Compare Crimson Desert vs 1348 Ex Voto

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: innovation was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).

Several reviewers see the game borrowing prestige-action conventions without adding enough mechanical depth of its own, making the design feel more imitative than inventive.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: replay value was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).

One reviewer notes there is no level selection and little reason to revisit completed stages, limiting the appeal of going back for missed collectibles.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: world interactivity was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 5 review(s).

The world looks richer than it plays: many props are set dressing, NPCs are scarce, and interaction often comes down to supplies, collectibles, boxes, and narrow traversal prompts.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: level design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).

Levels can be visually impressive but are often criticized as narrow, repetitive corridors with confusing landmarks, invisible boundaries, and traversal solutions that are easy to miss.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: sandbox freedom was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 4 review(s).

The game is deliberately linear, but many reviewers feel the boundaries are too restrictive, with obvious side paths, invisible walls, and little freedom to explore the attractive scenery.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: map and navigation design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).

The absence of a map or minimap becomes frustrating in similar-looking spaces, where poorly distinguished routes and subtle interactable ledges can make the intended path harder to read than it should be.

Reviewer evidence is positive: performance optimization was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 9 review(s).

Optimization is one of the strongest negative patterns, especially on PC where capable hardware can still stutter badly. Console coverage also reports a restrictive frame-rate target and heavy drops in demanding scenes.

Reviewer evidence is positive: side character depth was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 2 review(s).

One long-form playthrough criticizes the supporting cast as so thinly established that even recurring side characters fail to leave a memorable identity.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: animation quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).

Combat motion capture can look authentic in motion, but the broader animation package is inconsistent, with glitches, stiffness, odd hair physics, and rough transitions frequently breaking the presentation.

Reviewer evidence is positive: frame rate stability was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 7 review(s).

Frame-rate problems are widespread in the reviewed builds, including severe PC drops and a 30 FPS console cap with additional dips during busy scenes or effects-heavy boss fights.

Reviewer evidence is positive: mission variety was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 4 review(s).

Mission structure changes very little across the campaign, with reviewers describing repeated travel, skirmishes, and simple traversal rather than meaningfully different objectives.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: content variety was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 9 review(s).

The campaign leans heavily on the same basic rhythm of walking, fighting small groups, and light traversal. Several reviewers felt the limited enemy, puzzle, and activity mix became repetitive quickly.

Reviewer evidence is positive: fun factor was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 6 review(s).

Most reviewers found the experience more frustrating than enjoyable, chiefly because combat and technical friction dominate the short campaign. Positive moments usually come from scenery, atmosphere, or brief one-on-one combat flow.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: skill tree depth was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 7 review(s).

The skill tree adds parries, dodges, combo extensions, and stat boosts, but most reviewers consider it shallow or poorly explained. A few specific unlocks are powerful and genuinely improve combat.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: platform-specific feature support drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

Console reviewers are particularly disappointed by the lack of a 60 FPS option, including on PS5 Pro, making the platform feature set feel unusually limited for a 2026 release.

Reviewer evidence is positive: combat system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 17 review(s).

Sword fighting is the central point of disagreement. A few reviewers enjoy its one-on-one parry-and-guard rhythm, but the dominant view is that shallow tactics, broken targeting, unreliable dodges, and group encounters undermine it.

Reviewer evidence is positive: exploration quality was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 8 review(s).

Exploration is limited by strongly linear spaces and sparse interaction. Hidden paths and collectibles can reward curiosity, but many reviewers wanted more freedom and more meaningful reasons to leave the main route.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: gameplay mechanics drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).

The mechanical foundation is viewed as underdeveloped: a few workable ideas are present, but multiple reviews describe the overall play experience as clunky, shallow, or insufficiently refined.

Reviewer evidence is positive: originality was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 2 review(s).

The plague-era female-knight premise feels distinctive, yet some reviewers say the actual structure follows familiar cinematic action-adventure formulas too closely.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: tutorial quality drew both praise and caveats across 5 review(s).

The tutorial covers basic inputs but does not adequately explain timing, upgrades, or how later mechanics should be used, leaving some reviewers confused after the introductory section.

Reviewer evidence is positive: loot system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).

Trinkets and sword parts can offer useful bonuses, but reviewers disagree on how meaningful the hunt feels. Some collectibles reward exploration, while others feel low-impact or like filler.

Reviewer evidence is positive: progression system was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 5 review(s).

Scroll-based progression provides health, guard, food, and combat upgrades, but many reviewers find the growth shallow or low-impact. A few enjoy the straightforward additions and useful combat abilities.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: value for money drew both praise and caveats across 4 review(s).

The low asking price and short runtime appeal to a few reviewers, but most still recommend waiting for a discount because the combat and technical state make even the budget price hard to justify.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: visual effects quality drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).

Lighting and fire effects receive strong praise, adding drama and texture to chapels, burning buildings, landscapes, and other period environments.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: movement feel drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

Aeta is often described as heavy in an unflattering way, with stiff turning, awkward climbing, and sluggish movement that can make simple navigation feel more cumbersome than grounded.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: enemy variety drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).

Most coverage finds the enemy pool too repetitive, often describing only a handful of recognizable types and attack patterns. A few reviewers saw enough weapon variety to keep encounters interesting.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: weapon balance drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

Weapon and combat upgrades can skew balance sharply, with stronger parts or instant-kill effects reducing experimentation and making ordinary encounters easier than the broader combat system suggests.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: polish was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 9 review(s).

Across launch and pre-release builds, reviewers repeatedly describe the game as underbaked or unfinished. Glitches, rough transitions, animation problems, and inconsistent systems make the lack of final refinement hard to ignore.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: art direction drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).

The medieval Italian aesthetic is one of the clearest strengths, with striking lighting, countryside vistas, chapels, ruins, and period-inspired architecture giving the game a distinctive visual identity.

Reviewer evidence is positive: immersion was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).

The setting can be absorbing, but rough animations, technical glitches, and interface choices repeatedly remind players of the machinery underneath and pull them out of the historical fantasy.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: difficulty balance drew both praise and caveats across 5 review(s).

Difficulty can swing for the wrong reasons: some bosses feel punishing because of hitboxes and regeneration, while certain upgrades or later familiarity can make ordinary encounters trivial.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: camera behavior was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).

The camera and lock-on system are repeatedly blamed for combat frustration, especially in groups where focus snaps unpredictably or the close field of view hides incoming threats.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: puzzle design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 9 review(s).

Puzzles rarely rise beyond moving boxes, cutting ropes, or finding a simple traversal route. Reviewers generally see them as filler rather than a meaningful second pillar beside combat.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: onboarding experience was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 3 review(s).

Early guidance does not do enough to make the combat and upgrade systems understandable, leaving some players unsure how newly unlocked mechanics are meant to work.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: writing quality drew both praise and caveats across 2 review(s).

The writing draws praise from a minority for its earnest themes and performances, but most reviewers criticize blunt exposition, thin character work, abandoned ideas, and a late twist that feels poorly earned.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: platforming precision was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Basic climbing and ledge traversal are frequently finicky, with missed prompts, unclear climbable surfaces, and simple platforming sequences that can require repeated inputs.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: boss design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 8 review(s).

Boss fights are one of the most consistent complaints, with regenerating guard or health, spammy attacks, strange hitboxes, and difficulty spikes that feel more aggravating than satisfying.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: emotional impact drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

The premise aims for grief, devotion, betrayal, and forbidden love, yet most reviewers felt the relationship was too underdeveloped for the climax to land. A smaller group found the story genuinely moving.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: soundtrack quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).

The orchestral score is generally well received and helps sell the somber period atmosphere, even if repetitive combat cues or mixing occasionally compete with dialogue.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: crash stability was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).

Crashes appear in both PC and console coverage, including startup or save-loading failures in earlier builds. Patches improved some experiences, but stability remained a recurring concern.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: aiming precision was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Target selection is a major weak point. Reviewers describe lock-on jumping to the wrong opponent mid-combo, making attacks miss the enemy they intended to pressure.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: learning curve was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).

Combat is difficult to read for the wrong reasons in early play, with one reviewer still unable to make sense of parry and dodge timing well after the tutorial.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: graphics quality was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 15 review(s).

Visual quality is split between gorgeous environments and much rougher close-up character work. The scenery can be striking, but texture issues, clipping, facial problems, and performance compromises keep the package from looking consistently polished.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: bug frequency was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).

Bugs are common across the reviewed builds, ranging from broken interaction prompts and clipping to stuck characters, missing assets, glitched bosses, and other issues that sometimes force a restart.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: core gameplay loop was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

The linear walk-fight-walk structure wears thin for many reviewers because combat carries most of the interaction while the quieter stretches offer little beyond movement and collecting supplies.

Reviewer evidence is positive: sound design was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).

Ambient audio, weapon clashes, and the broader soundscape often strengthen the medieval mood, though several reviews flag uneven mixing, repeated combat lines, or volume shifts that distract.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: world-building drew both praise and caveats across 4 review(s).

Reviewers admire the medieval Italian setting and plague-era concept, but many feel the game underuses its history, religion, class tensions, and social collapse instead of making the world feel fully lived in.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: menu usability was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).

Menus receive direct criticism for sluggish or unresponsive behavior and for doing too little to explain the game's systems clearly.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: lore depth was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

The setting hints at rich medieval history, religion, plague, and social upheaval, but reviewers often felt those ideas were only gestured at rather than explored in depth.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: economy and resource balance drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

Food and provisions can add useful attrition to fights, but limited supplies combined with autosaves can also make retries harsher than intended. One reviewer liked the scarcity and decision-making it created.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: checkpoint system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Checkpoint experiences vary: some reviewers praise generous respawns close to encounters, while others describe autosaves that can send them back through frustrating fights or lock them into poor resource states.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: mission design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 6 review(s).

Chapters tend to funnel Aeta toward a distant objective through walking and combat arenas, creating a rigid structure that several reviewers found stale well before the ending.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: save system reliability was consistently framed as a major weakness across 2 review(s).

Autosaving can be inconvenient when it records progress before difficult encounters with poor supplies, and some reviewers had to reload saves to escape bugs or failed interactions.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: atmosphere was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 1 review(s).

The best stretches create a convincing plague-era mood through lighting, scenery, sound, and bleak environmental cues. Technical problems and repetitive combat can puncture that atmosphere at key moments.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: user interface design was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Interface complaints focus on overlapping subtitles, awkward presentation, and other rough UI details that do not match the cinematic ambitions of the rest of the game.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: controls responsiveness was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 11 review(s).

Input feel is a recurring problem, with delayed attacks, unreliable dodges and parries, finicky traversal prompts, and occasional moments where Aeta simply does not respond as expected.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: facial animations was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Facial animation is a prominent visual weakness, with uncanny mouths, stiff expressions, lip-sync issues, and distorted faces repeatedly distracting from otherwise strong dramatic performances.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: dialogue quality was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).

The performances often elevate the spoken material, but the dialogue itself is frequently criticized for repetitive combat lines, overexplaining, blunt exposition, and Aeta narrating obvious environmental details.

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: voice acting was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 5 review(s).

Voice acting is the clearest non-visual strength. Alby Baldwin and Jennifer English are repeatedly praised for giving conviction and emotional credibility to material that many reviewers otherwise find underwritten.

Reviewer evidence is positive: environmental detail was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 3 review(s).

The environments are the most universally praised part of the package, with detailed villages, forests, mountains, ruins, chapels, vineyards, and lighting that frequently look far beyond the game's small-team scale.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: character development was consistently framed as a major weakness across 3 review(s).

Aeta and Bianca begin with an appealing premise, but many reviewers wanted substantially more time and depth for their bond, motivations, and personal growth before the late-game revelations.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: upgrade system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 1 review(s).

Sword components, trinkets, and skill upgrades provide some useful customization, but their impact is uneven: certain bonuses feel negligible while a few powerful effects can trivialize encounters.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: pacing was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 2 review(s).

The short runtime keeps the campaign compact, but pacing inside that span can still drag because of long travel, repetitive combat, exposition, and abrupt jumps between story beats.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: grind level was consistently framed as a major weakness across 3 review(s).

One review describes the practical grind not as leveling but as repeating the same fight patterns until timing and resource use finally line up, turning progress into repetition.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: narrative quality was consistently framed as a major weakness across 11 review(s).

The opening rescue premise earns interest, but the broader consensus is that the second half becomes disjointed or underdeveloped and the climax does not earn its twists. A notable minority loved the story.

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: protagonist appeal was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 5 review(s).

Aeta divides reviewers: some find her resolve, vulnerability, and knightly idealism compelling, while others call her flat, repetitive, or difficult to invest in as the story progresses.

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: stealth mechanics was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).

One reviewer specifically criticizes the lack of stealth or alternate approaches, reinforcing how narrowly the game funnels players into direct combat.

Accessibility support is repeatedly called thin, with limited settings and no difficulty options in some builds; one PC review also struggled with fixed keybinds.

Enemy behavior often feels artificial rather than tactical: groups may wait their turn, spawn awkwardly, or repeat predictable patterns instead of coordinating naturally.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: character roster drew both praise and caveats across 3 review(s).

The few apparent choices near the ending have little weight; two reviewers specifically say the final outcome is unchanged even when the player refuses the prompted action.

Reviewer evidence is positive: companion AI was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: crafting system was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 4 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is strongly negative: endgame content was consistently framed as a major weakness across 1 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is negative or mixed: fast travel convenience was often criticized, even where some reviewers found redeeming moments across 3 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: flying mechanics was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 2 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is positive: handheld play suitability was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 1 review(s).

One review strongly praises the quiet dread of the plague-stricken world, where sound and lighting make the setting feel like a grounded medieval tragedy rather than fantasy.

The minimal interface can complement the cinematic presentation, but another reviewer found the bright enemy health bars visually jarring and immersion-breaking.

Reviewer evidence is mixed: load times drew both praise and caveats across 1 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is strongly positive: open-world design was repeatedly praised as a standout strength across 9 review(s).

Reviewer evidence is positive: quest design was generally praised, though some notes were more qualified across 4 review(s).