Compare Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Approach S70

P1 Garmin Forerunner 165
P2 Garmin Approach S70

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Forerunner 165

Where It Has the Edge

  • user interface is 4.5 vs 2.5. The user interface was considered approachable and easy to use, especially with the combined touchscreen and button approach.
  • call handling is 4.2 vs 2.7. Call handling was limited to reliable call-related smartphone alerts rather than full on-watch calling.
  • software smoothness is 3.8 vs 2.4. Software smoothness was acceptable but not premium-watch smooth, with one review noting the refresh rate was not Apple...
  • charging convenience is 4.2 vs 3.1. Charging convenience was mostly fine thanks to secure contacts and Garmin’s familiar proprietary cable, though it is not...

Garmin Approach S70

Where It Has the Edge

  • size options is 4.7 vs 2.7. Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are...
  • materials quality is 4.7 vs 3.2. Materials quality is positive in the available evidence, especially the ceramic bezel and premium-feeling build.
  • music controls is 3.6 vs 2.3. Music controls are present, but reviewers split between liking access and finding Garmin’s menu path less convenient than...
  • Wi-Fi connectivity is 4.0 vs 3.1. Wi-Fi connectivity is lightly supported by setup/menu evidence showing the watch can connect to Wi-Fi for updates.
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Auto-detection is supported mainly through automatic shot tracking and measured-shot behavior, with positive convenience but some manual confirmation or sensor caveats.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Connect IQ gives the watch a modest app ecosystem for watch faces, widgets, data fields, and extras, though it is not framed as a full smartwatch app platform.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

The Garmin ecosystem is praised for tying golf, fitness, watch faces, and Connect IQ-style additions together.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Reviewers generally liked the soft, adjustable silicone strap and standard strap options, with no major comfort complaints about the band itself.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Band quality is mixed: reviewers like comfort and integrated looks, but several dislike the molded strap not laying flat or prefer older straps.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Battery life was praised as strong for an AMOLED Garmin in normal training use, but several reviewers said always-on display, music, or endurance use reduces its advantage.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Battery life is one of the strongest positives, with reviewers reporting long smartwatch use, multiple rounds, and much better endurance than Apple Watch comparisons.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

The watch includes blood oxygen or Pulse Ox tracking, but reviewers treated it as a useful health sensor rather than a headline reason to buy.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Pulse ox and blood oxygen tracking are present in several reviews and treated as part of the S70’s higher-end health sensor package.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Bluetooth and ANT+ sensor/headphone support were viewed positively, with reviewers noting external sensor support and solid headphone connectivity.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Bluetooth connectivity is supported through Bluetooth music and headphone pairing, though the evidence is functional rather than deeply evaluated.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.7

Brightness was a clear strength, especially the bold AMOLED screen and usable bright-display behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Brightness is repeatedly praised, with reviewers describing the screen as bright, crisp, colorful, and clear.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Build quality was viewed as dependable for the price, with Garmin durability praised even though the plastic construction feels less premium.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Build quality is viewed positively, with reviewers describing a lightweight, well-designed build and confidence-inspiring construction.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

The five-button layout was one of the most consistently praised usability strengths, especially for workouts, gloves, sweat, and wet conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Button controls are generally praised, with reviewers liking the three-button setup and easy navigation support.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Call handling was limited to reliable call-related smartphone alerts rather than full on-watch calling.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.7

Call handling is limited because reviewers say the watch can show or manage calls but cannot be used to actually speak through the watch.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Calorie tracking received weak support; one reviewer saw calorie burn data in strength mode but did not find that feature very useful.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Charging convenience was mostly fine thanks to secure contacts and Garmin’s familiar proprietary cable, though it is not universal wireless charging.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.1

Charging convenience is mixed to negative, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning proprietary charging, USB-C adapter issues, and awkward face-down charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Charging speed was generally acceptable to good, with reviewers reporting around one hour to just under two hours depending on the source.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Charging speed has limited but positive support from one reviewer who says it does not take long to fully charge.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Coaching features were well supported through Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, structured workouts, daily suggestions, and race-related guidance.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Coaching features are one of the S70’s strongest themes, with virtual caddie, PlaysLike, club suggestions, shot dispersion, and scoring advice appearing across many reviews.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Comfort was a major point of agreement: reviewers repeatedly described the watch as light, compact, unobtrusive, and easy to wear day and night.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Comfort is a major strength, with reviewers saying the watch disappears, sits comfortably, and does not bother them during golf or sleep.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Garmin Connect was mostly praised for depth, workout analysis, and improving organization, though one reviewer found the redesign not dramatically easier.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Companion app quality is generally positive, especially Garmin Golf for round data, stats, and ecosystem value, with setup requirements noted.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Garmin Pay was consistently mentioned as available and useful for contactless payments across models.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but evidence is mixed because bank support and setup can be limiting in some regions.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Cross-platform compatibility is functional, but one reviewer noted the phone experience differs between iPhone and Android, especially for replies.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Cross-platform compatibility is positive overall because the watch pairs with iPhone and Android, though notification controls differ by platform.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Customization was strong, with configurable widgets, data fields, watch faces, and training screens noted across reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Customization is strong, with reviewers noting data fields, colors, golf settings, watch faces, and movable pin or flag controls.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Display quality was one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly praising the vibrant, crisp AMOLED screen.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Display quality is the strongest consensus attribute: reviewers repeatedly praise the AMOLED screen’s sharpness, clarity, color, and impact on maps.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Durability evidence was positive overall, including resistance to daily abuse, though not all reviewers considered it a rugged outdoor watch.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Durability has limited direct support but is positive where mentioned, with the scratch-proof lens cited.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.0

ECG functionality was consistently absent; reviewers repeatedly stated users need a different or higher-end Garmin for ECG/EKG.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Fit was generally positive, with the small case sitting neatly on wrists and under layers without feeling oversized.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Fit is positive, helped by wrist comfort, swing clearance, and the smaller 42mm option for users who found larger cases too big.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy was praised across multiple reviews, especially for daily activity data, run metrics, and overall sensor reliability.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Fitness and shot-tracking accuracy is mostly positive, with reviewers praising Garmin-level sensor accuracy and convenient data, though some note shot-tracking limitations.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

GPS accuracy was a major strength; most reviewers found it accurate or solid despite the lack of dual-band GPS, with only occasional challenging-environment issues.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

GPS and yardage accuracy are consistently praised, including quick GPS lock, accurate yardages, and close agreement with rangefinder-style measurements.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Health tracking accuracy was supported by the reliable sensor package and detailed data collection, but evidence was less extensive than for GPS and heart rate.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Reviewers describe broad health tracking as useful and Garmin-level accurate, especially when combining sleep, stress, heart rate, pulse ox, and fitness metrics.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Heart rate accuracy was broadly positive, often matching chest straps or higher-end watches well, with occasional optical-sensor lag or spikes.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Heart rate appears as part of the S70’s fitness and wellness tracking, with reviewers treating it as a useful everyday metric rather than a golf-only add-on.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Navigation is useful but limited: reviewers liked breadcrumb routing, courses, back-to-start, and GPX support, while noting the absence of full maps.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Mapping and navigation are a major strength, with detailed hole maps, hazard views, pin movement, blind-shot tools, and full-color course layouts repeatedly praised.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.2

Materials quality was a tradeoff: the polymer/plastic body helps weight and price but feels less premium than metal.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Materials quality is positive in the available evidence, especially the ceramic bezel and premium-feeling build.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Menu navigation is flexible because Garmin allows almost everything to be controlled by buttons, reducing reliance on touch.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Menu navigation is mixed: several reviews praise simple starts and quick menus, while touch-heavy hole navigation frustrates one reviewer.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.3

Music controls were a weak spot, with reviewers finding on-run controls unintuitive or limited without the Music model.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Music controls are present, but reviewers split between liking access and finding Garmin’s menu path less convenient than Apple Watch behavior.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Onboard music storage is useful on the Music edition, but reviews were split because syncing can be tedious and costs extra.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Onboard music storage is a clear plus, with multiple reviewers noting downloaded songs or playlists from services such as Spotify or Amazon Music.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

The operating system experience felt Garmin-like and sport-focused, with solid hybrid smartwatch behavior but limitations versus true smartwatches.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.2

Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer finds Garmin software mostly intuitive, while another says the OS hurts enjoyment on the course.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Outdoor visibility was a standout strength; reviewers repeatedly said the AMOLED screen was readable in sunlight and bright conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent across reviews, with several reviewers saying bright sunlight or sun glare did not prevent easy reading.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Pairing reliability was specifically praised for Bluetooth headphones in one review, with no broad pairing complaints across the review set.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer calling phone pairing straightforward through Garmin’s apps.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.5

Recovery insights are useful through Recovery Time, Training Effect, HRV, Body Battery, and related tools, but the missing Training Readiness and Training Load limited depth.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Recovery insight evidence is limited but supported by HRV readiness language, tying recovery-style feedback to sleep and heart-rate variability.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Reliability was praised in long-term and general-use terms, with reviewers describing the watch as dependable and accessible.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Reliability is mixed: GPS/course lock and battery endurance are praised, but one reviewer reports missed shot detections.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Safety features were positively noted through LiveTrack and incident detection, though the evidence came from one detailed review.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Safety features have limited support, with one guide noting an assistance/fall-detection-style safety feature.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.7

Size options were a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted there is only one case size, despite the size working for many wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are limited in some reviews.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Sleep tracking was mostly useful for sleep duration and scores, but opinions were mixed because at least one reviewer found missed restless sleep.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

Sleep tracking gets frequent attention, with reviewers noting sleep scores, deep sleep or REM data, and morning feedback, though one reviewer questions how helpful the messaging feels.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Smartphone notifications were considered reliable and readable, with texts, calls, and app alerts working well when paired.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Notifications are useful but mixed: reviewers like seeing messages and alerts, yet some call them distracting or limited for replies and conversation flow.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Smartwatch features were solid for a sport watch, including notifications, wallet/payments, Find My Phone, music, and safety tools, but not full smartwatch depth.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Smartwatch features are strong for a golf watch, but reviewers still flag limitations compared with dedicated Apple or Android smartwatches.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Software smoothness was acceptable but not premium-watch smooth, with one review noting the refresh rate was not Apple Watch-like.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.4

Software smoothness is a noted weakness in limited evidence, especially around pan-and-zoom behavior on the course.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Step counting accuracy was positively supported by one review that found it closely matched other tested devices.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Step counting is mentioned positively in limited evidence, mainly as an advanced counter one reviewer found useful.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Stress tracking was present as part of the broader Garmin health and sleep feature set.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Stress tracking is widely mentioned; some reviewers found it surprisingly accurate or habit-changing, while one reviewer considered it less valuable.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Style and design were viewed positively for a sporty, compact watch with a bright display that could be worn daily.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Style and design are positive, with reviewers calling the S70 stylish, modern, and suitable beyond the course.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ widgets, watch faces, data fields, and apps, but reviewers did not portray it as a rich smartwatch store.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Third-party app support is useful but not always seamless, with Connect IQ and downloadable apps/features appearing as the main support path.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Touchscreen responsiveness was mostly praised as smooth and useful, though one reviewer noted accidental touches.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mixed: some reviewers find it good or responsive, while others find on-course panning and zooming fiddly.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

The user interface was considered approachable and easy to use, especially with the combined touchscreen and button approach.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.5

User interface evidence is limited but negative where cited, focused on the touchscreen interface feeling fiddly during golf use.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Value for money was one of the strongest consensus points, with many reviewers calling the 165 a strong budget or sweet-spot Garmin.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Value for money is mixed but generally favorable for advanced golfers: reviewers praise value if using the full feature set, while warning basic-yardage users can spend less.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.0

Voice assistant quality is effectively absent because one reviewer explicitly noted there is no voice assistant.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Watch face quality was strong thanks to customizable stock faces and Connect IQ options.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Watch face quality is well supported, with reviewers praising built-in faces, Connect IQ options, and the AMOLED screen making faces look better.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Water resistance was well supported for swimming, rain, sweat, and shallow water, with reviewers noting 5ATM or 50-meter resistance.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers citing 5 ATM or 50-meter ratings and shower/swim use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Wellness insights were strong through Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, sleep, stress, recovery, and daily health glances.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Wellness insights are a major differentiator, especially Body Battery, sleep, stress, energy, and Garmin’s explanations of what the metrics mean.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.1

Wi-Fi connectivity exists mainly for the Music edition and music syncing, but one review reported Wi-Fi troubleshooting friction.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is lightly supported by setup/menu evidence showing the watch can connect to Wi-Fi for updates.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Workout tracking variety covers most common running, cycling, swimming, gym, yoga, and fitness modes, but reviewers repeatedly noted missing triathlon, skiing, and other niche profiles.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Workout variety is a clear strength, with reviewers citing running, cycling, swimming, yoga, skiing, pickleball, and other activity modes.