Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.7
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Reviewers said the watch automatically tracks workouts and auto-start was reliable for walks and runs.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews describe auto-detection as reliable for walks and runs and able to recognize many workout types, though one reviewer treats it more as a convenience backup than a substitute for manually choosing the exact workout.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Wear OS app support was a strength, with reviewers highlighting popular third-party apps and mainstream app availability.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Reviews highlight lots of available apps, including media and fitness options, and portray the Wear OS app catalog as broad enough to add meaningful utility to the watch.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Bands are easy to swap and there are multiple styles, but some reviewers disliked the Marine band’s design and clasp behavior.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The band system is easy to swap, stays secure in daily wear, and is described as robust, though one review notes that genuine replacement bands are expensive.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Battery life usually landed around two to three days, which reviewers saw as strong for Wear OS but still short of true outdoor-watch endurance.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Battery life is consistently one of the watch’s strongest traits, with reviewers reporting anything from roughly 35–36 hours under heavier use to multiple days in lighter real-world use.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Blood oxygen features support sleep and health tracking, but one reviewer found overnight readings suspiciously low versus other wearables.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Blood oxygen tracking is widely available as part of the sensor package, but one long-term review says the SpO2 readings tend to run low, so confidence in the metric is mixed.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
1.5

Bluetooth-based cycling power meter support was described as unreliable, with frequent disconnects and poor implementation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

The screen was repeatedly praised for high brightness and strong visibility in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

The display’s brightness is a standout strength in the review that directly measures it, with the screen described as exceptionally bright.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Multiple reviews called the build quality excellent or top-notch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Reviews describe the chassis as rugged and premium, with a solid case that fits the Ultra’s outdoor positioning.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.7

The Quick Button was seen as useful and well placed, but reviewers also missed a rotating crown or bezel for better control.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

The Quick button gets positive marks for usefulness and shortcut flexibility, but other reviews dislike the overall button layout or want better workout-time control behavior.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

The watch supports calls and messaging features, and reviewers used it for calls and replies without flagging major issues.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Reviews confirm that the watch supports speaker-and-mic calling, but they focus more on availability and setup than on deep call-quality analysis.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Calories and calorie-burn goals were part of the watch’s workout and wellness tools, and reviewers found them useful enough in context.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.8

Wireless charging is supported, but losing reverse charging and needing regular top-ups reduced charging convenience.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Wireless charging is a plus, but convenience is undercut by Samsung’s decision to omit the wall charging block in the box.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.7

Charging speed was a common complaint, with full recharges often taking around two hours.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Charging looks decent rather than class-leading, with one review citing about 95 minutes for a full charge and another showing a meaningful top-up during a short morning routine.

coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Wellness Tips, sleep coaching, and guided heart-rate targets gave the watch useful coaching-style features.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Running Coach is the standout coaching feature, with reviews describing personalized plans, helpful guidance, and useful support for improving pace or distance.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Despite the large case, several reviewers still found the watch comfortable for daily wear.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Comfort is generally good for a large watch thanks to the straps and wrist feel, but reviewers who prefer smaller watches still notice the size and weight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Galaxy Wearable and Samsung Health provide plenty of functionality, but the Samsung app setup can feel fragmented.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Setup and app integration are smooth, but Samsung’s split between Galaxy Wearable and Samsung Health remains a mild annoyance.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Contactless payments were available through NFC wallets and were described as handy in everyday use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Samsung Wallet or Pay access is readily available from the watch and is framed as convenient for payments on the go.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
1.8

Compatibility is limited: it works only with Android, and several important features are reserved for Samsung phones.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The watch works with Android phones beyond Samsung, but the best experience is still framed as being inside Samsung’s own ecosystem, and iPhone compatibility is off the table.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Reviewers highlighted broad customization for tiles, watch faces, layouts, and button shortcuts.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Customization is a major strength, with repeated praise for editable widgets, watch faces, colors, fonts, and shortcut layouts.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

The AMOLED display was repeatedly described as excellent and among the best on Android watches.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

The display is repeatedly described as large, vibrant, detailed, and excellent to look at, making it one of the clearest strengths in the review set.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Durability was a clear strength thanks to rugged construction, scratch resistance, and adventure-focused hardware.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra’s rugged build and durability are repeated positives, with both spec-focused and long-term reviews reinforcing its tough-watch positioning.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

ECG is available, but its usefulness is reduced by Samsung-phone restrictions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

ECG is supported and easy to access, but Samsung-specific limitations still apply for some advanced health functions.

fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Fit was workable for some reviewers, but the large case still felt bulky to others.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.3

Fit is polarizing: larger-wrist users like the substantial case, while others call it bulky or simply too big.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Fitness tracking was generally seen as capable and useful, even if it is not flawless in every sport.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

General fitness tracking is reviewed positively overall, with one reviewer saying it matched a Garmin closely, but the scientific review still frames it as good enough rather than class-leading.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

GPS performance was one of the watch’s strongest traits, with several reviewers calling it very solid or Garmin-level good.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

GPS performance is usually described as accurate or very good for normal use, but the scientific review says it is not perfect and trails stronger sports-watch options.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Health tracking has broad coverage and can be useful, but reviewers did not see all metrics as equally accurate.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

The dedicated scientific review judges the overall health-and-sports tracking package as acceptable rather than elite, with clear room for improvement versus stronger competitors.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Heart-rate tracking was generally good for many runs and workouts, though it was not universally class-leading.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Heart-rate tracking is solid for running in several reviews, but the scientific review stops short of calling it best-in-class.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

LTE is built in, and reviewers noted eSIM calling support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

LTE availability is a clear Ultra advantage, with reviewers appreciating phone-free use and noting that LTE is standard on this model.

materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Titanium and sapphire materials gave the watch a premium feel in multiple reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Titanium construction and premium materials are central to the Ultra’s identity and are repeatedly cited as meaningful differentiators.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.5

Menu navigation was a weak point, especially without a rotating bezel or crown.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Navigation is serviceable and helped by touch and haptics, but several reviews still miss a true rotating control or want better workout-time interactions.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Music and media controls were convenient for skipping and pausing playback from the wrist.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Music access is integrated into the interface, with reviewers noting Spotify-aware controls and quick access from the watch.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

The move to 64GB is one of the clearest 2025 upgrades and is repeatedly framed as useful for storing music, podcasts, or other offline content directly on the watch.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Wear OS 5 with Samsung’s interface delivered a refined, full-featured operating experience.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

One UI Watch and One UI 8 are portrayed as feature-rich and modern, with newer software bringing visible interface changes and new capabilities.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Outdoor readability was a clear strength, especially in bright sunlight.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Outdoor readability is a clear strength, with multiple reviews saying the screen stays readable in bright sun.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Initial setup was described as quick, and GPS lock was praised as very fast.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Setup is described as immediate and hassle-free in the review that directly covers pairing.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

The watch offers recovery-focused data including post-workout heart-rate recovery and sleep recovery factors.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The recovery-style insight layer exists, but the long-term review says the recommendations often feel off or unhelpful.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.0

General reliability was mixed: some reviewers saw a stable, glitch-free experience, while others hit odd workout stops or unpredictable battery behavior.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

One review notes occasional display interruptions, suggesting that everyday reliability is good but not flawless.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

The emergency siren stood out as a strong safety feature and was described as loud and useful.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Safety-minded setup options and the built-in siren add real appeal for outdoor-focused users.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.3

Size choice is limited, as the watch comes only in one large 47mm case.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Multiple reviews call out the lack of size choice, noting that the watch comes only in a single 47mm configuration.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Sleep tracking was usually close on timing and rich in detail, but some reviewers found scoring or stage data imperfect.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Sleep tracking is useful but mixed: some reviews call the stages relatively accurate, while others say certain sleep metrics still miss obvious awake time.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

As a phone companion, the watch kept texts, apps, and notifications accessible from the wrist.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Notifications are easy to access from the main interface and behave like a normal smartwatch strength.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

The overall smartwatch feature set was repeatedly praised as one of the most complete in Wear OS.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra is consistently described as feature-packed, combining fitness tools with everyday smart features like calls, texts, and assistant access.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Software smoothness was a standout, with multiple reviewers describing the watch as snappy and free of glitches.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Day-to-day performance is smooth in the review that directly comments on software behavior, with fast app launches and fluid operation.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Step tracking was generally close enough for daily use, though some reviewers noticed occasional inaccuracies.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

One detailed long-term review found step counts spot-on in normal walking, while also noting that locked-arm situations can reduce accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.3

Stress tracking exists, but reviewers found it inconsistent and underdeveloped.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Design reactions were mixed: some liked the premium, sporty look, while others found it derivative or bulky.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Design reactions are mixed: some reviewers like the rugged adventure look and color options, while others find the watch too big or not especially attractive.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.7

Third-party app support was strong overall, but there were still some limits such as third-party watch-face compatibility.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Third-party fitness and media apps are part of the appeal, with examples like Spotify, Strava, Map My Run, and Hole19 explicitly mentioned.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.5

The touchscreen worked well when dry, but wet or sweaty use remained a problem.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

The interface felt refined and easy to use overall, even if navigation was not perfect.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The updated UI is generally viewed as more functional and easier to organize, though some reviewers still think Samsung’s visual design language looks odd or over-layered.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.8

Value depends on the buyer: reviewers saw it as worthwhile for serious users, but too expensive and less compelling than the Watch 7 for many people.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.4

Value is the biggest caveat. Reviews repeatedly say the watch is hard to justify at launch price unless you specifically want the Ultra’s rugged build, LTE, or extra storage.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Gemini and voice-assistant access are treated as genuinely useful additions, especially for quick hands-free interactions from the wrist.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Samsung’s own watch faces were viewed positively and offered good customization, but outside watch-face support had limits.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Watch faces are a standout strength, with repeated praise for variety, aesthetics, and customization depth.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Water resistance was good for pool and open-water use, but reviewers repeatedly noted that it is not a true dive watch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews consistently frame the watch as well-suited to water exposure, with strong resistance credentials and real-world confidence for wet conditions.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Energy Score and related wellness guidance could be useful, but newer insight features still need refinement.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Wellness features like Energy Score, guidance, and metric explanations add context, but some reviewers feel parts of the insight layer are generic or gimmicky.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Workout coverage was broad, with lots of exercise modes and solid multisport support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Workout support is broad, with reviewers describing lots of trackable activities and something for nearly everyone.