Compare Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Eufy S2 Omni

Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.

Included extras are solid for a flagship robot vacuum, with reviewers noting cleaning solution, fragrance modules, documentation, and extra dust bags in the box.

The S2's chassis-lift feature is repeatedly presented as a major upgrade for plush rugs, thresholds, and higher-pile carpet handling.

Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.

Reviewers generally liked the modern, visible-tech design, translucent top, lighting, and premium styling, though the dock can be taller than some alternatives.

Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.

AI navigation, 3D mapping, floor-type recognition, and app controls are useful, but the deepest independent test found app customization and smart-home integration behind rivals.

With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.

Area rug handling is a notable strength in several reviews, with the S2 lifting, avoiding tassels, and preventing rugs from bunching or getting pushed around.

Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.

Setup is consistently described as simple, with the app and base display guiding pairing, mapping, and first cleaning with little friction.

Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.

Battery comments are mostly positive, but measured coverage varies sharply by suction level and real-world recharge time can be long.

The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.

The dustbin and bag system benefits from automatic emptying and strong dock suction, reducing hands-on bin work.

Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.

Build quality impressions are positive, with reviewers calling the construction solid and the overall package premium.

High-pile and thick-rug handling is a split point: several reviewers praised climbing and deep cleaning, while one lab-style test found carpet agitation underwhelming versus rivals.

Low/mixed carpet pickup is usable, but independent testing found it did not clearly outperform cheaper Eufy models or the older S1 Pro in deep-clean scoring.

Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.

Medium-pile carpet evidence is limited but positive, with one review citing solid medium-pile results.

Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.

Child lock exists on the station controls, though one reviewer noted it can reduce the touchscreen's practical usefulness.

Cyclonic separation and filter cleanliness are strong recurring themes, with reviewers finding suction stayed strong and filters avoided clogging.

In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.

Comparisons are mixed: the S2 improves on some Eufy weaknesses and beats some rivals in specific tests, but other flagships remain stronger for carpet, mopping feel, or value.

Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.

The app and station controls are generally easy to use, with clean navigation and touchscreen controls, but advanced customization is not class-leading.

The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.

Corner cleaning benefits from an extending side brush, though independent tests suggest the robot can still leave perimeter gaps depending on the run.

Groove and crevice evidence is positive for cracks but mixed for grout, where one test removed only part of the residue.

Cyclone performance is one of the clearest strengths: multiple reviewers praised multi-cyclone separation for maintaining airflow and keeping filters cleaner.

Dirty-water sensing evidence comes mainly from the dock's intelligent dirt detection, which can trigger additional washing or cleaning when water is dirty.

The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.

The dock is a major strength, handling auto-emptying, mop washing, drying, refilling, and hair-heavy debris with few clog complaints.

Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.

Dried-on stain removal is usually good for normal household stains, though heavy grout or extreme dried-mud testing is less certain.

Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.

Everyday use is easy, with scheduling, automatic routines, and low-touch maintenance repeatedly mentioned as benefits.

Edge and baseboard mopping is mixed: some reviewers liked the extending roller, while the most critical tester found visible wall gaps.

Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.

Edge-following accuracy is one of the weaker areas, with independent testing saying it rides too far from walls and sometimes avoids edges inconsistently.

Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.

Dust containment and filtration are strong, with filters repeatedly staying clean after weeks of use and cyclonic separation keeping fine dust away from airflow.

The floorhead design stands out for its wide roller mop, extending mop head, and dual-brush anti-tangle layout.

Hard floors can look clean and shiny after mopping, though this evidence comes from one strong hands-on review.

Fresh wet-mess pickup evidence is positive in tomato sauce testing, where the robot picked up the mess without smearing.

Hair-removal channel behavior is positive overall: reviewers reported no tangles and center-channel hair removal working as intended.

Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.

Hair pickup on carpets is strong when the priority is hair management, even if carpet agitation is not always class-leading.

Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.

Hard-floor hair pickup appears strong, with reviewers finding minimal buildup on the roller after cleaning.

The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the strongest consensus wins, especially for long-hair and pet households.

Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is strong, including cocoa powder and fine-particle references, with no visible residue in several tests.

Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.

Large debris intake is strong on hard floors and mixed surfaces, with reviewers citing immediate pickup and good handling of cereal-like debris.

Lighting evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer noting a light for dark areas and tight spaces.

The station's heating functions are strong, with hot-water mop washing and hot-air drying repeatedly called out.

Reviewers treated the S2 as innovative thanks to the fragrance system, cyclonic airflow, roller mop, and award/first-look attention.

Kid-friendliness is supported mainly by chemical-free sanitizing and cleaner floors for children or pets, not by child-specific controls beyond lockout.

Large debris handling is generally strong, with cereal, candy, and heavier debris picked up well in multiple tests.

At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.

Low-profile performance is positive for the robot body, which can fit under beds or tighter furniture better than some taller models.

Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.

Maintenance needs are low overall thanks to the dock, cyclonic filter, and anti-tangle brush, though roller-tray buildup and tank rinsing still matter.

Maneuverability is generally smooth, with one reviewer praising movement quality and another noting mapping/path quirks around obstacles.

It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.

Mapping is fast and detailed, but path efficiency is not perfect in obstacle-heavy testing.

The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.

The mop-lift system is a major strength, with 28 mm lift and carpet avoidance repeatedly mentioned, though one review wished for a mop cover.

Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.

Mopping is one of the best-supported strengths, especially on hard floors, visible stains, and everyday LVP/tile cleaning.

Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.

Noise is a drawback: reviewers measured or noticed above-average sound, especially on maximum suction.

Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.

Obstacle avoidance is useful but not flawless; some reviewers saw excellent avoidance, while independent testing found everyday clutter still gets pushed.

Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.

Odor control is polarizing: the dock sanitation and fragrance can help, but some reviewers found the scent too weak to matter.

Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.

Overall cleaning convenience is high because the dock, mapping, self-cleaning mop, and scheduled operation reduce hands-on work.

Longevity evidence is positive, centered on sustained suction, clean filters, and claims/tests showing no quick performance drop.

Overall opinion is favorable but nuanced: most reviewers praised the S2, while the strongest independent review framed it as specialized rather than universal.

Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.

Packaging evidence is brief but positive, with one reviewer saying everything was well packed.

Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.

Pet-readiness is supported indirectly through hair management, pet waste avoidance, pet hair pickup, and odor/sanitation features.

Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.

Price and value are the clearest caveats: several reviews noted the high $1,599.99-class price and questioned value versus cheaper or competing models.

Privacy evidence is limited but positive for buyers who dislike camera-style monitoring, since one reviewer noted there is no video monitoring mode.

Runtime is adequate but context-dependent; coverage can be large on low suction and much lower on max suction.

Sanitizing performance is widely emphasized, especially electrolyzed or ozonated water and claimed 99% to 99.99% bacteria/pathogen reduction.

Self-cleaning is a core strength: the roller cleans in real time and the dock washes, dries, and prepares the mop after runs.

One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.

Software support evidence is positive but early, with one pre-production reviewer seeing frequent firmware fixes.

The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.

The liquid system is advanced, with auto detergent, clean/dirty water handling, and electrolyzed water.

Storage footprint is mixed: the station is narrow or compact to some reviewers, but taller and more wall-space-hungry to another.

Streaking and residue performance is strong in most hard-floor tests, with reviewers repeatedly reporting no visible streaks, residue, or smearing.

Stuck resistance is positive on thresholds, rugs, and obstacles, though not every obstacle-avoidance test was flawless.

Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.

Suction and airflow are major strengths, with 30,000 Pa, 100 air watts, and sustained airflow repeatedly highlighted.

Heavy-duty suitability is good but not absolute; it can tackle demanding rugs and heavy use, but sustained max boost and deep shag can still be caveats.

Support and reliability are mixed: firmware updates were active, but a preorder recall and short warranty caveat reduce confidence.

Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.

Under-furniture pickup is positive, with reviewers saying it fits under most furniture and cleaned under beds that prior robots missed.

Value-for-money is mixed: the S2 is premium and capable, but reviewers questioned whether it justifies its price over Eufy's cheaper models or other flagships.

Versatility is strong across vacuuming, mopping, carpet adaptation, hard floors, thresholds, schedules, and multi-room cleaning.

Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.

Water tank usability is mostly good, with clear clean-water visibility and large reservoirs, though dirty tanks can develop odor without rinsing.