Compare Garmin Approach S50 vs Garmin Forerunner 570

P1 Garmin Approach S50
P2 Garmin Forerunner 570

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Approach S50

Where It Has the Edge

  • reliability is 4.5 vs 2.3. Reliability is strong, with reviewers saying Garmin golf watches simply work, though one review mentioned a reduced GPS-signal...
  • mapping and navigation is 4.0 vs 2.2. Mapping and navigation are core strengths for yardages, hazards, green views, PinPointer, and course data, but fuller maps...
  • value for money is 4.0 vs 2.6. Value depends on buyer priorities: reviewers liked the golf-plus-health package, but subscription-locked maps and the cheaper S44 created...
  • pairing reliability is 4.7 vs 3.6. Pairing reliability is a strength, with reviewers describing Garmin Golf app pairing as simple, seamless, and reliable after...

Garmin Forerunner 570

Where It Has the Edge

  • voice assistant quality is 4.1 vs 2.0. Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky...
  • call handling is 4.2 vs 2.5. Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it...
  • size options is 4.5 vs 3.1. Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than...
  • fitness tracking accuracy is 4.6 vs 3.3. Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and...
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.4

Auto-detection evidence is strongest around golf-shot detection, score prompts, and Move IQ-style automatic activity interpretation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Reviewers noted helpful race/activity automation, especially AutoLap timing gates and finish-line cleanup, but evidence is narrow rather than a broad auto-detection theme.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.4

The Garmin ecosystem is a strength, especially app syncing, accessory support, Garmin Golf membership upgrades, club sensors, and cross-device benefits.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin's app ecosystem is useful through Connect IQ and watchface downloads, though reviewers repeatedly describe it as more limited than Apple or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.9

Band quality is polarizing: several reviewers liked the lightweight nylon ComfortFit band, while others found it fiddly, sweaty, or less premium.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a strap tail/bump annoyance.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Battery life is strong overall, with multi-day to near-week-long use reported, but it remains below the S70's rated endurance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Battery life is divisive: still far better than mainstream smartwatches for some users, but several reviewers saw a drop from the 265 and short always-on endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present through Pulse Ox, with reviewers noting both the sensor and sleep/on-demand measurement behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of the health suite rather than a standout accuracy feature.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.7

Bluetooth connectivity is useful for accessories, especially rangefinder yardages and connected golf hardware.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Bluetooth supports calls and pairing with phones/sensors, but one reviewer reported frequent phone disconnect notices, making connectivity evidence mixed.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.4

Brightness is generally praised, but one Florida-sun review found smaller text could be hard to read in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's brightest.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.8

Build quality is generally positive for slimness and lightness, but one reviewer felt the S50 was somewhat plasticky versus pricier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Build quality is viewed positively thanks to a robust-feeling case and upgraded aluminum bezel, with no major build concerns outside price-tier omissions.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Button controls are functional with two side buttons, but several reviewers preferred the extra physical controls on higher-end Garmin watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The five-button setup is repeatedly praised for sweaty, rainy, gloved, and swimming use, while also complementing the touchscreen well.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
2.5

Call handling is basic: reviewers found phone-call notifications and answer/reject controls, but no full calling experience from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it as handy rather than essential.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.8

Calorie tracking is available as part of the daily health metrics, but reviewers mostly mentioned it as a tracked stat rather than deeply evaluating its usefulness.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Calorie tracking is available and tied into activity details, including pack-weight calculations, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.5

Charging convenience is mixed: the cable is familiar for Garmin users, but proprietary charging was criticized as inconvenient for trips.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Charging convenience is acceptable but not premium: Garmin's connector is functional and fast enough, yet the lack of wireless charging is a recurring caveat.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Charging speed has limited evidence, but one reviewer said the initial charge only took a few hours.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.1

Coaching features include Garmin coaching, meditation or breathing prompts, sleep coach, and training-program support, though they are secondary to the golf feature set.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Coaching features are a major strength, including Garmin Coach, triathlon plans, daily workout suggestions, and adaptive training guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Comfort is one of the S50's standout strengths thanks to its lightweight, low-profile design, though the nylon strap can feel less comfortable when sweaty.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Comfort is broadly strong, with reviewers calling it light and wearable all day; only larger-size sleep comfort and strap buckle issues temper the praise.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

The companion app experience is positive, with reviewers citing Garmin Golf setup, connectivity, and flawless syncing after pairing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin Connect is powerful and data-rich, though one reviewer notes its learning curve and depth can feel overwhelming.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.1

Contactless payments are supported through Garmin Pay/NFC, but reviewer evidence points to limited bank compatibility in the UK.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Contactless payment support is confirmed through NFC payments, but reviewers mention it briefly rather than as a major buying reason.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.3

Cross-platform compatibility is mixed: the S50 works with iPhone and Apple users, but reviewers found Garmin's iPhone experience less flexible than Apple Watch integration.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of Apple Watch-level integration.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Customization is strong for golf settings, data screens, flag position, watch upgrades, and optional feature toggles.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Customization is strong across watchfaces, widgets, data fields, layouts, colors, and report options, with several reviewers highlighting personalization.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.6

Display quality is a major strength, with repeated praise for the AMOLED/OLED screen, crispness, color, and modern look.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Display quality is a standout: the AMOLED panel is sharp, vivid, responsive, and frequently cited as a major upgrade.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Durability evidence is limited but positive, centered on the Corning Gorilla Glass 3 lens.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review noted small scratches or heat-related unresponsiveness.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.0

ECG functionality is the clearest omission: many reviewers criticize the lack of ECG despite the newer heart-rate sensor and the price.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.6

Fit is strong for many wrists due to the low profile and adjustable fabric strap, though some reviewers questioned larger-wrist suitability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Fit is praised for secure, no-bounce wear and useful size options, particularly for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.3

Fitness tracking accuracy is more mixed: reviewers liked the broad activity tracking and stats, but one noted the S50 cannot track elevation as accurately as the S70.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and multisport use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.8

GPS accuracy was one of the strongest points, with reviewers reporting quick satellite lock, reliable course selection, and yardages within a few yards of a laser rangefinder.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among the best tested.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Reviewers treated the S50 as a credible health tracker, especially through body battery, HRV, blood oxygen, sleep, and daily activity insights, though the evidence is stronger on feature coverage than lab-level validation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health tracking is broad and useful, covering heart rate, sleep, stress, skin temperature, respiration, and wellness metrics, but some illness/sleep limitations appear.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Heart-rate tracking was repeatedly cited as the key hardware difference that unlocks the S50's health and fitness value, with one reviewer noting it uses Garmin's older Gen 4 sensor.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Heart-rate accuracy is highly rated across most reviews, especially for running and intervals, though lab-style testing found some delays and dips.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.1

LTE connectivity is not offered; reviewers explicitly note the lack of cellular connection or cellular smartwatch capability.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Mapping and navigation are core strengths for yardages, hazards, green views, PinPointer, and course data, but fuller maps and green contours often require Garmin's paid membership.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.2

Navigation is the biggest tradeoff: breadcrumb routing works, but the absence of offline/topographic maps is repeatedly criticized at this price.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.8

Materials are mixed-to-good, with Gorilla Glass and aluminum noted positively while the lightweight body drew a plasticky caveat.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Materials quality improves over the 265 with an aluminum bezel and Gorilla Glass, giving the watch a more premium feel.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Menu navigation is mostly straightforward once learned, though one reviewer found the golf features a bit complicated at first.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Menu navigation is mostly intuitive and easy, supported by buttons, touchscreen, Glances, and refreshed menus, though phantom clicks hurt one review.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Music controls are present and useful, including phone music control and a music-controller feature in the watch interface.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Music controls are available alongside notifications and calendar previews, but reviewer evidence is brief.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.4

Onboard music storage is available, but storage is modest compared with the S70 and one review specifically called out the 4 GB limit.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Onboard music storage is supported through 8GB storage, MP3s, and streaming-service syncing, giving it better music capability than many sports watches.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.9

The operating-system experience is familiar and Garmin-consistent, but reviewers still saw some iPhone-related limitations.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The updated operating-system experience is cleaner and more modern, with Garmin aligning the 570 with newer Fenix/Forerunner UI styling.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Outdoor visibility is mostly strong thanks to the bright AMOLED screen and big-number options, but direct sun can make fine details harder to see.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.7

Pairing reliability is a strength, with reviewers describing Garmin Golf app pairing as simple, seamless, and reliable after setup.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Pairing and syncing are mixed: some reviewers found smooth iPhone/Strava syncing, while another saw repeated phone disconnects.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Recovery insights were supported by body battery, sleep-recovery feedback, and post-exercise recovery guidance, making this one of the stronger wellness features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery insights are a major reason reviewers liked the watch, especially Training Readiness, Body Battery, HRV, and sleep-informed rest guidance.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.5

Reliability is strong, with reviewers saying Garmin golf watches simply work, though one review mentioned a reduced GPS-signal course issue.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.3

Reliability is mixed: core tracking is reliable, but reviewers cite occasional crashes, overheating unresponsiveness, software bugs, and phantom clicks.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Safety features are present through LiveTrack and fall/emergency-contact settings, but they were covered mainly in a feature walkthrough.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Safety features are solid, with LiveTrack, Incident Detection, and safety/tracking features mentioned as part of the package.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.1

Size options are limited compared with the S70, and reviewers repeatedly flagged that the S50 may feel small for larger wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than single-size Garmin alternatives.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Sleep tracking drew strong praise across reviews, with reviewers highlighting detailed scoring, sleep coach features, and comfort for overnight wear.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Sleep tracking is useful but not class-leading; some found it reasonably accurate while others called it less robust or less complete than competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.6

Smartphone notifications are useful for triage and can be muted in golf mode, but reviewers noted limited iPhone notification controls and limited actionability from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.1

Smartphone notifications work, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer found notification handling intrusive during workouts.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

Smartwatch features are solid for a golf-focused device, adding alarms, timers, health metrics, notifications, weather, calendar, and broader daily-use tools.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Smartwatch features improved meaningfully with mic, speaker, calls, voice commands, music, NFC, reports, and notifications, though it is not a full smartwatch.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.8

Software smoothness scored well based on seamless Garmin app pairing and the reviewer's statement that it works flawlessly after initial setup.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Software smoothness is generally positive, with reviewers describing the interface as polished, faster, and modern, but not bug-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in direct step tests and is part of the daily tracking suite.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.1

Stress tracking appeared consistently as part of the S50's wellness package, often tied to body battery, sleep, and heart-rate-based insights.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Stress tracking feeds into readiness and wellness guidance, giving it practical value for recovery decisions.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.5

Style and design are widely praised, with reviewers calling the S50 sleek, lightweight, understated, and better looking than bulkier alternatives.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Style and design are a standout upgrade, with reviewers praising the colorful, expressive, more premium look.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.3

Third-party app support is limited and mixed, with restrictions around iPhone app notifications but some music-provider support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, but reviewers view Garmin's store as useful yet limited versus full smartwatch platforms.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is a repeated strength, with reviewers calling the screen responsive, intuitive, and central to navigation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Touchscreen responsiveness is widely praised as responsive, fast, and useful, especially alongside the physical buttons.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.3

The interface is generally intuitive, with reviewers praising the touchscreen, simple golf start flow, and easy feature-to-feature movement.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

The user interface is cleaner and easier to navigate than before, though Garmin's learning curve and rare menu quirks remain.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.0

Value depends on buyer priorities: reviewers liked the golf-plus-health package, but subscription-locked maps and the cheaper S44 created meaningful tradeoffs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.6

Value for money is the most common concern: reviewers like the watch but repeatedly say the price is high versus the 265, 965, 970, and rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
2.0

Voice assistant support is weak, with the reviewer specifically noting that Siri-style talking from the watch is not available.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky or dependent on the phone.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.8

Watch-face quality is decent with many selectable faces, though the S70 was described as having better customization options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Watch face quality is strong thanks to customization and readable data layouts, with reviewers highlighting clean default faces and useful widgets.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
3.8

Water-related evidence is indirect: reviewers discussed swimming and shower use, but mainly as a nylon-band drying consideration.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is well supported for swimming and real-world water exposure, including pools, lakes, ocean use, and a 5ATM rating.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.4

Wellness insights are a major strength, especially body battery, sleep, stress, respiration, recovery, and health snapshots that make the watch useful off the course.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Wellness insights are deep and actionable, especially Body Battery, readiness, stress, sleep, and recovery metrics that shape daily decisions.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Wi-Fi support is present for updates, though reviewer evidence is limited to feature walkthrough coverage.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Approach S50
4.2

Workout variety is broad for a golf watch, with support called out for runs, rides, swims, gym sessions, and other sports, though reviewers still framed it below higher-end Garmin fitness watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with triathlon/multisport support, many sport modes, open-water swimming, gym profiles, and new activity types.