Breath of the Wild
- Worse: world density and side content VICE argues Crimson Desert surpasses BOTW in the amount of unique side content and scenarios.
Crimson Desert Review
Bottom Line
Choose Crimson Desert for a huge, gorgeous sandbox with deep combat and endless distractions. Skip it if weak storytelling, clunky controls, boss spikes, or open-world jank will wear you down.
Best for
Best for players who want a massive open-world action sandbox with deep combat, long-term progression, and lots of systems to discover. It especially suits players who enjoy exploration more than tightly scripted storytelling.
Not for
Not for players who need polished controls, a strong protagonist-led narrative, clean menus, or friction-free boss encounters. Base-console players should also weigh the mixed performance evidence.
Verdict
Crimson Desert earns its excitement through scale, spectacle, and unusually deep sandbox systems. Reviewers repeatedly praise its vast world, striking visuals, rewarding exploration, strong PC performance, and combat that can feel powerful once its many moves and tools click. The tradeoff is that the same ambition creates friction: the story and protagonist often fail to carry the adventure, controls and menus can feel overloaded, bosses swing from thrilling to aggravating, and bugs or checkpoint issues can undercut long sessions. It is most convincing as a discovery-driven action sandbox, less convincing as a polished narrative RPG.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Cyberpunk 2077
- Compared: console launch quality Gameranx says the console version is compromised but not a Cyberpunk-level base-console disaster.
Devil May Cry
- Similar: combat feel Eurogamer likens the melee combat's impact and style to Devil May Cry with extra weight.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
The soundtrack receives strong praise, with reviewers calling it a standout part of the experience.
-
Visual effects are praised through examples like physics-based water and weather effects.
-
Exploration is one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers describing the world as rewarding to wander through for hours.
-
World interactivity is a major strength, with reactive environments, physical objects, lived-in NPC routines, and dense town activity.
-
Environmental detail is consistently strong, with reviewers highlighting vistas, landscapes, towns, and dense world detail.
-
Mission variety is praised in the stronger reviews, especially across main and side quests.
-
Level design benefits from distinct biomes and varied spaces that encourage exploration across a huge world.
-
Originality is praised by reviewers who say there is nothing else quite like it.
-
The open world is consistently described as huge, beautiful, and technically ambitious, though not every reviewer finds it fully cohesive.
-
Sandbox freedom is praised for letting players roam, experiment, and approach exploration in their own way.
-
Content variety is enormous, with minigames, side activities, quests, systems, and mechanics repeatedly noted across reviews.
-
Voice acting is one of the stronger presentation elements, repeatedly praised even when story writing is criticized.
-
Graphics are one of Crimson Desert's strongest and most consistent positives, with repeated praise for vistas, foliage, and scale.
-
Performance optimization is generally strong on PC and PS5 Pro, though platform caveats remain for base consoles.
-
Atmosphere is praised through the living world, inviting spaces, and believable towns.
-
Vehicle and mount variety is broad, including unusual rideable animals and combat mounts.
-
Animation quality is praised for grounded combat weight, motion capture, and strong action presentation.
-
The skill trees are seen as deep and rewarding, often expanding movement and combat in noticeable ways.
-
Frame-rate stability is strong on high-end PC and PS5 Pro but more mixed on base consoles and large combat scenes.
-
Innovation comes through the game's unusual scale and information delivery, even when some borrowed systems feel obvious.
-
Combat is one of the most discussed strengths, praised for impact, depth, and spectacle, but some reviews find it uneven or dragged down by encounter design.
-
Value is high for players who want hundreds of hours, but one review questions day-one value for everyone.
-
Progression earns praise when Abyss artifacts, reputation, loot, and new abilities create meaningful long-term growth.
-
The loop works best when exploration, combat, and camp/base systems feed into each other, though not every system is equally refined.
-
Companions are described as useful in combat support roles, especially for weakening enemy forces.
-
Handheld suitability is supported by one PC-performance discussion that calls Xbox Ally X a good portable way to play.
-
Map and navigation design emphasizes scale and travel, with the map taking hours to cross.
-
Flying, gliding, grappling, and aerial traversal are generally praised as exciting mobility tools, with some control caveats.
-
Loot is promising and sometimes deep, especially unique weapons and gear systems, but inventory friction affects the experience.
-
Fun factor depends heavily on tolerance for friction: many reviews report a blast, while others call it uneven.
-
Enemy variety and density are present, but the number of enemies can become overwhelming in large fights.
-
The art direction mixes high fantasy, steampunk, and sci-fi elements in a way that stands out but can feel less cohesive.
-
Reviewers describe Crimson Desert as mechanically dense, with overlapping systems that can feel exciting, confusing, or MMO-like depending on tolerance.
-
Side characters fare better than Kliff in some reviews, especially Greymane allies with distinct personalities or bonding moments.
-
Platform-specific support includes console modes and ultrawide support, but console performance quality varies by hardware.
-
Crash stability is mixed, with some crashes reported but not uniformly across all reviewers.
Cons
-
The character roster adds variety through multiple playable characters, though progression across them is not always streamlined.
-
Puzzle design is divisive: some reviewers enjoy the thoughtful, discovery-driven puzzles, while others find them obtuse, clunky, or progression-stopping.
-
Immersion is strong when the world and factions work, but visual issues and design setbacks can break it.
-
Crafting and life-skill systems are substantial, but some reviewers find food, resources, and storage frustrating.
-
World-building is mixed: some reviews praise regional context and Pywel, while others find it lacking soul or distinctiveness.
-
Weapon balance is mixed, with weapon variety praised but bows singled out as weak.
-
Bosses are one of the most polarizing elements: some reviewers call them epic and varied, while others find them frustrating, spongy, or poorly balanced.
-
Load times are a minor concern in one review, though they reportedly improved during the review period.
-
Upgrades are important for stats and abilities, though they are tied to resource gathering and preparation.
-
Resource balance is split between an interesting trade economy and major complaints about inventory/storage limitations.
-
On-foot movement is criticized as slow or clunky, even by reviewers who enjoy broader traversal once more tools open up.
-
Quest design is mixed, ranging from strong side content to needlessly drawn-out errands and uneven narrative delivery.
-
The learning curve is steep, with little hand-holding and many systems that take time to understand.
-
Tutorials and instructions are inconsistent, with some guidance appreciated but several reviewers calling it vague or insufficient.
-
Platforming precision is a weak point, with movement and controls not feeling precise enough for traversal-heavy sections.
-
Difficulty is divisive, especially around boss spikes that can feel rewarding to some and punishing or unfair to others.
-
Narrative quality is mixed to negative overall, with a few reviewers finding coherence or appeal but many calling the story weak.
-
Polish is one of the main caveats, with repeated mentions of jank, rough edges, and systems that need refinement.
-
Bugs appear across several reviews, including progression-blocking issues and visual glitches.
-
Pacing is a recurring weakness, with reviewers pointing to padding, slow progression, and systems that waste time.
-
Enemy AI receives limited but negative early-impression evidence, with basic foes described as passive.
-
Lore is present but sometimes buried in menu entries rather than delivered naturally through quests.
-
The grind level is a concern, especially around resource harvesting and required preparation.
-
User interface design is criticized for inventory, controls, MMO-style padding, and missing quality-of-life expectations.
-
Fast travel convenience is limited by discoverable points and confusing unlock rules, frustrating multiple reviewers.
-
Controls are a repeated complaint, especially controller and keyboard mappings that reviewers call clunky, overloaded, or slow to learn.
-
Menu usability is hurt by inventory management, storage limitations, and nested or messy menus.
-
The opening and onboarding are frequently described as rough, overwhelming, or weak before the game opens up.
-
Kliff is widely seen as underwhelming, hollow, or too close to a blank protagonist.
-
Camera behavior is a combat problem, especially when enemies surround the player or boss fights become tight.
-
Character development is weak overall, with reviewers saying the main cast often lacks growth or personhood.
-
Ranged aiming and bow use receive negative feedback, with bows singled out as unsatisfying regardless of investment.
-
Checkpointing can frustrate when deaths force players to repeat puzzle sections.
-
The intended emotional beats are criticized for lacking payoff.
-
Facial animation is a weak spot, with janky faces and lip sync called out.
-
Some mission structures are criticized for repetitive kill-count objectives that stretch encounters too long.
-
Writing is directly criticized in one review as messy and lacking depth.
-
Dialogue is directly criticized as hard to listen to in one review.
-
Save reliability is a serious concern in reviews that encountered progression bugs or large setbacks.
-
Endgame content is criticized as minimal by one reviewer after the main story.
-
Stealth is treated as an underdeveloped detour rather than a core strength.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Video Games, this product is below average in endgame content, emotional impact, save system reliability.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| endgame content | 1.5 | 4.0 | -2.5 |
| emotional impact | 2.0 | 4.4 | -2.4 |
| save system reliability | 1.5 | 3.8 | -2.3 |
| stealth mechanics | 1.5 | 3.8 | -2.3 |
| character development | 2.0 | 4.2 | -2.2 |
| controls responsiveness | 2.3 | 4.2 | -1.9 |
| aiming precision | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| dialogue quality | 1.6 | 3.7 | -2.1 |
FAQ
Is Crimson Desert more about story or exploration?
The review evidence leans strongly toward exploration, combat, and sandbox discovery. Story reactions are mixed to negative, with several reviewers calling the narrative weak, messy, or secondary to the gameplay.
How good is the combat?
Combat is one of the biggest strengths when the systems click, with reviewers praising its impact, depth, and over-the-top moves. The main caveat is that boss fights and large encounters can become frustrating or uneven.
Does Crimson Desert run well?
PC performance is widely praised, and PS5 Pro impressions are strong. Base console impressions are more mixed, with visual compromises and frame-rate drops during hectic combat.
Is the open world actually worth exploring?
Yes, reviewers repeatedly highlight the size, vistas, environmental detail, and many discoveries. The world is one of the most consistently praised parts of the game.
Are the controls hard to learn?
Yes. Multiple reviewers criticize overloaded controls, awkward mappings, and menus that take time to understand, especially early on.
Who will enjoy Crimson Desert most?
It fits players who want a huge action sandbox, deep combat tools, and a long checklist of systems to explore. It is less suited to players who prioritize a polished story, clean controls, or friction-free pacing.
Consider This Instead
If you want better dialogue quality
Choose Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. It scores 4.9 vs 1.6 for dialogue quality, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better endgame content
Choose Hollow Knight: Silksong. It scores 4.8 vs 1.5 for endgame content, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better controls responsiveness
Choose The First Berserker: Khazan. It scores 4.9 vs 2.3 for controls responsiveness, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better save system reliability
Choose Saros. It scores 4.6 vs 1.5 for save system reliability, with a 4.3 overall score.
Overall Top Video Games Alternatives
Good if you want deeper Hades-style roguelite combat, huge build variety, polished art, and rewarding progression. Skip it if repetition, resource tracking, or a less intimate story than the original...
Pros: world interactivity, side character depth
Cons: grind level
Good if you want a faithful, modern JRPG remake with rich world-building, lovable characters, and layered combat. Skip it if slow pacing, localization quirks, or the cliffhanger-first-chapter structure will frustrate...
Pros: crash stability, frame rate stability
Cons: facial animations
Best for a stylish, emotional RPG with deep timed combat and exceptional music. Skip it if tight parry timing, weak maps, or awkward platforming would frustrate you.
Pros: world-building, crash stability
Cons: platforming precision, map and navigation design
Good if you want joyful 3D exploration, fluid DK movement, dense collectibles, and playful destruction. Skip it if frame drops, camera hiccups, easy or repeated bosses, or a $70 price...
Pros: load times, movement feel
Cons: enemy variety, platforming precision