Average score
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews describe auto-detection as reliable for walks and runs and able to recognize many workout types, though one reviewer treats it more as a convenience backup than a substitute for manually choosing the exact workout.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
app ecosystem
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Reviews highlight lots of available apps, including media and fitness options, and portray the Wear OS app catalog as broad enough to add meaningful utility to the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin's broader software ecosystem is a positive, with Connect and Connect IQ giving the watch more depth than a barebones entry-level tracker.

band quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The band system is easy to swap, stays secure in daily wear, and is described as robust, though one review notes that genuine replacement bands are expensive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The included band gets positive remarks for its slim silicone construction and everyday wearability.

battery life
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Battery life is consistently one of the watch’s strongest traits, with reviewers reporting anything from roughly 35–36 hours under heavier use to multiple days in lighter real-world use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Battery life is good for an AMOLED running watch and often lands near Garmin's claims, but it is not class-leading once heavy GPS use or always-on display enters the picture.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Blood oxygen tracking is widely available as part of the sensor package, but one long-term review says the SpO2 readings tend to run low, so confidence in the metric is mixed.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Pulse-ox support is present and useful for extra health data, but it is treated more as a nice add-on than a core reason to buy the watch.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Bluetooth support is solid for headphones and sensor sharing, with reviewers reporting stable connections in normal use.

brightness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

The display’s brightness is a standout strength in the review that directly measures it, with the screen described as exceptionally bright.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Screen brightness is strong enough to make the display look lively and readable instead of dim or washed out.

build quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Reviews describe the chassis as rugged and premium, with a solid case that fits the Ultra’s outdoor positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Build quality is strong for the price, with reviewers calling Garmin's overall construction dependable.

button controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

The Quick button gets positive marks for usefulness and shortcut flexibility, but other reviews dislike the overall button layout or want better workout-time control behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

The five-button layout is a real advantage for sweaty workouts and gloves, giving the watch dependable control beyond touch alone.

call handling
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Reviews confirm that the watch supports speaker-and-mic calling, but they focus more on availability and setup than on deep call-quality analysis.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Call features are limited because the watch lacks a microphone and speaker for taking calls directly from the wrist.

charging convenience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Wireless charging is a plus, but convenience is undercut by Samsung’s decision to omit the wall charging block in the box.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Charging is less convenient than USB-C-on-watch designs because Garmin still relies on its proprietary cable.

charging speed
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Charging looks decent rather than class-leading, with one review citing about 95 minutes for a full charge and another showing a meaningful top-up during a short morning routine.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Charging speed is a plus, with reviewers commonly seeing a full charge in about an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Running Coach is the standout coaching feature, with reviews describing personalized plans, helpful guidance, and useful support for improving pace or distance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Coaching is a major strength, with Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, and suggested workouts giving newer runners useful structure without much friction.

comfort
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Comfort is generally good for a large watch thanks to the straps and wrist feel, but reviewers who prefer smaller watches still notice the size and weight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Comfort is a standout, with many reviewers saying the watch feels light, unobtrusive, and easy to wear all day and overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Setup and app integration are smooth, but Samsung’s split between Galaxy Wearable and Samsung Health remains a mild annoyance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Connect is generally useful and improving, though some reviewers still find it a bit dense compared with simpler platforms.

contactless payments
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Samsung Wallet or Pay access is readily available from the watch and is framed as convenient for payments on the go.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Pay is a convenient inclusion and works well when supported by the user's bank, adding real day-to-day usefulness during runs and errands.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The watch works with Android phones beyond Samsung, but the best experience is still framed as being inside Samsung’s own ecosystem, and iPhone compatibility is off the table.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch works across phone platforms, though the notification experience can vary somewhat between iPhone and Android.

customization options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Customization is a major strength, with repeated praise for editable widgets, watch faces, colors, fonts, and shortcut layouts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Customization is a strong point, with editable widgets, data screens, watch faces, and settings that let users tune the experience to their preferences.

display quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

The display is repeatedly described as large, vibrant, detailed, and excellent to look at, making it one of the clearest strengths in the review set.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

The AMOLED display is a headline feature, repeatedly praised for its sharpness, color, and premium feel at this price.

durability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra’s rugged build and durability are repeated positives, with both spec-focused and long-term reviews reinforcing its tough-watch positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Durability looks strong for normal training use, with reviewers calling the watch durable and noting it held up well over time.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

ECG is supported and easy to access, but Samsung-specific limitations still apply for some advanced health functions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

ECG is a clear omission; multiple reviewers note that shoppers who need ECG or EKG features should look at pricier Garmin models.

fit
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.3

Fit is polarizing: larger-wrist users like the substantial case, while others call it bulky or simply too big.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Fit is generally good across typical wrists, though the single-case-size approach will not suit everyone equally.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

General fitness tracking is reviewed positively overall, with one reviewer saying it matched a Garmin closely, but the scientific review still frames it as good enough rather than class-leading.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Core fitness tracking is described as accurate and dependable for day-to-day activity and general training use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

GPS performance is usually described as accurate or very good for normal use, but the scientific review says it is not perfect and trails stronger sports-watch options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

GPS accuracy is one of the watch's standout strengths, with repeated praise for dependable routes and mileage even without dual-band GPS.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

The dedicated scientific review judges the overall health-and-sports tracking package as acceptable rather than elite, with clear room for improvement versus stronger competitors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Reviewers describe the watch's sleep and workout insights as highly accurate and useful for everyday training decisions.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Heart-rate tracking is solid for running in several reviews, but the scientific review stops short of calling it best-in-class.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Heart-rate performance is generally strong, with several reviewers finding it reliable and in some cases close to chest-strap or higher-end watch readings.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

LTE availability is a clear Ultra advantage, with reviewers appreciating phone-free use and noting that LTE is standard on this model.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Titanium construction and premium materials are central to the Ultra’s identity and are repeatedly cited as meaningful differentiators.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Materials are more functional than luxurious, leaning on polymer and plastic to keep weight low, though the glass still feels durable.

menu navigation
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Navigation is serviceable and helped by touch and haptics, but several reviews still miss a true rotating control or want better workout-time interactions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Menu navigation is flexible because the watch can be fully operated with buttons, touch, or a mix of both.

music controls
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Music access is integrated into the interface, with reviewers noting Spotify-aware controls and quick access from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Music handling is functional but mixed: controls are handy once set up, yet several reviewers find Garmin's music experience clunky or not worth the premium.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

The move to 64GB is one of the clearest 2025 upgrades and is repeatedly framed as useful for storing music, podcasts, or other offline content directly on the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Offline music support is helpful on the Music model and includes major services, but the extra cost and setup friction keep it from being an easy win.

operating system experience
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

One UI Watch and One UI 8 are portrayed as feature-rich and modern, with newer software bringing visible interface changes and new capabilities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch OS feels familiar and practical, making common tasks like scrolling through menus and smart features straightforward.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Outdoor readability is a clear strength, with multiple reviews saying the screen stays readable in bright sun.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers consistently able to read the screen in sunlight and other bright conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Setup is described as immediate and hassle-free in the review that directly covers pairing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong for Bluetooth headphones in day-to-day use.

recovery insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The recovery-style insight layer exists, but the long-term review says the recommendations often feel off or unhelpful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Recovery Time, Training Effect, and similar post-workout guidance are useful, but the watch still lacks deeper training-readiness and load tools from higher-end models.

reliability
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

One review notes occasional display interruptions, suggesting that everyday reliability is good but not flawless.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Overall reliability is strong, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch dependable in daily use and training.

safety features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Safety-minded setup options and the built-in siren add real appeal for outdoor-focused users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Safety features like emergency contacts, incident alerts, and phone-finding tools add meaningful utility beyond pure fitness tracking.

size options
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Multiple reviews call out the lack of size choice, noting that the watch comes only in a single 47mm configuration.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Only one size is offered, which simplifies the lineup but reduces fit choice for shoppers who prefer smaller or larger cases.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Sleep tracking is useful but mixed: some reviews call the stages relatively accurate, while others say certain sleep metrics still miss obvious awake time.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Sleep tracking is usually judged accurate enough for nightly timing and general recovery, though one reviewer found the sleep score too generous on a rough night.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Notifications are easy to access from the main interface and behave like a normal smartwatch strength.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Phone notifications are easy to read and generally reliable, though they are basic smartwatch alerts rather than a full communications experience.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra is consistently described as feature-packed, combining fitness tools with everyday smart features like calls, texts, and assistant access.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Smartwatch extras like notifications, payments, music on the Music model, and safety tools are useful, but the feature set is still secondary to fitness and training.

software smoothness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Day-to-day performance is smooth in the review that directly comments on software behavior, with fast app launches and fluid operation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Software smoothness is good, with swipes and widget navigation feeling responsive rather than sluggish.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

One detailed long-term review found step counts spot-on in normal walking, while also noting that locked-arm situations can reduce accuracy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Step counts are reported to line up closely with comparison devices, suggesting dependable all-day step tracking.

stress tracking
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Stress and recovery-style wellness metrics are available and helpful for day-to-day awareness, even if they are not the platform's most advanced readiness tools.

style and design
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Design reactions are mixed: some reviewers like the rugged adventure look and color options, while others find the watch too big or not especially attractive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The design is sporty, slim, and easy to wear daily, though it favors practical training aesthetics over luxury materials.

third-party app support
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Third-party fitness and media apps are part of the appeal, with examples like Spotify, Strava, Map My Run, and Hole19 explicitly mentioned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Connect IQ widgets, watch faces, and sync options add useful third-party flexibility, though the ecosystem is still more fitness-focused than app-heavy smartwatch rivals.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Touch response is consistently praised as smooth and reliable, and it works well alongside the physical controls.

user interface
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The updated UI is generally viewed as more functional and easier to organize, though some reviewers still think Samsung’s visual design language looks odd or over-layered.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

The interface is approachable and easy to learn, which helps the Forerunner 165 feel friendlier than more intimidating Garmin options.

value for money
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.4

Value is the biggest caveat. Reviews repeatedly say the watch is hard to justify at launch price unless you specifically want the Ultra’s rugged build, LTE, or extra storage.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Value is one of the Forerunner 165's biggest advantages, especially for runners who want Garmin training depth without moving up to much pricier models.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Gemini and voice-assistant access are treated as genuinely useful additions, especially for quick hands-free interactions from the wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Voice-assistant support is absent, so this is not a strong pick for users who want voice help from a smartwatch.

watch face quality
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Watch faces are a standout strength, with repeated praise for variety, aesthetics, and customization depth.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Watch-face options are plentiful thanks to built-in designs and Connect IQ additions.

water resistance
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews consistently frame the watch as well-suited to water exposure, with strong resistance credentials and real-world confidence for wet conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Water resistance is solid for rain, sweat, and swimming, making it suitable for everyday fitness use around water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Wellness features like Energy Score, guidance, and metric explanations add context, but some reviewers feel parts of the insight layer are generic or gimmicky.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, and related insights are widely seen as genuinely useful for understanding recovery, sleep, and daily readiness.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Wi-Fi helps with music downloads and syncing on supported models, but at least one reviewer found the setup and troubleshooting process frustrating.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Workout support is broad, with reviewers describing lots of trackable activities and something for nearly everyone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Workout coverage is broad for common sports like running, cycling, swimming, hiking, and gym work, but missing triathlon and some niche activities limits the ceiling.