Compare Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard vs Razer Joro

P1 Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
P2 Razer Joro

Comparison Takeaways

Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard

Where It Has the Edge

  • ease of switch replacement is 3.6 vs 1.0. Ease of switch replacement follows the same split as hot-swap support: it is possible, but magnetic switch limits...
  • hot-swappable switches is 3.6 vs 1.0. Hot-swappable switch support is mixed-positive because some reviewers say switches can be changed, while the main written review...
  • sound dampening is 4.2 vs 1.8. Sound dampening is supported by foam and internal layers, including dampening foam and spacebar foam.
  • latency is 4.5 vs 2.4. Latency evidence is positive, with the written review reporting no noticeable input lag during testing.

Razer Joro

Where It Has the Edge

  • portability is 4.7 vs 2.0. Portability is one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thin, light body and bag-friendly design.
  • compatibility is 4.4 vs 2.8. The Joro earns strong marks for cross-platform support, especially Windows, macOS, iPad and mobile-device use.
  • software quality is 3.7 vs 2.2. Synapse is viewed as useful and improved, including Mac support, but availability, dependency and customization limits keep reactions...
  • layout options is 3.8 vs 2.8. The 75% layout is useful and compact, but the right-side key arrangement and smaller keys bother some typists.
Average score
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.8
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.5
acoustics
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Acoustics are mixed-positive: several reviewers liked the sound, but one criticized the spacebar as cheap-sounding.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.3

Reviewers describe the Joro as quiet and more thocky than clicky, with a subdued sound that suits offices and travel.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.4

Actuation control is well supported, with adjustable ranges, accuracy claims, slider control, and rapid-trigger actuation repeatedly mentioned.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.4

PCMag finds the scissor-switch feel consistent across the board, with crisp actuation and no mush.

analog input support
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
1.5

The Joro is not treated as an analog-input keyboard; GamesRadar notes fancier actuation features are reserved for Razer analog systems.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.9

Reviewers like the controllable, useful, bright RGB lighting, but repeatedly note that higher brightness drains battery quickly.

battery life
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.6

Battery life is highly usage-dependent: excellent with lighting off or power saving, but much shorter when RGB brightness is high.

build quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.6

Build quality is a major strength, with repeated praise for the aluminum case, heavy feel, and tank-like construction.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.4

Most reviewers praise the sturdy, premium-feeling build, especially given the thin and light travel-focused chassis.

cable quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Cable quality has limited positive evidence from the included braided USB-C cable.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.8

The included USB-C cable is generally viewed positively, with reviewers noting a braided or high-quality cable, though one says it is short.

compatibility
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.8

Compatibility has caveats, including Windows-focused software for customization and a narrow port opening that did not fit one coiled cable.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.4

The Joro earns strong marks for cross-platform support, especially Windows, macOS, iPad and mobile-device use.

connectivity
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.5

Connectivity evidence is limited to wired USB-C, with one review pointing to a USB-C port on the left side.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

Bluetooth multi-device pairing and wired USB-C are useful, but the lack of an included 2.4GHz dongle limits gaming-focused connectivity.

customization options
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.9

Customization options are broad on paper, including remapping, actuation, layers, RGB, macros, and rapid trigger, but software friction hurts execution.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.9

Synapse enables remapping, RGB changes and profiles, but several reviewers note limitations around certain keys, layers or software dependency.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Desk space efficiency is supported by the lack of a function row and number pad, fitting the compact 65% layout.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.4

Its compact 75% low-profile body saves space while retaining useful keys, making it efficient for travel setups and tight desks.

durability
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.5

Durability is positively supported by one reviewer tying the aluminum case to premium feel and durability.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.1

Evidence points to durable laser-etched legends and solid wear resistance, though full environmental resistance is not a major strength.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.6

Ease of switch replacement follows the same split as hot-swap support: it is possible, but magnetic switch limits reduce flexibility.

Product 2: Razer Joro
1.0

One comparison review states the keys or switches cannot be replaced, so switch replacement is effectively unsupported.

ergonomics
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Ergonomics are positively supported by the light switch force reducing fatigue over time.

Product 2: Razer Joro
2.9

Ergonomics are divisive: the flat low-profile angle suits some users but fixed height and no feet cause fatigue for others.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.4

Extra gaming features are mixed: rapid trigger, dead-zone settings, and high polling are present, but Snap Tap and quad-actuation are called out as missing.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.1

The Joro includes gaming extras such as Snap Tap, NKRO, anti-ghosting and gaming-mode support, which help it exceed typical travel keyboards.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.4

Frame rigidity is strongly implied by the heavy aluminum construction, solid weight, and reports that the board stays in place.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.6

Reviewers consistently praise the rigid chassis, repeatedly noting minimal or no flex despite the keyboard’s thin design.

gaming performance
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.6

Gaming performance is strong in the evidence, with snappy movement, responsive rapid trigger, and flawless or complaint-free game testing.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.1

Gaming performance is acceptable for casual or travel use, but reviewers do not view it as a replacement for a proper low-latency mechanical gaming board.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.6

Hot-swappable switch support is mixed-positive because some reviewers say switches can be changed, while the main written review says hot-swap ability is limited.

Product 2: Razer Joro
1.0

The Joro does not support hot-swappable switches; the comparison review says the keys or switches cannot be replaced.

keycap quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.4

Keycap quality is praised where discussed, especially the dye-sublimated or PBT Cherry-profile keycaps.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.5

The laser-etched ABS keycaps are comfortable and legible, but several reviewers report smudges, fingerprints or less premium texture.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.6

Key responsiveness is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers citing responsive switches, zero dead zone, and quick in-game actuation.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.5

Responsiveness is mixed: some reviewers report no input delay or reliable registration, while others find the keys slow or less responsive than mechanical boards.

key spacing
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.5

Key spacing opinions vary, with praise for full-sized arrows and decent spacing but criticism of small right-side keys and a cramped feel.

key stability
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
4.5

PCMag specifically notes no wobble or mush, supporting a stable key feel.

latency
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.5

Latency evidence is positive, with the written review reporting no noticeable input lag during testing.

Product 2: Razer Joro
2.4

Latency is a key weakness for competitive play because Bluetooth introduces delay, leaving wired mode as the safer option for speed-sensitive use.

layout options
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.8

Layout options are limited in the evidence, with the board presented as a 65% layout and one reviewer wishing for TKL instead.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.8

The 75% layout is useful and compact, but the right-side key arrangement and smaller keys bother some typists.

legend visibility
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

Primary legends are clean and readable, though one reviewer complains that secondary key functions are not backlit.

macro customization
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.1

Macro customization is supported in several software walkthroughs, with reviewers showing macros and remapping options.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

Macro support exists through Synapse and function layers, but on-the-fly recording and broader keymap flexibility are limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.7

Materials quality is a clear strength thanks to the aluminum case and premium feel mentioned by several reviewers.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.3

The aluminum top plate is widely praised, while the plastic underside or base is sometimes described as a compromise.

media controls
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.1

Media controls are present mostly through function layers, but the lack of dedicated controls and some placements draw criticism.

noise level
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.8

Noise level is context-dependent: one reviewer liked that it was not too loud, while another disliked the spacebar sound during gaming.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.5

Reviewers consistently describe the Joro as quiet enough for travel, shared workspaces and office use.

onboard memory
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
4.1

The Joro supports multiple onboard profiles, allowing saved changes to travel with the keyboard.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.5

Per-key lighting control has evidence only through the software workflow, and one reviewer found selecting keys for custom lighting unreliable.

Product 2: Razer Joro
1.6

Multiple reviewers say lighting is single-zone or not individually controllable, so per-key RGB control is weak or absent.

polling rate
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.7

Polling rate is consistently praised because reviewers confirm support for up to 8,000Hz, even though some users may not need that ceiling.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

The keyboard offers 1,000Hz wired polling or NKRO-related gaming capability, but wireless performance is constrained by Bluetooth unless using later dongle support.

portability
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.0

Portability is weak because the board is heavier than average and built around a substantial aluminum case.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.7

Portability is one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thin, light body and bag-friendly design.

profile management
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.1

Profile management is mixed: layers are available, but one reviewer could not find a way to set a separate profile.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.1

Profile management is a strength, with support for device profiles and up to five saved profiles noted across reviews.

rapid trigger support
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.4

Rapid Trigger is a core strength and appears in every review, with reviewers confirming it exists and works as intended.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.0

The Joro supports Snap Tap or last-key prioritization, described as a rapid-trigger-like software gaming feature rather than true analog actuation.

reliability
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.6

Reliability is mixed and mostly hurt by software problems, including crashes and finicky setup, despite one reviewer having no keyboard problems.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.4

Reliability is mostly solid in day-to-day switching and Bluetooth use, but sleep timeout annoyance and an occasional connection reset temper the score.

RGB customization
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.1

RGB customization is mixed: it has custom lighting and patterns, but multiple reviewers found the software or lighting workflow frustrating.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.0

RGB customization is useful through Synapse and shortcuts, but single-zone behavior limits advanced personalization.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

RGB lighting quality is generally acceptable to good in the limited evidence, with reviewers saying the RGB looks nice or has patterns.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.3

The lighting itself is widely praised as vivid, bright, colorful and attractive, even by reviewers critical of other features.

size and form factor
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Size and form factor are mostly positive for a compact 65% board with arrow keys, though one reviewer preferred TKL.

Product 2: Razer Joro
4.6

Reviewers consistently praise the ultra-low-profile, thin, light 75% form factor as the core appeal of the keyboard.

software quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
2.2

Software quality is the most divisive weakness, ranging from functional-but-early to janky, confusing, and severely frustrating.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

Synapse is viewed as useful and improved, including Mac support, but availability, dependency and customization limits keep reactions mixed.

sound dampening
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.2

Sound dampening is supported by foam and internal layers, including dampening foam and spacebar foam.

Product 2: Razer Joro
1.8

TechRadar specifically criticizes the keys for lacking dampening, making hard typing feel harsher.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.0

Stabilizer quality gets positive but limited evidence, with lubed stabilizers mentioned, although spacebar sound remains a caveat.

Product 2: Razer Joro
No score yet
switch feel
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.3

Switch feel is described as light, smooth, and strong across reviews, with praise for the magnetic switches and actuation force.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.7

The scissor switches are better than many laptop-style boards and often tactile, but they do not satisfy users wanting mechanical feel.

switch options
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.0

Switch choice is a mixed point: reviewers note two or three magnetic switch options, but the main written review says the options are limited and all linear.

Product 2: Razer Joro
2.0

Reviewers emphasize that the Joro does not use mechanical switches, and no alternate switch options are discussed.

typing comfort
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.2

Typing comfort is positively supported by soft PBT keycaps and comfort during long typing sessions.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.5

Typing comfort ranges from excellent for fast mobile typing to fatiguing over time because of the fixed angle and key feel.

typing feel
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
4.2

Typing feel is positive overall, with reviewers describing a good typing experience and a nice feel, aided by light switches and PBT keycaps.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.9

Typing feel is a central split: many like the crisp, quiet scissor action, while others find it less satisfying or precise than mechanical alternatives.

value for money
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.2

Value for money is mixed: one reviewer calls the price reasonable, another likes the $155 price, but the written review says better value exists elsewhere.

Product 2: Razer Joro
2.9

Value is mixed to weak because reviewers like the premium travel design but repeatedly call the keyboard expensive for a scissor-switch board.

volume control
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
3.5

Volume control evidence is limited to software-layer customization rather than a dedicated hardware control.

Product 2: Razer Joro
3.2

Volume control is available through function-layer shortcuts, but placement and lack of dedicated controls are not universally liked.

wireless performance
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
3.1

Wireless use is convenient and generally reliable for productivity, but Bluetooth-only operation creates latency concerns for gaming.

wrist rest quality
Product 1: Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Joro
1.5

No bundled wrist rest is provided, and PCMag notes users must bring their own if wrist support is needed.