Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.9
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Across reviews, auto-detection was quick and effective for common activities like walks, though one reviewer still framed the watch as better for basic fitness starts than deeper training.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Wear OS gives the FE a strong app ecosystem, with reviewers highlighting broad access to popular Android wearable apps and a deeper app library than many cheaper rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin's broader software ecosystem is a positive, with Connect and Connect IQ giving the watch more depth than a barebones entry-level tracker.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

The bundled band drew positive comments for its soft feel and visual detailing, though band comfort and finish were discussed more favorably than outright premium materials.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The included band gets positive remarks for its slim silicone construction and everyday wearability.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.8

Battery life is the watch’s clearest compromise. Most reviewers landed around a day to roughly a day and a half, with lighter use stretching farther but daily charging remaining common.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Battery life is good for an AMOLED running watch and often lands near Garmin's claims, but it is not class-leading once heavy GPS use or always-on display enters the picture.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Blood oxygen support is a genuine strength for the FE, with multiple reviews calling out SpO2 monitoring as part of a health feature set that feels unusually complete for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Pulse-ox support is present and useful for extra health data, but it is treated more as a nice add-on than a core reason to buy the watch.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Bluetooth support is solid for headphones and sensor sharing, with reviewers reporting stable connections in normal use.

brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

The display gets bright enough for outdoor use, helping the FE stay readable in strong light even if the screen itself is not class-leading.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Screen brightness is strong enough to make the display look lively and readable instead of dim or washed out.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Build impressions were solid overall, with reviewers describing a watch that looks and feels put together well enough for everyday use despite its budget positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Build quality is strong for the price, with reviewers calling Garmin's overall construction dependable.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

The physical buttons add useful control shortcuts and navigation, though one reviewer noted occasional missed presses that keep them from feeling flawless.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

The five-button layout is a real advantage for sweaty workouts and gloves, giving the watch dependable control beyond touch alone.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Call handling is a real smartwatch strength here: reviewers noted on-watch calling support with a microphone and speaker, plus easy answering and declining from the wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Call features are limited because the watch lacks a microphone and speaker for taking calls directly from the wrist.

charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.5

Charging is straightforward thanks to the included magnetic cable, but the lack of a power brick makes the overall setup feel more basic than convenient.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Charging is less convenient than USB-C-on-watch designs because Garmin still relies on its proprietary cable.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.8

Charging speed is slow by current standards. Multiple reviews put a full charge around one and a half to two hours, which is noticeable on a watch meant for round-the-clock tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Charging speed is a plus, with reviewers commonly seeing a full charge in about an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

Coaching features are useful rather than advanced, with heart-rate prompts, running coaching, sleep coaching, and guided pace or intensity feedback called out most often.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Coaching is a major strength, with Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, and suggested workouts giving newer runners useful structure without much friction.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

Comfort is mixed. Some reviewers found the FE easy to wear all day and through sleep, while others said the strap or case edges became noticeable over longer sessions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Comfort is a standout, with many reviewers saying the watch feels light, unobtrusive, and easy to wear all day and overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.5

The phone-side software feels fragmented. Reviewers repeatedly mentioned needing multiple Samsung apps, and one also ran into a frustrating setup and account-linking process.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Connect is generally useful and improving, though some reviewers still find it a bit dense compared with simpler platforms.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Contactless payments are well covered through NFC and wallet support, though one reviewer disliked Samsung’s hardwired shortcut behavior compared with Google Wallet preferences.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Pay is a convenient inclusion and works well when supported by the user's bank, adding real day-to-day usefulness during runs and errands.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.3

Compatibility is limited: the FE is built for Android, does not work with iPhone, and some higher-value features are reserved for Samsung phones specifically.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch works across phone platforms, though the notification experience can vary somewhat between iPhone and Android.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Customization is a plus, with support for different straps and configurable replies, widgets, or interface shortcuts helping the watch feel flexible day to day.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Customization is a strong point, with editable widgets, data screens, watch faces, and settings that let users tune the experience to their preferences.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.5

Display quality is decent but compromised. Reviewers liked the AMOLED panel and sharpness, yet several also called out the small screen area and chunky bezels.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

The AMOLED display is a headline feature, repeatedly praised for its sharpness, color, and premium feel at this price.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Durability is one of the FE’s better traits, with reviewers noting IP68 protection, strong water resistance, and scratch-focused glass protection that make it feel tougher than the price suggests.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Durability looks strong for normal training use, with reviewers calling the watch durable and noting it held up well over time.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.5

ECG support helps the FE stand out on paper, but its usefulness is reduced by Samsung-phone requirements in some setups.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

ECG is a clear omission; multiple reviewers note that shoppers who need ECG or EKG features should look at pricier Garmin models.

fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

The single 40mm case was described as fitting a broad range of wrists, even if that same one-size approach also limits buyer choice.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Fit is generally good across typical wrists, though the single-case-size approach will not suit everyone equally.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.2

General fitness tracking is consistently good for the basics. Reviewers found workout tracking dependable for heart rate, distance, and everyday exercise, even if the watch is not aimed at serious athletes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Core fitness tracking is described as accurate and dependable for day-to-day activity and general training use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally solid, with route tracking that stayed close to reality and avoided major path errors, though minor deviations still showed up at times.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

GPS accuracy is one of the watch's standout strengths, with repeated praise for dependable routes and mileage even without dual-band GPS.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Health tracking is broadly strong for the class. Reviewers praised the range of metrics and said the core readings were useful, even if certain values can skew slightly or newer premium extras are absent.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Reviewers describe the watch's sleep and workout insights as highly accurate and useful for everyday training decisions.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Heart-rate tracking performs well overall. Several reviewers found readings close to reference devices, usually with only a slight high bias rather than major errors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Heart-rate performance is generally strong, with several reviewers finding it reliable and in some cases close to chest-strap or higher-end watch readings.

materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Material choices feel better than entry-level, with sapphire crystal glass and an aluminum case helping the watch avoid a cheap feel.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Materials are more functional than luxurious, leaning on polymer and plastic to keep weight low, though the glass still feels durable.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Navigation is easy to learn, with quick tile scrolling and bezel-based movement helping users move around the watch efficiently.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Menu navigation is flexible because the watch can be fully operated with buttons, touch, or a mix of both.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Music handling is functional but mixed: controls are handy once set up, yet several reviewers find Garmin's music experience clunky or not worth the premium.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Onboard music support is useful enough for workouts, with one reviewer noting that music can be downloaded directly to the watch for offline listening.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Offline music support is helpful on the Music model and includes major services, but the extra cost and setup friction keep it from being an easy win.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.5

The operating system experience is capable but dated. Reviewers liked Wear OS access and familiar Galaxy watch behavior, yet several also noted that the FE is not on Samsung’s freshest software stack.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch OS feels familiar and practical, making common tasks like scrolling through menus and smart features straightforward.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Outdoor visibility is strong thanks to a bright display and clear text, making the FE easier to read outside than its chunky bezels might suggest.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers consistently able to read the screen in sunlight and other bright conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.0

Pairing can be a pain outside the Samsung comfort zone. One review described account linking and setup as fussier than it should be.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong for Bluetooth headphones in day-to-day use.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Recovery-style insights are present through sleep and running analysis, with reviewers calling out physical and mental recovery data plus deeper running-form metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Recovery Time, Training Effect, and similar post-workout guidance are useful, but the watch still lacks deeper training-readiness and load tools from higher-end models.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

One reviewer explicitly framed the FE as a tried-and-true entry point, suggesting dependable day-to-day behavior even if the overall package is not especially exciting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Overall reliability is strong, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch dependable in daily use and training.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Safety coverage includes emergency access and heart-related alerts, giving the FE more protective utility than a bare-bones budget smartwatch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Safety features like emergency contacts, incident alerts, and phone-finding tools add meaningful utility beyond pure fitness tracking.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.4

Size choice is a weakness. Reviewers repeatedly pointed out that the FE comes in only one 40mm size, which narrows its appeal for shoppers wanting a larger watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Only one size is offered, which simplifies the lineup but reduces fit choice for shoppers who prefer smaller or larger cases.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Sleep tracking is one of the FE’s more convincing health features. Reviews found its sleep timing and stage data generally accurate, though total sleep can read a bit low.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Sleep tracking is usually judged accurate enough for nightly timing and general recovery, though one reviewer found the sleep score too generous on a rough night.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Phone notifications are a strong everyday feature, with reviewers saying alerts reach the wrist promptly and feel easy to manage from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Phone notifications are easy to read and generally reliable, though they are basic smartwatch alerts rather than a full communications experience.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.7

The FE feels surprisingly complete for a budget smartwatch, delivering a broad mix of health, fitness, and smart features that covers most mainstream needs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Smartwatch extras like notifications, payments, music on the Music model, and safety tools are useful, but the feature set is still secondary to fitness and training.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
2.9

Software smoothness is adequate at best. Some reviewers found the interface responsive enough in daily use, but sluggish app loads, hiccups, and an aging chip came up often.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Software smoothness is good, with swipes and widget navigation feeling responsive rather than sluggish.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

One hands-on review found step counting close to spot-on in simple manual checks, suggesting good enough accuracy for everyday activity tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Step counts are reported to line up closely with comparison devices, suggesting dependable all-day step tracking.

stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Stress tracking is present as part of the FE’s broader wellness toolkit, though reviewers spent more time noting availability than validating its precision.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Stress and recovery-style wellness metrics are available and helpful for day-to-day awareness, even if they are not the platform's most advanced readiness tools.

style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.3

Design is broadly appealing. Reviewers liked the classic round shape and felt the watch looked good, even if the thick bezel makes it feel less modern.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The design is sporty, slim, and easy to wear daily, though it favors practical training aesthetics over luxury materials.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.5

Third-party app support is a standout advantage, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting access to mainstream apps through Google Play.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Connect IQ widgets, watch faces, and sync options add useful third-party flexibility, though the ecosystem is still more fitness-focused than app-heavy smartwatch rivals.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Touch input is easy enough to use, with taps and swipes generally feeling responsive and not overly finicky on the small display.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Touch response is consistently praised as smooth and reliable, and it works well alongside the physical controls.

user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

The user interface is easy to understand, using familiar tiles, swipe directions, and straightforward navigation once setup hurdles are out of the way.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

The interface is approachable and easy to learn, which helps the Forerunner 165 feel friendlier than more intimidating Garmin options.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.0

Value is highly context-dependent. Some reviewers saw real budget appeal, but others argued the FE makes less sense when discounted Galaxy Watch 6 or rival models are priced similarly.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Value is one of the Forerunner 165's biggest advantages, especially for runners who want Garmin training depth without moving up to much pricier models.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.0

Voice assistant use is serviceable, and one review specifically found Google Assistant faster and easier to understand than the default alternative.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Voice-assistant support is absent, so this is not a strong pick for users who want voice help from a smartwatch.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Watch-face options are plentiful thanks to built-in designs and Connect IQ additions.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.6

Water resistance is a strength, with multiple reviews describing the FE as suitable for rain, swims, and general wet-condition use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Water resistance is solid for rain, sweat, and swimming, making it suitable for everyday fitness use around water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
3.8

Wellness insights go beyond raw numbers with sleep scoring, recovery-related context, and coaching-style interpretation, though the FE misses Samsung’s newer AI-driven Energy Score layer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, and related insights are widely seen as genuinely useful for understanding recovery, sleep, and daily readiness.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Wi-Fi helps with music downloads and syncing on supported models, but at least one reviewer found the setup and troubleshooting process frustrating.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
4.8

Workout coverage is broad, with support for more than 100 exercise types and enough variety to satisfy most general fitness users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Workout coverage is broad for common sports like running, cycling, swimming, hiking, and gym work, but missing triathlon and some niche activities limits the ceiling.