Compare Edifier LolliClip Earbuds vs Shokz OpenFit 2+

P1 Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
P2 Shokz OpenFit 2+

Comparison Takeaways

Edifier LolliClip Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 2.0. Codec support is considered strong for the class because reviewers highlight Bluetooth 5.4 with SBC, AAC, and LDAC.
  • LDAC is 3.8 vs 2.0. LDAC is a welcome high-res feature, though reviewers disagree on how much it matters in an open-ear design.
  • Active noise cancellation is 2.9 vs 1.3. ANC is the most split attribute: it helps with drones or lower frequencies for some, but many call...
  • Find My is 4.5 vs 2.9. The find-my-earbuds feature is positively framed as a useful backup for misplaced clips.

Shokz OpenFit 2+

Where It Has the Edge

  • USB-C is 5.0 vs 2.5. USB-C received one explicit positive mention for avoiding proprietary charging cables.
  • Equalizer customization is 4.2 vs 2.1. EQ customization was a clear strength: reviewers liked tweaking sound, custom EQ, and personal preference controls, though one...
  • Clamping force comfort is 5.0 vs 3.3. The one explicit clamping-force assessment was very positive because the reviewer felt no clamping pressure at all.
  • Sound leakage is 4.3 vs 2.5. Sound leakage was generally better than expected for open-ear earbuds at reasonable volumes, but reviewers still warned that...
Average score
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.9
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.9

ANC is the most split attribute: it helps with drones or lower frequencies for some, but many call it weak or modest for real noise blocking.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.3

Reviewers consistently framed ANC as absent or unsuitable for noise-cancellation seekers, treating the product as intentionally awareness-first instead.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3

Android pairing support is positive where discussed, especially Google Fast Pair quickly recognizing the earbuds.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Android compatibility received one direct positive test result alongside iOS compatibility.

App
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.6

The app is feature-rich but inconsistent: some reviewers like its tools, while others dislike clunky menus, pauses, and login friction.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

The app was generally considered useful, simple, or feature-rich for EQ, firmware, controls, Dolby, and tracking, though a few reviews described it as minimal or not essential.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.0

Video latency caused no issues in the comparison review, and gaming latency was described as decent.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0

One reviewer found video latency minimal and acceptable for casual gaming, while noting no dedicated gaming mode elsewhere in the review.

Bass performance
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8

Bass is a standout for the category, often fuller than expected, but sub-bass roll-off, muddiness, or open-ear limits appear in several reviews.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Bass was often better than expected for open-ear earbuds, especially with EQ or Dolby, but several reviewers still noted limited punch and depth compared with sealed earbuds.

Battery
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.4

Battery life is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the nine-hour buds and long case total.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Battery life received strong agreement as excellent, long-lasting, or a non-issue for daily use, training, and long sessions.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3

Bluetooth connectivity is generally reliable and modern, with reviewers praising connection consistency and feature support.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Bluetooth behavior was mixed: reviewers liked seamless single-bud use, but others reported earbuds staying connected in the case or draining phone battery without an off switch.

Build quality
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.7

Build quality is mixed: the earbuds and silicone can feel well made, while the case build looks cheaper to several reviewers.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Build quality was praised through flexible/durable ear hooks and robust-feeling materials.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5

Hi-res playback is supported through LDAC, but reviewers are mixed on whether the open design reveals much extra detail.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Button control usability
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Physical buttons were widely praised as easier, more reliable, and more comfortable than touch-only controls, though one ultrarunner wanted an on/off button.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.3

The case draws repeated criticism for bulk, cheap-feeling plastic, or a less durable feel.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Case quality was mixed: reviewers liked the size/design and wireless charging, but cited a pinch hazard, poor low-battery signaling, and non-waterproof case limitations.

Charging
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.6

Charging is helped by useful fast charging, but the lack of wireless charging appears as a repeated caveat.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Charging was praised for wireless convenience and quick top-ups, but one review reported case charging behavior that could leave earbuds undercharged.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3

Clamping comfort is mixed: one reviewer felt pressure after hours, while another praised the clip force as balanced.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

The one explicit clamping-force assessment was very positive because the reviewer felt no clamping pressure at all.

Codec support
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5

Codec support is considered strong for the class because reviewers highlight Bluetooth 5.4 with SBC, AAC, and LDAC.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

Codec support drew criticism from one reviewer because the earbuds lack high-end Bluetooth codecs.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1

Comfort is a major strength overall, with many reviewers forgetting they were wearing the buds, though some felt pressure or fatigue.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.9

Comfort was one of the strongest points across nearly every review, with repeated praise for long-wear softness, low fatigue, and all-day active use.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.2

The clip design is distinctive and often ergonomic or premium-looking, but some reviewers call the overall look or finish mixed.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Design and aesthetics were praised as classy, understated, premium, sleek, and among the best-looking open-ear designs tested.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.1

EQ customization is repeatedly criticized because reviewers wanted a true custom, graphic, or band EQ.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

EQ customization was a clear strength: reviewers liked tweaking sound, custom EQ, and personal preference controls, though one app workflow was limited.

Find My
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5

The find-my-earbuds feature is positively framed as a useful backup for misplaced clips.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.9

Find My-style feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked ringing/tracking features, while others complained about missing true case Find My support or losing tracking when the battery died.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3

Frequency balance is respectable through mids and overall tone, but low-bass roll-off below preference targets limits full-range accuracy.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

Only SoundGuys offered an opinionated frequency-response critique, finding upper mids and treble below its preferred target.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5

Case hinge durability raised a concern in one review because the hinge crackled when opened widely.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8

Separation is praised in some tracks, but one comparison review says competing models have cleaner instrument separation.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.7

Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard clean, distinct instruments or stereo separation without muddying vocals and guitars.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.6

The interchangeable left/right bud design is consistently praised as convenient and clever.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
LDAC
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8

LDAC is a welcome high-res feature, though reviewers disagree on how much it matters in an open-ear design.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0

LDAC was specifically missed by one reviewer who expected it on a premium open-ear product.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5

High-volume clarity is mixed, with some reports of muddied bass or distortion and one strong report of retaining bass without distortion.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Most reviewers who discussed high-volume behavior heard clean playback without distortion, though one warned that very high volume could sound cranky.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.1

Microphone noise reduction can suppress traffic, fans, or background noise, but several reviewers heard aggressive gating, artifacts, or smothering.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Microphone noise reduction generally handled traffic, background noise, or indoor noise well, but wind remained the recurring weak scenario.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3

Call mic quality is usable but inconsistent, ranging from clear in quiet spaces to metallic, distant, or tinny in tougher conditions.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Call quality was mostly praised as clean, clear, or very good, with caveats around wind, crowded cafés, or heavy processing.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1

Mids and vocals are usually described as clear, full, or warm, with only a few comments about subdued instruments or ordinary smoothness.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Midrange and vocals were generally described as clean, natural, energetic, or more forward, with the strongest praise coming from music-focused reviews.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positively supported by tested compatibility across Android and iOS.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8

Multipoint works and is useful, but reviewers note occasional hiccups or the need to pause one device before the other takes over.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Multipoint was repeatedly described as smooth, seamless, convenient, or reliable for switching between phones, laptops, watches, and other devices.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.1

Passive isolation is intentionally weak because of the open/semi-open design, preserving awareness while letting external sound bleed in.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.5

Passive isolation is essentially not the point of the design; the cited reviewer emphasized that the earbuds do not isolate the listener from the world.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0

Portability is limited by a chunky case, though the review evidence still frames it as usable rather than unmanageable.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5

Portability had one notable criticism from an ultrarunner who found carrying the case extra weight and space during long races.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0

Preset EQ quality is mixed: Classic and Bass Boost can work well, while Bass, Treble, or Vocal modes sometimes muddy or over-sharpen sound.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4

Preset EQ opinions were mostly positive for Bass Boost, Treble Boost, and Vocal/voice modes, with one technical review saying presets help compensate for open-ear limitations.

Sensors
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.9

Sensors are ambitious and often useful, covering wear detection and biometrics, but health tracking is not a full smartwatch replacement and can lag.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Sensor feedback was mixed: one review praised wear detection, while another wished smart sensors were included.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
1.9

Smudge resistance is poor; multiple reviewers call the glossy case or buds fingerprint magnets.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.7

Software setup and operation are uneven: setup/navigation can be simple, but login friction, hidden menus, and playback interruptions hurt polish.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Setup simplicity was supported by the convenient pairing button and the fact that app use is not required for basic functions.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage remains an open-ear caveat, with one reviewer warning that nearby people may hear audio around 60% volume.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Sound leakage was generally better than expected for open-ear earbuds at reasonable volumes, but reviewers still warned that higher volumes can be heard nearby.

Sound quality
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.4

Reviewers largely agree the LolliClip sounds unusually strong for open-ear earbuds, though music-focused listeners and rock-heavy tracks expose limits.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Reviewers broadly praised the open-ear sound as unusually strong, clear, balanced, or top-tier for the category, though SoundGuys treated it as below critical-listening earbuds and one runner focused mainly on clear voice playback.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1

Several reviewers heard a wide or well-spread stage, with open-ear positioning helping side-to-side presentation.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Dolby and the open presentation usually expanded the stage, but SoundGuys felt the spatial positioning was more artificial than genuinely dimensional.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.9

Spatial audio is mostly a weak point, often described as poor, gimmicky, recessed, or harmful to music, with a few movie/gaming positives.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Spatial/Dolby audio was usually praised for richer, wider, more immersive sound, but some reviewers preferred it for video or podcasts over music and one found it gimmicky.

Stability
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3

Fit stability is strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds stay secure during workouts, walks, or long use.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1

Stability was strong for running, workouts, and general movement, but reviewers found caveats with helmets, buffs, high-impact jumps, or losing an earbud when removing layers.

Sustainability materials
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0

Sustainability gets partial credit for recyclable elements, but excess packaging and plastic wrap limit the benefit.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.6

Touch controls are one of the bigger weaknesses: many found them finicky, limited, or misfiring, though one reviewer liked the full-loop tap area.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5

Touch control usefulness was limited in the cited review because the touchpad was mainly restricted to voice assistant activation.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1

Transparency and environmental awareness are strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds preserve surrounding sounds very well.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yet
Treble clarity
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.9

Treble is generally controlled and non-harsh, but some reviewers found it bright, lacking upper sparkle, or slightly subdued.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4

Treble drew mostly positive comments for crispness, sparkle, and detail, while SoundGuys found the treble weak and less detailed in busy mixes.

USB-C
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5

USB-C is present, but one reviewer specifically criticized the rear port placement as awkward.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0

USB-C received one explicit positive mention for avoiding proprietary charging cables.

Value for money
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.2

Value is generally favorable because the LolliClip combines strong sound, long battery, ANC, sensors, and open-ear design for the price.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5

Value was usually positive for first-time buyers because reviewers saw the $10-$20 Plus premium or category price as justified, though existing OpenFit 2 owners may not need to upgrade.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.0

Voice assistant access is hindered by limited onboard controls, pushing some everyday actions back to the phone.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3

Voice assistant integration exists through limited touch or button customization, but reviewers treated it as secondary rather than a standout feature.

Volume output
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5

Volume output is a strength: reviewers repeatedly say the LolliClip gets loud enough, and in some cases very loud.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0

Volume was usually enough for music, calls, and outdoor use, but reviewers split on headroom in noisy places, with some wanting more output.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.6

Water and sweat resistance is consistently praised, with IP56 seen as suitable for rain, sweat, and workouts.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3

Water and sweat resistance was generally reassuring for rain, sweat, and workouts, though reviewers warned against submersion and sweat-related charging care.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.8

Weight comfort is strongly positive, with reviewers describing the earbuds as barely perceptible or very light.

Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8

Weight comfort was consistently praised; reviewers repeatedly said the earbuds felt very light or nearly disappeared on-ear.