- More expensive: money-saving alternative The Forerunner 165 was presented as a good money-saving alternative to the Garmin Forerunner 265.
- More expensive: feature set and price The 165 was described as bringing many popular Forerunner 265 features to a lower price.
- Better: GPS feature set The Forerunner 165 lacks the Forerunner 265's multiband GPS, though the reviewer said most users would be fine.
Garmin Forerunner 165 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Garmin Forerunner 165 if you want a light, accurate running watch with a bright AMOLED screen and strong value. Skip it if you need advanced recovery metrics, triathlon profiles, longer GPS battery life, or seamless phone-free music.
Best for
Best for runners and fitness users who want accurate GPS, useful Garmin training tools, a readable AMOLED screen, and a lightweight watch without paying for flagship features. It also suits beginners who want serious metrics without a complex multisport watch.
Not for
Not for triathletes, backcountry users, or endurance athletes who need richer sport profiles, full maps, dual-band GPS, advanced recovery/load analysis, or longer GPS battery life. The Music edition is also a poor fit for users expecting effortless phone-free streaming.
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 165 comes across as a high-value running watch that gets the essentials right: accurate GPS, dependable heart-rate tracking, a bright AMOLED display, strong comfort, and approachable coaching tools. Reviewers repeatedly liked its lightweight design, button-plus-touch interface, Garmin Connect data, and overall price-to-performance balance. The tradeoff is that Garmin clearly holds back some higher-end tools, including fuller training load/readiness metrics, triathlon support, richer sport profiles, and full mapping. Battery life is good for everyday AMOLED use but not ideal for long endurance events, always-on display users, or heavy music use. The Music edition also drew sharper criticism than the base watch because playlist syncing and controls could feel tedious.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Worse: GPS accuracy edge cases The reviewer said the Forerunner 165 could beat the Apple Watch Ultra 2 in some GPS tests.
- Better: music and cellular convenience The reviewer contrasted Garmin's music friction with the Apple Watch Ultra's seamless cellular music experience.
- Compared: fitness tracking accuracy The reviewer compared the 165's GPS and step accuracy against several trackers including the Apple Watch SE.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 48% 24 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 34% 17 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 14% 7 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 4% 2 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Outdoor visibility was excellent in direct sun and bright conditions.
-
Reliability was praised in workout use, with one reviewer reporting no issues with stability.
-
Smartphone notifications were described as reliable and easier to read on the AMOLED display.
-
Watch face quality was praised for full customization.
-
Button controls were a major strength, especially for workouts, gloves, sweat, rain, and avoiding touchscreen reliance.
-
Comfort was consistently excellent, with reviewers praising the lightweight feel for all-day wear and sleep.
-
Display quality was a standout strength thanks to a crisp, vibrant AMOLED screen, though one reviewer still preferred MIP for always-visible use.
-
Durability was reassuring, with reviewers reporting no concerns and even real-world abuse without damage.
-
Fit was strong for many wrists, with secure wear and little slipping, though the single case size remained a caveat.
-
Fitness tracking accuracy was praised for broad data quality and even strength-training rep counting in testing.
-
Customization was a strength, from watch faces and widgets to activity screens and data pages.
-
Brightness was strongly praised in sunlight and adaptive lighting conditions.
-
The interface was repeatedly described as simple, approachable, and easy to use.
-
Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling it a high-value or sweet-spot Garmin.
-
Coaching and structured workouts were praised as approachable, flexible, and valuable for beginner and intermediate runners.
-
Touchscreen responsiveness was widely praised, including smooth swiping, reliable taps, and usability with gloves or wet screens.
-
GPS accuracy was one of the strongest themes, with most reviewers finding reliable tracks even without dual-band GPS; a few dense-terrain issues remained.
-
Wellness insights such as Morning Report and Body Battery were considered fun, useful, and sometimes addictive.
-
Charging speed was praised in the reviews that discussed it, ranging from under two hours to very fast top-ups.
-
Style and design were viewed as slim, low-profile, sleek, and suitable for daily wear, though still sporty.
-
Reviewers described the Forerunner 165 as having reliable sensors and detailed data collection for general health and fitness tracking.
-
Menu navigation was considered intuitive after a short adjustment period.
-
Software smoothness was praised as simple, fast, and accurate in use.
-
Step counting was reported as close to other tested devices.
-
Water resistance was considered more than enough for rain, sweat, showering, and swimming use.
-
Heart-rate accuracy was generally praised across runs, rides, and intervals, with only occasional optical-sensor lag or spikes.
-
Build quality was viewed as solid and well-made for a lightweight running watch.
-
Battery life was generally good for an AMOLED Garmin and daily training, but reviewers flagged limits for long adventures, always-on use, or heavy GPS/music.
-
Garmin Connect was seen as powerful and useful, with cleaner or comprehensive analysis, though one reviewer found the redesign not much easier.
-
Band quality was mostly comfortable and flexible, but one reviewer warned the stock strap needs frequent washing to avoid irritation.
-
Mapping and navigation were useful for breadcrumb routes and GPX/course following, but the lack of full maps was a repeated limitation.
-
Smartwatch features were considered respectable for a training watch, especially notifications, Garmin Pay, music features, and basic phone-linked tools.
-
Blood oxygen tracking was treated as a useful extra by reviewers who valued the reassurance, though broader accuracy was not deeply tested.
-
Bluetooth headphone pairing was reported to work without problems.
-
Garmin Pay was viewed as a straightforward, effective contactless payment feature.
-
The operating experience was familiar and straightforward for Garmin users.
-
Pairing reliability for headphones was described as generally solid.
-
Safety features such as LiveTrack were valued for sharing location during activities.
-
Stress tracking was mentioned as part of the watch's helpful health-glance system for knowing when to ease off.
-
Sleep tracking was mostly viewed as useful and directionally accurate, though one reviewer reported a poor night that the watch missed.
-
Workout variety covers most mainstream running, gym, cycling, swimming, and fitness needs, but reviewers consistently noted missing triathlon or backcountry profiles.
Cons
-
The app ecosystem was useful through Connect IQ and Garmin features, but Garmin's broader platform could still feel intimidating.
-
Charging convenience was mixed: secure contacts helped, but the proprietary/short cable was a drawback.
-
Third-party app/widget support was available and sometimes useful for tailoring data, though one reviewer did not find it especially useful.
-
Onboard music storage drew split views: handy or smooth for some, but tedious and poor value for others.
-
Size options were limited because the watch comes in only one size, though one reviewer liked the in-between fit.
-
Recovery insights were useful but clearly limited versus higher Forerunners, with some reviewers calling out missing readiness/load tools or odd recovery estimates.
-
Materials quality was mixed: plastic kept it light and affordable but felt less premium.
-
Music controls were criticized as unintuitive during runs.
-
Wi-Fi/music setup drew criticism when troubleshooting made the watch appear connected even though playlist syncing failed.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in smartphone notifications, contactless payments, button controls, below average in music controls, materials quality.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 75% 6 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 25% 2 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| smartphone notifications | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| music controls | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| contactless payments | 4.0 | 2.7 | +1.3 |
| button controls | 4.9 | 3.8 | +1.1 |
| materials quality | 2.8 | 4.0 | -1.2 |
| watch face quality | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| reliability | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| value for money | 4.6 | 3.8 | +0.8 |
FAQ
Is the Garmin Forerunner 165 accurate for running?
Yes. Reviewers consistently praised its GPS accuracy, with several saying it stayed close to pricier dual-band watches, though one reviewer saw dropouts in more difficult terrain.
Is the AMOLED display easy to read outdoors?
Yes. Multiple reviewers said the screen was bright, vibrant, and easy to read in direct sunlight or bright outdoor conditions.
How good is the battery life?
Reviewers generally found battery life good for daily training and smartwatch use, especially for an AMOLED watch. The main caveat is that always-on display, GPS-heavy use, music, or long adventures can make the battery feel limiting.
Should I buy the Music version?
Only if offline music matters to you. Some reviewers liked having storage, but others found playlist syncing and music controls tedious enough that they recommended saving the extra money.
Does it have advanced training and recovery tools?
It has useful tools like Garmin Coach, suggested workouts, Training Effect, Body Battery, HRV Status, and recovery time. Reviewers repeatedly noted that it lacks fuller Training Readiness, Training Load, Training Status, and triathlon support from higher-end models.
Is it comfortable enough for sleep and all-day wear?
Yes. Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers praising the light case, low-profile fit, and soft strap for daily wear, workouts, and sleep tracking.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Fit Dad Fabio
- Review score
- 5.0/5
YouTube - DC Rainmaker
YouTube - Ryan's Tech
YouTube - Chase the Summit
Article Reviews
theverge.com
- Review score
- 4.4/5
womanandhome.com
- Review score
- 4.2/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better music controls
Choose Samsung Galaxy Watch 6. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for music controls, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better materials quality
Choose Suunto Vertical 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for materials quality, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better recovery insights
Choose Garmin Lily 2 Active. It scores 5.0 vs 3.1 for recovery insights, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better app ecosystem
Choose Apple Watch Ultra 2. It scores 5.0 vs 3.3 for app ecosystem, with a 4.1 overall score.
Overall Top Smartwatches Alternatives
Best for rugged outdoor training, long battery life, accurate GPS, maps, calls, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if the high price, tactical extras, proprietary charging cable, or mixed...
Pros: wellness insights, build quality
Cons: LTE connectivity, band quality
Good if you want the best balanced Apple Watch for an older upgrade, stronger battery, comfort, and health tools. Skip it if you own Series 10, need week-long battery, or...
Pros: ECG functionality, app ecosystem
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights
Choose it if you want a rugged Garmin hybrid with real hands, a sharp AMOLED display, strong tracking, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if price, full maps, onboard...
Pros: heart rate accuracy, GPS accuracy
Cons: onboard music storage, mapping and navigation
Best for bright AMOLED visuals, strong battery life, accurate GPS, maps, and standout value. Skip it if you need rich apps, reliable payments, LTE, ECG, or the cleanest companion app.
Pros: step counting accuracy, menu navigation
Cons: voice assistant quality, contactless payments