meaningful premium strengths. The tradeoff is consistency outside pure listening. Transparency mode ranges from natural to processed or hissy, call quality swings from excellent to unusable, and fit depends heavily on ear shape. They come across as audiophile-leaning all-rounders with excellent everyday features, but not the safest pick for people who prioritize calls, gym stability, or absolute noise-cancelling above sound.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    22 (44%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (48%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    2 (4%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.7, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.
  • 4.7
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Bass performance: 4.7, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.
  • 4.7
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 4.7, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Multipoint connectivity reliability: 4.8, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Equalizer customization: 4.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Midrange clarity: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Cons

  • 2.0
    1 review
    aptX: 2.0, 1 review
    aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Auracast support: 2.0, 1 review
    Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Included accessories: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Sound leakage: 2.5, 1 review
    Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in LDAC, Volume output, Bass performance, near average in Eartips fit, Design and Aesthetics, below average in Auracast support, Included accessories, Sound leakage.

Comparison summary

50 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    30 (60%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (28%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    6 (12%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Auracast support 2.0 3.6 -1.6
LDAC 4.5 3.1 +1.3
Volume output 5.0 3.8 +1.2
Included accessories 2.5 3.6 -1.1
Bass performance 4.7 3.9 +0.8
Equalizer customization 4.5 3.8 +0.8
Multipoint connectivity reliability 4.8 3.9 +0.8
Bluetooth 5.0 4.0 +1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better Microphone noise reduction

Choose Sony WF-1000XM5 Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 4.0 for Microphone noise reduction, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Auracast support

Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Auracast support, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

airpods Pro 2

  • Cheaper: price The review says the AZ100 costs more than airpods Pro 2.

AirPods Pro 3

  • Better: fit and ANC The reviewer moved daily use to AirPods Pro 3 because of fit and industry-leading ANC.

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds

  • Better: ANC The review says Bose is still better at some mid-frequency silencing, though Technics comes close.

FAQ

Do the Technics EAH-AZ100 sound good?

Yes. Reviewers strongly agree that sound quality is the main strength, with praise for clarity, detail, bass control, instrument separation, and spaciousness.

How good is the noise cancellation?

Most reviewers rate ANC highly and say it handles everyday noise well. Several still note that Bose-style noise cancellation can beat it, especially if silence is the top priority.

Are the AZ100 comfortable?

Comfort is mostly positive thanks to the smaller, lighter design and multiple ear tips. Fit is still ear-dependent, with some reviewers reporting bulk, looseness, or weaker workout security.

Is call quality reliable?

Call quality is the most divided area. Some reviewers praise the Voice Focus AI and wind reduction, while others report robotic sound, choppy voices, or poor call clarity.

How is the app and EQ?

The app gets strong marks for customization, especially the eight-band EQ, control remapping, ANC settings, and multipoint options. A few reviewers find the layout clunky or menu-heavy.

Are they good for Android users?

Yes. Reviewers praise Android-friendly strengths such as LDAC playback, fast pairing, and strong feature support, while the earbuds remain usable across iOS and Android.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Earbuds to Consider

#1 Activo Scoop
4.7

Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...

Pros: Sound quality, Midrange clarity

Cons: Software/setup simplicity, Portability/foldability

#2 JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...

Pros: Codec support, Dongle

Cons: Sound leakage, Find My

#3 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4 Earbuds
4.3

Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...

Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability

Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction

#4 Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro
4.2

Choose them for superb sound, strong ANC and deep Samsung integration, especially if comfort and calls matter. Skip them if you need true multipoint, class-leading battery life, or a universally...

Pros: Sensors, Weight comfort

Cons: Warranty and support service, Ear-tip replacement