Garmin Forerunner 570

Garmin Forerunner 570 Review

Brand: Garmin
Released: May 15, 2025
Updated: 3 months ago
3.9
Overall review score
245
Review evidence points
48
Scored features
18
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Garmin Forerunner 570 for a bright, stylish training watch with excellent GPS, heart-rate accuracy, and coaching. Skip it if value, offline maps, ECG, or long always-on battery life matter most.

Best for

Best for runners, triathletes, and Garmin users who want a stylish, bright, accurate training watch with rich coaching and recovery tools. It also suits buyers who value 42mm and 47mm size choices.

Not for

Not for shoppers prioritizing the lowest price, full offline mapping, ECG, or maximum always-on battery life. Casual smartwatch users may also find it too sports-focused and expensive.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently framed the Garmin Forerunner 570 as an excellent sports watch with a more polished design, brighter AMOLED display, accurate GPS, and highly trusted heart-rate tracking. Its training tools, recovery guidance, workout variety, and improved smartwatch features make it feel more complete than earlier mid-range Forerunners. The tradeoff is value: many reviewers felt the higher price was hard to justify when battery life regressed with the brighter screen and Garmin still withheld offline maps and ECG. It works best as a premium-feeling runner and triathlon watch, not as the most feature-complete or budget-efficient Garmin.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    21 (44%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (35%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (13%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (8%)

Pros

  • 4.9
    12 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 4.9, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS accuracy was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for near-flawless tracks, reliable distance, and strong multi-band performance.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 4.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Heart-rate accuracy was widely praised, often compared favorably with chest straps, though gym and cycling edge cases remained.
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    brightness: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Brightness was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the brighter AMOLED panel and outdoor readability.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Display quality was a clear highlight: reviewers liked the larger, sharper, vivid AMOLED screen and premium visual feel.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    outdoor visibility: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Outdoor visibility was excellent, with reviewers praising bright-sun readability and clarity in varied outdoor conditions.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design were widely praised for a more colorful, expressive, premium-looking Forerunner, though one reviewer found it visually familiar.

Cons

  • 1.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    ECG functionality: 1.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    ECG functionality was one of the most criticized omissions because the Gen 5 sensor made reviewers expect ECG at this price.
  • 2.1
    15 reviews strong consensus
    mapping and navigation: 2.1, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Mapping and navigation drew the most consistent criticism: breadcrumb routing helped, but reviewers wanted full offline maps at this price.
  • 2.7
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 2.7, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value for money was the main controversy: reviewers loved the watch but often said the price and omitted maps/ECG hurt its case.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Bluetooth connectivity: 2.0, 1 review
    Bluetooth reliability had negative evidence from one reviewer who repeatedly saw phone disconnect and reconnect messages.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    smartphone notifications: 2.0, 1 review
    Smartphone notifications were a drawback in one review because alerts lingered during workouts and vibration controls were limited.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    health tracking accuracy: 2.8, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Health tracking accuracy was mixed: general metrics were useful, but reviewers criticized illness detection and Garmin’s sleep-stage limitations.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in size options, GPS accuracy, heart rate accuracy, near average in user interface, style and design, below average in Bluetooth connectivity, mapping and navigation, value for money.

Comparison summary

48 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    28 (58%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    11 (23%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    9 (19%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Bluetooth connectivity 2.0 3.7 -1.7
mapping and navigation 2.1 3.5 -1.4
value for money 2.7 3.8 -1.2
smartphone notifications 2.0 3.5 -1.5
size options 4.4 3.2 +1.3
battery life 3.3 4.2 -0.9
health tracking accuracy 2.8 3.9 -1.1
ECG functionality 1.6 2.6 -0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better Bluetooth connectivity

Choose Garmin Forerunner 265. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Bluetooth connectivity, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better smartphone notifications

Choose Ticwatch Pro 5 Enduro. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for smartphone notifications, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better pairing reliability

Choose Garmin Vivoactive 6. It scores 4.7 vs 3.4 for pairing reliability, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: battery life and offline maps Tom’s Guide said the Coros Pace Pro offers better battery life and offline maps for less.
  • Better: battery life and maps Android Central said the COROS Pace Pro offers longer battery life and offline maps.
  • Cheaper: price and features TechRadar framed the 570 as pricier than the Coros Pace Pro despite rivals offering maps and battery advantages.
  • Better: battery life Tom’s Guide said the 570’s battery life is shorter than the Garmin Forerunner 265.
  • Cheaper: value for money Lifehacker argued many buyers could save money with the Forerunner 265.
  • Better: battery life TechRadar said the 570 lasts less than the prior Forerunner 265 with comparable use.
  • Better: battery life and offline maps Tom’s Guide said the Suunto Race S offers better battery life and offline maps for less.
  • Cheaper: price and features TechRadar framed the 570 as pricier than the Suunto Race S, which offers competitive extras.

FAQ

Is the Garmin Forerunner 570 accurate for running?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its GPS and heart-rate accuracy, with several comparing it favorably to chest straps and premium Garmin models.

Does the Forerunner 570 have offline maps?

No. It supports breadcrumb-style routing and routes from Garmin Connect, but reviewers consistently criticized the lack of full offline maps at this price.

How good is the battery life?

It depends heavily on display settings. Some reviewers got around a week or more, while several reported only three to four days with always-on display and heavier training.

Is the display a major upgrade?

Yes. The brighter AMOLED screen was one of the most consistently praised upgrades, especially for sunlight visibility and day-to-day readability.

Does the Forerunner 570 support ECG?

No. Reviewers repeatedly called ECG a disappointing omission because the watch uses Garmin’s newer heart-rate sensor and sits at a premium price.

Is it worth the price?

Reviewer opinion was mixed to negative on value. They liked the watch itself, but many felt cheaper or slightly pricier alternatives offered better feature packages.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling