Average score
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.7
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8
3.5mm analog input availability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.0
The lack of a headphone jack was a clear drawback in the one review that evaluated analog input availability.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2
The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick useful or cool.
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient noise.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.9
Reviewers repeatedly flagged the absence of ANC as the Major V's biggest feature gap, especially for commuting, flights, and loud environments.
Advanced software features
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Advanced features were praised as unusually generous for the low price.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5
Advanced software and feature impressions were mixed: battery preservation impressed, but feature depth lagged some competitors.
Aesthetics / discreet profile
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0
Discreet/aesthetic appeal was weak in Tom's Guide, which said the headphones paled next to other sub-$50 designs.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4
Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.
ANC background noise level
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0
ANC background noise was present in one review, but it was not considered disturbing once music played.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetANC effect on sound signature
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8
ANC's effect on the sound signature was favorable where tested because the tonal balance stayed essentially unchanged.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetANC sound impact on audio
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8
ANC did not meaningfully harm audio in the reviews that evaluated it, with sound staying consistent across ANC modes.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetAndroid compatibility
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Android compatibility evidence was positive through LDAC use, which a reviewer said could reveal more clarity.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.3
Android compatibility was weakened by missing higher-quality Android-friendly codecs such as aptX or LDAC.
App
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
The app was polarizing: reviewers liked its controls and simplicity, but others found it buggy, laggy, crash-prone or poorly translated.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8
App opinions were mixed: support and customization were major upgrades, but some reviewers found the app buggy, basic, or limited.
aptX
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.3
aptX support was criticized because reviewers specifically noted that aptX or aptX Adaptive was missing.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Audio-video sync was mostly strong, with several reviewers reporting no lag, while one reviewer heard no meaningful low-latency difference.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3
Reviewers who discussed sync reported no noticeable delay or expected LE Audio benefits for video use.
Auracast support
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3
Auracast support was praised as rare and forward-looking, though some comments depended on future firmware or ecosystem adoption.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Bass was often praised as punchy, warm and adjustable, though one reviewer felt the low-end emphasis contributed to an unbalanced sound.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2
Bass impressions skewed positive for punch and warmth, though a few reviewers found the low end light or uneven depending on tuning.
Battery
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.9
Battery life had the strongest agreement, with reviewers repeatedly calling 60-90 hour playback excellent, outstanding or top-tier.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0
Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the 100-hour class endurance and real-world longevity.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Bluetooth behavior was praised for strong range, solid connection and fast pairing across multiple reviews.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3
Bluetooth was described positively where reviewers referenced modern or useful wireless capabilities rather than just listing the version.
Bluetooth version
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Bluetooth 5.4 was praised for range, efficiency and current-generation capability.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetBuild quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
Build quality was mixed: many found it solid for the price, while others criticized plastic feel, wobble or budget materials.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3
Build quality was generally praised as rugged, tough, and durable, though not always premium-looking.
Button control usability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7
Button controls were a repeated concern, with reversed or counterintuitive mappings offset by a few comments that basic controls worked.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.7
Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive and reliable.
Cable quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0
Cable impressions were weak because reviewers repeatedly criticized the included USB-C cable as very short or stubby.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.3
Cable impressions were mixed: one reviewer liked the retro detail, while another disliked the tangling coiled cable.
Carry case quality
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.9
Carry protection was a consistent weakness because reviewers repeatedly complained that no case, pouch, or tote was included.
Charging
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5
Charging was praised for useful fast-charge behavior, especially five-minute top-ups that add hours of listening.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6
Charging was mostly praised for fast, USB-C, and wireless charging, though several reviewers found wireless placement fiddly or unreliable.
Clamping force comfort
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.9
Clamp force divided reviewers, ranging from secure and well balanced to tight enough to cause discomfort.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.6
Clamp force feedback was mixed, ranging from gentle or moderate to too tight or uncomfortable depending on head shape and use.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5
Codec support was praised mainly because LDAC appeared in such a low-priced headphone.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.4
Codec support was mixed-to-weak: LC3/LE Audio helped, but reviewers criticized the lack of higher-quality codecs.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6
Comfort was highly split: some reviewers wore them comfortably for long sessions, while others found clamp, weight or pressure tiring.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
Long-wear comfort was highly divided, with many praising light padding and hours-long comfort while others reported pressure, heat, or glasses discomfort.
Connectivity options
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Connectivity options were useful where reviewed, especially wired fallback and simple USB-C plug-and-play use.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
Connectivity options were praised for wired listening, sharing audio, and useful device switching.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Design opinions leaned positive for a simple, modern or premium look, though one review found the aesthetics weak versus budget rivals.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6
The retro Marshall design was widely praised as distinctive, classic, stylish, and aligned with the brand's rock identity.
Detachable cable convenience
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
The detachable analog cable was praised for enabling the music-sharing trick with another pair of headphones.
Durability over time
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Long-term durability had limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who expected the construction to last normally.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8
Durability-over-time comments were positive where reviewers expected the headphones to survive years of use or abuse.
Ear cup padding quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1
Ear cup padding was consistently positive, with reviewers describing the pads as soft, cushiony or well covered.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.6
Ear cup padding was consistently praised as thick, soft, plush, or squishy enough to help the on-ear fit.
Ear cup swivel/rotation range
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
The rotating earcups were useful because they helped the headphones lie flat and improve portability.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0
One review praised the ear cups' 90-degree tilt as part of the flexible fit system.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1
EQ customization was a strength, with reviewers valuing custom EQ and preset controls despite one review noting no custom EQ option.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.9
EQ customization was useful and often praised, though some reviewers said its effect was subtle or insufficient.
Features at launch
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5
Feature set at launch impressed the reviewer because the specification looked unusually strong for the price.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0
Launch feature set was criticized as limited, especially compared with competitors that include ANC, transparency, cases, or richer apps.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7
Frequency balance varied by reviewer, from a pleasant non-harsh V-shape to unbalanced, dull overall tonality.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0
Measured frequency-response commentary was negative, with one review saying the tuning deviated drastically from the preferred curve.
Headband adjustability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Headband adjustment received limited but positive evidence for helping achieve a good fit.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8
Headband adjustment was praised for smooth sliding rails and flexible adjustability.
Headband padding quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
Headband padding evidence was mixed, with one reviewer finding it too soft and another liking the padded feel.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.3
Headband padding feedback was mixed, with one review praising full soft coverage and another calling it thin.
Hinge durability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0
Hinge durability evidence was negative in the one review that judged the hinged earcups too wobbly.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.5
One reviewer disliked the way the metal hinges stick out when folded, making hinge design a minor caveat.
Immersive audio quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0
Immersive audio quality was mixed, as one reviewer liked vocal heightening but disliked artificial movie effects.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetIncluded accessories
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.2
Included accessories were a weakness because reviewers noted the bare-bones box, no case and limited included cable.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.0
Included accessories were criticized as skimpy because reviewers expected more protection or extras for the price.
Instrument separation
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4
Reviewers who focused on separation generally praised stereo placement, detail visibility, and the ability to follow individual sound elements.
Integrated microphone
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
The integrated microphone received positive limited evidence from one reviewer who found the captured voice good enough for calls.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
The integrated mic array was praised in one review as working well for clear recordings.
LDAC
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
LDAC was treated as a strong perk, improving perceived clarity or adding high-resolution capability for supported devices.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.5
LDAC was criticized as a missing advantage versus a competing Android-focused headphone.
LE Audio readiness
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2
LE Audio readiness was treated as a forward-looking advantage for streaming, sync, and Auracast-related future use.
Maximum volume clarity
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
Reviewers noted that the headphones could play loudly without obvious strain and still had headroom.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Microphone noise reduction was praised by some reviewers for cutting background noise, but one review noted robotic or distant voice artifacts.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.4
Microphone noise reduction received positive comments for cleaning up office, cafe, and ambient noise around speech.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8
Call microphone quality was inconsistent but often positive, ranging from average or weak in cars/noise to excellent in several reviews.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2
Call quality was usually praised, with reviewers hearing loud, clear, understandable voice capture; one found it noisy but usable.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0
Midrange impressions were mixed, with clear mids in one review but dipped, coarse, meh or shouty vocals in several others.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.1
Midrange clarity was often praised for vocals and detail, but some reviewers heard recessed or deficient mids.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Multi-platform compatibility was positive in the review that tested switching between iOS/macOS and Android devices.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
5.0
Multi-platform use was positive where one reviewer reported seamless switching between phone and laptop.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Multipoint and dual-device switching were judged reliable and seamless where tested.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.2
Multipoint generally worked well, though one reviewer noted playback must be paused on one device before switching.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
Passive isolation was decent overall, but one reviewer noted an imperfect seal while another praised low leakage and passive isolation.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.2
Passive isolation was mixed: the pads muffled some office chatter and ambient sound, but on-ear fit still let plenty through.
Overall recommendation
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1
Overall recommendations leaned positive for budget buyers, though one critical review advised saving money for another option.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.1
Overall recommendations were mixed-to-positive: many reviewers recommended the headphones for battery, design, and casual use, but with clear caveats.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.4
Portability was strong thanks to folding or flat-rotating earcups and compact storage.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.9
Portability and foldability were consistently praised because the headphones collapse very small and fit easily in bags.
Premium feel
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3
Premium feel was divided, from clearly not premium to surprisingly premium depending on the reviewer.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.0
Premium feel was mixed: the design could look special, but some reviewers said the materials did not feel expensive.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.9
Preset EQ quality was generally useful, although Tom's Guide found only about half worth selecting.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
Preset EQ feedback was limited but positive when reviewers singled out balanced or useful presets.
Replaceable earpads
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
Replaceable earpads were a plus in reviews that noted removable pads or replacement cups.
Smart listening features
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.9
Smart listening features were useful for quick Spotify, EQ, or assistant access, though one reviewer found the M button nonessential.
Smudge resistance
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Smudge resistance had limited but positive evidence from the matte finish resisting fingerprints.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetSoftware/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Setup simplicity was positive overall, with reviewers describing the app or setup flow as simple, easy or seamless.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5
Setup was easy out of the box in one review, but app responsiveness and connection reliability were criticized elsewhere.
Sound leakage
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5
Sound leakage evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting minimal leakage.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
2.6
Sound leakage was mixed-to-negative, with some office-safe results but several warnings about leakage at higher volumes.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8
Reviewers split on sound: several called it warm, balanced or very good for casual listening, while others found it dull, average or uneven.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
Most reviewers liked the lively Marshall-leaning sound, but several found it average, treble-heavy, distant, or not competitive for audiophiles.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6
Soundstage evidence was mixed: spatial processing and some tuning added width, but other reviewers found the stage narrow or unimpressive.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.4
Soundstage ranged from surprisingly wide and dynamic to compact, intimate, or under-imaged depending on the reviewer.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Spatial audio was mostly seen as a pleasant width or immersion booster, with caveats that it is not flagship-level or can sound artificial.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
One review said Dolby Atmos playback still had kick despite the lack of noise cancelling.
Stability
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.7
Stability was mostly good and snug, though one reviewer reported sliding during gym bench use.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.5
Fit stability was mixed: some reviews praised secure fit, while others found head movement could shift or dislodge the headphones.
Streaming service integration
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8
Spotify integration was praised by Spotify users as genuinely useful for starting or cycling music quickly.
Sustainability and repairability
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.8
Repairability was viewed as a plus because reviewers noted battery replacement through Marshall's repair program.
Transparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3
Transparency mode was generally useful and sometimes excellent, though one reviewer heard some distortion in ambient sound.
P2Product 2: Marshall Major V
No score yetTravel friendliness
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2
Travel friendliness was positive, with reviewers tying the headphones to commuting, on-the-go use and long battery life.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
Travel friendliness was mixed-to-positive: small size and battery helped, while no ANC and no case limited flights and loud travel.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.8
Treble was a recurring weakness in the critical reviews, described as blunt or over-exaggerated and sharp.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.4
Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated, or clustered.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2
USB-C was viewed positively for charging and plug-and-play wired use, though cable length remained a separate complaint.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
USB-C charging was viewed positively, especially as a more reliable option than fiddly wireless charging.
Value for money
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.6
Value was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones high-value or a strong deal for the price.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
3.6
Value was split: reviewers liked the battery, design, and sound for the price, but many felt ANC competitors offered more.
Voice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0
Voice assistant use was positive where evaluated, with reliable speech recognition and swift interactions.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.0
Voice assistant use was positive in the review that tested Google Assistant and Siri.
Voice prompts/feedback
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
Voice feedback was present and usable, but the reviewer described learning the non-verbal audio cues rather than clear voice prompts.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
Marshall's guitar-riff feedback tones were described as a nice brand touch by reviewers who mentioned them.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3
Volume output was split, with one reviewer saying it lacked maximum volume and another calling the volume good.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.5
One reviewer found normal listening volume more than sufficient, with extra output available if needed.
Water/sweat resistance rating
P1Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
1.5
Reviewers treated the lack of IP or water resistance as a real limitation for rain, sweat, hikes, and outdoor use.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.4
Weight comfort was mixed, with some reviewers calling the headphones light enough and others finding the weight noticeable or heavy.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.8
Low weight was a consistent strength, with reviewers calling the headphones light, barely noticeable, and easy to wear.
Wind noise handling
P1
Product 1: SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5
Wind handling was mixed, with one reviewer praising wind resistance and another saying wind noise could still be an issue.
P2
Product 2: Marshall Major V
4.3
Wind handling was only discussed in microphone-test contexts and was generally positive alongside noisy-condition call performance.