Average score
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.9
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.9
ANC is the most split attribute: it helps with drones or lower frequencies for some, but many call it weak or modest for real noise blocking.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.3
Reviewers consistently framed ANC as absent or unsuitable for noise-cancellation seekers, treating the product as intentionally awareness-first instead.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3
Android pairing support is positive where discussed, especially Google Fast Pair quickly recognizing the earbuds.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Android compatibility received one direct positive test result alongside iOS compatibility.
App
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.6
The app is feature-rich but inconsistent: some reviewers like its tools, while others dislike clunky menus, pauses, and login friction.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
The app was generally considered useful, simple, or feature-rich for EQ, firmware, controls, Dolby, and tracking, though a few reviews described it as minimal or not essential.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.0
Video latency caused no issues in the comparison review, and gaming latency was described as decent.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0
One reviewer found video latency minimal and acceptable for casual gaming, while noting no dedicated gaming mode elsewhere in the review.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8
Bass is a standout for the category, often fuller than expected, but sub-bass roll-off, muddiness, or open-ear limits appear in several reviews.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
Bass was often better than expected for open-ear earbuds, especially with EQ or Dolby, but several reviewers still noted limited punch and depth compared with sealed earbuds.
Battery
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.4
Battery life is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the nine-hour buds and long case total.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Battery life received strong agreement as excellent, long-lasting, or a non-issue for daily use, training, and long sessions.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3
Bluetooth connectivity is generally reliable and modern, with reviewers praising connection consistency and feature support.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Bluetooth behavior was mixed: reviewers liked seamless single-bud use, but others reported earbuds staying connected in the case or draining phone battery without an off switch.
Build quality
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.7
Build quality is mixed: the earbuds and silicone can feel well made, while the case build looks cheaper to several reviewers.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Build quality was praised through flexible/durable ear hooks and robust-feeling materials.
Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5
Hi-res playback is supported through LDAC, but reviewers are mixed on whether the open design reveals much extra detail.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetButton control usability
P1Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Physical buttons were widely praised as easier, more reliable, and more comfortable than touch-only controls, though one ultrarunner wanted an on/off button.
Carry case quality
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.3
The case draws repeated criticism for bulk, cheap-feeling plastic, or a less durable feel.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Case quality was mixed: reviewers liked the size/design and wireless charging, but cited a pinch hazard, poor low-battery signaling, and non-waterproof case limitations.
Charging
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.6
Charging is helped by useful fast charging, but the lack of wireless charging appears as a repeated caveat.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Charging was praised for wireless convenience and quick top-ups, but one review reported case charging behavior that could leave earbuds undercharged.
Clamping force comfort
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3
Clamping comfort is mixed: one reviewer felt pressure after hours, while another praised the clip force as balanced.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
The one explicit clamping-force assessment was very positive because the reviewer felt no clamping pressure at all.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5
Codec support is considered strong for the class because reviewers highlight Bluetooth 5.4 with SBC, AAC, and LDAC.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
Codec support drew criticism from one reviewer because the earbuds lack high-end Bluetooth codecs.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1
Comfort is a major strength overall, with many reviewers forgetting they were wearing the buds, though some felt pressure or fatigue.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.9
Comfort was one of the strongest points across nearly every review, with repeated praise for long-wear softness, low fatigue, and all-day active use.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.2
The clip design is distinctive and often ergonomic or premium-looking, but some reviewers call the overall look or finish mixed.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Design and aesthetics were praised as classy, understated, premium, sleek, and among the best-looking open-ear designs tested.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.1
EQ customization is repeatedly criticized because reviewers wanted a true custom, graphic, or band EQ.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
EQ customization was a clear strength: reviewers liked tweaking sound, custom EQ, and personal preference controls, though one app workflow was limited.
Find My
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5
The find-my-earbuds feature is positively framed as a useful backup for misplaced clips.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.9
Find My-style feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked ringing/tracking features, while others complained about missing true case Find My support or losing tracking when the battery died.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3
Frequency balance is respectable through mids and overall tone, but low-bass roll-off below preference targets limits full-range accuracy.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
Only SoundGuys offered an opinionated frequency-response critique, finding upper mids and treble below its preferred target.
Hinge durability
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5
Case hinge durability raised a concern in one review because the hinge crackled when opened widely.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetInstrument separation
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8
Separation is praised in some tracks, but one comparison review says competing models have cleaner instrument separation.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.7
Instrument separation was praised when reviewers heard clean, distinct instruments or stereo separation without muddying vocals and guitars.
Interchangeable left/right bud design
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.6
The interchangeable left/right bud design is consistently praised as convenient and clever.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetLDAC
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8
LDAC is a welcome high-res feature, though reviewers disagree on how much it matters in an open-ear design.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.0
LDAC was specifically missed by one reviewer who expected it on a premium open-ear product.
Maximum volume clarity
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.5
High-volume clarity is mixed, with some reports of muddied bass or distortion and one strong report of retaining bass without distortion.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Most reviewers who discussed high-volume behavior heard clean playback without distortion, though one warned that very high volume could sound cranky.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.1
Microphone noise reduction can suppress traffic, fans, or background noise, but several reviewers heard aggressive gating, artifacts, or smothering.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Microphone noise reduction generally handled traffic, background noise, or indoor noise well, but wind remained the recurring weak scenario.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.3
Call mic quality is usable but inconsistent, ranging from clear in quiet spaces to metallic, distant, or tinny in tougher conditions.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2
Call quality was mostly praised as clean, clear, or very good, with caveats around wind, crowded cafés, or heavy processing.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1
Mids and vocals are usually described as clear, full, or warm, with only a few comments about subdued instruments or ordinary smoothness.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Midrange and vocals were generally described as clean, natural, energetic, or more forward, with the strongest praise coming from music-focused reviews.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
Multi-platform compatibility was positively supported by tested compatibility across Android and iOS.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.8
Multipoint works and is useful, but reviewers note occasional hiccups or the need to pause one device before the other takes over.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Multipoint was repeatedly described as smooth, seamless, convenient, or reliable for switching between phones, laptops, watches, and other devices.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.1
Passive isolation is intentionally weak because of the open/semi-open design, preserving awareness while letting external sound bleed in.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
1.5
Passive isolation is essentially not the point of the design; the cited reviewer emphasized that the earbuds do not isolate the listener from the world.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0
Portability is limited by a chunky case, though the review evidence still frames it as usable rather than unmanageable.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5
Portability had one notable criticism from an ultrarunner who found carrying the case extra weight and space during long races.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0
Preset EQ quality is mixed: Classic and Bass Boost can work well, while Bass, Treble, or Vocal modes sometimes muddy or over-sharpen sound.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4
Preset EQ opinions were mostly positive for Bass Boost, Treble Boost, and Vocal/voice modes, with one technical review saying presets help compensate for open-ear limitations.
Sensors
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.9
Sensors are ambitious and often useful, covering wear detection and biometrics, but health tracking is not a full smartwatch replacement and can lag.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Sensor feedback was mixed: one review praised wear detection, while another wished smart sensors were included.
Smudge resistance
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
1.9
Smudge resistance is poor; multiple reviewers call the glossy case or buds fingerprint magnets.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetSoftware/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.7
Software setup and operation are uneven: setup/navigation can be simple, but login friction, hidden menus, and playback interruptions hurt polish.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Setup simplicity was supported by the convenient pairing button and the fact that app use is not required for basic functions.
Sound leakage
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5
Sound leakage remains an open-ear caveat, with one reviewer warning that nearby people may hear audio around 60% volume.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Sound leakage was generally better than expected for open-ear earbuds at reasonable volumes, but reviewers still warned that higher volumes can be heard nearby.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.4
Reviewers largely agree the LolliClip sounds unusually strong for open-ear earbuds, though music-focused listeners and rock-heavy tracks expose limits.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Reviewers broadly praised the open-ear sound as unusually strong, clear, balanced, or top-tier for the category, though SoundGuys treated it as below critical-listening earbuds and one runner focused mainly on clear voice playback.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1
Several reviewers heard a wide or well-spread stage, with open-ear positioning helping side-to-side presentation.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Dolby and the open presentation usually expanded the stage, but SoundGuys felt the spatial positioning was more artificial than genuinely dimensional.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.9
Spatial audio is mostly a weak point, often described as poor, gimmicky, recessed, or harmful to music, with a few movie/gaming positives.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Spatial/Dolby audio was usually praised for richer, wider, more immersive sound, but some reviewers preferred it for video or podcasts over music and one found it gimmicky.
Stability
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.3
Fit stability is strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds stay secure during workouts, walks, or long use.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.1
Stability was strong for running, workouts, and general movement, but reviewers found caveats with helmets, buffs, high-impact jumps, or losing an earbud when removing layers.
Sustainability materials
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.0
Sustainability gets partial credit for recyclable elements, but excess packaging and plastic wrap limit the benefit.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetTouch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.6
Touch controls are one of the bigger weaknesses: many found them finicky, limited, or misfiring, though one reviewer liked the full-loop tap area.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
2.5
Touch control usefulness was limited in the cited review because the touchpad was mainly restricted to voice assistant activation.
Transparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.1
Transparency and environmental awareness are strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds preserve surrounding sounds very well.
P2Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
No score yetTreble clarity
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
3.9
Treble is generally controlled and non-harsh, but some reviewers found it bright, lacking upper sparkle, or slightly subdued.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.4
Treble drew mostly positive comments for crispness, sparkle, and detail, while SoundGuys found the treble weak and less detailed in busy mixes.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.5
USB-C is present, but one reviewer specifically criticized the rear port placement as awkward.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
5.0
USB-C received one explicit positive mention for avoiding proprietary charging cables.
Value for money
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.2
Value is generally favorable because the LolliClip combines strong sound, long battery, ANC, sensors, and open-ear design for the price.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.5
Value was usually positive for first-time buyers because reviewers saw the $10-$20 Plus premium or category price as justified, though existing OpenFit 2 owners may not need to upgrade.
Voice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
2.0
Voice assistant access is hindered by limited onboard controls, pushing some everyday actions back to the phone.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
3.3
Voice assistant integration exists through limited touch or button customization, but reviewers treated it as secondary rather than a standout feature.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.5
Volume output is a strength: reviewers repeatedly say the LolliClip gets loud enough, and in some cases very loud.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.0
Volume was usually enough for music, calls, and outdoor use, but reviewers split on headroom in noisy places, with some wanting more output.
Water/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.6
Water and sweat resistance is consistently praised, with IP56 seen as suitable for rain, sweat, and workouts.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.3
Water and sweat resistance was generally reassuring for rain, sweat, and workouts, though reviewers warned against submersion and sweat-related charging care.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: Edifier LolliClip Earbuds
4.8
Weight comfort is strongly positive, with reviewers describing the earbuds as barely perceptible or very light.
P2
Product 2: Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.8
Weight comfort was consistently praised; reviewers repeatedly said the earbuds felt very light or nearly disappeared on-ear.