Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) Review

Brand: Samsung
Released: July 10, 2024
Updated: 2 months ago
3.7
Overall review score
220
Review evidence points
56
Scored features
17
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Galaxy Watch Ultra if you want a rugged Samsung-focused Wear OS watch with strong GPS, a bright display, and multi-day battery. Skip it if you need lower cost, smaller sizing, dive-grade water sports, or elite all-sport accuracy.

Best for

Best for Samsung or Android users who want a premium rugged Wear OS watch with a bright display, reliable GPS, useful smart features, and battery life that usually stretches beyond a day.

Not for

Not for shoppers who want a small or inexpensive watch, iPhone compatibility, true dive-watch water sports, Garmin-level endurance battery, or consistently elite health and sleep accuracy.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently frame the Galaxy Watch Ultra as Samsung’s most capable Wear OS watch: rugged, bright, smooth, and far better for battery life and GPS than prior Galaxy watches. The strongest evidence centers on outdoor visibility, durable materials, responsive software, useful quick controls, and mostly accurate GPS, with several reviewers calling it a serious sports-watch alternative. The tradeoff is that the Ultra branding raises expectations it does not always meet. The watch is large, expensive, sometimes awkward to navigate without a physical bezel, and its health metrics are uneven: sleep, stress, blood oxygen, and some heart-rate scenarios drew caveats. It is best understood as a premium Samsung smartwatch with improved fitness credibility, not a full Garmin-style endurance watch or Apple-level dive/sports platform.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

56 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (38%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    15 (27%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    7 (13%)

Pros

  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Display quality was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen excellent, gorgeous, and among the best on Android watches.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it top-notch, excellent, solid, or tank-like.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS accuracy drew strong agreement: multiple reviewers found routes, lock speed, and distance tracking accurate, with only some urban caveats.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    software smoothness: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Software smoothness was a strong point, with reviewers repeatedly describing the interface as snappy, glitch-free, or without lag.
  • 4.0
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    battery life: 4.0, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life was one of the clearest improvements, usually landing around two to three days, though reviewers still noted it falls short of true outdoor-watch endurance.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    outdoor visibility: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Outdoor visibility was consistently strong thanks to the bright display, with reviewers reporting easy readability in sun and outdoor workouts.

Cons

  • 2.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    charging speed: 2.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Charging speed was a repeated weakness, with reviewers often reporting around two hours or saying faster charging should be expected at this tier.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    stress tracking: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Stress tracking was weak in the available evidence, with one review calling it an afterthought and another saying it made them more stressed.
  • 2.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    size options: 2.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Size options were a common limitation because the watch only comes in one large 47mm case and several reviewers found it bulky.
  • 2.4
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    mapping and navigation: 2.4, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Navigation was a weak spot: reviewers liked basic Track Back or GPX-style routing but criticized missing maps and bare-minimum routing.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    cross-platform compatibility: 2.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Compatibility was a recurring concern: reviewers praised Samsung ecosystem integration but criticized Samsung-phone-only features and Android-only restrictions.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    menu navigation: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Menu navigation was one of the weaker usability areas, mainly because reviewers missed the rotating bezel and found Tile scrolling tedious.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in voice assistant quality, call handling, smartphone notifications, near average in battery life, heart rate accuracy, below average in charging speed, stress tracking, Bluetooth connectivity.

Comparison summary

56 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    18 (32%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    18 (32%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (36%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
charging speed 2.3 4.1 -1.9
stress tracking 1.8 3.5 -1.8
Bluetooth connectivity 2.0 3.7 -1.7
menu navigation 2.3 3.8 -1.6
voice assistant quality 4.5 3.0 +1.5
blood oxygen tracking 2.0 3.4 -1.4
value for money 2.7 3.8 -1.2
call handling 4.5 3.2 +1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better stress tracking

Choose Garmin Venu 3. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for stress tracking, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better blood oxygen tracking

Choose OnePlus Watch 3. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for blood oxygen tracking, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Bluetooth connectivity

Choose Garmin Vivoactive 6. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for Bluetooth connectivity, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Similar: GPS accuracy TechRadar was satisfied with GPS accuracy when comparing against Apple’s Ultra 2.
  • Better: water sports The Watch Ultra was judged less capable for diving-style water sports than Apple’s Ultra.
  • Similar: emergency siren loudness The Ultra’s siren was judged about as loud as Apple’s version.

FAQ

How long does the Galaxy Watch Ultra battery last in real use?

Most reviewers reported around two days, with some reaching closer to three days depending on settings and workout use. Several still said it is not long enough for true weekend backcountry use.

Is the GPS accuracy good?

Yes. GPS accuracy was one of the strongest points, with reviewers finding accurate routes, fast locks, and solid distance tracking, though dense city environments could still cause issues.

Is heart rate tracking accurate?

It is generally good for running and many workouts, but not uniformly excellent. Reviewers flagged weaknesses during cycling, rowing, rough surfaces, or specific high-intensity situations.

Do you need a Samsung phone?

A Samsung phone is not required for basic use, but reviewers repeatedly noted that features such as ECG, blood pressure, some AI features, or sleep apnea tools depend on Samsung phone support.

Is it worth paying more than the Galaxy Watch 7?

Reviewers saw the Ultra as worthwhile mainly for people who value the bigger battery, rugged materials, brighter screen, Quick Button, LTE model, and outdoor-focused build. Many said most Android users get better value from the Watch 7.

Can it handle water sports?

It is fine for swimming and held up in surf-style testing, but reviewers warned it is not a true dive watch and is not suitable for high-pressure water sports like scuba diving or jet skiing.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling