Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a consistently secure workout fit.
Best for
Best for listeners who want detailed, spacious, bass-capable earbuds with strong ANC, long battery life, LDAC, deep EQ controls, and reliable multipoint across several devices.
Not for
Not for buyers who need consistently excellent call quality, the most natural transparency mode, top Bose-level silence, or a gym-first fit that stays locked during vigorous movement.
Verdict
The Technics EAH-AZ100 earn their strongest praise for sound: reviewers repeatedly describe the audio as clear, detailed, spacious, punchy, and unusually strong in bass for true wireless earbuds. ANC, battery life, LDAC support, multipoint, and EQ depth also stand out as meaningful premium strengths. The tradeoff is consistency outside pure listening. Transparency mode ranges from natural to processed or hissy, call quality swings from excellent to unusable, and fit depends heavily on ear shape. They come across as audiophile-leaning all-rounders with excellent everyday features, but not the safest pick for people who prioritize calls, gym stability, or absolute noise-cancelling above sound.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 44% 22 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 48% 24 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 4% 2 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 4% 2 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.
-
Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.
-
Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.
-
Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.
-
Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.
-
Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.
-
Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.
-
Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.
-
Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.
-
Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.
-
Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.
-
Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.
-
Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.
-
Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.
-
EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.
-
Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.
-
LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.
-
Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.
-
Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.
-
Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.
-
Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.
-
Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.
-
The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.
-
ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.
-
Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.
-
Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.
-
Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.
-
Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.
-
Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.
-
Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.
-
Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.
-
Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.
-
Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.
-
Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.
-
Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.
-
Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.
-
Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.
-
Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.
-
Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.
-
Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.
-
Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.
-
Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.
-
Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.
-
Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.
-
Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.
-
Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.
Cons
-
Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.
-
Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.
-
aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.
-
Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in LDAC, Equalizer customization, Volume output, below average in Auracast support, Included accessories.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 75% 6 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 25% 2 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auracast support | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| LDAC | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| Included accessories | 2.5 | 3.7 | -1.2 |
| Equalizer customization | 4.5 | 3.7 | +0.9 |
| Volume output | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| Bass performance | 4.7 | 4.0 | +0.7 |
| Maximum volume clarity | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| Multipoint connectivity reliability | 4.8 | 3.9 | +0.9 |
FAQ
Do the Technics EAH-AZ100 sound good?
Yes. Reviewers strongly agree that sound quality is the main strength, with praise for clarity, detail, bass control, instrument separation, and spaciousness.
How good is the noise cancellation?
Most reviewers rate ANC highly and say it handles everyday noise well. Several still note that Bose-style noise cancellation can beat it, especially if silence is the top priority.
Are the AZ100 comfortable?
Comfort is mostly positive thanks to the smaller, lighter design and multiple ear tips. Fit is still ear-dependent, with some reviewers reporting bulk, looseness, or weaker workout security.
Is call quality reliable?
Call quality is the most divided area. Some reviewers praise the Voice Focus AI and wind reduction, while others report robotic sound, choppy voices, or poor call clarity.
How is the app and EQ?
The app gets strong marks for customization, especially the eight-band EQ, control remapping, ANC settings, and multipoint options. A few reviewers find the layout clunky or menu-heavy.
Are they good for Android users?
Yes. Reviewers praise Android-friendly strengths such as LDAC playback, fast pairing, and strong feature support, while the earbuds remain usable across iOS and Android.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 3.9
Article Reviews
popsci.com
- Review score
- 4.6
techradar.com
- Review score
- 4.4
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
airpods Pro 2
- Cheaper: price The review says the AZ100 costs more than airpods Pro 2.
AirPods Pro 3
- Better: fit and ANC The reviewer moved daily use to AirPods Pro 3 because of fit and industry-leading ANC.
Bose QC Ultra Earbuds
- Better: ANC The review says Bose is still better at some mid-frequency silencing, though Technics comes close.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Microphone noise reduction
Choose Sony WF-1000XM5 Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 4.0 for Microphone noise reduction, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Transparency mode quality
Choose Status Pro X Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.4 vs 3.6 for Transparency mode quality, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Included accessories
Choose Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 2.5 for Included accessories, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Auracast support
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Auracast support, with a 4.2 overall score.
Top Earbuds to Consider
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Codec support, Dongle
Cons: Sound leakage, Find My
Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...
Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability
Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction
Choose the Sennheiser CX 80U for detailed, comfortable USB-C wired listening at a low price. Skip them if you need deep sub-bass, waterproofing, wireless features, volume buttons, or a cleaner...
Pros: Comfort during long use, USB-C
Cons: Microphone noise reduction, Water/sweat resistance rating
Choose the Denon PerL Pro if personalized, spacious sound and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need small earbuds, class-leading ANC, or natural transparency mode.
Pros: Audio-video sync accuracy, Multi-platform compatibility
Cons: LDAC, Weight comfort