Compare Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) vs Amazfit Active 3 Premium

P1 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
P2 Amazfit Active 3 Premium

Comparison Takeaways

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 4.0 vs 1.0. LTE was part of the Ultra’s default configuration and supported independent smartwatch use, though reviewers did not deeply...
  • Wi-Fi connectivity is 4.0 vs 1.8. Wi-Fi setup and connectivity were supported through the Galaxy Wearable flow, but review evidence was limited to basic...
  • ECG functionality is 3.0 vs 1.0. ECG was valued as an advanced health feature, but multiple reviewers noted Samsung-phone or app restrictions.
  • activity auto-detection is 4.3 vs 3.5. Reviewers generally found automatic activity detection reliable and convenient, especially for walks, runs, and auto pausing, with only...

Amazfit Active 3 Premium

Where It Has the Edge

  • value for money is 4.7 vs 2.9. Value for money is the strongest consensus point, with reviewers repeatedly contrasting the price with the premium build,...
  • Bluetooth connectivity is 4.0 vs 2.3. Bluetooth is central to calls, pairing, notifications, peripherals, and map transfer, though reviewers note phone proximity and Bluetooth-only...
  • size options is 3.5 vs 2.0. Size options are limited because the watch comes in one case size, although reviewers also liked the smaller,...
  • touchscreen responsiveness is 4.2 vs 2.9. Touchscreen use is functional, but reviewers emphasized the value of physical buttons and did not deeply praise touch...
Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8
Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Reviewers generally found automatic activity detection reliable and convenient, especially for walks, runs, and auto pausing, with only minor caveats.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.5

Workout auto-detection is mixed: some sources say it auto-recognizes strength movements and several sports, while one hands-on review says it lacks automatic workout detection.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Wear OS and Google/Samsung integration were treated as major strengths, though one long-term reviewer still found smartwatch apps somewhat limited.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.0

The app ecosystem is useful but bounded: reviewers mention hundreds of apps and Zepp App Store extras, while one notes apps must come from Zepp rather than Apple or Google stores.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Band feedback was sharply mixed: some reviewers praised the attachment system and comfort, while others disliked the stock or Marine bands.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.1

Band impressions are generally practical, with standard 20 mm quick-release or non-proprietary bands and an included silicone strap.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.1

Battery life was consistently better than ordinary Galaxy Watches, commonly reaching roughly two days or more, but still short of serious sports-watch endurance.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Battery life is one of the strongest themes, with typical use ranging from about 8-12 days in hands-on reviews and up to 24 hours in GPS mode in launch coverage.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Blood oxygen support appeared in sleep and apnea-related tracking, but reviewer confidence varied because one outlet saw unusually low overnight readings.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Blood oxygen tracking is repeatedly listed among the health features and background sensor options.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.3

Bluetooth support exists, but the clearest reviewer evidence focused on frustrating power-meter pairing rather than broad Bluetooth reliability.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.0

Bluetooth is central to calls, pairing, notifications, peripherals, and map transfer, though reviewers note phone proximity and Bluetooth-only transfer limitations.

brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Reviewers strongly agreed the 3,000-nit display is a standout, with excellent brightness in sunlight and outdoor use.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.7

Brightness is widely praised, especially the 3,000-nit screen and outdoor readability.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Build quality was repeatedly praised as premium, rugged, and solid, with reviewers calling out top-notch construction.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Build quality is consistently described as premium for the price, helped by stainless steel, sapphire glass, and four-button construction.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

The Quick Button was often useful, but reviewers repeatedly criticized the missing rotating bezel, absent crown-like control, and limited customization.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.7

Button controls are a clear strength, with four physical buttons praised for workouts, gloves, sweaty hands, and navigation without touch input.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Call handling worked well as a phone-extension feature, with reviewers using or highlighting calls from the wrist.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.9

Call handling is mostly supported through Bluetooth calling and a mic/speaker, though one preview transcript reports a no-speaker limitation.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Calorie tracking was present in daily stats and workout targets, but reviewer evidence focused more on availability than accuracy or depth.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.8

Calorie tracking is mentioned as part of the app ecosystem, but reviewer evidence does not deeply evaluate its accuracy or usefulness.

charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Charging convenience was mixed to weak because wireless charging exists, but reverse wireless charging was removed and top-ups still require planning.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Charging convenience is helped by long battery life and a familiar Amazfit magnetic charger used across several models.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.5

Charging speed was a recurring drawback, with reviewers reporting roughly 1.5 to 3 hours for a full recharge.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
No score yet
coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Coaching support was clearest through Wellness Tips and audio feedback tied to goals, but evidence was narrower than for core tracking.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.6

Coaching features are a major strength, including Zepp Coach, adaptive plans, training libraries, guided metrics, and beginner-friendly structure.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.7

Comfort depended heavily on wrist size and use case: several reviewers wore it comfortably, while others found it too large or disruptive for sleep.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.6

Comfort is consistently positive, with reviewers calling out the light feel, smaller size, and approachable wearability.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Samsung Health was praised for useful aggregation and free features, but the broader app setup was criticized for requiring multiple Samsung apps.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

The Zepp companion app is mostly praised as clear, detailed, easy to set up, and useful, though one German review criticizes weak translations.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

NFC and wallet payments were useful and reliable for several reviewers, though one long-term user disliked the PIN friction.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Contactless payments are supported through NFC/Zepp Pay/Curve in supported regions, but availability is country- and bank-dependent.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.2

Compatibility was a major caveat: the watch is Android-only and many advanced features are best or only available with Samsung phones.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.5

Cross-platform behavior is mixed: it works with iPhone and Android, but reviewers note less seamless iPhone integration and Android-only response features.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.4

Customization was a clear strength, covering data pages, complications, watch faces, tiles, and the Quick Button.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Customization is strong for training screens, metrics, shortcut buttons, replies, and watch/app settings.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Display quality was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising the AMOLED panel, clarity, size, sharpness, and visual impact.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Display quality is a standout, with reviewers praising the AMOLED panel, clarity, color, and premium look, despite one smudging complaint.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Durability was widely praised, with evidence around titanium, sapphire, rugged ratings, scratch resistance, and long-term wear.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Durability is supported by sapphire glass, scratch resistance, 5 ATM water resistance, and a sturdier build than expected for the price.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.0

ECG was valued as an advanced health feature, but multiple reviewers noted Samsung-phone or app restrictions.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
1.0

ECG functionality is absent according to the review evidence.

fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Fit was polarizing because the 47mm body felt comfortable to some but bulky, wide, or wrist-dominating to others.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Fit is generally positive thanks to the light weight, comfortable sizing, and adjustable lugs, though it comes in one case size.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Fitness accuracy was broadly positive for runs and GPS workouts, but reviewers still reported sport-specific weaknesses and mixed conclusions.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Fitness tracking is generally strong for running metrics and training data, but reviewers note some accuracy caveats for heart rate and GPS in harder conditions.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

GPS accuracy was one of the product’s clearest wins, with many reviewers finding it accurate, fast-locking, or finally competitive.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

GPS and navigation are strong for the price, with offline maps and route features, but single-band GPS can drift or struggle in dense woods or obstructed areas.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Health accuracy was mixed: some scores and sensors seemed useful or consistent, while AGEs, body composition, and broader insights drew skepticism.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Health tracking is broad and mostly praised, covering HRV, heart rate, blood oxygen, stress, sleep, and BioCharge-type readiness insights.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Heart-rate accuracy was usually strong for running and everyday workouts, but reviewers reported weaknesses in cycling, rowing, or certain conditions.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.5

Heart-rate accuracy is mixed: some tests report good chest-strap agreement, while others saw cadence-like behavior or imperfect interval tracking.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

LTE was part of the Ultra’s default configuration and supported independent smartwatch use, though reviewers did not deeply stress-test it.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
1.0

LTE connectivity is not available, so connected features depend on a nearby phone over Bluetooth.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.0

Navigation was mixed: GPX, compass, Track Back, and turn-by-turn features helped, but reviewers criticized missing maps and limited routing depth.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.6

Materials quality was consistently praised, especially titanium, sapphire crystal, and the more premium feel versus aluminum Galaxy Watches.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Materials quality is a strength, with stainless steel, sapphire glass, and metal accents repeatedly mentioned.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.1

Navigation was mixed to weak: touch and touch-bezel controls can work, but reviewers missed a rotating bezel or crown.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.7

Menu navigation is mostly smooth and button-aided, though some workout and map workflows confused reviewers or required leaving an activity.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Music and media controls were useful as a phone-free convenience for pausing, skipping, and playback control.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Music controls and audio functions are present through phone control, playback widgets, podcasts, and music/podcast storage.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
No score yet
Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Onboard storage is useful for maps, music, podcasts, and routes, but space is limited compared with higher-end Amazfit models.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

The Wear OS 5 and One UI Watch experience was considered modern and capable, with performance and efficiency improvements.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

The Zepp OS experience is familiar and smooth, with reviewers describing it as similar to other Amazfit watches.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Outdoor visibility was excellent in most situations thanks to the bright screen, though one reviewer noted underwater visibility limits.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.8

Outdoor visibility is a major strength, supported by the bright 3,000-nit AMOLED display and direct-sun readability.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Pairing was mixed: phone setup could be easy and Samsung integration strong, but cycling power-meter pairing was poor.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Pairing is generally easy, but one iPhone user noticed occasional brief syncing delays.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Recovery and readiness insights were useful but uneven, with Energy Score and post-workout recovery data sometimes lacking sensitivity.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Recovery insights are a major part of the product, including recovery time, fatigue, exertion, HRV, sleep quality, and BioCharge/readiness-style data.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Reliability was mostly positive over time, especially battery health, but reviewers noted isolated workout stoppage and power-warning issues.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Overall reliability is positive in hands-on use, though early heart-rate and map-transfer quirks keep it from being flawless.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Safety features were a plus, especially the loud emergency siren and outdoor-focused emergency positioning.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Safety and navigation features are strong for the price, including offline maps, turn-by-turn guidance, rerouting, POIs, and backtrack-style return options.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.0

Size options were weak because the Ultra only comes in one 47mm case, leaving smaller-wrist users with no Ultra-sized alternative.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.5

Size options are limited because the watch comes in one case size, although reviewers also liked the smaller, more manageable form factor.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Sleep tracking accuracy was mixed: several reviewers found sleep/wake times close, while others saw gaps, optimistic scoring, or idle-time confusion.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Sleep tracking is one of the best-reviewed attributes, with detailed stages, wakeups, HRV, breathing data, and sleep scores.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Notifications generally worked well as a phone-extension feature, with reviewers appreciating wrist-based texting and alerts.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.1

Smartphone notifications are supported, including calls, SMS, app alerts, WhatsApp, and notification viewing, with richer replies on Android.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.4

Smartwatch features were broad and capable, with reviewers highlighting Wear OS tools, Samsung ecosystem functions, sports modes, and phone-extension use.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Smartwatch features are broad for the price, including calls, notifications, stand reminders, Find My Phone, camera control, speaker/mic, and app extras.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Software smoothness was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting fast, fluid, lag-free performance.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.8

Software smoothness is praised, with reviewers noting little lag, no stutters, and smooth operation.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Step counting was generally acceptable but not flawless, with reviewers noting close controls in one case and phantom or hand-motion-related steps in others.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
No score yet
stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.2

Stress tracking was present but weakly reviewed, with one reviewer calling it an afterthought and another simply listing it among Samsung Health tools.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Stress tracking is repeatedly included among the automatic health features and wellness insights.

style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Design was polarizing: some reviewers loved the bold rugged look, while others disliked the squircle body and Apple-like cues.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.0

Style and design are mostly positive for a premium-looking budget watch, but some reviewers wanted more color and strap choices.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Third-party app support was a Wear OS advantage, especially popular apps like Komoot, Strava, Spotify, and broader Wear OS options.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.7

Third-party support is mixed: key training platforms like Strava, TrainingPeaks, Runna, and Intervals appear, but broader app-store access and some training-app links are limited.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Touch input was fine in dry conditions but a weakness in sweat, rain, or wet sports situations.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.2

Touchscreen use is functional, but reviewers emphasized the value of physical buttons and did not deeply praise touch responsiveness itself.

user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.9

The UI was generally refined and familiar, though some reviewers found Samsung’s watch experience less straightforward than rivals.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.7

The interface is generally beginner-friendly, smooth, and jargon-free.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Value was a recurring concern because the Ultra costs far more than Watch 7 while sharing many features, despite its rugged advantages.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.7

Value for money is the strongest consensus point, with reviewers repeatedly contrasting the price with the premium build, maps, battery, and health features.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
No score yet
Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Voice assistant support is present through Zepp Flow/AI assistant controls and commands, with generally positive but not deeply tested impressions.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Watch faces were praised for attractiveness, customization, complications, and useful at-a-glance information.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
3.7

Watch face quality is mixed: there are Zepp App Store watch faces, but one reviewer questioned whether some looked AI-generated.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Water resistance was stronger than standard Galaxy Watches and good for swimming/open water, but reviewers noted it is not a true dive-sports watch.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.4

Water resistance is solid for everyday use and swimming, with multiple reviews mentioning 5 ATM protection.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Wellness insights were promising but mixed: Energy Score and Wellness Tips helped some reviewers, while AGEs and score sensitivity drew criticism.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.5

Wellness insights are broad and digestible, with BioCharge, HRV, sleep, respiratory data, readiness, fatigue, and recovery-style feedback.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Wi-Fi setup and connectivity were supported through the Galaxy Wearable flow, but review evidence was limited to basic connection behavior.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
1.8

Wi-Fi connectivity appears weak or absent for map transfer; one reviewer specifically says map transfer is Bluetooth-only rather than Wi-Fi.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Workout variety was strong, covering multisport, triathlon, gym machines, runs, hikes, swims, rides, and many activity profiles.

Product 2: Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.7

Workout tracking variety is strong, with more than 170 sport modes and detailed running, hybrid, strength, treadmill, and swimming profiles.