Compare Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Roborock Qrevo Edge S5A Robot Vacuum and Mop

Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.

The box contents are comprehensive for an all-in-one robot: dock, ramp, mop pads, power cord, an extra dust bag, and printed guides, making it easy to get started without extra purchases.

This model does not include an adaptive lift chassis, which limits threshold climbing compared with the higher Edge model and some flagships. If your home has tall transitions, this is a notable constraint.

Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.

Design is generally viewed as modern and clean, though some reviewers prefer the more premium-looking alternatives (for example Curv or flagships). The dock can look a bit industrial, but the robot and station still fit well in most rooms.

Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.

Automation and smart features are a highlight: schedules, no-go/no-mop zones, multi-floor maps, granular suction and water control, assistant integrations, and dock control. Obstacle detection relies on structured-light style sensing rather than a camera on this model.

With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.

Mop pads lift when carpet/rugs are detected and many users report rugs staying dry during transitions. Very high-pile carpets may still get damp depending on settings, so vacuum-first routines can be helpful.

Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.

Setup is described as straightforward: attach the ramp, plug in the dock, charge, pair to Wi‑Fi, and fill the clean water tank. Most reviewers report quick, hassle-free first run and mapping.

Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.

Battery life is repeatedly called a strong point, with a large battery and long runtimes on lower suction settings. Higher suction drains faster, and some testing shows max-power coverage below average, but typical mixed use is expected to fall in between.

The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.

Uses a dock dust-bag system that empties cleanly and is easy to swap with minimal mess. Reported replacement cadence ranges from roughly 30–60 days to about 2–3 months depending on debris load.

Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.

Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.

Carpet cleaning is generally rated strong for the tier, including an above-average deep-cleaning score in testing and good pickup on rugs. Performance is not positioned as flagship-level, but it is consistently described as effective.

Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.

The brush and dock system handle heavy hair and mixed debris without frequent clogs, and auto-emptying is reported to work without choking on hair. Occasional checks are still advisable, but clogging is not a common complaint.

In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.

Across comparisons, the S5A is framed as upper mid-tier: strong fundamentals and automation, but behind flagships in obstacle avoidance sophistication and premium extras. Many reviewers still consider it a sweet spot when priced well.

Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.

The Roborock app and controls are repeatedly called intuitive and customizable, with clear UI for maps, routines, suction, and water levels. Live video-style viewing is not available on this model, but core control is polished.

The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.

Corner cleaning improves notably thanks to an extending side brush, leaving corners visibly cleaner than many robots. Some reviews still note a small amount of leftover debris in tight corners.

The dock dirt-detection and remopping concept can work well (for example, triggering a second pass after muddy paw prints). However, other testing reports it did not reliably detect certain dried stains, making the behavior inconsistent.

The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.

Docking and automation are consistently reliable in reviews: automatic dust emptying, water refilling, mop washing, and drying generally work as expected. The tradeoff is a larger dock footprint compared with simpler stations.

Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.

Handles common dried messes well, including muddy paw prints and dried coffee, often improving significantly on a second pass. Tougher stains like dried ketchup may require multiple passes and sometimes manual intervention.

Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is a consistent strength, helped by an extending mop pad and flex arm side brush that can reach right up to walls. It is often described as better than most robot mops, though not always perfect in tight corners.

Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.

Edge-following is strong, with the robot staying close to walls and the mop pad reaching into baseboard lines. Reviewers often show it maintaining contact better than typical robot mops.

Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.

Auto-emptying to a sealed bag keeps dust handling clean and hands off, and swapping bags is reported to be quick with minimal mess. This is a major convenience advantage for frequent cleaning.

Fresh liquid pickup is reported as effective when mopping up spills like a glass of water, with the spinning pads absorbing and clearing liquid without leaving notable residue.

When hair does collect, it tends to channel toward the center of the split brush, making it quick to remove by hand. This is described as manageable rather than a major snagging problem.

Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.

Carpet hair pickup is usually strong, especially on rugs, though a few tests still show small amounts of hair remaining after a pass. Overall performance is described as better than average for this tier.

Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.

Hair pickup on hard floors is a standout, including long and even slightly damp strands, with users reporting thorough collection and minimal cleanup afterward.

The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the biggest strengths: the DuoDivide brush and redesigned side brush greatly reduce tangles. In extreme stress tests, some hair may channel to the center and require a quick manual pull, but it is easy to clear.

Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is repeatedly described as strong, including successfully collecting very fine particles like powdery debris without leaving a visible film.

Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.

Handles larger debris well on hard floors, such as crumbs, rice, and oatmeal, often clearing scattered mess in a single run or a couple of passes.

This model is noted as lacking built-in LED or headlight illumination, which some reviewers say would help in dim rooms and for better obstacle detection.

The dock uses heated processes (hot water mop washing and warm/hot air drying). Some testing questions whether advertised maximum water temperature is reached, but the heating still appears effective for pad cleaning and drying.

At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.

The robot is relatively slim for a LiDAR-top model (around 4 inches / ~9.8 cm), helping it fit under more furniture than many competitors. It is still taller than ultra-thin flagships that remove the top LiDAR turret.

Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.

Maintenance is largely hands off thanks to the auto-empty and mop-wash dock, plus reduced hair tangling. Users still need to replace bags, rinse/clean the dock tray occasionally, and maintain filters and pads.

It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.

LiDAR-based navigation earns strong marks for fast, accurate mapping and efficient room coverage. Multi-floor support and reliable pathing are repeatedly highlighted as core strengths.

The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.

The mop lifting system (about 10 mm) works well for most rugs and carpets and helps prevent wetting during transitions. Very plush/high-pile carpet can still be challenging without using vacuum-first settings.

Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.

Mopping performance is widely praised: dual spinning pads, adjustable water output, and frequent pad washing produce clean, refreshed hard floors. Sticky dried stains may take multiple passes, but everyday grime is handled very well.

Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.

Generally quieter than many competitors; peak loudness is cited around 70 dB on higher suction, and real-home testing reports low disruption (pets barely reacting).

Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.

Obstacle avoidance is the most mixed area: some users see graceful navigation around common items, while multiple controlled tests show it can run over cables and miss smaller or low objects, especially on carpet. Camera-equipped models are consistently reported as better here.

Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.

Hot-water washing plus hot/warm air drying helps keep mop pads fresh, and at least one real-home review explicitly reports no lingering smells after repeated runs.

Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.

Consumables are typical for an auto-empty robot: dust bags and periodic filter cleaning/replacement. Reported bag life of 30–60 days (or 2–3 months) helps keep ongoing costs manageable, but you may also buy cleaning solution since it is manually dosed.

Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.

Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.

Well-suited to pet homes thanks to excellent hair pickup and anti-tangle brush design. It lacks camera-based pet recognition features found on higher models, but day-to-day pet hair cleanup is a standout.

Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.

Value is strongest when discounted, with multiple reviewers calling sale pricing an excellent deal versus higher models with cameras or chassis lift. At full price it sits in an upper mid-tier range and may feel expensive if you mainly want top obstacle avoidance.

The absence of a front-facing camera means no live video monitoring, which many see as a privacy benefit. The tradeoff is weaker camera-assisted obstacle recognition and fewer monitoring features compared with models that include an RGB camera.

Measured low-suction runtime and coverage are impressive in testing, with the robot covering roughly 3,947 sq ft before reaching 0% battery, which is above average. Measured max-suction runtime and coverage are weaker in testing, with roughly 513 sq ft covered before depletion, which is below average. Expect significantly better results on mixed or lower suction settings.

The dock automates mop washing, pad drying, water refills, and in some cases self-cleaning of the base tray. Reviews generally find these cycles effective and appreciate the reduced hands-on maintenance.

One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.

The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.

There is no auto solution or detergent dispensing tank, so cleaning solution must be added manually to the clean water tank. Multiple reviews call this a missed feature at this price.

The dock is described as larger because it houses clean/dirty tanks and the auto-empty system, so it needs dedicated floor space. Some comparisons note it is narrower than certain flagship docks, but it is still a sizable station.

Mopping is typically reported as streak free on hard flooring, but heavy muddy messes can smear on an initial pass before pad washing and follow-up cleaning improves the result.

Most day-to-day runs are described as smooth with few stops, but the robot can still get caught by cables or a sock in some tests. Lack of chassis lift also limits its ability to self-recover on tall thresholds.

Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.

Strong rated suction (up to 18,500 Pa) and consistently good real-world pickup, even when lab airflow/pressure measures slightly below average. Overall cleaning results on hard floors and rugs are described as above average for the price tier.

The robot itself suits small spaces well thanks to efficient mapping, but the multifunction dock is relatively large. Homes with limited floor space near outlets may need to plan dock placement carefully.

Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.

Its relatively low height helps it reach under furniture and low cabinetry where many robots miss dust. At least one real-home test highlights under-cabinet cleaning as a major day-to-day benefit.

Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.

The clean/dirty water tank setup is a key convenience feature; reviewers cite large tanks (around 4 L clean and ~3.5 L dirty in one real-home test) and automatic onboard refills. This enables multiple full clean-and-mop sessions before needing attention.