Compare Samsung Galaxy Watch FE vs Apple Watch SE 3

P1 Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
P2 Apple Watch SE 3

Comparison Takeaways

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 4.3 vs 1.0. Reviewers consistently note SpO2 or blood oxygen tracking as part of the FE's health feature set.
  • ECG functionality is 4.1 vs 1.0. ECG is repeatedly cited as a valuable health feature, though several reviews note it may require a Samsung...
  • style and design is 4.1 vs 3.3. Style and design are generally positive, with classic circular styling and color options praised despite the aging bezel-heavy...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 2.7 vs 2.0. Cross-platform compatibility is limited: reviewers repeatedly frame it as Android-focused, with some Samsung-only feature restrictions.

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • size options is 4.0 vs 2.3. Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists,...
  • charging speed is 4.3 vs 2.7. Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around...
  • fit is 4.3 vs 2.8. Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush...
  • software smoothness is 4.8 vs 3.3. Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast...
Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.9
Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Auto-detection is generally responsive for walking and pauses, though one reviewer noted GPS routes require manually starting workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Wear OS gives the FE a strong app ecosystem, with Google Play and popular third-party apps, even if one reviewer still disliked its broader value.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Band feedback is mostly positive thanks to easy one-click or quick-release swaps, though one reviewer disliked Samsung's band selection and another noted sensitive-skin concerns.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.9

Battery life is the most consistent drawback: reviewers report roughly a day to under two days, with some positive outliers near 40 hours.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Reviewers consistently note SpO2 or blood oxygen tracking as part of the FE's health feature set.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Bluetooth support is treated as standard and reliable, with one reviewer noting an updated Bluetooth version and better expected stability.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Brightness is generally praised, especially on the AMOLED display, though the small panel and bezels limit the overall screen experience.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Build quality is viewed as solid for the price, with aluminum construction and a durable smartwatch body repeatedly mentioned.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Button controls are useful and customizable, though one reviewer found the buttons sometimes needed more than one press.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Call handling is a useful everyday feature, with reviewers noting calls can be taken or managed from the watch.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Calorie tracking appears as part of the broader workout and health data set, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.2

Charging is convenient enough through magnetic or wireless-style charging, but the lack of a brick and slow speed reduce the experience.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.7

Charging speed is a repeated weakness, with reviewers citing slow full charges, no fast charging, or nearly two hours to fill.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Coaching features are a strength, including running coach, heart-rate-zone prompts, running analysis, sleep coaching, and enhanced sleep coaching.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.9

Comfort is mixed: some reviewers found the strap or watch comfortable all day, while others noted digging edges or possible skin sensitivity.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.7

Companion app quality is a pain point because Samsung health features can require multiple apps, and non-Samsung setup can be annoying.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Contactless payments are a clear strength, with NFC, Samsung Wallet, Samsung Pay, and Google Wallet mentioned across reviews.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.7

Cross-platform compatibility is limited: reviewers repeatedly frame it as Android-focused, with some Samsung-only feature restrictions.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Customization is strong for tiles, buttons, gestures, bands, shortcuts, widgets, and watch controls, though not every shortcut is fully remappable.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.7

Display quality is mixed: AMOLED sharpness and color are praised, but the 1.2-inch screen and large bezels disappoint several reviewers.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

Durability is a strong point because reviewers cite sapphire crystal, IP68, 5ATM, water protection, and scratch resistance.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

ECG is repeatedly cited as a valuable health feature, though several reviews note it may require a Samsung phone.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.8

Fit is limited by the single 40mm size, which may not suit people who want a larger smartwatch.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Fitness tracking accuracy is generally good for basics like heart rate, walking, distance, and GPS, with some caveats for deeper running metrics.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

GPS accuracy is mostly positive, with reviewers reporting good route tracking, though a few minor map deviations and auto-start limits appear.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is broadly favorable for mainstream use, but some metrics are framed as basic or sensor-limited compared with pricier watches.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Heart rate accuracy is generally strong for a wrist device, with multiple reviewers finding close or consistent readings despite slight high skew.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

LTE connectivity is available or noted as an option, but some reviews describe delayed availability or regional limits.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Mapping and navigation are useful through GPS and Google Maps, with route tracking often praised but not perfect.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Materials quality is strong for the price, especially sapphire crystal glass and aluminum construction.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Menu navigation is usually intuitive through swipes, tiles, digital bezel, and app navigation, with mostly positive responsiveness comments.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

Music support is useful for playback gestures, compatible music apps, and Spotify/offline listening, though one key gesture is absent.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Onboard music storage is supported by the watch's 16GB storage, which reviewers connect to music or internal storage use.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.7

Wear OS and One UI provide a capable smartwatch platform, but reviewers split on whether the older chip makes it feel dated.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Outdoor visibility is a strength where tested, with reviewers saying the AMOLED display remains readable in sunlight or outdoor use.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.5

Pairing and setup are mixed: Samsung setup can be quick, while non-Samsung setup created friction for one reviewer.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.5

Recovery insights exist through sleep and recovery-style metrics, but the FE lacks Samsung's newer Energy Score and some advanced sensors.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Reliability is supported by PCMag's finding that readings were accurate and consistent enough for most people.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Safety features are present through emergency calling from the side button, but reviews do not deeply test broader safety tools.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.3

Size options are a weakness because the FE is repeatedly described as available only in one 40mm size.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Sleep tracking is a relative strength, with reviewers reporting useful scores, matching stage charts, and responsive sleep timing, though not perfect.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

Notification handling is strong, with prompt phone notifications and message handling called out by reviewers.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

The FE is feature-rich for a budget smartwatch, offering many Galaxy Watch lifestyle, health, and smartwatch features despite tradeoffs.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.3

Software smoothness is divided: some reviewers find it responsive or fluid, while others report sluggishness, lag, and slow app loading.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Step counting appears accurate in limited testing and is part of the broader activity tracking feature set.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Stress tracking is present and commonly listed with the health suite, but reviews mostly discuss availability rather than accuracy.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.1

Style and design are generally positive, with classic circular styling and color options praised despite the aging bezel-heavy look.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

Third-party app support is a major advantage, with Google Play and apps like WhatsApp, Spotify, Google Maps, AllTrails, Strava, and more cited.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good, though one reviewer saw occasional missed taps and another emphasized responsive swipes and taps.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

The user interface is easy to understand, with swipe-based quick settings, app access, widgets, and control panels highlighted.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.6

Value is highly mixed: many reviewers like the low price, while others say discounted Watch 6, Watch 7, or OnePlus alternatives are better buys.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Voice assistant support is solid with Bixby and Google Assistant, and one reviewer preferred Google's faster understanding.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

Watch face quality is supported through effortless watch-face changes and new watch faces from recent software updates.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.4

Water resistance is a clear strength, with reviewers citing IP68, 5ATM, pool use, swimming, and water/dust protection.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

Wellness insights include sleep score, stress/energy-style insights, and body composition, but the missing Energy Score limits the holistic picture.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Wi-Fi is included on the Bluetooth/Wi-Fi model and is part of the baseline connectivity reviewers cite.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.6

Workout variety is excellent, with repeated mentions of more than 100 workouts or broad sport-mode coverage.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.