- Better: battery life and maps Tom's Guide says the Coros Pace Pro lasts longer and includes offline maps for less.
- Cheaper: price and battery life The Coros Pace Pro is cited as a cheaper rival with offline maps and longer battery life.
Garmin Forerunner 570 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Garmin Forerunner 570 for accurate run tracking, a vivid AMOLED display, coaching, and better smart features. Skip it if value, offline maps, ECG, or maximum battery life matter most.
Best for
Best for runners, triathletes, and fitness-focused Garmin users who want accurate tracking, rich training guidance, bright outdoor visibility, and a lighter watch with some smartwatch conveniences.
Not for
Not for shoppers who need built-in maps, ECG, LTE, expedition-grade battery life, or the best value compared with discounted Garmin and competing sports watches.
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 570 lands as a polished, highly capable sports watch with excellent GPS, strong heart-rate accuracy, a brighter AMOLED display, and deeper coaching than many mid-range runners need. Reviewers consistently liked the lighter, more colorful design, the new mic/speaker features, and Garmin’s recovery guidance. The tradeoff is value: its higher price collides with shorter always-on battery life, no offline maps, and no ECG despite the newer sensor. Breadcrumb navigation, Connect IQ, NFC, music, and safety tools round out the package, but repeated comparisons to the Forerunner 265, 965, 970, Coros, and Suunto make the 570 feel more like a premium-priced refinement than an obvious upgrade.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: battery life and maps Tom's Guide says Suunto Race S and Coros Pace Pro last longer and include offline maps for less.
- Cheaper: price and features The 570 is described as pricier than map-equipped rivals like the Suunto Race S.
- Worse: battery life The 570 comfortably outlasts the Apple Watch Series 10.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.
-
Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's brightest.
-
Display quality is a standout: the AMOLED panel is sharp, vivid, responsive, and frequently cited as a major upgrade.
-
GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among the best tested.
-
Workout tracking variety is excellent, with triathlon/multisport support, many sport modes, open-water swimming, gym profiles, and new activity types.
-
Touchscreen responsiveness is widely praised as responsive, fast, and useful, especially alongside the physical buttons.
-
Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and multisport use.
-
Recovery insights are a major reason reviewers liked the watch, especially Training Readiness, Body Battery, HRV, and sleep-informed rest guidance.
-
The five-button setup is repeatedly praised for sweaty, rainy, gloved, and swimming use, while also complementing the touchscreen well.
-
Wellness insights are deep and actionable, especially Body Battery, readiness, stress, sleep, and recovery metrics that shape daily decisions.
-
Software smoothness is generally positive, with reviewers describing the interface as polished, faster, and modern, but not bug-free.
-
Menu navigation is mostly intuitive and easy, supported by buttons, touchscreen, Glances, and refreshed menus, though phantom clicks hurt one review.
-
Heart-rate accuracy is highly rated across most reviews, especially for running and intervals, though lab-style testing found some delays and dips.
-
Fit is praised for secure, no-bounce wear and useful size options, particularly for smaller wrists.
-
Style and design are a standout upgrade, with reviewers praising the colorful, expressive, more premium look.
-
Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review noted small scratches or heat-related unresponsiveness.
-
Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than single-size Garmin alternatives.
-
Watch face quality is strong thanks to customization and readable data layouts, with reviewers highlighting clean default faces and useful widgets.
-
Comfort is broadly strong, with reviewers calling it light and wearable all day; only larger-size sleep comfort and strap buckle issues temper the praise.
-
The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a strap tail/bump annoyance.
-
Water resistance is well supported for swimming and real-world water exposure, including pools, lakes, ocean use, and a 5ATM rating.
-
Build quality is viewed positively thanks to a robust-feeling case and upgraded aluminum bezel, with no major build concerns outside price-tier omissions.
-
Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.
-
Contactless payment support is confirmed through NFC payments, but reviewers mention it briefly rather than as a major buying reason.
-
Customization is strong across watchfaces, widgets, data fields, layouts, colors, and report options, with several reviewers highlighting personalization.
-
Coaching features are a major strength, including Garmin Coach, triathlon plans, daily workout suggestions, and adaptive training guidance.
-
Materials quality improves over the 265 with an aluminum bezel and Gorilla Glass, giving the watch a more premium feel.
-
Stress tracking feeds into readiness and wellness guidance, giving it practical value for recovery decisions.
-
Step counting appears accurate in direct step tests and is part of the daily tracking suite.
-
Health tracking is broad and useful, covering heart rate, sleep, stress, skin temperature, respiration, and wellness metrics, but some illness/sleep limitations appear.
-
Safety features are solid, with LiveTrack, Incident Detection, and safety/tracking features mentioned as part of the package.
-
Garmin Connect is powerful and data-rich, though one reviewer notes its learning curve and depth can feel overwhelming.
-
Garmin's app ecosystem is useful through Connect IQ and watchface downloads, though reviewers repeatedly describe it as more limited than Apple or Wear OS.
-
Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it as handy rather than essential.
-
The user interface is cleaner and easier to navigate than before, though Garmin's learning curve and rare menu quirks remain.
-
Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky or dependent on the phone.
-
Onboard music storage is supported through 8GB storage, MP3s, and streaming-service syncing, giving it better music capability than many sports watches.
-
Smartwatch features improved meaningfully with mic, speaker, calls, voice commands, music, NFC, reports, and notifications, though it is not a full smartwatch.
-
Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of Apple Watch-level integration.
-
Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of the health suite rather than a standout accuracy feature.
-
Calorie tracking is available and tied into activity details, including pack-weight calculations, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.
-
Reviewers noted helpful race/activity automation, especially AutoLap timing gates and finish-line cleanup, but evidence is narrow rather than a broad auto-detection theme.
-
Music controls are available alongside notifications and calendar previews, but reviewer evidence is brief.
-
The updated operating-system experience is cleaner and more modern, with Garmin aligning the 570 with newer Fenix/Forerunner UI styling.
-
Charging convenience is acceptable but not premium: Garmin's connector is functional and fast enough, yet the lack of wireless charging is a recurring caveat.
-
Pairing and syncing are mixed: some reviewers found smooth iPhone/Strava syncing, while another saw repeated phone disconnects.
-
Bluetooth supports calls and pairing with phones/sensors, but one reviewer reported frequent phone disconnect notices, making connectivity evidence mixed.
-
Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, but reviewers view Garmin's store as useful yet limited versus full smartwatch platforms.
Cons
-
Battery life is divisive: still far better than mainstream smartwatches for some users, but several reviewers saw a drop from the 265 and short always-on endurance.
-
Sleep tracking is useful but not class-leading; some found it reasonably accurate while others called it less robust or less complete than competitors.
-
Smartphone notifications work, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer found notification handling intrusive during workouts.
-
Value for money is the most common concern: reviewers like the watch but repeatedly say the price is high versus the 265, 965, 970, and rivals.
-
Reliability is mixed: core tracking is reliable, but reviewers cite occasional crashes, overheating unresponsiveness, software bugs, and phantom clicks.
-
Navigation is the biggest tradeoff: breadcrumb routing works, but the absence of offline/topographic maps is repeatedly criticized at this price.
-
LTE connectivity is not offered; reviewers explicitly note the lack of cellular connection or cellular smartwatch capability.
-
ECG functionality is the clearest omission: many reviewers criticize the lack of ECG despite the newer heart-rate sensor and the price.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Watch, this product is above average in voice assistant quality, contactless payments, size options, below average in mapping and navigation, value for money, reliability.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| mapping and navigation | 2.2 | 3.7 | -1.5 |
| voice assistant quality | 4.1 | 2.6 | +1.5 |
| value for money | 2.6 | 3.8 | -1.2 |
| contactless payments | 4.4 | 2.8 | +1.6 |
| reliability | 2.3 | 3.8 | -1.4 |
| ECG functionality | 1.0 | 2.3 | -1.3 |
| size options | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.3 |
| onboard music storage | 4.1 | 2.8 | +1.3 |
FAQ
Is the Garmin Forerunner 570 accurate for running?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised GPS and heart-rate accuracy, including strong route tracks, close chest-strap agreement, and reliable pacing data.
Does the Forerunner 570 have offline maps?
No. It supports breadcrumb-style navigation and routes, but reviewers repeatedly called the lack of offline or topographic maps the biggest omission.
How good is the battery life?
It can last about a week or more with raise-to-wake use, but always-on display testing often dropped to roughly three to five days. Reviewers generally saw it as a step down from the Forerunner 265.
Can you take calls on the Forerunner 570?
Yes. The added microphone and speaker let you take calls when paired to a nearby phone, and reviewers generally found it useful in a pinch.
Does it support ECG?
No. Many reviewers criticized the missing ECG feature because the watch uses Garmin’s newer heart-rate sensor and costs more than some Garmin models with ECG.
Is it comfortable enough for all-day wear?
Mostly yes. Reviewers praised the light case, soft band, secure fit, and two size options, though the larger version was not ideal for everyone during sleep.
Is the Forerunner 570 good value?
Reviewers liked the watch itself but frequently questioned the price, especially versus the Forerunner 265, Forerunner 965, Forerunner 970, and cheaper map-equipped rivals.
Consider This Instead
If you want better ECG functionality
Choose Apple Watch Series 11. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for ECG functionality, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better mapping and navigation
Choose Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2). It scores 4.8 vs 2.2 for mapping and navigation, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better value for money
Choose Amazfit Active 2. It scores 4.9 vs 2.6 for value for money, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better reliability
Choose Garmin Enduro 3. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for reliability, with a 3.8 overall score.
Overall Top Smart Watch Alternatives
Good if you want the most rugged Apple Watch, brighter outdoor screen, better battery, LTE, and top apps. Skip it if you need Garmin-like mapping, recovery analytics, smaller sizing, or...
Pros: display quality, heart rate accuracy
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights
Choose the Galaxy Watch 6 for a polished Android smartwatch with a bright screen, strong apps, and broad health tracking. Skip it if battery life, iPhone support, or full non-Samsung...
Pros: outdoor visibility, workout tracking variety
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, battery life
Good if you need a rugged Garmin with deep outdoor, tactical, GPS, training, and battery features. Skip it if you want a cheaper lifestyle watch or do not need the...
Pros: materials quality, durability
Cons: LTE connectivity, value for money
Good if you want premium golf maps, virtual caddie tools, health metrics, music, notifications, and long battery life in one watch. Skip it if you only need basic yardages or...
Pros: pairing reliability, brightness
Cons: software smoothness, user interface