Compare SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones vs Marshall Major V

P1 SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
P2 Marshall Major V

Comparison Takeaways

SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Features at launch is 4.5 vs 2.0. Feature set at launch impressed the reviewer because the specification looked unusually strong for the price.
  • Active noise cancellation is 4.3 vs 1.9. ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient...
  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 2.4. Codec support was praised mainly because LDAC appeared in such a low-priced headphone.
  • Sound leakage is 4.5 vs 2.6. Sound leakage evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting minimal leakage.

Marshall Major V

Where It Has the Edge

  • 3.5mm analog input availability is 4.2 vs 1.0. The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick...
  • Aesthetics / discreet profile is 4.4 vs 2.0. Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.
  • Button control usability is 4.7 vs 2.7. Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive...
  • Treble clarity is 3.4 vs 1.8. Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated,...
Average score
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.7
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8
3.5mm analog input availability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.0

The lack of a headphone jack was a clear drawback in the one review that evaluated analog input availability.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2

The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick useful or cool.

Active noise cancellation
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient noise.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.9

Reviewers repeatedly flagged the absence of ANC as the Major V's biggest feature gap, especially for commuting, flights, and loud environments.

Advanced software features
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Advanced features were praised as unusually generous for the low price.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5

Advanced software and feature impressions were mixed: battery preservation impressed, but feature depth lagged some competitors.

Aesthetics / discreet profile
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Discreet/aesthetic appeal was weak in Tom's Guide, which said the headphones paled next to other sub-$50 designs.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4

Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.

ANC background noise level
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

ANC background noise was present in one review, but it was not considered disturbing once music played.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
ANC effect on sound signature
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8

ANC's effect on the sound signature was favorable where tested because the tonal balance stayed essentially unchanged.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
ANC sound impact on audio
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8

ANC did not meaningfully harm audio in the reviews that evaluated it, with sound staying consistent across ANC modes.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
Android compatibility
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Android compatibility evidence was positive through LDAC use, which a reviewer said could reveal more clarity.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.3

Android compatibility was weakened by missing higher-quality Android-friendly codecs such as aptX or LDAC.

App
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

The app was polarizing: reviewers liked its controls and simplicity, but others found it buggy, laggy, crash-prone or poorly translated.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8

App opinions were mixed: support and customization were major upgrades, but some reviewers found the app buggy, basic, or limited.

aptX
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.3

aptX support was criticized because reviewers specifically noted that aptX or aptX Adaptive was missing.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Audio-video sync was mostly strong, with several reviewers reporting no lag, while one reviewer heard no meaningful low-latency difference.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3

Reviewers who discussed sync reported no noticeable delay or expected LE Audio benefits for video use.

Auracast support
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3

Auracast support was praised as rare and forward-looking, though some comments depended on future firmware or ecosystem adoption.

Bass performance
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Bass was often praised as punchy, warm and adjustable, though one reviewer felt the low-end emphasis contributed to an unbalanced sound.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2

Bass impressions skewed positive for punch and warmth, though a few reviewers found the low end light or uneven depending on tuning.

Battery
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.9

Battery life had the strongest agreement, with reviewers repeatedly calling 60-90 hour playback excellent, outstanding or top-tier.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0

Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the 100-hour class endurance and real-world longevity.

Bluetooth
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Bluetooth behavior was praised for strong range, solid connection and fast pairing across multiple reviews.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3

Bluetooth was described positively where reviewers referenced modern or useful wireless capabilities rather than just listing the version.

Bluetooth version
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Bluetooth 5.4 was praised for range, efficiency and current-generation capability.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
Build quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Build quality was mixed: many found it solid for the price, while others criticized plastic feel, wobble or budget materials.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3

Build quality was generally praised as rugged, tough, and durable, though not always premium-looking.

Button control usability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7

Button controls were a repeated concern, with reversed or counterintuitive mappings offset by a few comments that basic controls worked.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.7

Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive and reliable.

Cable quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Cable impressions were weak because reviewers repeatedly criticized the included USB-C cable as very short or stubby.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.3

Cable impressions were mixed: one reviewer liked the retro detail, while another disliked the tangling coiled cable.

Carry case quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.9

Carry protection was a consistent weakness because reviewers repeatedly complained that no case, pouch, or tote was included.

Charging
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Charging was praised for useful fast-charge behavior, especially five-minute top-ups that add hours of listening.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6

Charging was mostly praised for fast, USB-C, and wireless charging, though several reviewers found wireless placement fiddly or unreliable.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.9

Clamp force divided reviewers, ranging from secure and well balanced to tight enough to cause discomfort.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.6

Clamp force feedback was mixed, ranging from gentle or moderate to too tight or uncomfortable depending on head shape and use.

Codec support
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Codec support was praised mainly because LDAC appeared in such a low-priced headphone.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.4

Codec support was mixed-to-weak: LC3/LE Audio helped, but reviewers criticized the lack of higher-quality codecs.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6

Comfort was highly split: some reviewers wore them comfortably for long sessions, while others found clamp, weight or pressure tiring.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

Long-wear comfort was highly divided, with many praising light padding and hours-long comfort while others reported pressure, heat, or glasses discomfort.

Connectivity options
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Connectivity options were useful where reviewed, especially wired fallback and simple USB-C plug-and-play use.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

Connectivity options were praised for wired listening, sharing audio, and useful device switching.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Design opinions leaned positive for a simple, modern or premium look, though one review found the aesthetics weak versus budget rivals.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6

The retro Marshall design was widely praised as distinctive, classic, stylish, and aligned with the brand's rock identity.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

The detachable analog cable was praised for enabling the music-sharing trick with another pair of headphones.

Durability over time
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Long-term durability had limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who expected the construction to last normally.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8

Durability-over-time comments were positive where reviewers expected the headphones to survive years of use or abuse.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Ear cup padding was consistently positive, with reviewers describing the pads as soft, cushiony or well covered.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6

Ear cup padding was consistently praised as thick, soft, plush, or squishy enough to help the on-ear fit.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

The rotating earcups were useful because they helped the headphones lie flat and improve portability.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0

One review praised the ear cups' 90-degree tilt as part of the flexible fit system.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

EQ customization was a strength, with reviewers valuing custom EQ and preset controls despite one review noting no custom EQ option.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.9

EQ customization was useful and often praised, though some reviewers said its effect was subtle or insufficient.

Features at launch
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Feature set at launch impressed the reviewer because the specification looked unusually strong for the price.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0

Launch feature set was criticized as limited, especially compared with competitors that include ANC, transparency, cases, or richer apps.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7

Frequency balance varied by reviewer, from a pleasant non-harsh V-shape to unbalanced, dull overall tonality.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0

Measured frequency-response commentary was negative, with one review saying the tuning deviated drastically from the preferred curve.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Headband adjustment received limited but positive evidence for helping achieve a good fit.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8

Headband adjustment was praised for smooth sliding rails and flexible adjustability.

Headband padding quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Headband padding evidence was mixed, with one reviewer finding it too soft and another liking the padded feel.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.3

Headband padding feedback was mixed, with one review praising full soft coverage and another calling it thin.

Hinge durability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Hinge durability evidence was negative in the one review that judged the hinged earcups too wobbly.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.5

One reviewer disliked the way the metal hinges stick out when folded, making hinge design a minor caveat.

Immersive audio quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

Immersive audio quality was mixed, as one reviewer liked vocal heightening but disliked artificial movie effects.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.2

Included accessories were a weakness because reviewers noted the bare-bones box, no case and limited included cable.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0

Included accessories were criticized as skimpy because reviewers expected more protection or extras for the price.

Instrument separation
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4

Reviewers who focused on separation generally praised stereo placement, detail visibility, and the ability to follow individual sound elements.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

The integrated microphone received positive limited evidence from one reviewer who found the captured voice good enough for calls.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

The integrated mic array was praised in one review as working well for clear recordings.

LDAC
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

LDAC was treated as a strong perk, improving perceived clarity or adding high-resolution capability for supported devices.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.5

LDAC was criticized as a missing advantage versus a competing Android-focused headphone.

LE Audio readiness
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2

LE Audio readiness was treated as a forward-looking advantage for streaming, sync, and Auracast-related future use.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

Reviewers noted that the headphones could play loudly without obvious strain and still had headroom.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Microphone noise reduction was praised by some reviewers for cutting background noise, but one review noted robotic or distant voice artifacts.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4

Microphone noise reduction received positive comments for cleaning up office, cafe, and ambient noise around speech.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Call microphone quality was inconsistent but often positive, ranging from average or weak in cars/noise to excellent in several reviews.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2

Call quality was usually praised, with reviewers hearing loud, clear, understandable voice capture; one found it noisy but usable.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

Midrange impressions were mixed, with clear mids in one review but dipped, coarse, meh or shouty vocals in several others.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.1

Midrange clarity was often praised for vocals and detail, but some reviewers heard recessed or deficient mids.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positive in the review that tested switching between iOS/macOS and Android devices.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0

Multi-platform use was positive where one reviewer reported seamless switching between phone and laptop.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Multipoint and dual-device switching were judged reliable and seamless where tested.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2

Multipoint generally worked well, though one reviewer noted playback must be paused on one device before switching.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Passive isolation was decent overall, but one reviewer noted an imperfect seal while another praised low leakage and passive isolation.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.2

Passive isolation was mixed: the pads muffled some office chatter and ambient sound, but on-ear fit still let plenty through.

Overall recommendation
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Overall recommendations leaned positive for budget buyers, though one critical review advised saving money for another option.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.1

Overall recommendations were mixed-to-positive: many reviewers recommended the headphones for battery, design, and casual use, but with clear caveats.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Portability was strong thanks to folding or flat-rotating earcups and compact storage.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.9

Portability and foldability were consistently praised because the headphones collapse very small and fit easily in bags.

Premium feel
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3

Premium feel was divided, from clearly not premium to surprisingly premium depending on the reviewer.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.0

Premium feel was mixed: the design could look special, but some reviewers said the materials did not feel expensive.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.9

Preset EQ quality was generally useful, although Tom's Guide found only about half worth selecting.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

Preset EQ feedback was limited but positive when reviewers singled out balanced or useful presets.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

Replaceable earpads were a plus in reviews that noted removable pads or replacement cups.

Smart listening features
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.9

Smart listening features were useful for quick Spotify, EQ, or assistant access, though one reviewer found the M button nonessential.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Smudge resistance had limited but positive evidence from the matte finish resisting fingerprints.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Setup simplicity was positive overall, with reviewers describing the app or setup flow as simple, easy or seamless.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5

Setup was easy out of the box in one review, but app responsiveness and connection reliability were criticized elsewhere.

Sound leakage
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Sound leakage evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting minimal leakage.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.6

Sound leakage was mixed-to-negative, with some office-safe results but several warnings about leakage at higher volumes.

Sound quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Reviewers split on sound: several called it warm, balanced or very good for casual listening, while others found it dull, average or uneven.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

Most reviewers liked the lively Marshall-leaning sound, but several found it average, treble-heavy, distant, or not competitive for audiophiles.

Soundstage width
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6

Soundstage evidence was mixed: spatial processing and some tuning added width, but other reviewers found the stage narrow or unimpressive.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.4

Soundstage ranged from surprisingly wide and dynamic to compact, intimate, or under-imaged depending on the reviewer.

Spatial audio
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Spatial audio was mostly seen as a pleasant width or immersion booster, with caveats that it is not flagship-level or can sound artificial.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

One review said Dolby Atmos playback still had kick despite the lack of noise cancelling.

Stability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.7

Stability was mostly good and snug, though one reviewer reported sliding during gym bench use.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5

Fit stability was mixed: some reviews praised secure fit, while others found head movement could shift or dislodge the headphones.

Streaming service integration
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8

Spotify integration was praised by Spotify users as genuinely useful for starting or cycling music quickly.

Sustainability and repairability
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8

Repairability was viewed as a plus because reviewers noted battery replacement through Marshall's repair program.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Transparency mode was generally useful and sometimes excellent, though one reviewer heard some distortion in ambient sound.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yet
Travel friendliness
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Travel friendliness was positive, with reviewers tying the headphones to commuting, on-the-go use and long battery life.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

Travel friendliness was mixed-to-positive: small size and battery helped, while no ANC and no case limited flights and loud travel.

Treble clarity
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.8

Treble was a recurring weakness in the critical reviews, described as blunt or over-exaggerated and sharp.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.4

Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated, or clustered.

USB-C
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2

USB-C was viewed positively for charging and plug-and-play wired use, though cable length remained a separate complaint.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

USB-C charging was viewed positively, especially as a more reliable option than fiddly wireless charging.

Value for money
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.6

Value was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones high-value or a strong deal for the price.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.6

Value was split: reviewers liked the battery, design, and sound for the price, but many felt ANC competitors offered more.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Voice assistant use was positive where evaluated, with reliable speech recognition and swift interactions.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0

Voice assistant use was positive in the review that tested Google Assistant and Siri.

Voice prompts/feedback
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Voice feedback was present and usable, but the reviewer described learning the non-verbal audio cues rather than clear voice prompts.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

Marshall's guitar-riff feedback tones were described as a nice brand touch by reviewers who mentioned them.

Volume output
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3

Volume output was split, with one reviewer saying it lacked maximum volume and another calling the volume good.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5

One reviewer found normal listening volume more than sufficient, with extra output available if needed.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.5

Reviewers treated the lack of IP or water resistance as a real limitation for rain, sweat, hikes, and outdoor use.

Weight comfort
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.4

Weight comfort was mixed, with some reviewers calling the headphones light enough and others finding the weight noticeable or heavy.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8

Low weight was a consistent strength, with reviewers calling the headphones light, barely noticeable, and easy to wear.

Wind noise handling
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Wind handling was mixed, with one reviewer praising wind resistance and another saying wind noise could still be an issue.

Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3

Wind handling was only discussed in microphone-test contexts and was generally positive alongside noisy-condition call performance.