If you want better Cable quality
Choose JLab JBuds Lux ANC Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Cable quality, with a 3.7 overall score.
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the SonoFlow SE HQ31 if you want very long battery life, effective ANC, LDAC and strong value on a budget. Skip it if clamp comfort, polished controls, reliable app behavior or refined sound matter most.
Best for
Best for budget-focused commuters, students and casual listeners who want long battery life, useful ANC, LDAC and EQ flexibility without paying premium prices.
Not for
Not for audiophiles, comfort-sensitive listeners, or buyers who need a polished app, intuitive controls, a 3.5mm jack, premium materials or consistently strong microphones.
Verdict
Across the reviews, the SonoFlow SE HQ31 comes across as a budget headphone that overdelivers on stamina, ANC, LDAC support and overall value. Reviewers repeatedly praise the battery life, usable transparency mode, flexible EQ options and surprisingly strong noise cancellation for the price. The main tradeoff is refinement: comfort splits sharply because some reviewers found the clamp and weight tiring, while app reliability and button layout drew repeated criticism. Sound quality is also context-dependent, ranging from warm and enjoyable to dull, narrow or uneven in the mids and treble. The strongest case is practical daily use rather than audiophile listening or premium ergonomics.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
63 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.08 (13%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.440 (63%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (8%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros
-
Battery life had the strongest agreement, with reviewers repeatedly calling 60-90 hour playback excellent, outstanding or top-tier.
-
Value was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones high-value or a strong deal for the price.
-
ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient noise.
-
Transparency mode was generally useful and sometimes excellent, though one reviewer heard some distortion in ambient sound.
-
Design opinions leaned positive for a simple, modern or premium look, though one review found the aesthetics weak versus budget rivals.
-
Overall recommendations leaned positive for budget buyers, though one critical review advised saving money for another option.
Cons
-
Cable impressions were weak because reviewers repeatedly criticized the included USB-C cable as very short or stubby.
-
Treble was a recurring weakness in the critical reviews, described as blunt or over-exaggerated and sharp.
-
The lack of a headphone jack was a clear drawback in the one review that evaluated analog input availability.
-
Included accessories were a weakness because reviewers noted the bare-bones box, no case and limited included cable.
-
Discreet/aesthetic appeal was weak in Tom's Guide, which said the headphones paled next to other sub-$50 designs.
-
Hinge durability evidence was negative in the one review that judged the hinged earcups too wobbly.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in LDAC, ANC sound impact on audio, ANC effect on sound signature, near average in Soundstage width, Overall recommendation, below average in 3.5mm analog input availability, Treble clarity, Aesthetics / discreet profile.
Comparison summary
63 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher15 (24%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts27 (43%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower21 (33%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm analog input availability | 1.0 | 3.8 | -2.8 |
| Treble clarity | 1.8 | 3.9 | -2.2 |
| Aesthetics / discreet profile | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| Hinge durability | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| Button control usability | 2.7 | 4.2 | -1.5 |
| Included accessories | 2.2 | 3.7 | -1.6 |
| LDAC | 4.3 | 3.0 | +1.3 |
| Immersive audio quality | 3.0 | 4.3 | -1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Aesthetics / discreet profile
Choose 1MORE SonoFlow-Pro Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Aesthetics / discreet profile, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Comfort during long use
Choose EarFun Wave Life Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.6 vs 3.6 for Comfort during long use, with a 3.6 overall score.
If you want better Button control usability
Choose Marshall Major V. It scores 4.7 vs 2.7 for Button control usability, with a 3.9 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Worse: battery life The HQ31 is credited with longer ANC battery life than Sony WH-1000XM5.
- More expensive: price versus premium noise-cancellers The HQ31 is described as much more affordable than Sony WH-1000XM5.
- Better: volume and liveliness The Edifier WH950NB is described as louder and livelier than the HQ31.
- Better: comfort and sound Tom's Guide says Sony WH-CH720N offers greater comfort and sound than the HQ31.
FAQ
Is the SonoFlow SE HQ31 good for noise cancellation?
Yes, most reviewers found ANC strong for the price, especially against low, steady sounds like traffic, fans or commute noise. It does not fully match flagship Bose or Sony-level noise cancellation.
How good is the battery life?
Battery life is the clearest strength across the reviews. Reviewers repeatedly cited up to 90 hours without ANC, long ANC runtime and useful five-minute fast charging.
Are these headphones comfortable for long sessions?
Comfort is mixed. Some reviewers found the padding soft and the headphones easy to wear, while others complained about tight clamp force, pressure or noticeable weight after about an hour.
How is the sound quality?
The sound is good enough for many casual listeners, with punchy bass and useful EQ options. Critical reviewers found the mids, treble, soundstage or overall tonality less refined.
Is the app worth using?
The app adds ANC controls, EQ, LDAC, spatial audio and other useful settings. However, some reviewers found it buggy, laggy, crash-prone or awkwardly translated.
Are they good for calls?
Call quality varies by review. Several reviewers praised clear calls and noise reduction, while others found the microphone only average or weak in noisy conditions.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.0
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.2
Article Reviews
expertreviews.co.uk
- Review score
- 3.1
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 3.2
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality
Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort
Cons: Volume output, aptX
Best for spacious, detailed home listening, excellent comfort, and premium construction. Skip it for commuting, private shared-space use, built-in voice chat, or subwoofer-like bass impact.
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Glasses and hat compatibility
Cons: Travel friendliness, Sound leakage
Choose the Strada for premium build, long-session comfort, strong isolation and an unusually spacious closed-back presentation. Skip it if you have a small head, dislike energetic treble, or want consistently...
Pros: Hinge durability, Durability over time
Cons: Ear cup swivel/rotation range, Portability/foldability