Compare Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard vs ASUS ROG Azoth

P1 Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
P2 ASUS ROG Azoth

Comparison Takeaways

Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard

Where It Has the Edge

  • software quality is 4.2 vs 2.4. Software quality is generally good and easy to use, though one review says it is less customizable than...
  • macro customization is 4.4 vs 3.3. Macro customization is a clear software strength, with reviews citing macro recording, mouse-click detection, and easy setup.
  • value for money is 4.3 vs 3.4. Value for money is strong, with reviewers repeatedly framing the Cypher96 as affordable or well priced for its...
  • portability is 3.9 vs 3.1. Portability is decent for a 96-key board because reviewers cite a lightweight portable form and use while commuting,...

ASUS ROG Azoth

Where It Has the Edge

  • switch options is 4.6 vs 3.1. Switch options are good, with reviewer evidence for red, brown, blue, linear, tactile, and clicky variants.
  • frame rigidity is 4.7 vs 3.3. Frame rigidity is excellent in the available evidence, with a reviewer noting almost no flex.
  • materials quality is 4.8 vs 3.5. Materials quality is high, with reviews pointing to aluminum, steel, durable PBT, and premium-feeling construction.
  • layout options is 4.5 vs 3.5. The compact layout is praised for keeping a function row and dedicated everyday keys while avoiding the restrictions...
Average score
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.2
acoustics
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Reviewers describe the Cypher96 as pleasingly clacky or thocky, with strong overall sound quality, though one review notes pinging can spoil the profile.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Reviewers consistently liked the Azoth's tuned sound, describing it as quiet, marbled, and more refined than typical gaming keyboards.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Actuation is supported by one review that describes keypresses as consistent and smooth, helped by the gasket-mounted design.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

The strongest actuation-consistency evidence is positive, with one reviewer saying keystrokes felt consistent and measured after switch changes.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Lighting brightness is generally viewed positively, with several reviewers calling it vibrant or bright, while one found the side underglow weak.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.0

Backlighting is useful and bright enough for dim settings, though one review noted a slight reddish hue in white lighting.

battery life
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Battery life is a strength thanks to the dual 4,000mAh packs, with reviewers repeatedly noting the large 8,000mAh total capacity.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.5

Battery life is one of the Azoth's clearest strengths, with reviews reporting days, weeks, or very high remaining charge depending on RGB and OLED use.

build quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Build quality is mostly solid for a plastic budget board, though opinions differ because some reviewers report flex while others found no creaks or wobble.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Build quality receives broad praise for solidity, weight, premium feel, and a sturdy top structure, even where the plastic bottom is noted.

cable quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Cable feedback is mixed: one review praises the braided USB-C cable, while another calls the included cable generic but usable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.3

The included braided USB-C cable is treated as a solid premium accessory rather than a bare-minimum pack-in.

compatibility
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Compatibility is good for Windows and Mac users, though one review notes the lack of dedicated Mac-specific keycaps or hotkeys.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.1

Compatibility is mostly positive across Windows, Mac, and even Linux mentions, but customization support is stronger on Windows than on Mac.

connectivity
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Connectivity is a major strength, with reviewers consistently pointing to wired, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth modes, plus multi-device pairing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Connectivity is repeatedly praised for offering wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz modes with easy switching and dependable operation.

customization options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Customization options are strong, covering key remapping, RGB adjustments, macros, programmable inputs, and shared configurations.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Customization is a major selling point, spanning switch work, lighting, OLED/dial controls, profiles, and included enthusiast tools.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

The 96-key layout keeps a numpad while saving desk space, making it more compact than a typical full-size keyboard.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.5

The 75% layout is repeatedly valued for saving desk space while preserving arrows, function keys, and practical navigation keys.

durability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Durability evidence centers on double-shot PBT keycaps, which reviewers say resist shine and should last well over time.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Durability evidence is strong, including long-term use reports and reviewer impressions that the keyboard feels built to last.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Switch replacement is easy because the board is hot-swappable and supports common 3-pin and 5-pin MX-style switches.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Switch replacement is repeatedly described as easy thanks to hot-swap sockets and the included pullers, opener, lube kit, and tools.

ergonomics
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Ergonomics are helped by adjustable feet and multiple resting positions, though the evidence is limited to setup angle rather than wrist support.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
3.7

Ergonomics are mixed: adjustable feet help comfort, but the high-profile design can become tiring without a wrist rest.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Gaming extras are present but basic, with reviews citing anti-ghosting, N-key rollover, and a 1,000Hz polling rate rather than advanced analog features.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.0

Extra gaming features are strong overall, including OLED/dial functions, stealth mode, Windows lock, macro recording, and software-backed key control, though one reviewer disliked the screen/knob implementation.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

Frame rigidity is mixed: some reviewers report flex and twisting, while another found no flex when pressing down.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Frame rigidity is excellent in the available evidence, with a reviewer noting almost no flex.

gaming performance
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Gaming performance is solid for conventional play thanks to responsive switches, anti-ghosting, N-key rollover, and 1,000Hz polling.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Gaming performance is repeatedly praised for responsiveness, smooth gameplay, reliability, and no noticeable lag or missed inputs.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Hot-swappable switch support is consistently praised, with reviewers noting easy replacement and broad 3-pin or 5-pin compatibility.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Hot-swappable switches are a standout feature, with reviewers praising both compatibility and the enthusiast-style flexibility.

keycap quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Keycap quality is mostly strong because of double-shot PBT caps, although one reviewer disliked inconsistent thin legends.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.4

Keycap quality is generally strong thanks to PBT doubleshot construction, texture, and durability, though one reviewer found them a little slippery.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Key responsiveness is rated highly, with reviewers calling the switches responsive, fast enough, and light to actuate.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Responsiveness evidence is strongly positive, with reviews describing snappy typing, fast inputs, and low-latency operation.

key spacing
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
2.6

Key spacing is a weakness for one reviewer, who found the 96% layout harder to navigate without looking.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
2.8

Key spacing has a specific drawback: one reviewer found the compressed F-row harder to hit without looking.

key stability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Key stability is mostly good on large keys, but stabilizer looseness appears as a caveat for rattle-sensitive users.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Key stability is positive, especially around the spacebar, stabilized keys, and shorter stems intended to reduce wobble.

latency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Latency is strong in 2.4GHz and wired modes, with low-latency wireless and minimal-latency wired performance cited; Bluetooth is a slight caveat.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Latency is repeatedly praised, with reviews reporting no noticeable delay and test-based references to very low 2.4GHz latency.

layout options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Layout options are somewhat mixed: the board supports Mac/Windows layout modes, but one reviewer preferred a true full-size layout.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.5

The compact layout is praised for keeping a function row and dedicated everyday keys while avoiding the restrictions of smaller boards.

legend visibility
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

Legend visibility is mixed, with one review praising sharp visible legends while another criticizes inconsistent thin lettering.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
2.6

Legend visibility is a repeated weakness when lighting is off or dim, even though the shine-through caps support RGB.

macro customization
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Macro customization is a clear software strength, with reviews citing macro recording, mouse-click detection, and easy setup.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
3.3

Macro customization is useful but limited: reviews praise on-the-fly recording and software assignment while criticizing the lack of function-layer remapping.

materials quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Materials quality is acceptable rather than premium: reviewers repeatedly identify an ABS plastic build that feels sturdy but not aluminum-like.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Materials quality is high, with reviews pointing to aluminum, steel, durable PBT, and premium-feeling construction.

media controls
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.3

Media controls are useful through the OLED/dial system, though some reviewers prefer a simpler dedicated knob.

noise level
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Noise level is generally well controlled by dampening, with reviewers saying it avoids obnoxious noise and keeps rattles down.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Noise level is a strength, especially with NX Red or dampened builds, with multiple reviewers describing the board as quiet or nearly silent.

onboard memory
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Onboard memory is supported by evidence of stored default and custom profiles, making profile use possible without constant software interaction.

passthrough features
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
1.0

Passthrough features are weak: reviews explicitly note the lack of extra USB ports, audio jacks, or similar passthrough hardware.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Per-key lighting evidence is limited but positive, with references to per-key RGB underglow and zone-based effects.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Per-key lighting control is strong in the software evidence, with direct support for key-by-key backlight adjustment.

polling rate
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.8

Polling rate is strong, with multiple reviewers citing a 1,000Hz rate in wired and wireless modes.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.0

Polling-rate evidence confirms a mainstream 1,000 Hz rate over wired or 2.4GHz modes, which reviewers generally considered sufficient.

portability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Portability is decent for a 96-key board because reviewers cite a lightweight portable form and use while commuting, though it is not tiny.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
3.1

Portability is mixed: the compact layout helps, but the heavy, sturdy chassis makes it less travel-friendly for some users.

profile management
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Profile management has limited but positive evidence through shareable configurations for keymaps, macros, and lighting profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.4

Profile management is useful, with evidence of quick profile switching and software profile setup, though execution depends on Armoury Crate.

reliability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.7

Reliability is mixed: some evidence praises reliable switches and daily dependability, but one review warns PCB bending may be a long-term risk.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.3

Reliability is mostly positive in gaming use, but long-term evidence includes occasional double or triple letters from aging switches.

RGB customization
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

RGB customization is consistently strong, with software controls for effects, colors, brightness, zones, and multiple lighting modes.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

RGB customization is strong, with keyboard shortcuts, software control, and multiple built-in lighting modes.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

RGB lighting quality is generally praised as vibrant, bright, and attractive, though the lack of shine-through legends limits visibility through keycaps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

RGB lighting quality is generally praised for sharp per-key lighting and attractive effects, with minor caveats around color tint elsewhere.

size and form factor
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

The compact 96%/96-key form factor is widely recognized as useful because it retains a numpad in a smaller footprint.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.5

The 75% form factor is repeatedly seen as a good compact size that keeps everyday usability.

software quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Software quality is generally good and easy to use, though one review says it is less customizable than deeper enthusiast platforms.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
2.4

Software quality is the most consistent complaint: Armoury Crate is often described as bloated, slow, buggy, or limiting despite some positive experiences.

sound dampening
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Sound dampening is one of the clearest strengths, with reviews repeatedly citing foam, silicone pads, gasket mounting, and reduced vibration.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Sound dampening is one of the board's strongest enthusiast traits, with foam, silicone, and gasket layers repeatedly credited for the sound and feel.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

Stabilizer quality is mixed: several reviews say large keys are rattle-free or solid, while others recommend tuning or relubing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Stabilizer quality is strong, with reviews praising pre-lubed stabilizers, spacebar treatment, and good out-of-box behavior.

switch feel
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Switch feel is mostly positive, with smooth pre-lubed linear switches praised, though some reviewers found them generic or too light.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Switch feel is praised across switch variants for smoothness, tactile feedback, and strong factory tuning.

switch options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.1

Switch options are limited because stock choices are basically Wisteria or Flamingo, though hot-swap support lets users change them later.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.6

Switch options are good, with reviewer evidence for red, brown, blue, linear, tactile, and clicky variants.

typing comfort
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort is a highlight, with reviewers describing long sessions as comfortable, cushioned, and easy on the fingers.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.7

Typing comfort is strong where reviewers focus on cushioned feel, pleasant travel, and long-form typing satisfaction.

typing feel
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Typing feel is one of the strongest attributes, repeatedly described as smooth, cushioned, pleasant, and premium for the price.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.5

Typing feel is one of the Azoth's standout strengths, though one review found the stock gasket feel firmer than expected.

value for money
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Value for money is strong, with reviewers repeatedly framing the Cypher96 as affordable or well priced for its features.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
3.4

Value is divisive: some reviewers justify the premium through features and quality, while others say the price remains prohibitive.

volume control
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
3.5

Volume control is mixed because the OLED/dial can handle volume and media, but several reviewers found the control less precise or easy to mispress.

wireless performance
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Wireless performance is strong overall, with low-latency 2.4GHz, multi-device Bluetooth, and usable range, though Bluetooth response rates can dip slightly.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
4.8

Wireless performance is a major strength, with reviewers reporting reliable Bluetooth, strong 2.4GHz performance, and no dropouts or input lag.

wrist rest quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Azoth
2.0

Wrist-rest evidence is negative because reviewers note the high-profile board can tire users and no wrist rest is included.