- Better: health tracking The reviewer says Apple Watch provides deeper and more automatic health tracking.
Edifier LolliClip Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Edifier LolliClip if you want comfortable open-ear earbuds with strong category sound, long battery life, secure fit, and health extras. Skip them if you need strong ANC, refined app controls, custom EQ, or a premium case.
Best for
Best for active listeners who want open-ear awareness, secure wear, long battery life, good category sound, and a richer feature set than basic clip-on earbuds. It also suits podcast and audiobook listeners who value comfort and ambient awareness.
Not for
Not for buyers who need sealed-earbud isolation, strong ANC, deep sub-bass, a polished custom EQ experience, or a premium-feeling case. Audiophile listeners and frequent callers in noisy spaces should be cautious.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently frame the Edifier LolliClip as a unusually capable open-ear option: it delivers fuller sound and stronger bass than many expect from this form factor, with long battery life, secure wear, IP56 durability, and useful extras like biometric sensors and interchangeable left/right buds. The tradeoff is that its ambition outpaces its polish. ANC ranges from weak to merely modest because the design still lets the outside world in, while spatial audio, touch controls, app flow, and EQ flexibility draw repeated complaints. The case also feels cheaper and glossier than some reviewers wanted. Overall, the evidence points to a feature-rich, workout-friendly open-ear earbud that prioritizes awareness and convenience over audiophile precision or premium refinement.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Worse: versatility Tom's Guide says the LolliClip is more versatile than Shokz OpenFit 2.
Soundcore AeroClip
- Compared: price class The reviewer places the LolliClip around the same price class as Soundcore AeroClip.
- Compared: clip-on earbud category Serious Insights compares the LolliClip against other clip-on earbuds and says it stands out for ambition.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
48 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 13% 6 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 48% 23 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 29% 14 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 10% 5 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Weight comfort is strongly positive, with reviewers describing the earbuds as barely perceptible or very light.
-
The interchangeable left/right bud design is consistently praised as convenient and clever.
-
Water and sweat resistance is consistently praised, with IP56 seen as suitable for rain, sweat, and workouts.
-
Volume output is a strength: reviewers repeatedly say the LolliClip gets loud enough, and in some cases very loud.
-
Codec support is considered strong for the class because reviewers highlight Bluetooth 5.4 with SBC, AAC, and LDAC.
-
The find-my-earbuds feature is positively framed as a useful backup for misplaced clips.
-
Battery life is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the nine-hour buds and long case total.
-
Reviewers largely agree the LolliClip sounds unusually strong for open-ear earbuds, though music-focused listeners and rock-heavy tracks expose limits.
-
Bluetooth connectivity is generally reliable and modern, with reviewers praising connection consistency and feature support.
-
Fit stability is strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds stay secure during workouts, walks, or long use.
-
Android pairing support is positive where discussed, especially Google Fast Pair quickly recognizing the earbuds.
-
Value is generally favorable because the LolliClip combines strong sound, long battery, ANC, sensors, and open-ear design for the price.
-
The clip design is distinctive and often ergonomic or premium-looking, but some reviewers call the overall look or finish mixed.
-
Comfort is a major strength overall, with many reviewers forgetting they were wearing the buds, though some felt pressure or fatigue.
-
Several reviewers heard a wide or well-spread stage, with open-ear positioning helping side-to-side presentation.
-
Transparency and environmental awareness are strong, with reviewers saying the earbuds preserve surrounding sounds very well.
-
Mids and vocals are usually described as clear, full, or warm, with only a few comments about subdued instruments or ordinary smoothness.
-
Video latency caused no issues in the comparison review, and gaming latency was described as decent.
-
Sensors are ambitious and often useful, covering wear detection and biometrics, but health tracking is not a full smartwatch replacement and can lag.
-
Treble is generally controlled and non-harsh, but some reviewers found it bright, lacking upper sparkle, or slightly subdued.
-
Multipoint works and is useful, but reviewers note occasional hiccups or the need to pause one device before the other takes over.
-
Bass is a standout for the category, often fuller than expected, but sub-bass roll-off, muddiness, or open-ear limits appear in several reviews.
-
Separation is praised in some tracks, but one comparison review says competing models have cleaner instrument separation.
-
LDAC is a welcome high-res feature, though reviewers disagree on how much it matters in an open-ear design.
-
Build quality is mixed: the earbuds and silicone can feel well made, while the case build looks cheaper to several reviewers.
-
Charging is helped by useful fast charging, but the lack of wireless charging appears as a repeated caveat.
-
The app is feature-rich but inconsistent: some reviewers like its tools, while others dislike clunky menus, pauses, and login friction.
-
High-volume clarity is mixed, with some reports of muddied bass or distortion and one strong report of retaining bass without distortion.
-
Hi-res playback is supported through LDAC, but reviewers are mixed on whether the open design reveals much extra detail.
Cons
-
Frequency balance is respectable through mids and overall tone, but low-bass roll-off below preference targets limits full-range accuracy.
-
Call mic quality is usable but inconsistent, ranging from clear in quiet spaces to metallic, distant, or tinny in tougher conditions.
-
Clamping comfort is mixed: one reviewer felt pressure after hours, while another praised the clip force as balanced.
-
Microphone noise reduction can suppress traffic, fans, or background noise, but several reviewers heard aggressive gating, artifacts, or smothering.
-
Preset EQ quality is mixed: Classic and Bass Boost can work well, while Bass, Treble, or Vocal modes sometimes muddy or over-sharpen sound.
-
Portability is limited by a chunky case, though the review evidence still frames it as usable rather than unmanageable.
-
Sustainability gets partial credit for recyclable elements, but excess packaging and plastic wrap limit the benefit.
-
ANC is the most split attribute: it helps with drones or lower frequencies for some, but many call it weak or modest for real noise blocking.
-
Spatial audio is mostly a weak point, often described as poor, gimmicky, recessed, or harmful to music, with a few movie/gaming positives.
-
Software setup and operation are uneven: setup/navigation can be simple, but login friction, hidden menus, and playback interruptions hurt polish.
-
Touch controls are one of the bigger weaknesses: many found them finicky, limited, or misfiring, though one reviewer liked the full-loop tap area.
-
Case hinge durability raised a concern in one review because the hinge crackled when opened widely.
-
Sound leakage remains an open-ear caveat, with one reviewer warning that nearby people may hear audio around 60% volume.
-
USB-C is present, but one reviewer specifically criticized the rear port placement as awkward.
-
The case draws repeated criticism for bulk, cheap-feeling plastic, or a less durable feel.
-
EQ customization is repeatedly criticized because reviewers wanted a true custom, graphic, or band EQ.
-
Passive isolation is intentionally weak because of the open/semi-open design, preserving awareness while letting external sound bleed in.
-
Voice assistant access is hindered by limited onboard controls, pushing some everyday actions back to the phone.
-
Smudge resistance is poor; multiple reviewers call the glossy case or buds fingerprint magnets.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Open-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Active noise cancellation, Sensors, Find My, below average in Equalizer customization, USB-C, Software/setup simplicity.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 50% 4 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 50% 4 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equalizer customization | 2.1 | 4.2 | -2.1 |
| USB-C | 2.5 | 4.7 | -2.2 |
| Software/setup simplicity | 2.7 | 4.6 | -1.9 |
| Active noise cancellation | 2.9 | 1.5 | +1.3 |
| Sensors | 3.9 | 2.5 | +1.3 |
| Voice assistant integration | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| Find My | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| Codec support | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
FAQ
Are the Edifier LolliClip earbuds good for workouts?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praise the secure fit, IP56 dust and water resistance, light feel, and long battery life for gym, running, rain, and sweat-heavy use.
How good is the sound quality?
Sound quality is one of the strongest themes. Reviewers describe the LolliClip as rich, clear, loud, and unusually bass-capable for open-ear earbuds, though not a replacement for sealed audiophile earbuds.
Does the ANC work well?
It works only modestly. Some reviewers heard useful reduction of low drones or background distractions, but many called the ANC weak because the open design still lets in outside sound.
Are the app and touch controls easy to use?
The app has many features, but reviewers often found it clunky, slow, or interrupted by playback pauses. Touch controls are also frequently criticized as limited, finicky, or prone to missed taps.
How long does the battery last?
Battery life is a clear strength. Reviewers cite about nine hours from the earbuds and roughly 39 hours with the case, plus a 15-minute quick charge that adds about three hours.
Do the health sensors replace a smartwatch?
No. Reviewers found heart-rate and blood-oxygen tools interesting and sometimes consistent, but they require app-triggered checks and do not replace deeper, automatic wearable tracking.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - RonOnTech
- Review score
- 3.8/5
YouTube - My Tech Gear
- Review score
- 3.8/5
YouTube - MrYouWho
- Review score
- 4.3/5
YouTube - Picky Audio
- Review score
- 3.8/5
Article Reviews
the-gadgeteer.com
- Review score
- 4.0/5
loudnwireless.com
- Review score
- 3.2/5
techradar.com
- Review score
- 3.3/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better Equalizer customization
Choose EarFun OpenJump Open Ear Earbuds. It scores 4.3 vs 2.1 for Equalizer customization, with a 3.6 overall score.
If you want better Microphone noise reduction
Choose Shokz OpenFit 2. It scores 5.0 vs 3.1 for Microphone noise reduction, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Microphone quality for calls
Choose Soundcore AeroClip Earbuds. It scores 4.4 vs 3.3 for Microphone quality for calls, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better App
Choose Anker Soundcore AeroFit 2 Open-Ear Headphones. It scores 4.6 vs 3.6 for App, with a 3.7 overall score.
Overall Top Open-Ear Headphones Alternatives
Best for secure, comfortable open-ear workouts, strong battery life, and easier physical controls. Skip them if you need ANC, sealed-earbud sound, or the best value at full price.
Pros: Microphone noise reduction, Bluetooth
Cons: Active noise cancellation, Codec support
Choose the Soundcore AeroClip if you want featherlight open-ear buds with strong comfort, secure fit, clear calls, and surprisingly full sound. Skip them if you need ANC, sealed-bud isolation, higher...
Pros: Android compatibility, Software/setup simplicity
Cons: Active noise cancellation, Noise isolation (passive)
Best for open-ear comfort, secure runs, long battery life, and convenient wireless charging. Skip it if you need ANC, deep bass, LDAC, or earbuds that never shift under helmets, buffs,...
Pros: Clamping force comfort, Battery
Cons: Active noise cancellation, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose the AeroFit 2 for comfortable open-ear listening, strong battery life, app control, and value. Skip it if you want class-leading sound balance, real isolation or ANC, smaller cases, or...
Pros: Software/setup simplicity, AI translation
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Spatial audio