If you want better materials quality
Choose Suunto Race S. It scores 4.7 vs 2.8 for materials quality, with a 3.9 overall score.
Garmin Forerunner 165 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Garmin Forerunner 165 if you want a light, accurate running watch with a bright AMOLED screen and strong value. Skip it if you need advanced recovery metrics, triathlon profiles, longer GPS battery life, or seamless phone-free music.
Best for
Best for runners and fitness users who want accurate GPS, useful Garmin training tools, a readable AMOLED screen, and a lightweight watch without paying for flagship features. It also suits beginners who want serious metrics without a complex multisport watch.
Not for
Not for triathletes, backcountry users, or endurance athletes who need richer sport profiles, full maps, dual-band GPS, advanced recovery/load analysis, or longer GPS battery life. The Music edition is also a poor fit for users expecting effortless phone-free streaming.
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 165 comes across as a high-value running watch that gets the essentials right: accurate GPS, dependable heart-rate tracking, a bright AMOLED display, strong comfort, and approachable coaching tools. Reviewers repeatedly liked its lightweight design, button-plus-touch interface, Garmin Connect data, and overall price-to-performance balance. The tradeoff is that Garmin clearly holds back some higher-end tools, including fuller training load/readiness metrics, triathlon support, richer sport profiles, and full mapping. Battery life is good for everyday AMOLED use but not ideal for long endurance events, always-on display users, or heavy music use. The Music edition also drew sharper criticism than the base watch because playlist syncing and controls could feel tedious.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.024 (48%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (34%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.47 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.42 (4%)
Pros
-
Display quality was a standout strength thanks to a crisp, vibrant AMOLED screen, though one reviewer still preferred MIP for always-visible use.
-
Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling it a high-value or sweet-spot Garmin.
-
Button controls were a major strength, especially for workouts, gloves, sweat, rain, and avoiding touchscreen reliance.
-
GPS accuracy was one of the strongest themes, with most reviewers finding reliable tracks even without dual-band GPS; a few dense-terrain issues remained.
-
Comfort was consistently excellent, with reviewers praising the lightweight feel for all-day wear and sleep.
-
Outdoor visibility was excellent in direct sun and bright conditions.
Cons
-
Music controls were criticized as unintuitive during runs.
-
Wi-Fi/music setup drew criticism when troubleshooting made the watch appear connected even though playlist syncing failed.
-
Materials quality was mixed: plastic kept it light and affordable but felt less premium.
-
Size options were limited because the watch comes in only one size, though one reviewer liked the in-between fit.
-
The app ecosystem was useful through Connect IQ and Garmin features, but Garmin's broader platform could still feel intimidating.
-
Charging convenience was mixed: secure contacts helped, but the proprietary/short cable was a drawback.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in smartphone notifications, button controls, contactless payments, near average in onboard music storage, app ecosystem, below average in music controls, materials quality, recovery insights.
Comparison summary
50 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher30 (60%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts15 (30%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower5 (10%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| music controls | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| smartphone notifications | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| materials quality | 2.8 | 4.0 | -1.2 |
| button controls | 4.9 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| contactless payments | 4.0 | 2.7 | +1.3 |
| reliability | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| watch face quality | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| value for money | 4.6 | 3.8 | +0.8 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better charging convenience
Choose Suunto Race 2. It scores 4.6 vs 3.3 for charging convenience, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better battery life
Choose Coros Pace Pro. It scores 4.6 vs 4.2 for battery life, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better workout tracking variety
Choose Suunto Vertical 2. It scores 4.7 vs 3.6 for workout tracking variety, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- More expensive: money-saving alternative The Forerunner 165 was presented as a good money-saving alternative to the Garmin Forerunner 265.
- More expensive: feature set and price The 165 was described as bringing many popular Forerunner 265 features to a lower price.
- Better: GPS feature set The Forerunner 165 lacks the Forerunner 265's multiband GPS, though the reviewer said most users would be fine.
- Worse: GPS accuracy edge cases The reviewer said the Forerunner 165 could beat the Apple Watch Ultra 2 in some GPS tests.
- Better: music and cellular convenience The reviewer contrasted Garmin's music friction with the Apple Watch Ultra's seamless cellular music experience.
- Compared: fitness tracking accuracy The reviewer compared the 165's GPS and step accuracy against several trackers including the Apple Watch SE.
FAQ
Is the Garmin Forerunner 165 accurate for running?
Yes. Reviewers consistently praised its GPS accuracy, with several saying it stayed close to pricier dual-band watches, though one reviewer saw dropouts in more difficult terrain.
Is the AMOLED display easy to read outdoors?
Yes. Multiple reviewers said the screen was bright, vibrant, and easy to read in direct sunlight or bright outdoor conditions.
How good is the battery life?
Reviewers generally found battery life good for daily training and smartwatch use, especially for an AMOLED watch. The main caveat is that always-on display, GPS-heavy use, music, or long adventures can make the battery feel limiting.
Should I buy the Music version?
Only if offline music matters to you. Some reviewers liked having storage, but others found playlist syncing and music controls tedious enough that they recommended saving the extra money.
Does it have advanced training and recovery tools?
It has useful tools like Garmin Coach, suggested workouts, Training Effect, Body Battery, HRV Status, and recovery time. Reviewers repeatedly noted that it lacks fuller Training Readiness, Training Load, Training Status, and triathlon support from higher-end models.
Is it comfortable enough for sleep and all-day wear?
Yes. Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers praising the light case, low-profile fit, and soft strap for daily wear, workouts, and sleep tracking.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Fit Dad Fabio
- Review score
- 5.0
YouTube - DC Rainmaker
YouTube - Ryan's Tech
YouTube - Chase the Summit
Article Reviews
womanandhome.com
- Review score
- 4.2
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: pairing reliability, brightness
Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem
Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability
Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...
Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking
Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage
Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.
Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability
Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling