Compare Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Roborock Qrevo MaxV Robot Vacuum and Mop

Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.

Accessories vary by package: some reviewers got spare bags/mop parts, while others reported few or no extra consumables.

Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.

Design feedback is mixed: many like the clean white look, while others find it basic or worry the glossy finish shows marks/scratches.

Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.

The Roborock app is widely praised for deep customization, schedules, and map edits; a few mention missing/quirky workflows (e.g., open-plan room splitting).

With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.

Mixed-floor homes benefit from mop-lift + carpet detection, letting it clean rugs without soaking them in many cases.

Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.

Setup is repeatedly described as quick: minimal assembly, straightforward app onboarding, and fast initial mapping.

Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.

Battery life is commonly cited around 180 minutes, with reliable recharge-and-resume behavior and good efficiency.

The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.

Bagged auto-emptying and onboard bin capacity are viewed as convenient, with reports of weeks-long bag life in typical use.

Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.

Build quality impressions vary: some find it solid, while others say materials feel less premium than Roborock’s flagship lines.

Deep/high-pile carpet cleaning is strong for a single-roller bot, but some reviewers say dual-roller flagships still clean thicker carpets better.

Low-pile rugs are handled very well in both tests and everyday cleaning.

Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.

Carpet performance is generally strong, though at least one test reported weaker results on medium-pile compared with low-pile or top competitors.

Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.

In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.

Comparative testing often places it near the top for overall vacuum+mop combos, with tradeoffs mainly versus pricier flagships.

Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.

The app controls are generally clear and feature-rich; the built-in voice assistant is seen as helpful by some but limited/overly sensitive by others.

The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.

Corners remain a common limitation (round body + geometry), even though edge cleaning is strong.

Crevice pickup is generally above average, with some tests showing it can pull debris from fairly deep cracks.

Dirty-water/dirt sensing is cited as useful for triggering extra mop washing when pads are especially dirty.

The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.

The dock is a core strength (auto-empty + hot-water mop washing + drying), but it still requires water-tank service and occasional tray/plate cleaning.

Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.

Dried-on stain results are strong (coffee/grape/sauce), sometimes ranking near the top; the most stubborn spots may need extra passes.

Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.

Overall usability is high once configured, but convenience drops if you regularly need to pre-tidy cords or de-tangle long hair.

Edge/baseboard mopping is a standout due to the extending mop, with repeated mentions of near wall-to-wall coverage.

Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.

Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.

Auto-emptying is described as clean and convenient; you still need to replace bags and manage dirty water.

HEPA-style filtration and sealed dust handling are mentioned as effective, with no major dust-containment complaints.

Mopping leaves a thin layer that dries quickly, and the dock’s pad drying helps reduce lingering dampness.

Long-hair wrap on the side brush is a recurring complaint and can be time-consuming to clean.

Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.

Carpet hair pickup is strong overall, though occasional clumps/fluff can still need a quick touch-up.

Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.

Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently praised, including for pet hair.

The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.

Main-brush tangling is usually well controlled, but long hair can still wrap the side brush and needs periodic clearing.

Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.

Hard-floor fine debris pickup is consistently excellent in tests and daily use.

Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is a strength, though tight inside corners can still be a weak spot.

Headlights/LEDs are noted as helpful in low light, supporting more consistent cleaning in darker rooms.

At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.

A relatively low body for a LiDAR robot helps it reach under more furniture, though the sensor turret still limits very low clearances.

Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.

Automation reduces upkeep, but reviewers still mention periodic brush hair removal and cleaning the wash tray/plate.

It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.

Maps are detailed and coverage is efficient, but some tests note slower overall run times and occasional quirks segmenting open floor plans.

The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.

Mop lift height (often cited around 10 mm) is repeatedly praised for keeping carpets/rugs drier during mixed runs.

Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.

Mopping is widely rated excellent for daily maintenance and coverage; a few compare it as slightly less ‘deep scrub’ than top sonic/vibrating systems.

Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.

Often described as quiet for its performance (some measurements/estimates around low‑50 dB), though max power is still noticeable.

Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.

Obstacle avoidance is mixed: some report cable/small-item misses, while others (especially post-update) see meaningful improvement.

Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.

Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.

Ongoing costs mainly come from dust bags and wear items; some reviewers explicitly flag bag replacement as a recurring expense.

Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.

Packaging is praised as well organized in at least one review, making unboxing/setup smoother.

Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.

Pet hair pickup is a frequent highlight, and some reviews mention pet-focused modes/behaviors and monitoring features.

Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.

Value depends heavily on sale price: several call it feature-packed for the money, but many still label it expensive at MSRP.

The camera enables remote viewing/video calls; at least one reviewer flags camera-equipped robots as a privacy dealbreaker and suggests choosing camera-free if concerned.

Automatic mop washing/drying is strong, but some reviewers note the wash plate/board gets dirty and needs manual cleaning; periodic pad washing helps.

One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.

A documented firmware update improved obstacle avoidance in testing, suggesting active software tuning and support.

The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.

Multiple reviews call out limited/no detergent dosing (or not being able to use solution), a notable gap versus some rivals.

The dock is tall/space-hungry and needs a dedicated spot, even if it’s slimmer than some competitors’ stations.

Streaking is generally low, with settings/features that help keep finish even; deep-scrub expectations may still require tuning.

Reviews often report few rescues, with good threshold handling and less tendency to get stranded or stuck.

Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.

Strong 7,000‑Pa-class suction in reviews, with solid pickup across surfaces; a few note flagships can still edge it on deepest crevices or thick carpet.

Reliability notes are mostly positive (stable operation/connectivity), though obstacle/cable situations can still cause interruptions if floors aren’t prepped.

Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.

Under-furniture/toe-kick reach is highlighted as better than average in hands-on use.

Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.

Large dock tanks reduce refill frequency in some homes, but dirty-water emptying can be frequent if you mop often.