Compare JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds vs Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

P1 JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
P2 Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

Comparison Takeaways

JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Stability is 4.9 vs 2.8. Stability is one of the product's best traits, with the twist-lock wing design keeping the buds secure through...
  • Multi-platform compatibility is 4.4 vs 2.4. Compatibility looks broad, with successful use across phones, laptops, watches, and support for both Google and Microsoft quick-pair...
  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.8 vs 3.1. The IP68 buds are extremely well-suited to sweaty training and rainy runs, making durability against dust and water...
  • Multipoint connectivity reliability is 4.5 vs 3.0. Multipoint was a meaningful win, with seamless switching between devices highlighted as one of the more premium-feeling features...

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

Where It Has the Edge

  • Voice assistant integration is 4.0 vs 1.0. Voice assistant support is solid on paper, with access to Bixby and Gemini plus Galaxy-focused conveniences. It adds...
  • Treble clarity is 4.6 vs 3.0. Treble comes through cleanly with good detail and vocal presence. Reviewers do not describe it as harsh or...
  • Touch control responsiveness is 4.5 vs 3.3. Touch and stem-based controls are a strength. Reviewers repeatedly call them easy to locate, responsive, and customizable, with...
  • Carry case quality is 4.3 vs 3.3. The case earns positive marks for its flatter layout, translucent lid, and practical physical pairing button. It feels...
Average score
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.8
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0

ANC is useful for taking the edge off treadmills, office chatter, and travel noise, but every detailed reviewer said it falls clearly short of premium earbuds. ANC and ambient tuning are adjustable in the app, but reviewers generally felt those sliders and sport-mode tweaks made only modest real-world differences.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

ANC is the main weakness. The open design limits sealing, so the effect is modest against chatter and steady noise and much less convincing against higher-frequency or sudden sounds, even if it appears somewhat improved over Buds 3.

Android compatibility
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

Android support looks solid thanks to Google Fast Pair support and no reported compatibility red flags, though direct Android testing was limited.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.6

Android compatibility is strong, and Galaxy phones get the most complete experience. Non-Samsung Android users still get meaningful control through Samsung's software, but the best extras remain Galaxy-first.

App
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

The JBL app adds meaningful tuning options, sports modes, and control customization, but several reviewers found some mode behavior inconvenient or not especially impactful.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Samsung's settings integration and Wearables app expose useful controls, EQ options, and ANC adjustments. The software feels feature-rich, though some advanced features stay exclusive to Galaxy phones.

Bass performance
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.7

Bass is decent and workout-friendly, but multiple reviews suggest it benefits from EQ boosting rather than sounding especially punchy on the default tuning.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Bass is a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it punchy, warm, and satisfyingly deep for an open-fit earbud. It is not as textured as the Pro model, but it gives the Buds 4 a lively, full sound.

Battery
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8

Battery life is a standout strength, with reviewers consistently praising the long single-charge runtime and strong total endurance with the case.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.5

Battery life is acceptable rather than exceptional at roughly 5 to 6 hours from the buds and up to 30 hours with the case. Reviewers treat endurance as serviceable, not a category advantage.

Bluetooth
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7

Connection stability was excellent in testing, with easy room-range use during workouts and no reported dropouts.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Connectivity looks strong overall, helped by Bluetooth 6.1 and solid range in real-world use. The bigger limitation is not dropouts but that the smartest switching behavior is mostly reserved for Samsung-centric setups.

Build quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2

Build and finish are seen as more refined than the previous generation, with a more polished stem design and cleaner execution. The Buds 4 feel premium enough for the price, though not especially rugged.

Carry case quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3

The case is functional but not a highlight: it is on the larger side, only lightly protected against moisture, and can pick up wear in a gym bag.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

The case earns positive marks for its flatter layout, translucent lid, and practical physical pairing button. It feels useful and better thought out than a generic accessory shell.

Charging
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4

Charging performance is strong, with quick-charge support and reasonable full-charge times repeatedly called out as practical positives.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Comfort during long use
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

Long-session comfort is unusually good for winged sports buds, with reviewers noting they stayed comfortable through runs, workouts, and daily use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1

Comfort is one of the Buds 4's biggest wins, especially for listeners who prefer open-fit earbuds or have smaller ears. The only caveat is that the looser fit can require occasional readjustment.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9

The design is sporty and available in appealing colors, but the buds are still noticeably chunky and protrude more than slimmer everyday earbuds.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Design feedback is favorable overall: slimmer stems, a cleaner case, and a more polished look improve the presentation. The main knock is that the styling still feels very close to Apple's template.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

The included three ear-tip sizes were a useful fit aid, though one reviewer still felt the overall shell size may be too large for smaller ears.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Equalizer customization
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1

EQ customization is a real plus, letting users add extra bass or adjust the sound for workouts without needing third-party tools.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.7

EQ flexibility is unusually strong for mainstream earbuds, with both a multi-band equalizer and preset options available. This gives listeners real room to tailor the sound signature.

Find My
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0

One reviewer explicitly noted that there is no Find My-style locating feature, which limits convenience compared with some rivals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1

Accessory support is good for the class, with extra ear tips, wing options or covers, and a charging cable included in the box.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

The Buds 4 separate vocals, synths, percussion, and layered mixes well for the class. They are not hyper-analytical, but they rarely sound congested or smeared.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1

The earbuds include an onboard multi-mic setup that works well enough for routine calls and general hands-free use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

At higher volumes, clarity drops off and upper-range detail compresses, so these do not stay especially clean when pushed hard.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9

Call noise handling is respectable rather than exceptional, keeping traffic and background noise fairly controlled without fully erasing it.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2

Noise reduction during calls performs better than expected and can suppress loud background noise effectively. The tradeoff is that strong processing can make the speaker sound a bit digitized.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

Call quality is generally clear and usable, though voices can sound slightly hollow instead of especially rich or natural.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9

Call quality is good in quiet spaces and usable in noisier ones, but it is not best-in-class. Voices remain understandable, though they can sound slightly muffled or processed compared with stronger premium rivals.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1

Midrange performance is one of the stronger parts of the tuning, with vocals and core musical content coming through clearly for the price.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Midrange tuning is clear and well judged, keeping vocals and core instruments present even with the Buds 4's fuller bass. This helps the earbuds sound richer than many entry-level competitors.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4

Compatibility looks broad, with successful use across phones, laptops, watches, and support for both Google and Microsoft quick-pair systems.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.4

Basic listening works across devices, but the overall experience is plainly Samsung-centric. iPhone users and people mixing Apple, Windows, and Galaxy hardware lose access to several of the best features.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

Multipoint was a meaningful win, with seamless switching between devices highlighted as one of the more premium-feeling features at this price.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.0

Automatic switching is strongest inside the Galaxy ecosystem and notably less convenient elsewhere. Mixed-device users should expect more manual intervention than they would want at this price.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.1

Passive isolation is weak because the open design does not create a proper seal. That physical limitation is a big reason the ANC never becomes truly class-competitive.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.2

Portability is only average because both the buds and especially the case are a bit bulky compared with more pocket-friendly alternatives.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.7

The preset sports profiles are more interesting on paper than in practice, with reviewers often describing them as gimmicky or only mildly different.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

Setup is straightforward, with easy pairing and uncomplicated day-one use standing out as low-friction strengths.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3

Setup and customization are straightforward on Galaxy phones and still manageable on other Android devices through Wearables. The biggest friction comes from Galaxy-only options rather than a confusing interface.

Sound quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0

Overall sound quality is good for the money and enjoyable for workouts and casual listening, but it does not deliver premium detail, depth, or polish.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

Sound quality is the clearest reason to buy the Buds 4. Across the reviews, the earbuds are praised for rich tuning, strong bass, clear vocals, and a presentation that beats many direct price rivals.

Soundstage width
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4

For everyday earbuds, the Buds 4 sound fairly open and spacious, especially with higher-quality Galaxy playback modes enabled. They do not sound huge, but they avoid the boxed-in feel common at this tier.

Spatial audio
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

Spatial audio is present as a headline feature, but clear enthusiasm is limited. It adds another box to the feature list more than it defines the Buds 4 listening experience.

Stability
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.9

Stability is one of the product's best traits, with the twist-lock wing design keeping the buds secure through running, gym work, and sweaty sessions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8

Fit stability is acceptable for regular daily use, but the open shape can shift enough to require adjustment. This is not the best pick for people who prioritize a locked-in feel.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3

Touch controls are usable but not ideal for exercise, with some lag and reduced reliability versus physical buttons, especially with sweat or gloves.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.5

Touch and stem-based controls are a strength. Reviewers repeatedly call them easy to locate, responsive, and customizable, with the flatter stem helping usability.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

Transparency mode is the most divisive feature: one reviewer found it fairly natural, but the more detailed running-focused reviews said traffic awareness was still lacking.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0

Treble and upper-range clarity are only middling, with repeated comments about limited sparkle, detail, and openness up top.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.6

Treble comes through cleanly with good detail and vocal presence. Reviewers do not describe it as harsh or thin, which helps the Buds 4 avoid sounding brittle despite their lively tuning.

USB-C
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5

USB-C charging is included and treated as an expected but welcome convenience for everyday use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Value for money
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8

Value is a major selling point, with every review framing the Endurance Race 2 as a feature-rich, sports-focused bargain that undercuts pricier rivals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Voice assistant integration
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0

Voice assistant support is absent according to one review, which is a notable feature gap even at a budget price.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0

Voice assistant support is solid on paper, with access to Bixby and Gemini plus Galaxy-focused conveniences. It adds real hands-free utility, even if reviewers do not treat it as the product's main selling point.

Volume output
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8

Maximum loudness is below average for the category, and multiple reviewers had to raise volume more than expected during outdoor runs.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet
Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8

The IP68 buds are extremely well-suited to sweaty training and rainy runs, making durability against dust and water one of the clearest strengths.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.1

IP54 is enough for sweat and light splashes, making the Buds 4 workable for everyday workouts and commuting. Still, the rating is not especially rugged and is a downgrade from tougher earlier protection.

Weight comfort
Product 1: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.2

Even though the shells are fairly large, reviewers still described them as light enough to stay comfortable during movement and longer sessions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet