Compare LG xboom Buds by will.i.am vs Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

P1 LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
P2 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Where It Has the Edge

  • Find My is 4.1 vs 3.4. One review confirms a Find My feature that can play a sound to help locate the buds.
  • Portability/foldability is rated 4.5 while the other product has no score yet. The small, lightweight case makes the buds easy to carry on the go.
  • Android compatibility is rated 4.1 while the other product has no score yet. One review says Google and Microsoft fast pairing makes setup with those devices simple, indicating solid Android-side compatibility.
  • Noise isolation (passive) is rated 4.1 while the other product has no score yet. Passive isolation benefits from a snug seal and secure in-ear fit when the right tips are used.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • LDAC is 4.5 vs 1.0. LDAC support is frequently highlighted for higher-quality Android streaming, with the usual battery-life tradeoff.
  • Soundstage width is 4.6 vs 2.0. Soundstage is a standout: multiple outlets describe an immersive, wide presentation that feels larger than typical earbuds.
  • Instrument separation is 4.6 vs 2.0. Instrument separation is frequently praised on busy tracks, helping the AZ100 stay clean and layered.
  • Spatial audio is 4.0 vs 1.8. Dolby spatial audio/head tracking is supported and can add immersion, but some reviewers find it subtle or prefer...
Average score
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Reviews consistently praise ANC for strong everyday isolation, especially against low-frequency noise, even if it is not described as class-leading versus premium rivals.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is widely rated top-tier for everyday noise and transit rumble, but several reviews stop short of calling it the absolute best in the category. Noise control is highly adjustable, with adaptive ANC plus granular sliders that let you tune intensity and reduce pressure effects.

Android compatibility
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

One review says Google and Microsoft fast pairing makes setup with those devices simple, indicating solid Android-side compatibility.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
App
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.6

App support is generally a strength thanks to EQ, ANC and control customization, but one short review says the app still feels lacking.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

The Technics Audio Connect app is feature-rich (ANC, EQ, multipoint, spatial settings), but some reviews call the interface clunky or menu-heavy.

aptX
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.0

The only direct codec evidence is negative, with one review explicitly noting there is no aptX Adaptive support.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
1.0

Several reviews explicitly note aptX codecs are not supported.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Where tested, audio-video sync is reported as excellent with minimal to no noticeable lag.

Bass performance
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Bass is repeatedly described as deep, impactful and weighty, though some reviews say the low end can dominate or muddy the presentation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Bass is repeatedly called deep and unusually controlled for true wireless, though one review found it can feel heavy or change with ANC settings.

Battery
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Battery life is a clear positive, with reviews repeatedly citing around 10 hours from the buds and roughly 30 hours total with the case.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Battery life is commonly reported around 10 hours with ANC on (AAC) plus substantial case recharges, with lower figures when using high-res modes.

Bluetooth
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

One review explicitly confirms Bluetooth 5.4 with low-energy support.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bluetooth stability is generally reported as reliable with few dropouts across devices and environments.

Build quality
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.6

Build impressions are mixed: one review says the buds themselves have decent build quality, while other design comments are less enthusiastic overall.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Carry case quality
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.4

Case impressions are mixed-to-negative, with one review calling it basic and another saying it feels cheap.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

The case is generally pocketable and premium-feeling, but some reviews mention weak magnets, slight rattle, or scratch/scuff issues.

Charging
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.4

Charging is described as quick, with one reviewer seeing the buds return to full after a short top-up.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is praised for USB-C plus Qi wireless and quick-charge support; full recharge times are typically a few hours.

Codec support
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

Codec support is functional rather than premium, with SBC, AAC and LC3 confirmed but no evidence of higher-end wireless codecs.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Codec support is strong (SBC/AAC plus LDAC and LC3/LE Audio features noted), appealing to both iOS users and Android audiophiles.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.1

Comfort is the biggest divisive point: several reviews call the buds bulky or tiring in-ear, while two shorter reviews describe them as comfortable.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Comfort is widely rated high thanks to a smaller/lighter fit, though some users may still experience fatigue or fit variability over long sessions.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.3

Design is broadly seen as plain, bulky or utilitarian rather than stylish.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Design is viewed as premium and more compact than the prior model, though not everyone finds it the sleekest-looking option.

Eartips fit
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.6

Fit can be snug and sealed with the right tips, though not every reviewer found the available options ideal.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Ear tip size options
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.6

The buds include multiple ear tip sizes, but reviewers still note that the selection is modest compared with some rivals.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Multiple ear tip sizes are commonly included, helping most users achieve a seal, though tip choice remains key to fit.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.4

EQ customization is a major strength, with multiple reviews highlighting custom tuning tools and flexible adjustment.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

EQ customization is a strength, often cited as an 8-band EQ plus presets that can significantly change the sound.

Find My
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

One review confirms a Find My feature that can play a sound to help locate the buds.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.4

Find My/location features are present, but feedback varies; some appreciate the feature, while others complain the locating beep or accuracy is limited.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Tonal balance is inconsistent in the direct listening tests, with one review specifically calling the sound muddy.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Included extras are modest but useful, with extra ear tips and a removable hook specifically mentioned.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Instrument separation is a weak point, with one review explicitly saying these buds do not deliver phenomenal separation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Instrument separation is frequently praised on busy tracks, helping the AZ100 stay clean and layered.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Integrated microphones are clearly present and feature-rich, with one review noting three mics per earbud.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
LDAC
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.0

LDAC support is directly criticized as missing.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC support is frequently highlighted for higher-quality Android streaming, with the usual battery-life tradeoff.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Maximum-volume performance is a weakness, with one review saying clarity worsens at higher volumes.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Mic processing features are a strength, with reviews mentioning suppression of unwanted noise and dedicated wind-noise handling.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Voice noise reduction is often effective at cutting wind and background noise, though aggressive processing can create artifacts.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

Call quality is generally good rather than class-leading, with reviews describing clear speech and one standout whisper-mode result, but also a little tinniness in one case.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.8

Call quality is mixed: many find it usable or improved, while others report robotic processing or, in one case, serious call glitches.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.0

Midrange clarity is mixed: some tuning improvements help, but muddiness remains a recurring complaint in other listening notes.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Midrange is generally clear and natural for vocals, with occasional notes that bass-heavy mixes can push voices slightly back.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Cross-platform behavior is uneven, with iOS pairing friction specifically called out in one review.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

One review highlights multipoint as a perk for maintaining connections with multiple devices.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Three-device multipoint is a major differentiator and is often described as seamless; occasional switching lag is mentioned but not common.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

Passive isolation benefits from a snug seal and secure in-ear fit when the right tips are used.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Portability/foldability
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

The small, lightweight case makes the buds easy to carry on the go.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.4

Preset EQ modes are useful but inconsistent: they can improve some tracks, yet reviewers also describe the preset selection as limited.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Preset EQ options are generally useful, though some (like extra-bassy modes) may be too much for neutral listeners.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Case finish durability is mixed, with some noting scratches/scuffs and others calling it relatively scratch-resistant.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.5

Software and setup are not fully frictionless, with one review warning users to find the correct app.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.3

Setup is mostly straightforward, but the lack of a case pairing button and some app UX quirks can add friction.

Sound leakage
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.8

Sound leakage is a clear weakness once volume rises past moderate listening levels.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Sound quality
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.1

Overall sound quality is highly mixed across the review set: some hear enjoyable, affordable tuning, while others call it a letdown that trails key rivals on clarity and refinement.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Reviews consistently praise the AZ100 for highly detailed, spacious sound with strong dynamics; a few note the default tuning can be bass-forward or benefit from EQ.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.1

Depth is limited, with one review specifically describing the presentation as claustrophobic.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Soundstage width
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Reviewers wanting a more open presentation are left unsatisfied, with one review explicitly calling for greater spaciousness.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Soundstage is a standout: multiple outlets describe an immersive, wide presentation that feels larger than typical earbuds.

Spatial audio
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.8

One review says LG removed the focus on spatial, three-dimensional sound found in pricier alternatives.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Dolby spatial audio/head tracking is supported and can add immersion, but some reviewers find it subtle or prefer it off for music.

Stability
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

Stability is generally good thanks to the hook and snug fit, although one review says that security is only moderate if the tips do not suit your ears.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Fit stability varies: many report a secure hold, while some reviewers experienced looseness or buds falling out during vigorous movement.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.6

Touch controls are polarizing: some reviewers found them fast and reliable, while others complained about phantom or accidental taps.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Touch controls are responsive and highly configurable, with the main complaint being occasional over-sensitivity.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

Transparency and ambient listening are described positively, with reviewers saying outside sound comes through naturally enough for awareness.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Transparency/ambient mode is strong and adjustable, but some reviewers note hiss at higher levels, an unnatural voice-focused mode, or not enough outside sound for awareness.

Treble clarity
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.1

Treble needs care: one review found crisp vocals on the right track, but others say the upper range can be overly forward or harsh.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Treble is described as airy and detailed without harshness, but a few critics wanted more sparkle or presence.

USB-C
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.6

USB-C charging is explicitly confirmed.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

USB-C charging is consistently supported and frequently mentioned as a modern convenience.

Value for money
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Value is mixed but not disastrous; several reviews see decent value or fair pricing, while others say stronger-sounding alternatives exist nearby.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Volume output
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Volume output is on the low side in one review, forcing louder listening and exposing leakage issues.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Water resistance is consistently listed as IPX4, making the buds suitable for splashes and light rain rather than tougher workout protection.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

The earbuds are commonly cited as IPX4-rated for sweat and light rain, but not for heavy water exposure.