Compare Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) vs Garmin Approach S70

P1 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
P2 Garmin Approach S70

Comparison Takeaways

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)

Where It Has the Edge

  • software smoothness is 4.5 vs 2.4. Software smoothness was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting fast, fluid, lag-free performance.
  • call handling is 4.2 vs 2.7. Call handling worked well as a phone-extension feature, with reviewers using or highlighting calls from the wrist.
  • user interface is 3.9 vs 2.5. The UI was generally refined and familiar, though some reviewers found Samsung’s watch experience less straightforward than rivals.
  • operating system experience is 4.2 vs 3.2. The Wear OS 5 and One UI Watch experience was considered modern and capable, with performance and efficiency...

Garmin Approach S70

Where It Has the Edge

  • size options is 4.7 vs 2.0. Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are...
  • charging speed is 4.5 vs 2.5. Charging speed has limited but positive support from one reviewer who says it does not take long to...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.2 vs 2.2. Cross-platform compatibility is positive overall because the watch pairs with iPhone and Android, though notification controls differ by...
  • Bluetooth connectivity is 4.1 vs 2.3. Bluetooth connectivity is supported through Bluetooth music and headphone pairing, though the evidence is functional rather than deeply...
Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Reviewers generally found automatic activity detection reliable and convenient, especially for walks, runs, and auto pausing, with only minor caveats.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Auto-detection is supported mainly through automatic shot tracking and measured-shot behavior, with positive convenience but some manual confirmation or sensor caveats.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Wear OS and Google/Samsung integration were treated as major strengths, though one long-term reviewer still found smartwatch apps somewhat limited.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

The Garmin ecosystem is praised for tying golf, fitness, watch faces, and Connect IQ-style additions together.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Band feedback was sharply mixed: some reviewers praised the attachment system and comfort, while others disliked the stock or Marine bands.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Band quality is mixed: reviewers like comfort and integrated looks, but several dislike the molded strap not laying flat or prefer older straps.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.1

Battery life was consistently better than ordinary Galaxy Watches, commonly reaching roughly two days or more, but still short of serious sports-watch endurance.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Battery life is one of the strongest positives, with reviewers reporting long smartwatch use, multiple rounds, and much better endurance than Apple Watch comparisons.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Blood oxygen support appeared in sleep and apnea-related tracking, but reviewer confidence varied because one outlet saw unusually low overnight readings.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Pulse ox and blood oxygen tracking are present in several reviews and treated as part of the S70’s higher-end health sensor package.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.3

Bluetooth support exists, but the clearest reviewer evidence focused on frustrating power-meter pairing rather than broad Bluetooth reliability.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Bluetooth connectivity is supported through Bluetooth music and headphone pairing, though the evidence is functional rather than deeply evaluated.

brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Reviewers strongly agreed the 3,000-nit display is a standout, with excellent brightness in sunlight and outdoor use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Brightness is repeatedly praised, with reviewers describing the screen as bright, crisp, colorful, and clear.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Build quality was repeatedly praised as premium, rugged, and solid, with reviewers calling out top-notch construction.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Build quality is viewed positively, with reviewers describing a lightweight, well-designed build and confidence-inspiring construction.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

The Quick Button was often useful, but reviewers repeatedly criticized the missing rotating bezel, absent crown-like control, and limited customization.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Button controls are generally praised, with reviewers liking the three-button setup and easy navigation support.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Call handling worked well as a phone-extension feature, with reviewers using or highlighting calls from the wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.7

Call handling is limited because reviewers say the watch can show or manage calls but cannot be used to actually speak through the watch.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Calorie tracking was present in daily stats and workout targets, but reviewer evidence focused more on availability than accuracy or depth.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Charging convenience was mixed to weak because wireless charging exists, but reverse wireless charging was removed and top-ups still require planning.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.1

Charging convenience is mixed to negative, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning proprietary charging, USB-C adapter issues, and awkward face-down charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.5

Charging speed was a recurring drawback, with reviewers reporting roughly 1.5 to 3 hours for a full recharge.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Charging speed has limited but positive support from one reviewer who says it does not take long to fully charge.

coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Coaching support was clearest through Wellness Tips and audio feedback tied to goals, but evidence was narrower than for core tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Coaching features are one of the S70’s strongest themes, with virtual caddie, PlaysLike, club suggestions, shot dispersion, and scoring advice appearing across many reviews.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.7

Comfort depended heavily on wrist size and use case: several reviewers wore it comfortably, while others found it too large or disruptive for sleep.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Comfort is a major strength, with reviewers saying the watch disappears, sits comfortably, and does not bother them during golf or sleep.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Samsung Health was praised for useful aggregation and free features, but the broader app setup was criticized for requiring multiple Samsung apps.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Companion app quality is generally positive, especially Garmin Golf for round data, stats, and ecosystem value, with setup requirements noted.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

NFC and wallet payments were useful and reliable for several reviewers, though one long-term user disliked the PIN friction.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but evidence is mixed because bank support and setup can be limiting in some regions.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.2

Compatibility was a major caveat: the watch is Android-only and many advanced features are best or only available with Samsung phones.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Cross-platform compatibility is positive overall because the watch pairs with iPhone and Android, though notification controls differ by platform.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.4

Customization was a clear strength, covering data pages, complications, watch faces, tiles, and the Quick Button.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Customization is strong, with reviewers noting data fields, colors, golf settings, watch faces, and movable pin or flag controls.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Display quality was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising the AMOLED panel, clarity, size, sharpness, and visual impact.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Display quality is the strongest consensus attribute: reviewers repeatedly praise the AMOLED screen’s sharpness, clarity, color, and impact on maps.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Durability was widely praised, with evidence around titanium, sapphire, rugged ratings, scratch resistance, and long-term wear.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Durability has limited direct support but is positive where mentioned, with the scratch-proof lens cited.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.0

ECG was valued as an advanced health feature, but multiple reviewers noted Samsung-phone or app restrictions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.3

Fit was polarizing because the 47mm body felt comfortable to some but bulky, wide, or wrist-dominating to others.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Fit is positive, helped by wrist comfort, swing clearance, and the smaller 42mm option for users who found larger cases too big.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Fitness accuracy was broadly positive for runs and GPS workouts, but reviewers still reported sport-specific weaknesses and mixed conclusions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Fitness and shot-tracking accuracy is mostly positive, with reviewers praising Garmin-level sensor accuracy and convenient data, though some note shot-tracking limitations.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

GPS accuracy was one of the product’s clearest wins, with many reviewers finding it accurate, fast-locking, or finally competitive.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

GPS and yardage accuracy are consistently praised, including quick GPS lock, accurate yardages, and close agreement with rangefinder-style measurements.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Health accuracy was mixed: some scores and sensors seemed useful or consistent, while AGEs, body composition, and broader insights drew skepticism.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Reviewers describe broad health tracking as useful and Garmin-level accurate, especially when combining sleep, stress, heart rate, pulse ox, and fitness metrics.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

Heart-rate accuracy was usually strong for running and everyday workouts, but reviewers reported weaknesses in cycling, rowing, or certain conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Heart rate appears as part of the S70’s fitness and wellness tracking, with reviewers treating it as a useful everyday metric rather than a golf-only add-on.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

LTE was part of the Ultra’s default configuration and supported independent smartwatch use, though reviewers did not deeply stress-test it.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
mapping and navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.0

Navigation was mixed: GPX, compass, Track Back, and turn-by-turn features helped, but reviewers criticized missing maps and limited routing depth.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Mapping and navigation are a major strength, with detailed hole maps, hazard views, pin movement, blind-shot tools, and full-color course layouts repeatedly praised.

materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.6

Materials quality was consistently praised, especially titanium, sapphire crystal, and the more premium feel versus aluminum Galaxy Watches.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Materials quality is positive in the available evidence, especially the ceramic bezel and premium-feeling build.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.1

Navigation was mixed to weak: touch and touch-bezel controls can work, but reviewers missed a rotating bezel or crown.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Menu navigation is mixed: several reviews praise simple starts and quick menus, while touch-heavy hole navigation frustrates one reviewer.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Music and media controls were useful as a phone-free convenience for pausing, skipping, and playback control.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Music controls are present, but reviewers split between liking access and finding Garmin’s menu path less convenient than Apple Watch behavior.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Onboard music storage is a clear plus, with multiple reviewers noting downloaded songs or playlists from services such as Spotify or Amazon Music.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.2

The Wear OS 5 and One UI Watch experience was considered modern and capable, with performance and efficiency improvements.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.2

Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer finds Garmin software mostly intuitive, while another says the OS hurts enjoyment on the course.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.7

Outdoor visibility was excellent in most situations thanks to the bright screen, though one reviewer noted underwater visibility limits.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent across reviews, with several reviewers saying bright sunlight or sun glare did not prevent easy reading.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Pairing was mixed: phone setup could be easy and Samsung integration strong, but cycling power-meter pairing was poor.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer calling phone pairing straightforward through Garmin’s apps.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Recovery and readiness insights were useful but uneven, with Energy Score and post-workout recovery data sometimes lacking sensitivity.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Recovery insight evidence is limited but supported by HRV readiness language, tying recovery-style feedback to sleep and heart-rate variability.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Reliability was mostly positive over time, especially battery health, but reviewers noted isolated workout stoppage and power-warning issues.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Reliability is mixed: GPS/course lock and battery endurance are praised, but one reviewer reports missed shot detections.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Safety features were a plus, especially the loud emergency siren and outdoor-focused emergency positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Safety features have limited support, with one guide noting an assistance/fall-detection-style safety feature.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.0

Size options were weak because the Ultra only comes in one 47mm case, leaving smaller-wrist users with no Ultra-sized alternative.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are limited in some reviews.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Sleep tracking accuracy was mixed: several reviewers found sleep/wake times close, while others saw gaps, optimistic scoring, or idle-time confusion.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

Sleep tracking gets frequent attention, with reviewers noting sleep scores, deep sleep or REM data, and morning feedback, though one reviewer questions how helpful the messaging feels.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Notifications generally worked well as a phone-extension feature, with reviewers appreciating wrist-based texting and alerts.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Notifications are useful but mixed: reviewers like seeing messages and alerts, yet some call them distracting or limited for replies and conversation flow.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.4

Smartwatch features were broad and capable, with reviewers highlighting Wear OS tools, Samsung ecosystem functions, sports modes, and phone-extension use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Smartwatch features are strong for a golf watch, but reviewers still flag limitations compared with dedicated Apple or Android smartwatches.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Software smoothness was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting fast, fluid, lag-free performance.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.4

Software smoothness is a noted weakness in limited evidence, especially around pan-and-zoom behavior on the course.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.6

Step counting was generally acceptable but not flawless, with reviewers noting close controls in one case and phantom or hand-motion-related steps in others.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Step counting is mentioned positively in limited evidence, mainly as an advanced counter one reviewer found useful.

stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.2

Stress tracking was present but weakly reviewed, with one reviewer calling it an afterthought and another simply listing it among Samsung Health tools.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Stress tracking is widely mentioned; some reviewers found it surprisingly accurate or habit-changing, while one reviewer considered it less valuable.

style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Design was polarizing: some reviewers loved the bold rugged look, while others disliked the squircle body and Apple-like cues.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Style and design are positive, with reviewers calling the S70 stylish, modern, and suitable beyond the course.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.5

Third-party app support was a Wear OS advantage, especially popular apps like Komoot, Strava, Spotify, and broader Wear OS options.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Third-party app support is useful but not always seamless, with Connect IQ and downloadable apps/features appearing as the main support path.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Touch input was fine in dry conditions but a weakness in sweat, rain, or wet sports situations.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mixed: some reviewers find it good or responsive, while others find on-course panning and zooming fiddly.

user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.9

The UI was generally refined and familiar, though some reviewers found Samsung’s watch experience less straightforward than rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.5

User interface evidence is limited but negative where cited, focused on the touchscreen interface feeling fiddly during golf use.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
2.9

Value was a recurring concern because the Ultra costs far more than Watch 7 while sharing many features, despite its rugged advantages.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Value for money is mixed but generally favorable for advanced golfers: reviewers praise value if using the full feature set, while warning basic-yardage users can spend less.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Watch faces were praised for attractiveness, customization, complications, and useful at-a-glance information.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Watch face quality is well supported, with reviewers praising built-in faces, Connect IQ options, and the AMOLED screen making faces look better.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.8

Water resistance was stronger than standard Galaxy Watches and good for swimming/open water, but reviewers noted it is not a true dive-sports watch.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers citing 5 ATM or 50-meter ratings and shower/swim use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
3.5

Wellness insights were promising but mixed: Energy Score and Wellness Tips helped some reviewers, while AGEs and score sensitivity drew criticism.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Wellness insights are a major differentiator, especially Body Battery, sleep, stress, energy, and Garmin’s explanations of what the metrics mean.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.0

Wi-Fi setup and connectivity were supported through the Galaxy Wearable flow, but review evidence was limited to basic connection behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is lightly supported by setup/menu evidence showing the watch can connect to Wi-Fi for updates.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)
4.3

Workout variety was strong, covering multisport, triathlon, gym machines, runs, hikes, swims, rides, and many activity profiles.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Workout variety is a clear strength, with reviewers citing running, cycling, swimming, yoga, skiing, pickleball, and other activity modes.